Ali TURGUT, Anıl KOCA, Melikşah UZAKGİDER, Sert HANCIOĞLU, Serkan ERKUŞ, Önder KALENDERER

Quantitative assessment of changes in lesser trochanter shapes in relation to femoral rotations

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in lesser trochanter shapes in relation to femoral rotations and to develop a reference value for the determination of clinically relevant malrotation of the femur. Methods: Patients who underwent computed tomography angiography between January 2009 and July 2018 were identified based on a review of their institutional medical records. Thereafter, three-dimensional (3D) images of the whole femur for a total of 860 patients were obtained from their tomographic sections. The distance between the lateral outer cortex of the femur and the most medial point of the lesser trochanter with the femur in neutral rotation was measured and set as the reference value. Then, the same distance was measured at 5°, 10°, 15°, and 20° of femoral internal rotation and at 5°, 10°, 15°, 20°, and 25° of femoral external rotation. To avoid magnification errors, the reference values were divided by each measured value at these different rotation angles and then multiplied by 100. Results: The mean distances between the lateral cortex and the most medial point of the lesser trochanter at 5°, 10°, 15°, and 20° of femoral internal rotation were 97%, 93%, 90%, and 88%, respectively, of those measured with the femur in neutral rotation. The same distances at 5°, 10°, 15°, 20°, and 25° of femoral external rotation were 102%, 104%, 106%, 107%, and 108%, respectively, of those measured with the femur in neutral rotation. There was no statistically significant difference between the measured distances in males and females (p>0.05). However, significant differences were observed among each measured distance at different angles of femoral rotation (p

___

1. Salminen ST, Pihlajamaki HK, Avikainen VJ, Böstman OM. Population based epidemiologic and morphologic study of femoral shaft fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000; 372: 241-9. [CrossRef]

2. Court-Brown CM, Rimmer S, Prakash U, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of open long bone fractures. Injury 1998; 29: 529-34. [CrossRef]

3. Ramme AJ, Egol J, Chang G, Davidovitch RI, Konda S. Evaluation of malrotation following intramedullary nailing in a femoral shaft fracture model: Can a 3D c-arm improve accuracy? Injury 2017; 48: 1603-8. [CrossRef]

4. Krettek C, Miclau T, Gru O, Schandelmaier P, Tscherne H. Intraoperative control of axes, rotation and length in femoral and tibial fractures technical note. Injury 1998; 29: 29-39. [CrossRef]

5. Zeckey C, Bogusch M, Borkovec M, et al. Radiographic cortical thickness parameters as predictors of rotational alignment in proximal femur fractures: A cadaveric study. J Orthop Res 2019; 37: 69- 76 [CrossRef]

6. Braten M, Terjesen T, Rossvoll. Torsional deformity after intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures. Measurement of anteversion angles in 110 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993; 75: 799-803. [CrossRef]

7. Jaarsma RL, van Kampen A. Rotational malalignment after fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86: 1100-4. [CrossRef]

8. Zeckey C, Monsell F, Jackson M, et al. Femoral malrotation after surgical treatment of femoral shaft fractures in children: a retrospective CT-based analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2017; 27: 1157-62. [CrossRef]

9. Rippstein VJ. Zur bestimmung der antetorsion des schenkelhalses mittels zweier röntgenaufnahmen. Z Orthop 1995; 86: 345-60.

10. Bråten M, Terjesen T, Rossvoll I. Femoral anteversion in normal adults: ultrasound measurements in 50 men and 50 women. Acta Orthop Scand 1992; 63: 29-32. [CrossRef]

11. Wissing H, Buddenbrock B. Determining rotational errors of the femur by axial computerized tomography in comparison with clinical and conventional radiologic determination. Unfallchirurgie 1993; 19: 145-57. [CrossRef]

12. Ruedi TP, Murphy WM. AO. Principles of Fracture Management. New York: Thieme; 2000: 210-4.

13. Kim JJ, Kim E, Kim KY. Predicting the rotationally neutral state of the femur by comparing the shape of the contralateral lesser trochanter. Orthopedics 2001; 24: 1069-70.

14. Karaman O, Ayhan E, Kesmezacar H, Seker A, Unlu MC, Aydingoz O. Rotational malalignment after closed intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures and its influence on daily life. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014; 24: 1243-7. [CrossRef]

15. Kuo TY, Skedros JG, Bloebaum RD. Measurement of femoral anteversion by biplane radiography and computed tomography imaging: comparison with anatomic reference. Invest Radiol 2003; 38: 221-9. [CrossRef]

16. Marchand LS, Todd DC, Kellam P, Adeyemi TF, Rothberg DL, Maak TG. Is the lesser trochanter profile a reliable means of restoring anatomic rotation after femur fracture fixation? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2018; 476: 1253-61. [CrossRef]

17 Jaarsma RL, Verdonschot N, Van der Venne R, Van Kampen A. Avoiding rotational malalignment after fractures of the femur by using the profile of the lesser trochanter: an in vitro study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2005; 125: 184-7. [CrossRef]

18. Zhang Q, Liu H, Chen W, et al. Radiologic measurement of lesser trochanter and its clinical significance in Chinese. Skeletal Radiol 2009; 38: 1175-81. [CrossRef]