A Study on Size Optimization of Trusses with BB-BC Algorithm: Review and Numerical Experiments

In the last decades, great attention has been paid to structural optimization with stochastic methods. The applications of metaheuristic algorithms have become popular, which mostly provide solutions with adequate precision for the structural optimization problems from an engineering point of view. However, these algorithms should be specifically tuned for the considered problem to obtain satisfactory results. Big Bang - Big Crunch is one of the efficient metaheuristic optimization algorithms that is based on the famous theory on the evolution of the universe. A considerable number of researchers presented applications of the Big Bang - Big Crunch algorithm for the size optimization of trusses, which is an inviting challenge in the structural optimization field. This study revisits the size optimization of trusses with continuous variables using the Big Bang - Big Crunch algorithm, discusses the previously introduced improvements and presents the results of a few experimental modifications.

___

  • Azad, S., Hasançebi, O., Azad S. and Erol, O., 2013. Upper Bound Strategy in Optimum Design of Truss Structures: A Big Bang-Big Crunch Algorithm Based Application. Advances in Structural Engineering, 16(6), 1035–1046.
  • Camp, C. V., 2007. Design of Space Trusses Using Big Bang–Big Crunch Optimization. Journal of Structural Engineering, 133(7), 999–1008.
  • Casavola, C., Lamberti, L. and Pruncu, C. I., 2012. Weight Minimization of Truss Structures with Big Bang-Big Crunch. The 4th International Conference "Advanced Composite Materials Engineering", COMAT, Brasov.
  • Erol, O. K. and Eksin, I., 2006. A New Optimization Method: Big Bang-Big Crunch. Advances in Engineering Software, 37(2), 106–111.
  • Hasançebi, O. and Azad, S. K., 2013. Reformulations of Big Bang-Big Crunch Algorithm for Discrete Structural Design Optimization. International Journal of Civil, Environmental, Structural, Construction and Architectural Engineering, 7(2), 139–150.
  • Hasançebi, O. and Azad, S. K., 2014. Discrete Size Optimization of Steel Trusses Using a Refined Big Bang–big Crunch Algorithm. Engineering Optimization, 46(1), 61–83.
  • Jain, R., Arun, L. and Ananthan, H., 2016. Visual Basic Interface for Size & Shape Optimization of Space Trusses Using BB-BC Algorithm. International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology, 5(3), 669–674.
  • Kaveh, A. and Talatahari, S., 2009. Size Optimization of Space Trusses Using Big Bang–Big Crunch Algorithm. Computers & Structures, 87(17–18), 1129–1140.
  • Kaveh, A. and Talatahari, S., 2010a. A Discrete Big Bang - Big Crunch Algorithm for Optimal Design of Skeletal Structures. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 11(1), 103–122.
  • Kaveh, A. and Talatahari, S., 2010b. Optimal Design of Schwedler and Ribbed Domes via Hybrid Big Bang–Big Crunch Algorithm. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 66(3), 412–419.
  • Kaveh, A. and Zolghadr, A., 2012. Truss Optimization with Natural Frequency Constraints Using a Hybridized CSS-BBBC Algorithm with Trap Recognition Capability. Computers & Structures, 102–103, 14–27.
  • Kaveh, A. and Mahdavi, V. R., 2013. Optimal Design of Structures with Multiple Natural Frequency Constraints Using a Hybridized BB-BC/Quasi-Newton Algorithm. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, 57(1), 27.
  • Lotfi, H. and Ghoddosian, A., 2015. Size and Shape Optimization of Two-Dimensional Trusses Using Hybrid Big Bang-Big Crunch Algorithm. International Journal of Mechatronics, Electrical and Computer Technology, 5(14), 1987–1998.
  • Milajić, A. and Beljaković, D., 2016. Multi-Objective Truss Optimization Using Different Types of the BB-BC Algorithm. MATEC Web of Conferences, 73, 4012.
  • Milajić, A., Beljaković, D. and Barović, D., 2014. Optimum Truss Design Using Big Bang - Big Crunch Algorithm. International Conference of Contemporary Achievements in Civil Engineering, 447-453.
  • Özbaşaran, H., 2017. Experiments on Size Optimization of Trusses with BB-BC Algorithm. International Conference on Mathematics and Engineering, 130.