Results of the Novation CrowncupTM porous-coated uncemented acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year clinical and radiological assessment

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate theclinical, radiological, and survivorship results of a porous-coated uncementedacetabularcup (Novation Crowncup TM Exactech, Gainesville, Florida, USA) in patientsundergoing total hip arthroplasty at themid to long term follow-up.Methods: We prospectively analyzed 185 consecutivetotal hip replacements in 176 patients during 2009. All the patients receivedaNovation Crowncup™ uncemented cup. All surgeries were performed by one ofthe 4 joint replacement specialists. Severalclinical and radiographic outcomemeasures were evaluated.Results: There was no cupmigration recorded. Six cups (5.2%) had a thin (less than 1 mm) radiolucentline without signs ofloosening or clinical manifestation, but under close followup. The wear was not significative at the end of the follow up. Themean HarrisHip Score increased from 45.7 (range = 28 to 65) preoperatively to 89.8 (range= 87 to 96) at the final follow-up.Subjectiveevaluation showed excellent results in 82.6%, good in 8.6%, fair in 5.9%, andpoor in 2.9% of the cases. Eight patients, 3stems, and 5 cups (5% of the series)were revised, the survival of the series was 95% when the failure was the needfor additionalacetabular or femoral revision surgery for any reason. If wedefine failure as the need for an acetabular revision for some reason,thesurvival was (97.5%). When we evaluated survival only for aseptic loosening ofthe cup at 10 years of follow-up, 98.4% of theimplants survived.Conclusion: In our series,when we evaluated survival only for aseptic loosening of the cup at 10 years offollow-up, 98.4% of theimplants survived. The Crowncup acetabular cup survivalrate was 97.5% including all causes of loosening and 95% including allcausesfor revision at 10 years of follow-up.Level of Evidence: Level IV, Therapeutic Study

___

1. Havelin LI, Espehaug B, Engesaeter LB. The performance of two hydroxyapatite-coated acetabular cups compared with Charnley cups. From the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84-B(6):839- 845. 10.1302/0301-620X.84B6.0840839

2. Shon WY, Park B-Y RRN, Park PS, Im JT, Yun HH. Total hip arthroplasty: Past, present, and future. what has been achieved? Hip Pelvis. 2019;31(4):179-189. 10.5371/hp.2019.31.4.179

3. Kindsfater K, Lesko J. Survivorship of a modular acetabular cup system: Medium- to long-term follow-up. Arthroplasty Today. 2018;4(3):376-382. 10. 1016/j.artd.2017.07.001

4. McLawhorn AS, Potter HG, Cross MB, et al. Posterior Soft Tissue Repair After Primary THA is Durable at Mid-term Followup: A Prospective MRI Study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(10):3183-3189. 10.1007/s11999-015-4380-0

5. Gruen TA, McNeice GM, Amstutz HC. “Modes of failure” of cemented stemtype femoral components: A radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;(141):17-27 .47710010.1007/978-1-4471-5451-8_8

6. Loudon JR, Charnley J. Subsidence of the femoral prosthesis in total hip replacement in relation to the design of the stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1980;62-B(4):450-453. 10.1302/0301-620X.62B4.7430222

7. DeLee JG, Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;(121):20-32 .99150410.1097/ 00003086-197611000-00003

8. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60(2):217- 220. 10.2106/00004623-197860020-00014

9. Barrack RL, Mulroy RD, Harris WH. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992;74-B(3):385-389. 10. 1302/0301-620X.74B3.1587883

10. Brooker AF, Bowerman JW, Robinson RA, Riley LH. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55(8):1629-1632. 10.2106/00004623-197355080-00006

11. Martell JM, Berdia S. Determination of polyethylene wear in total hip replacements with use of digital radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(11):1635- 1641. 10.2106/00004623-199711000-00004

12. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: Treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51(4):73755.15. ):73755.15. 10.2106/00004623-196951040-00012

13. Mäkelä KT, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Paavolainen P, Remes V. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(10):2160-2170. 10.2106/JBJS.G.00870

14. Clohisy JC, Harris WH. The Harris-Galante uncemented femoral component in primary total hip replacement at 10 years. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14(8):915-917. 10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90003-7

15. Ritter MA, Thong AE. The role of cemented sockets in 2004: Is there one? J Arthroplasty. 2004;19( Suppl 4):92-94. 10.1016/j.arth.2004.02.006

16. Faizan A, Chuang P, Aponte C, Moretti V, Sharkey PF. Radiolucencies surrounding acetabular components with three-dimensional coatings: Artifact or real? Arthroplasty Today. 2017;3(4):269-274. 10.1016/j.artd.2017.06.004

