Önder OFLUOĞLU, Bülent EROL, Gökçe MIK, Cemil COŞKUN, Muzaffer YILDIZ

Uzun kemik yerleşimli osteoid osteomada görüntüleme yardımlı minimal invaziv cerrahi

Amaç: Bu prospektif çalışmada, görüntüleme yardımlı minimal invaziv cerrahinin uzun kemik yerleşimli osteoid osteoma tedavisindeki etkinliği değerlendirildi. Çalışma planı: Uzun kemik yerleşimli osteoid osteoma nedeniyle 14 hastaya (11 erkek, 3 kız; ort. yaş 13; dağılım 4-22) görüntüleme yardımlı minimal invaziv lezyoniçi genişletilmiş küretaj uygulandı. Ameliyat öncesinde tüm hastalar konvansiyonel radyografi, bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT), tüm vücut kemik sintigrafisi ve manyetik rezonans görüntüleme (MRG) ile değerlendirildi. Nidusun anatomik yerleşimi, ince-kesit BT (1-1.5 mm) veya MRG üzerinde yapılan ölçümlerle belirlendi ve nidus, görüntüleme yardımlı minimal invaziv teknikle tam olarak çıkarıldı. Hastalar ağrı şiddeti açısından ameliyat öncesi ve sonrasında görsel analog skala veya yüz ağrı skalası ile değerlendirildi. Ameliyat sonrasında hastalar ortalama 17 ay (dağılım13-31 ay) takip edildi. Sonuçlar: Görsel analog skala skorunun ameliyat öncesi ortalama değeri 7.9±1.2 (oldukça şiddetli ağrı) iken, ameliyat sonrasında bu değer 0.3±0.6 (ağrı yok) olarak belirlendi (p

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Femur, Fibula, Osteom, osteoid, İleriye dönük çalışma, Tomografi, x-ışınlı bilgisayarlı, Radyografi, girişimsel, Tedavi sonucu, Ağrı ölçümü, Ağrı, ameliyat sonrası, Cerrahi işlemler, minimal invaziv

Image-guided minimal invasive surgical resection of osteoid osteomas of the long bones

Objectives: In this prospective study, we evaluated the efficiency of image-guided minimal invasive surgical resection of osteoid osteomas of the long bones. Methods: Fourteen patients (11 males, 3 females; mean age 13 years; range 4 to 22 years) with osteoid osteoma of the long bones underwent image-guided minimal invasive intralesional extended curettage. Preoperatively, all the patients were evaluated by plain radiographs, computed tomography (CT), bone scintigraphy, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Localization of the nidus was determined by measurements on thin-section (1-1.5 mm) CT scans and MR images and complete excision of the nidus was performed by image-guided minimal invasive technique. All the patients were evaluated by visual analog scale or faces pain scale to determine pain levels before and after surgery. The mean follow-up period was 17 months (range 13 to 31 months). Results: The mean visual analog scale scores were 7.9±1.2 (severe pain) and 0.3±0.6 (no pain) before and after surgery, respectively (p<0.05). Bone grafting or internal fixation were not required during operations. No perioperative or postoperative complications or recurrences were encountered. Early mobilization was possible in all the patients. At the final follow-ups, all the patients were asymptomatic and had full functional use of their operated extremities. Conclusion: Image-guided minimal invasive surgery is effective in the local control of osteoid osteomas affecting the long bones and causes less morbidity. This technique also provides a good identification of the nidus intraoperatively.

Keywords:

Femur, Fibula, Osteoma, Osteoid, Prospective Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Radiography, Interventional, Treatment Outcome, Pain Measurement, Pain, Postoperative, Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive,

PDF

___

1. Frassica FJ, Waltrip RL, Sponseller PD, Ma LD, McCarthy EF Jr. Clinicopathologic features and treatment of osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma in children and adolescents. Orthop Clin North Am 1996;27:559-74.
2. Unni KK. Osteochondroma (Osteocartilaginous exostosis). In: Unni KK, editor. Dahlin’s bone tumors. General aspects and data on 11087 cases. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Raven; 1996. p. 11-23.
3. Erol B, States L, Pawel B, Tamai J, Dormans JP. Musculoskeletal tumor in children. In: Dormans JP, editor. Pediatric orthopaedics and sports medicine: the requisites in pediatrics series. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2004. p. 299-336.
4. Erol B, Dormans JP, States L, Pawel B. Tumors. In: Cramer KE, Scherl SA, editors. Pediatrics: orthopaedic essentials. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004. p. 250-70.
5. Ward WG, Eckardt JJ, Shayestehfar S, Mirra J, Grogan T, Oppenheim W. Osteoid osteoma diagnosis and management with low morbidity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993;(291):229-35.
6. Goldberg VM, Jacobs B. Osteoid osteoma of the hip in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1975;(106):41-7.
7. Jackson RP, Reckling FW, Mants FA. Osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma. Similar histologic lesions with different natural histories. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977;(128):303-13.
8. Tuzuner S, Gur S, Aydin AT. Diagnosis and treatment criteria of osteoid osteoma. [Article in Turkish] Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 1996; 30:355-60.
9. Rosenthal DI, Hornicek FJ, Wolfe MW, Jennings LC, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ. Percutaneous radiofrequency coagulation of osteoid osteoma compared with operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1998;80:815-21.
10. Huvos AG. Bone tumors: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1991.
11. Greenspan A, Remagen W, editors. Differential diagnosis of tumors and tumor-like lesions of bones and joints. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1998.
12. Goldman AB, Schneider R, Pavlov H. Osteoid osteomas of the femoral neck: report of four cases evaluated with isotopic bone scanning, CT, and MR imaging. Radiology 1993;186:227-32.
13. Meyer JS, Dormans JP. Differential diagnosis of pediatric musculoskeletal masses. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1998;6:561-77.
14. Davies M, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Davies AM, McCall IW, Tyrrell PN. The diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging in osteoid osteoma. Skeletal Radiol 2002;31:559-69.
15. Liu PT, Chivers FS, Roberts CC, Schultz CJ, Beauchamp CP. Imaging of osteoid osteoma with dynamic gadoliniumenhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2003;227:691-700.
16. Spouge AR, Thain LM. Osteoid osteoma: MR imaging revisited. Clin Imaging 2000;24:19-27.
17. Kneisl JS, Simon MA. Medical management compared with operative treatment for osteoid-osteoma. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1992;74:179-85.
18. Weber K. Osteoid osteoma. In: Bulstrode C, Buckwalter J, Carr A, Marsh L, Fairbank J, Wilson-McDonald J, et al. editors. Oxford textbook of orthopedics and trauma. Vol 1. New York: Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 151-7.
19. Campanacci M, Ruggieri P, Gasbarrini A, Ferraro A, Campanacci L. Osteoid osteoma. Direct visual identification and intralesional excision of the nidus with minimal removal of bone. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1999;81:814-20.
20. Cioni R, Armillotta N, Bargellini I, Zampa V, Cappelli C, Vagli P, et al. CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of osteoid osteoma: long-term results. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1203-8.
21. Ghanem I, Collet LM, Kharrat K, Samaha E, Deramon H, Mertl P, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency coagulation of osteoid osteoma in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Orthop B 2003;12:244-52.