Effect of regional or general anesthesia methods on mortality according to age groups in geriatric hip surgery patients

Objectives: Hip surgeries performed in elderly patients are important in terms of both the physiological features of geriatric patients and the risks of surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of age and the anesthesia method used on morbidity and mortality in geriatric patients who had hip surgery. Methods: Patients who were aged 65 and older who also had hip surgery and had American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Scale scores were included in the study. The patients were classified as aged (Group AG) for those ≥65 years of age, and very aged (Group VAG) for those ≥75 years of age. Details obtained from the hospital electronic records system of the patients’ age, sex, ASA score, anesthesia method used, intraoperative and postoperative blood transfusion requirements, respiratory and cardiovascular complications, postoperative intensive care requirements, duration of hospital treatment, period of development of any postoperative complications, morbidity, and mortality were evaluated by age group. Results: A total of 258 patients between the ages of 65 and 95 who had hip surgery and available ASA scores were included in the study. In Group VAG, the rate of morbidity and mortality of ASA III and IV patients was high in the postoperative period. Regional anesthesia methods were used more often in Group VAG patients, and there were more cardiovascular complications developing in the intraoperative period in the general anesthesia patients, although there was no difference between anesthesia methods in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Conclusion: In this study of elderly patients who had hip surgery, there was no correlation between the anesthesia method used and morbidity and mortality. Advanced age (≥75 years) and a high ASA score were the most important risk factors for mortality.

Geriatrik kalça cerrahisi hastalarında rejyonal ve genel anestezi yöntemlerinin yaş gruplarına göre mortaliteye etkisi

Amaç: Çalışmamızda kalça cerrahisi geçiren geriatrik dönem hastalarında yaş faktörünün ve anestezi yöntemlerinin morbidite ve mortalite üzerine olan etkilerini değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntem: Kalça cerrahisi geçiren, ASA I-IV grubuna giren, 65 yaş ve üstü hastalar çalışmaya dâhil edildi. Hastalar, yaşlı grup (≥65 yaş) Grup YG ve çok yaşlı (≥75 yaş) Grup ÇYG olarak sınıflandırıldı. Hastane elektronik kayıt sisteminden hastaların yaşı, cinsiyeti, ASA skoru, anestezi yöntemleri, intraoperatif ve postoperatif kan transfüzyonu gereksinimi, solunum ve kardiyovasküler komplikasyonlar, postoperatif yoğun bakım ihtiyacı, hastanede kalış süreleri, postoperatif dönemde komplikasyonların gelişme süresi, rejyonal ve genel anesteziye göre morbidite ve mortalite oranları yaş gruplarına göre değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Kalça cerrahisi geçiren ASA I-IV grubuna giren 65 ile 95 yaş arasında toplam 258 hasta çalışmaya dâhil edildi. 75 yaşın üzerindeki Grup ÇYG, ASA III ve IV hastaların postoperatif dönemde morbidite ve mortalite oranları yüksek bulundu. Ayrıca Grup ÇYG hastalarında rejyonal anestezi yöntemlerinin daha çok tercih edilirken, anestezi yöntemleri arasında postoperatif morbidite ve mortalite açısından farklılık olmamak ile birlikte intraoperatif dönemde gelişen kardiyovasküler komplikasyonlar genel anestezi uygulanan hastalarda daha yüksek bulundu. Sonuç: Kalça cerrahisi uygulanan hastaların yaş grupları ve anestezi yöntemlerine göre karşılaştırıldığı bu çalışmada uygulanan anestezi yöntemleri ile morbidite ve mortalite ilişkilendirilememek ile birlikte, mortalite için ileri yaş (≥75 yaş) ve yüksek ASA skoru en önemli risk faktörleridir.

___

1. Helwani MA, Avidan MS, Ben Abdallah A, Kaiser DJ, Clohisy JC, Hall BL, et al. Effects of regional versus general anesthesia on outcomes after total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective propensity-matched cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015;97(3):186–93.

2. Fields AC, Dieterich JD, Buterbaugh K, Moucha CS. Shortterm complications in hip fracture surgery using spinal versus general anaesthesia. Injury 2015;46(4):719–23.

3. Basques BA, Toy JO, Bohl DD, Golinvaux NS, Grauer JN. General compared with spinal anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015;97(6):455–61.

4. Parker MJ, Griffiths R. General versus regional anaesthesia for hip fractures. A pilot randomised controlled trial of 322 patients. Injury 2015;46(8):1562–6.

5. Vidán M, Serra JA, Moreno C, Riquelme G, Ortiz J. Efficacy of a comprehensive geriatric intervention in older patients hospitalized for hip fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53(9):1476–82.

6. Ersoy A, Ervatan Z, Ali A, Kara D, Sağ E, Adaş M. Kalça Cerrahisinde Anestezi Deneyimlerimiz. Okmeydanı Tıp Dergisi 2013;29(1):33–6.

7. Bakış M, Sarı S, Cillimoğlu AÖ, Özbey Ö, Uğur B, Oğurlu M. Major Alt Ekstremite Cerrahisinde Anestezi Türünün Postoperatif Komplikasyonlara Etkisi. Dicle Tıp Dergisi 2014;41(1):191–4.

8. Morrison SR, Chassin MR, Siu AL. The Medical Consultant’s Role in Caring for Patients with Hip Fracture. American College of Physicians 1998;128(12):1010–20.

9. Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland, Griffiths R, Alper J, Beckingsale A, Goldhill D, Heyburn G, et al. Management of proximal femoral fractures 2011: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland. Anaesthesia 2012;67(1):85–98.

10. Cook DJ, Rooke GA. Priorities in perioperative geriatrics. Anesth Analg 2003;96(6):1823–36.

11. Donegan DJ, Gay AN, Baldwin K, Morales EE, Esterhai JL Jr, Mehta S. Use of medical comorbidities to predict complications after hip fracture surgery in the elderly. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92(4):807–13.