17. Streit MR, Weiss S, Andreas F, et al. 10-year results of the uncemented Allofit press-fit cup in young patients. Acta Orthop. 2014;85(4):368-374. 10.3109/ 17453674.2014.925351

18. Long WJ, Nayyar S, Chen KK, Novikov D, Davidovitch RI, Vigdorchik JM. Early aseptic loosening of the Tritanium primary acetabular component with screw fixation. Arthroplasty Today. 2018;4(2):169-174. 10.1016/j.artd.2017.11.009

19. Bjerkholt H, Høvik Ø., Reikerås O. Direct comparison of polyethylene wear in cemented and uncemented acetabular cups. J Orthop Traumatol. 2010;11 (3):155-158. 10.1007/s10195-010-0104-0

20. Della Valle CJ, Mesko NW, Quigley L, Rosenberg AG, Jacobs JJ, Galante JO. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a porous-coated acetabular component. A concise follow-up, at a minimum of twenty years, of previous reports. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 2009;91(5):1130-1135. 10.2106/JBJS.H.00168

21. Kim YH, Kim JS, Park JW, Joo JH. Periacetabular osteolysis is the problem in contemporary total hip arthroplasty in young patients. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27 (1):74-81. 10.1016/j.arth.2011.03.022

22. Zicat B, Engh CA, Gokcen E. Patterns of osteolysis around total hip components inserted with and without cement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(3):432-439. 10.2106/00004623-199503000-00013

23. Barrack RL, Folgueras A, Munn B, Tvetden D, Sharkey P. Pelvic lysis and polyethylene wear at 5–8 years in an uncemented total hip. Clin Orthop. 1997;(335):211-217. 10.1097/00003086-199702000-00020

24. Udomkiat P, Dorr LD, Wan Z. Cementless hemispheric porous-coated sockets implanted with press-fit technique without screws: Average ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A(7):1195-1200. 10.2106/00004623-200207000- 00016

25. Ritter MA, Thong AE, Davis KE, Berend ME, Meding JB, Faris PM. Long-term deterioration of joint evaluation scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004;86-B(3):438- 442. 10.1302/0301-620X.86B3.14243

26. Celebi L, Muratli HH, Akşahin E, Yağmurlu MF, Yüksel HY, Biçimoğlu A. Femur başi avasküler nekrozu olan hastalarda çimentosuz total kalça artroplastisi [Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2006;40(2): 105-110.16757925
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica-Cover
  • ISSN: 1017-995X
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: Türk Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Derneği
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

A new modification of the Trapdoor Procedure without surgical hip dislocation in the management of patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A retrospective case series

Budak AKMAN, Melih GÜVEN, Barış KADIOĞLU, Namık Kemal ÖZKAN, Ömer YONGA, Burak ÖZTURAN

The effect of a preoperative physical therapy education program on short-term outcomes of patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty: A controlled prospective clinical trial

Marina PINSKIY, Omri LUBOVSKY, Leonid KALICHMAN

Comparison of systemic inflammatory responses of proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw after treatment of patients with pertrochanteric fractures: A prospective comparative study

Kushtrim GREZDA, Mislav JELIC, Armond DACI, Cen BYTYQI, Qerim KIDA

Comment on ‘’Spinopelvic alignment does not change after bilateral total hip arthroplasty in patients with bilateral Crowe type-IV developmental dysplasia of the hip‘’ by Can et al.

Alpaslan ÖZTÜRK, Nazan ÇEVİK, Yavuz AKALIN

Results of the Novation CrowncupTM porous-coated uncemented acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year clinical and radiological assessment

Daniel GODOY-MONZON, Agustin GARCIA-MANSILLA, Alberto Cid CASTEULANI, Santiago SVARZCHTEIN

Effect of different forearm positions on fragment rotation in extra-articular distal radius fractures: A cadaveric study

Maximilian LENZ, Maik NEUMANN, Christian K SPIES, Gregor STEIN, Peer EYSEL, Jens DARGEL, Johannes OPPERMANN

How to extract a broken cephalomedullary nail safely? A case presentation and review of the literature

Adel EBRAHIMPOUR, Farsad BIGLARI, Mehrdad SADIGHI, Rodrigo PESANTEZ

Long-term clinical outcomes of innervated digital artery perforator flap in the treatment of fingertip injuries

Ali CAVİT, Osman CİVAN, Haluk ÖZCANLI

Five-year mortality rate for patients with diabetic hand gangrene who undergo upper extremity amputation

Shin Woo CHOI, Young Ho SHIN, Jae Kwang KIM

The second victim in orthopedics and traumatology

Anna CARRERAS-CASTANER, Carles MARTİN-FUMADO, C sar VARGAS-BLASCO, Josep ARIMANY-MANSO