TAMAMLAYICI VE İKAME MALLARIN FİYATI ETKİSİ ALTINDA TALEBİN MALIN SATIŞ FİYATI VE ZAMANA BAĞLI OLDUĞU DURUM İÇİN BİR EKONOMİK SİPARİŞ MİKTARI MODELİ

Bir malın talebi, malın kendi satış fiyatından etkilenmektedir. Çoğu durumda bu talep bu malın tamamlayıcısı ve ikamesi olan malların fiyatından da etkilenmektedir. Bu etki marketlerdeki parekende ürünlerin çoğunda gözlenebilmektedir. Bu çalışmada talebin; zamana, malın satış fiyatına ve tamamlayıcı ve ikame malların fiyatına bağlı olduğu durum için bir ekonomik sipariş miktarı modeli geliştirilmiştir. Talep denklemi parametreleri için sayısal örnekler verilmiş ve duyarlılık analizleri yapılmıştır.

AN EOQ MODEL WITH PRICE AND TIME DEPENDENT DEMAND UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF COMPLEMENT AND SUBSTITUTE PRODUCT'S SELLING PRICES

Demand for a product is affected by its own selling price. In many situations it has also been affected by its Complement's as well as substitute's selling prices. This effect can be observed in many retailed items all over the markets. In this paper, we developed finite replenishment inventory model while considering that demand is sensitive to changes in time, its selling price and prices of complementary and substitute good's. Numerical example and sensitivity analysis have been performed for demand equation parameters.

___

  • Abad, P.L. (1988). ‘Determining Optimal Selling Price and Lot Size when the Supplier offers All-Unit Quantity Discounts’, Decision Sciences, 19 (3), 622-634.
  • Arkerlus, F.J., and Srinivasan, G. (1987), ‘Inventory Policies under Various Optimizing Criteria and Variable Markup Rates’, Management Sciences, 33 (6), 756- 762.
  • Balkhi, Z.T., and Benkherouf, L., (2004), ‘On an Inventory Model for Deteriorating Items with Stock Dependent and TimeVarying Demand’, Computers and Operations Research, 31 (2), 223– 240.
  • Burwell, T.H., Dave, D.S., Fitzpatrick K.E., and Roy, M.R., (1997), ‘Economic Lot Size Model for Price-Dependent Demand under Quantity and Freight Discounts’, International Journal of Production Economics, 48 (2), 141-155.
  • Brahmbahatt, A.C., and Jaiswal, M.C., (1980), An Order-Level Lot-Size Model with Uniform Replenishing Rate and Variable MarkUp of Prices, International Journal of Production Research, 18, 655- 664.
  • Cohen, M.A., (1977), ‘Joint Pricing and Ordering Policy for Exponentially Decaying Inventory with Known Demand’, Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 24 (2), 257-268.
  • Datta, T.K., and Paul, K., (2001), ‘An Inventory System with Stock-Dependent Demand, Price-Sensitive Demand Rate’, Production Planning and Control, 12 (1), 13-20.
  • Dye, C-Y., Hsieh, T-P., and Ouyang, L-Y., (2007), ‘Determining Optimal Selling Price and Lot Size with a Varying Rateof Deterioration and Exponential Partial Backlogging’, European Journal of Operational Research, 181, 668–678.
  • Gilbert, S.M., (1999), ‘Coordination of pricing and Multiperiod Production for Constant Priced Goods’, European Journal of Operational Research, 114 (2), 330-337.
  • Jorgensen, S., Kort, P.M., and Zaccour, G., (1999) ‘Production, Inventory, and Pricing under Cost and Demand Learning Effects’, European Journal of Operational Research, 117, 384-397.
  • Kim, D., and Lee, W.J., (1998), ‘Optimal Joint pricing and Lot Sizing with Fixed and Variable Capacity’, European Journal of Operational Research, 109 (1), 212-227. Kunreuther, H., and Richard J. F., (1971), ‘Optimal Pricing and Inventory Decisions for Non-Seasonal Items’, Econometrica, 2,193-205
  • Kunreuther, H., and Schrage, L., (1973), ‘Joint Pricing and Inventory Decisions for Constant Priced Item’, Management Science, 19 (7), 132-738.
  • Ladany, S.P., and Sternlieb, A., (1974), ‘The Interaction of Economic Ordering Quantities and Marketing Policies’, AIIE Transactions, 6, 35-40.
  • Lee. W.J., (1993), ‘Determining Order quantity and Selling Price by Geometric Programming: Optimal Solution, Bounds, and Sensitivity’, Decision Sciences, 24 (1), 76-87.
  • Padmanabhan, G., and Vrat, P., (1995), ‘EOQ Models for Perishable Items under Stock Dependent Selling Rate’, European Journal of Operational Research, 86, 281–92.
  • Rajan, A., Steinberg, R., and Steinberg, R., (1992), ‘Dynamic Pricing and Ordering Decisions by a Monopolist’, Management Science, 38 (2), 240-262.
  • Subramanyam, S.E., and Kumaraswamy, S., (1981), ‘EOQ formula under varying marketing policies and conditions’, AIIE Transactions, 13, 312-314,
  • Teng, J-T., and Chang, C-T., (2005), ‘Economic Production Quantity Models for Deteriorating Items with Price- and StockDependent Demand’, Computers & Operations Research, 32, 297– 308.
  • Teng, J-T., Chern, M-S., and Chan, Y-L., (2005), ‘Deterministic Inventory Lot-Size Models with Shortages for Fluctuating Demand and Unit Purchase Cost’, International Transactions in Operational Research, 12, 83–100.
  • Thomas, L.J., (1970), ‘Price-Production Decisions with Deterministic Demand’, Management Science, 16 (11), 747-750.
  • Urban, T.L., (1992), ‘Deterministic inventory models incorporating marketing decisions’, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 22, 1, 85-93.
  • Urban, T.L., and Baker, R.C., (1997), ‘Optimal Ordering and Pricing Policies in a Single-Period Environment with Multivariate Demand and Markdowns’, European Journal of Operational Research, 103, 573-583.
  • Wagner, H.M., and Whitin, T.M., (1958), ‘Dynamic version of the economic lot size model’, Management Science, 5 (1), 89–96.
  • Wee, H.M., and Law, S.T., (2001), ‘Replenishment and Pricing Policy for Deteriorating Items Taking into Account the TimeValue of Money’, International Journal of Production Economics, 71, 213–220.
  • Wee, H-M., (1999), ‘Deteriorating Inventory Model with Quantity Discount, Pricing and Partial Backordering’, International Journal of Production Economics, 59 511-518 Whitin, T.M. (1955), ‘Inventory Control and Price Theory’, Management Science, 2, 61-68.
  • You, P-S., (2005), ‘Inventory Policy for Products with Price and Time-Dependent Demands’, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 56, 870-873.
  • You, P-S., (2006), ‘Ordering and Pricing of Service Products in an Advance Sales System with Price-Dependent Demand’, European Journal of Operational Research, 170, 57–71.