Murad PEPE, ABDURRAHMAN ONUR KOCADAL, Abdullah IYİGUN, Zafer GUNES, ERTUĞRUL AKŞAHİN, Cem Nuri AKTEKİNA

Use of the smartphone for end vertebra selection in scoliosis

Objectives: The aim of our study was to develop a smartphone-aided end vertebra selection method andto investigate its effectiveness in Cobb angle measurement.Methods: Twenty-nine adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients' pre-operative posteroanterior scoliosisradiographs were used for end vertebra selection and Cobb angle measurement by standard method andsmartphone-aided method. Measurements were performed by 7 examiners. The intraclass correlationcoefŞcient was used to analyze selection and measurement reliability. Summary statistics of variancecalculations were used to provide 95% prediction limits for the error in Cobb angle measurements. Apaired 2-tailed t test was used to analyze end vertebra selection differences.Results: Mean absolute Cobb angle difference was 3.6for the manual method and 1.9for thesmartphone-aided method. Both intraobserver and interobserver reliability were found excellent inmanual and smartphone set for Cobb angle measurement. Both intraobserver and interobserver reliability were found excellent in manual and smartphone set for end vertebra selection. But reliabilityvalues of manual set were lower than smartphone. Two observers selected signiŞcantly different endvertebra in their repeated selections for manual method.Conclusion: Smartphone-aided method for end vertebra selection and Cobb angle measurement showedexcellent reliability. We can expect a reduction in measurement error rates with the widespread use ofthis method in clinical practice.Level of evidence: Level III, Diagnostic study© 2016 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

___

Cobb JR. Outline for the study of scoliosis. Instr Course Lect. 1948;5:261e275.

Vrtovec T, Pernus F, Likar B. A review of methods for quantitative evaluation of spinal curvature. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:593e607.

Shaw M, Adam CJ, Izatt MT, Licina P, Askin GN. Use of the iPhone for Cobb angle measurement in scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(6):1062e1068.

Shea KG, Stevens PM, Nelson M, Smith JT, Masters KS, Yandow S. A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement. Intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles. Spine. 1998;23(5):551e555.

Franko OI. Smartphone apps for orthopaedic surgeons. Clin Orthop Relat Res. ;469(7):2042e2048.

Qiao J, Liu Z, Xu L, et al. Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measure- ment method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012;25(4): e92.

Carman DL, Browne RH, Birch JG. Measurement of scoliosis and kyphosis ra- diographs. Intraobserver and interobserver variation. J Bone Jt Surg Am. ;72(3):328e333.

Gstoettner M, Sekyra K, Walochnik N, Winter P, Wachter R, Bach CM. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the Cobb angle: manual versus digital measurement tools. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(10):1587e1592.

Zhang J, Lou E, Shi X, et al. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010;23(6):383e387.

Hough PVC. Method and Means for Recognizing Complex Patterns. US Patent. , 3069654.

Han JH, Koczy LT, Poston T. Fuzzy Hough transform. Patterns Recognit Lett. ;15:649e658. Fleiss JL. Reliability of measurement. In: Fleiss JL, ed. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. Toronto: Wiley; 1986:1e32.

Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979;86:420e428.

Dang NR, Moreau MJ, Hill DL, Mahood JK, Raso J. Intra-observer reproducibility and interobserver reliability of the radiographic parameters in the Spinal Deformity Study Group's AIS Radiographic Measurement Manual. Spine. ;30(9):1064e1069.

Lonstein JE. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Lancet. 1994;344:1407e1412.

Pruijs JE, Hageman MK, Keessen W, van der Meer R, van Wieringen JC. Varia- tion in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis. Skelet Radiol. 1994;23(7): e520.

Oda M, Rauh S, Gregory PB, Silverman FN, Bleck EE. The signiŞcance of roentgenographic measurement in scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1982;2(4): e382.

Morrissy RT, Goldsmith GS, Hall EC, Kehl D, Cowie GH. Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1990;72(3):320e327.

Langensiepen S, Semler O, Sobottke R, et al. Measuring procedures to deter- mine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. ;22(11):2360e2371.

Mok JM, Berven SH, Diab M, Hackbarth M, Hu SS, Deviren V. Comparison of observer variation in conventional and three digital radiographic methods used in the evaluation of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. :681e686.

Rosenfeldt MP, Harding IJ, Hauptfleisch JT, Fairbank JT. A comparison of traditional protractor versus Oxford Cobbometer radiographic measurement: intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles. Spine. 2005;30(4): e443.

Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Schroeder TM, O'Brien MF. Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2006;31(11): e1246.

Chockalingam N, DangerŞeld PH, Giakas G, Cochrane T, Dorgan JC. Computer- assisted Cobb measurement of scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2002;11(4):353e357.

Sardjono TA, Wilkinson MH, Veldhuizen AG, van Ooijen PM, Purnama KE, Verkerke GJ. Automatic Cobb angle determination from radiographic images. Spine. 2013;38(20):1256e1262.