Bicolumnar 90e90 plating of AO 13C type fractures

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate functional results and complication rate of patients whounderwent medial-dorsolateral plating for intra-articular distal humeral fracture (Müller AO type 13C).Methods: Twenty-four patients (14 men, 10 women; mean age: 47 years) with AO type 13C distal humerus fracture were included in the study. Mean follow-up time was 28 months. Nine patients were in13C1 subgroup, according to AO classiŞcation system, 11 patients were categorized as 13C2, and 4 patients were 13C3. Final follow-up assessment of outcomes included Broberg and Morrey radiologicalcriteria; Mayo Elbow Performance Score, disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) OutcomeMeasure, score based on Jupiter criteria; and range of motion (ROM) values.Results: The mean carrying angle of operated elbows was 11.37. According to Broberg andMorrey radiological criteria, 14 patients, had radiologically normal elbow, 4 patients had mild change, 3patients had moderate change, and 3 patients had severe radiological change. Mean DASH score was21.91 , and mean Mayo rating was 83.37 . Jupiter criteria evaluation revealedexcellent results in 10 cases, good in 12, and fair results in 2. One patient with fair result had openfracture, and the other had previous hemiparesis in the same extremity. There was no instance ofnonunion observed at follow-up.Conclusion: Osteosynthesis with medial-dorsolateral plating is a safe and effective method for thetreatment of intra-articular fractures of distal humerus.Level of evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic study.© 2017 Turkish Association of Orthopaedics and Traumatology. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This isan open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

___

Robinson CM, Hill RM, Jacobs N, Dall G, Court-Brown CM. Adult distal humeral metaphysical fractures: epidemiology and results of treatment. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:38e47.

Throckmorton TW, Zarkadas PC, Steinmann SP. Distal humerus fractures. Hand Clin. 2007;23(4):457e469.

Ramsey L, Bratic AK, Getz CL, et al. Open reduction and internalŞxation of distal humerus fractures. Tech Shoulder Elb Surg. 2006;7(1):44e51.

Nauth A, McKee MD, Ristevski B, Hall J, Schemitsch EH. Distal humeral fractures in adults. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2011;93:686e700.

Hewins EA, Gofton WT, Dubberly J, MacDermid JC, Faber KJ, King GJ. Plate Şxation of olecranon osteotomies. J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21:58e62.

Nijs S, Graeler H, Bellemans J. Fixing simple olecranon fractures with the Olecranon Osteotomy Nail (OleON). Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2011;23: e445.

Shin SJ, Sohn HS, Do NH. A clinical comparison of two different double plating methods for intraarticular distal humerus fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg. ;19:2e9. Jupiter JB, Mehne DK. Fractures of the distal humerus. Orthopedics. 1992;15: e833.

Muller ME, Allgower M, Schneider R, Willenegger H. Manual of Internal Fixation. Techniques Recommended by the AO-ASIF Group. 3rd ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1991:427e452.

Sanchez-Sotelo J, Torchia ME, O'Driscoll SW. Complex distal humeral fractures: internalŞxation with a principle based parallel-plate technique. J Bone Jt Surg Am]. 2007;89:961e969.

O'Driscoll SW, Sanchez-Sotelo J, Torchia ME. Management of the smashed distal humerus. Orthop Clin North Am. 2002;33:19e33.

Muller ME. The comprehensive classiŞcation of fractures of long bones. In: Muller ME, Allgower M, Schneider R, Willenegger H, eds. Manual of Internal Fixation. 3rd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1991:118e150.

Broberg MA, Morrey BF. Results of delayed excision of the radial head after fracture. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1986;68:669e674.

Morrey BF, An KN. Functional evaluation of the elbow. In: Morrey BF, ed. The Elbow and its Disorders. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2009:80e91.

Oksuz C, Duger T. Kol, omuz ve el yaralanması anketi. DASH Turkce. Available from: http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/sites/dash/public/translations/DASH_Turkish_ pdf. Jupiter JB, Neff U, Holzach P, Allgower M. Intercondylar fractures of the hu- merus. An operative approach. J Bone Jt Surg [Am]. 1985;67:226e239.

Ozdemir H, Urgüden M, SEURoyüncü Y, Aslan T. Long-term functional results of adult intra-articular distal humeral fractures treated by open reduction and plate osteosynthesis. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2002;36(4):328e335.

Morrey BF. Bryan-Morrey triceps-reflecting approach. Tech Shoulder Elb Surg. ;3(1):28e32. Ulusal AE, Boz U, SertEURoz Z, Ustao glu RG. Approaches to distal humeral fractures in adults and comparison of treatment results. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. ;40(1):22e28.

Wilkinson JM, Stanley D. Posterior surgical approaches to the elbow: a comparative anatomic study. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2001;10:380e382.

Khalid MU, Saeed KM, Akhter M. A comparison of functional outcome of intercondylar fracture of distal humerus managed by olecranon osteotomy approach versus triseps sparing approach in adults. J Pak Med Assoc. 2015 Nov;65(11 suppl 3):S119eS122.

Coles CP, Barei DP, Nork SE, Taitsman LA, Hanel DP, Henley MB. The olecranon osteotomy: a six-year experience in the treatment of intraarticular fractures of the distal humerus. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:164e171.