12. Crego-Vita D, Sanchez-Perez C, Gomez-Rico JA, de Arriba CC. Intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly. Do we know what is important? Injury 2017;48(3):695–700.

13. O’Hara DA, Duff A, Berlin JA, Poses RM, Lawrence VA, Huber EC, et al. The effect of anesthetic technique on postoperative outcomes in hip fracture repair. Anesthesiology 2000;92(4):947–57.

14. Helimoğlu Şahin S, Heybeli N, Çolak A, Arar C, Alan K, Çopuroğlu C, et al. Comparison of Different Anesthetic Techniques on Postoperative Outcomes in Elderly Patients with Hip Fracture. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2012;32(3):623–9.

15. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Management of hip fracture in older people. National clinical guideline 111. Accessed at: https://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign111. pdf.

16. Sandby-Thomas M, Sullivan G, Hall JE. A national survey into the peri-operative anaesthetic management of patients presenting for surgical correction of a fractured neck of femur. Anaesthesia 2008;63(3):250–8.

17. Luger TJ, Kammerlander C, Gosch M, Luger MF, Kammerlander-Knauer U, Roth T, et al. Neuroaxial versus general anaesthesia in geriatric patients for hip fracture surgery: does it matter? Osteoporos Int 2010;21(Suppl 4):S555– 72.

18. Desai V, Chan PH, Prentice HA, Zohman GL, Diekmann GR, Maletis GB, et al. Is Anesthesia Technique Associated With a Higher Risk of Mortality or Complications Within 90 Days of Surgery for Geriatric Patients With Hip Fractures? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018;476(6):1178–88.

19. Sarıcaoğlu F, Akıncı BS, Atay S, Çağlar Ö, Aypar Ü. Femur Kırığı Nedeni İle Opere Olan Yaşlı Hastalarda Anestezi Tekniklerinin Postoperative Mortality ‘ye Etkisinin Retrospektif Olarak İncelenmesi. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics 2012;15(4):434–8.

20. Le-Wendling L, Bihorac A, Baslanti TO, Lucas S, Sadasivan K, Wendling A, et al. Regional anesthesia as compared with general anesthesia for surgery in geriatric patients with hip fracture: does it decrease morbidity, mortality, and health care costs? Results of a single-centered study. Pain Med 2012;13(7):948–56.

21. Lawrence VA, Hilsenbeck SG, Noveck H, Poses RM, Carson JL. Medical complications and outcomes after hip fracture repair. Arch Intern Med 2002;162(18):2053–7.

22. Parker MJ, Handoll HHG, Griffiths R, Urwin SC. Anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults. The Cochrane Collaboration and Published in The Cochrane Library 2001;4:CD000521.

23. Urwin SC, Parker MJ, Griffiths R. General versus regional anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth 2000;84(4):450–5.

24. Liu Y, Peng M, Lin L, Liu X, Qin Y, Hou X. Relationship between American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade and 1-year mortality in nonagenarians undergoing hip fracture surgery. Osteoporos Int 2015;26(3):1029–33.
Ağrı-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0012
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2018
  • Yayıncı: Ali Cangül
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Detecting pain severity with full cup test in painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Bahar SAY, Ufuk ERGÜN, Ayşe YILDIZ, Murat ALPUA, Şenay DURMAZ ARIKAN, Ebru TURGAL

Pregabaline bağlı gelişen geçici işitme kaybı, beklenmedik bir olgu

Şeyda TÜRK, Resul YILMAZ, Sema TUNCER UZUN, Ruhiye REİSLİ

Platelet-rich plasma injection in a patient with adhesive capsulitis due to chronic kidney disease

Hüma BÖLÜK ŞENLİKCİ, Sevgi İkbali AFŞAR, Selin ÖZEN

Jinekolojik maligniteli hastalarda akut ve kronik postoperatif ağrı için epidural ve intravenöz yolun karşılaştırılması

Halil ÇETİNGÖK, Bedih BALKAN, Cihan COMBA, Gökhan DEMİRAYAK, Gülsüm Oya HERGÜNSEL, Yusuf Ziya YENER, İsa Aykut ÖZDEMİR

Comparison of epidural and intravenous route for acute and chronic postoperative pain control in patients with gynecological malignancy

Bedih BALKAN, Gökhan DEMİRAYAK, Halil ÇETİNGÖK, Cihan COMBA, Yusuf Ziya YENER, Gülsüm Oya HERGÜNSEL, İsa Aykut ÖZDEMİR

Geriatrik kalça cerrahisi hastalarında rejyonal ve genel anestezi yöntemlerinin yaş gruplarına göre mortaliteye etkisi

Alpaslan AKCAN, Sema ŞANAL BAŞ, Mehmet Sacit GÜLEÇ

Effect of regional or general anesthesia methods on mortality according to age groups in geriatric hip surgery patients

Alpaslan AKCAN, Sema ŞANAL BAŞ, Mehmet Sacit GÜLEÇ

Ağrılı diyabetik periferal nöropatide dolu bardak testi ile ağrı şiddetinin belirlenmesi

Bahar SAY, Ufuk ERGÜN, Ayşe YILDIZ, Ebru TURGAL, Şenay ARIKAN DURMAZ, Murat ALPUA

Kanser tanılı hastalarda palyatif bakım hizmetlerinin etkisinin değerlendirilmesi: Semptom düzeyi ve bakım memnuniyeti açısından bir karşılaştırma

Meltem SAYGILI, Yusuf ÇELİK

A probable case of pregabalin - related reversible hearing loss

Resul YILMAZ, Şeyda TÜRK, Ruhiye REİSLİ, Sema Tuncer UZUN