Ç Türksel DÜLGERGİL, Ertuğrul ERCAN, Işıl YILDIRIM, Meryem ERCAN, Murat ÖZTÜRK, Mehmet DALLI, Rojan ARCAK

Kırıkkale İline Bağlı İlçe Merkezlerinde Yaflayan Okul Çocuklarında 6 Farklı Materyalin Yüzey Örtücü Olarak Değerlendirilmesi: Ön Rapor

Bu üç merkezli çalıflmada, Kırıkkale kırsalındayaflayan bir çocuk grubunda fissür örtücüolarak kullanılan 3 farklı akıflkan kompozit ve 3klasik rezin fissür örtücü karflılafltırılmıfltır.Yaflları 9-15 arasında değiflen 101 çocuğa 3difl hekimi tarafından 354 fissür örtücü uygulandı. Difller ortalama 8 ay sonra 4 farklı kriterlerle değerlendirildi: skor 1- bütünüyle tutucu,skor 2- kısmen tutucu, skor 3- tamamen kayıpve skor 4- çürük. Tüm difller, bağımsız birhekim tarafından incelendi ve bulgular MannWitney U testi ve ki-kare testi kullanılarak analiz edildi. Admira flow’daki 60 örtücünün %38 iskor 1, %28’i skor 2, %28’i skor 3 ve % 6’sıskor 4 idi. Point 4 ve Grandio flow için buoranlar; %26, 14; %32, 43; %42, 43 ve %0, 0idi. Klasik fissür örtücü gruplar için bütünüyletutucu, kısmen tutucu, tamamen kayıp ve çürükskor yüzdeleri sırasıyla; %49, 39, 21; %28, 31,30; %18, 22, 40 ve %5, 8, 9 idi. Admira flow,Fissürit F ve Fissürit diğerlerinden anlamlıolarak daha farklı bulundu. Bu sonuçlar; Kırıkkale bölgesi kırsalında bazıakıflkan kompozitlerin Admira Flow, Point 4 veGrandio Flow fissür örtücü olarak iyi bir retansiyon sağlayabileceklerini ancak klasik fissürörtücülerin hala en iyi sonuçlar verebildiğinigösterdi

Anahtar Kelimeler:

çürük, koruyucu tedaviuygulaması, fissür örtücü

Evaluation of six different sealant materials in school children living in Kırıkkale districts: Preliminary Report

The present three-centered study evaluated theretention of 3 flowable resin composites used apit and fissure sealant compared with 3 conventional filled resin sealants in a child population living in rural districts of Kırıkkale region.In 101 children aged 9 to 15 years, 354sealants were applied by 3 dentists. The teethwere assessed using the following criteria:score1 - fully retained FR , score 2 - partiallylost PL , score 3 - totally lost TL and score 4 decayed D . All teeth were clinically assessedby one examiner who was blinded to thesealant materials. Data were statistically analyzed with Mann-Witney U and chi-squaretests. After 8 months, of the sealants in Admiraflow, 38% were fully retained, 28% were partially lost, 28% were totally lost, and 6% weredecayed. The corresponding values were Point4 and Grandio flow were 49, 39%; 28, 31%;18, 22% and 5, 8%, respectively. For the conventional sealants group these values were 26,21 14%; 32, 30 43%; 42, 40, 43% and 0, 9,0%, respectively. Admira flow, Fissürit F andFissürit were significantly different from theother groups x2 =19,795, p=0,001 . It may be concluded that some flowablerestorative systems Admira Flow, Point 4 veGrandio Flow yielded optimal retention as fissure sealant while conventional systems stillprovided the best results in rural districts ofKırıkkale region

Keywords:

caries, prevention treatments, fissuresealant,

PDF

___

Simon C, Tesfaye F, Berhane Y. Assessment of the oral health status of school children in Addis Ababa. Ethiop Med J. 41; 245-56, 2003.
Künzel W. Trends in caries experience of 12-year-old chil- dren in east European countries. Int J Pediatr Dent. 6;221–6,1996.
Petersen PE, Danila I, Dalean FA, Grivu O, Ionita G, Pop M, et al. Oral health status among schoolchildren in Romania1992. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 22;90–3. 1994.
Ağız ve Difl Sağlığı Hizmetlerinin Finansmanı, Örgütlenmesi, Sunumu Kurultayı. Türk Diflhekimleri Birliği Yayınları. Eğitim dizisi: 10, 2002.
Gökalp S, Doğan BG. Türkiye Ağız-Difl Sağlığı profili 2004. Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ocak 2006; s: 56-9,114-5.
Arrow P. Oral hygiene in the control of occlusal caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 26; 324–30,1998.
Holmen L, Meja`re I, Malmgren B, Thylstrup A. The effect of regular professional plaque removal on dental caries in vivo. Caries Res. 22;250–6,1988.
Carvalho J, Thylstrup A, Ekstrand K. Results after 3 years of non-operative occlusal caries treatment of erupting perma- nent first molars. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 20; 187–92, 1992.
Dülgergil ÇT, “Türkiye’deki diflhekimliği uygulamalarında yeni bir bölüme mi ihtiyacımız var? Yetersiz teknik ve ekonomik flartlar için Kırsal Alan Diflhekimliği”, Diflhekimliği Dergisi. 57; 161-70,2004.
Dülgergil ÇT, Soyman M, Civelek A, Ercan E, Ercan M: Güneydoğu Anadolu kırsalında yaflayan çocuklarda değiflik koruyucu uygulamaların değerlendirilmesi: 24 aylık saha çalıflması sonuçları. A. Ü. Difl Hek. Fak Derg. 16;26-32, 2006.
Beiruti N, Frencken JE, van't Hof MA, Taifour D, van Palenstein Helderman WH. Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years. Caries Res. 40; 52-9, 2006.
de Luca-Fraga LR, Pimenta, LAF: Clinical evaluation of glass- ionomer/resin based hybrid materials used as pit and fi ssure sealants. Quintessence Int 32; 463–68,2001.
Locker D, Jokovic A, Kay EJ: Prevention. 8. The use of pit and fissure sealants in preventing caries in the permanent dentition of children. Br Dent J 195; 375–8,2003.
Taifour D, Frencken JE, van 0t Hof MA, Beiruti N,Truin G-J. Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of com- posite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 31;314-9, 2003.
Mejàre I, Lingström P, Petersson LG, Holm A-K, Twetman S, Källestål C et al. Caries-preventive effect of fissure sealants: a 61;321–30,2003. Acta Odontol Scand.
Messer LB, Calache H, Morgan MV. The retention of pit and fissure sealants placed in primary school children by Dental Health Services, Victoria. Aust Dent J. 42;233-9, 1997.
Klein SP, Bohannan HM, Bell RM, Disney JA, Foch CB, Graves RC. The cost and effectiveness of school-based pre- ventive dental care. Am J Public Health 75;382–91,1985.
Varenne B, Petersen PE, Ouattara S. Oral health status of children and adults in urban and rural areas of Burkina Faso, Africa. Int Dent J. 54; 83–9, 2004.
Ayrancı Ü. Bir grup ilkokul öğrencisinde difl çürüğü saptama arafltirmasi. Sürekli Tıp Eğitim Dergisi.14;50-54,2005.
Morphis TL, Toumba KJ. Retention of two fluoride pit-and-fis- sure sealants in comparison to a conventional sealant. Int J Paediatr Dent. 8;203-8,1998.
Corona SA, Borsatto MC, Garcia L, Ramos RP, Palma-Dibb RG.Randomized, controlled trial comparing the retention of a flowable restorative system with a conventional resin sealant: one-year follow up. Int J Paediatr Dent. 15;44- 50,2005.
Poulsen S, Laurberg L, Vaeth M, Jensen U, Haubek D. A field trial of resin-based and glass-ionomer fissure sealants: clin- ical and radiographic assessment of caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 34;36-40, 2006.
Chadwick B. Flowable restorative systems has a higher retention rate than conventional resin sealant on primary teeth. Evid Based Dent. 6;89, 2005.
Lekic PC, Deng D, Brothwell D. Clinical evaluation of sealants and preventive resin restorations in a group of envi- ronmentally homogeneous children. J Dent Child.73;15- 9,2006.
ten Cate JM. Remineralization of caries lesions extending into dentin. J Dent Res. 80;1407-11, 2001.
Moszner N, Klapdohr S. Nanotechnology for dental com- posites Int. J. of Nanotechnology. 1; 130-56, 2004.
Morphis TL, Toumba KJ. Retention of two fluoride pit-and-fis- sure sealants in comparison to a conventional sealant. Int J Paediatr Dent. 8;203-8,1998.
Yildiz E, Dorter C, Efes B, Koray F. A comparative study of two fissure sealants: a 2-year clinical follow-up. J Oral Rehabil. 31;979-84,2004.