Woods BI, Rosario BL, Siska PA, Gruen GS, Tarkin IS, Evans AR. Determining the efŞcacy of screw and washer Şxation as a method for securing olecranon osteotomies used in the surgical management of intraarticular distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(1):44e49.

Helfet DL, Hotchkiss RN. InternalŞxation of the distal humerus: a biome- chanical comparison of methods. J Orthop Trauma. 1990;4:260e264.

Arnander MW, Reeves A, MacLeod IA, Pinto TM, Khaleel A. A biomechanical comparison of plate conŞguration in distal humerus fractures. J Orthop Trauma. ;22:332e336.

Got C, Shuck J, Biercevicz A, et al. Biomechanical comparison of parallel versus 90 plating of bicolumn distal humerus fractures with intra-articular comminution. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(12):2512e2518.

Lee SK, Kim KJ, Park KH, Choy WS. A comparison between orthogonal and parallel plating methods for distal humerus fractures: a prospective random- ized trial. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014 Oct;24(7):1123e1131.

Babhulkar S, Babhulkar S. Controversies in the management of intra-articular fractures of distal humerus in adults. Indian J Orthop. 2011;45(3):216e225.

Bogataj M, Kosel F, Norris R, Krkovic M, Brojan M. Biomechanical study of different plate conŞgurations for distal humerus osteosynthesis. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2015 May;53(5):381e392.

Gofton WT, MacDermid JC, Patterson SD, Faber KJ, King GJ. Functional outcome of AO type C distal humeral fractures. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28: 295e308.

Flinkkila T, Toimela J, Sirni EUR o K, Leppilahti J. Results of parallel plate EUR fixation of comminuted intra-articular distal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2014;23(5):701e707.

Schmidt-Horlohe K, Wilde P, Bonk A, Becker L, Hoffmann R. One third tubularhook-plate osteosynthesis for olecranon osteotomies in distal humerus type-C fractures: a preliminary report of results and complications. Injury. 2012;43: 295e300.

Worden A, Ilyas AM. Ulnar neuropathy following distal humerus fracture fixation. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012;43(4):509e514.

Atalar AC, Demirhan M, Salduz A, Kiliçoglu O, Seyahi A. Functional results of the parallel-plate technique for complex distal humerus fractures. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2009;43(1):21e27.

Foruria AM, Lawrence TM, Augustin S, et al. Heterotopic ossification after surgery for distal humeral fractures. Bone Jt J. 2014;96-B(12):1681e1687.

Bauer AS, Lawson BK, Bliss RL, et al. Risk factors for posttraumatic heterotopic ossification of the elbow: case-control study. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37(7): 1422e1429.
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica-Cover
  • ISSN: 1017-995X
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Treatment preferences in Turkey for open fracture of the tibial diaphysis

Güzelali ÖZDEMİR, Barış YILMAZ, Baran KOMÜRB, Evrim SİRİNA, Nazım KARAHANA, Erman CEYHANA

Hexagonal grafts in mosaicplasty: Biomechanical comparison of standard cylindrical and novel hexagonal grafts in calf cadaver model

Adem KAR, NİHAT DEMİRHAN DEMİRKIRAN, Hasan TATARİ, BORA UZUN, Fatih ERTEM

Chemotherapy in primary osteogenic sarcoma in patients over the age of forty

BÜLENT ÖZKURT, Kerem BAŞARIR, Bülent YALÇIN, ABDULLAH MERTER, Yusuf YILDIZ, Yener SAĞLIK

Bicolumnar 90e90 plating of AO 13C type fractures

CEMAL KURAL, ERSİN ERÇİN, Mehmet ERKİLİNC, Evren KARAALİ, MUSTAFA GÖKHAN BİLGİLİ, Süleyman ALTUN

Extreme proximal migration of dislocated lunate over carpal ligament e A case report

Jun-Mo LEE, Jong-Kil KİM, Kwang-Bok LEE

Pain level after ACL reconstruction: A comparative study between free quadriceps tendon and hamstring tendons autografts

Cristian Tudor BUESCU, Adela Hilda ONUTU, Dan Osvald LUCACİU, Adrian TODOR

Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with severe varus deformity

Ethem Ayhan ÜNKAR, YUSUF ÖZTÜRKMEN, Erhan ŞÜKÜR, Engin ÇARKÇI, MURAT MERT

Is the use of hemostatic matrix (Floseal) and alkylene oxide copolymer (Ostene) safe in spinal laminectomies? Peridural Şbrosis assessment

Oktay GÜRCAN, AHMET GÜRHAN GÜRÇAY, Atilla KAZANCI, Evrim ONDERB, Salim SENTURKC, Murad BAVBEKA

A novel computer-based method for measuring the acetabular angle on hip radiographs

Seda ŞAHİN, MURAT EMİN AKATA, ORÇUN ŞAHİN, İSMAİL CENGİZ TUNCAY, Hüseyin ÖZKAN

Results of endoscopically-assisted cubital tunnel release without using any speciŞc instrument

EYUP ÇAĞATAY ZENGİN, Mesut TAHTA, Ozgür GÜNTÜRK, Cihan ASLAN, Ufuk ŞENER, Muhittin ŞENER