Bir grup Türk popülasyonunda dudak izinin morfolojik yapısının incelenmesi

AMAÇ: Bu çalışmanın amacı Türk toplumunda dudak izinin morfolojikyapısını belirlemek ve cinsiyetler arasındaki farklılıklarıdeğerlendirmektir.YONTEM: Çalışma 30 erkek 30 bayan olmak üzere 60 bireydenoluşmaktadır. Her bir bireyin dudak izleri koyu renkli dudak boyasıve selefon bant aracılığıyla temin edilmiştir. Dudak izleri büyüteçile değerlendirilmiş ve Suzuki ve Tsuchihashi sınıflamasına göresınıflandırılmıştır. Cinsiyetler arasındaki farklılığı tespit etmekamacıyla Pearson ki-kare testi kullanılmıştır.BULGULAR: Erkeklerde üst dudak sağ kısmında en sık gözlenendudak izi tipinin Tip I', üst dudak sol kısımda Tip II, alt dudaksol kısımda Tip II, alt dudak sağ kısımda ise Tip I', Tip II ve Tip IIIolduğu bulunmuştur. Kadın bireylerde üst dudak sağ kısmında ensık gözlenen dudak izi tipinin Tip I', üst dudak sol kısımda Tip I',alt dudak sol kısımda Tip II, alt dudak sağ kısımda ise Tip II olduğubulunmuştur. Dudak izinin morfolojik yapısı cinsiyetler arasındaistatistiksel olarak farklılık göstermemiştir [p>0.05].SONUÇ: Kadınlarda en çok Tip I', erkeklerde ise en çok Tip IIdudak izi morfolojik yapısına rastlanmıştır. Dudak izinin morfolojikyapısı cinsiyetler arasında farklılık göstermemiştir.

Evaluation of morphological pattern of lip print in Turkish subpopulation

OBJECTİVE: The aim of this study was to determine morphologicpattern of lip print and to evaluate the differences betweenthe sexes.METHODS: 60 subjects [consisting of 30 females and 30 males]participated in the study and lip print of each subject was obtainedthrough using dark-colored lipstick and cellophane tape.Lip prints were evaluated using magnifying lens and categorizedaccording to the Suzuki and Tsuchihashi classification of lip prints.Pearson chi-square test was applied to compare the differencesbetween the sexes.RESULTS: Type I' pattern was found out to be the most commontype in upper right lip whereas type II pattern revealed to bethe most frequently encountered one in upper left lip. Furthermore,type II pattern was found to be the most common in lower leftlip, and type I', type II and type III pattern appeared to be the mostprevalent pattern in lower right lip among males. Type I' patternwas found to be the most common in upper right lip while typeI' pattern appeared to be the most common in upper left lip. Inaddition, type II pattern revealed to be the most common in lowerleft lip, and type II pattern was found to be the most frequentlyencountered one in lower right lip among females. The differencein morphologic pattern of lip print is not statistically significantbetween the sexes [p>0.05].CONCLUSION: Type I' pattern was found out to be the mostcommon pattern in females while Type II pattern was encounteredmost in males. Distribution of lip print morphologic pattern wasnot affected by the sex.

PDF

___

1. M, Cantürk G, Sarı H, Büken B, İşler H. Problems in the investigation of the crime scene in death cases and proposals for the solution of these problems. For Med 2001;15[1]:45-- 54.
2. Caldas |M, Magalhaes T, Afonso A. Establishing iden-- tity using cheiloscopy and palatoscopy. Forensic Sci Int 2007;165[1]:1--9.
3. Utsuno H, Kanoh T, Tadokoro O, Inoue K. Preliminary study of post mortem identification using lip prints. Forensic Sci Int 2005;149[2]:129--32.
4. Alvarez M. Cosmetic advances and criminalistics: The study of lip prints generated by permanent lipstick. Doctoral The-- seis Spain: Universitat de Valencia. 1999.
5. Saraswathi T, Mishra G, Ranganathan K. Study of lip prints. Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1[1]:28--31.
6. GondivkarSM, Indurkar A, Degwekar S, Bhowate R. Cheilos-- copy for sex determination. Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1[2]:56-- 60.
7. Kasprzak J. Possibilities of cheiloscopy. Forensic Sci Int 1990;46[1]:145--51.
8. Suzuki K, Tsuchiahashi Y. new attempt of personal identification by means of lip print. Can Soc Forensic Sci 1971;4[4]:154--8.
9. Suzuki K, Tsuchihashi Y. New attempt of personal identifica-- tion by means of lip print. Indian Dent Assoc 1970;42l1]:8--9.
10. Verghese AJ, Somasekar M, Babu R. study on lip print types among the people of Kerala. Indian Acad Forensic Med 2010;32[1]:6--7.
11. El Domiaty MA, Al--Gaidi SA, Elayat AA, Safwat MDE, Galal SA. Morphological patterns of lip prints in Saudi Ara-- bia at Almadinah Almonawarah province. Forensic Sci Int 2010;200[1]:179.e1--. e9.
12. Prabhu RV, Dinkar A, Prabhu V. study of lip print pattern in Goan dental students--A digital approach. Forensic Leg Med 2012;19[7]:390--5.
13. Ehara Y, Marumo Y. Identification of lipstick smears by fluorescence observation and purge--and--trap gas chroma-- tography. Forensic Sci Int 1998;96[1]:1--10.
14. Williams T. Lip prints: Another means of identification. Forensic Ident 1991 ;41[3]:190--4.
15. Costa VA, Caldas |M. Morphologic patterns of lip prints in Portuguese population: preliminary analysis. Forensic Sci. 2012;57[5]:1318--22.
16. Tsuchihashi Y. Studies on personal identification by means of lip prints. Forensic Sci 1974;3:233--48.
17. Sharma P, Saxena S, Rathod V. Cheiloscopy: The study of lip prints in sex identification. Forensic Dent Sci 2009;1[1]:24--7.
18. Mohamed S, Panchmal GS, Hegde V. Chieloscopy--Can it be tool for sex determination? Medico--Legal Update. 2009;9[2]:30--2.