Non-inferiority of The Cementless Total TKA Compared to The Cemented TKA, A m-Metanalysis

Non-inferiority of The Cementless Total TKA Compared to The Cemented TKA, A m-Metanalysis

Objective: Cemented total knee arthroplasty still represents the reference standard in the field of prothesis knee replacement; but since cementless total knee arthroplasties were introduced there have been strong discussions over the years among cemented and non-cemented total knee arthroplasties to establish which gives the best benefits for the patient and for the surgeon. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to systematically analyze the use of cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasties by investigating clinical and radiological outcomes and rate of complications, in order to assess which techniques confers more benefits to the patient and the surgeon. Materials and Methods: The current systematic review has been written in accordance to the Cochrane handbook and the PRISMA statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network. Results: Six randomized controlled trials were finally included in this systematic review. The statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in all clinical scores of interest (Knee Society Score, clinical and functional, Oxford Knee Score, Visual Analogue Score) and a similar revision rate. Conclusion: the results of the current metanalysis suggest the noninferiority of cementless fixation with respect to cemented total knee arthroplasties in terms of clinical outcomes and survival rates of the implants.

___

  • [1] Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, et al. Future Young Patient Demand for Primary and Revision Joint Replacement: National Projections from 2010 to 2030. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467: 2606-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0834-6.
  • [2] Gandhi R, Tsvetkov D, Davey JR, et al. Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91: 889-95. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301- 620X.91B7.21702.
  • [3] Zhou K, Yu H, Li J, Wang H, et al. No difference in implant survivorship and clinical outcomes between fullcementless and full-cemented fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2018; 53: 312-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. ijsu.2018.04.015.
  • [4] Berger RA, Lyon JH, Jacobs JJ, et al. Problems with cementless total knee arthroplasty at 11 years followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001: 196-207. https://doi. org/10.1097/00003086-200111000-00024.
  • [5] Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 5474- 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002.
  • [6] Henricson A, Linder L, Nilsson KG. A trabecular metal tibial component in total knee replacement in patients younger than 60 years: a two-year radiostereophotogrammetric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90: 1585-93. https:// doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B12.20797.
  • [7] Fernandez-Fairen M, Hernández-Vaquero D, Murcia A, et al. Trabecular metal in total knee arthroplasty associated with higher knee scores: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471: 3543-53. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11999-013-3183-4
  • [8] Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions : Cochrane Book Series n.d.:674. [9] Kendall C, Maskalyk J, Palepu A. Closing Open Medicine. Open Med 2014; 8: e147-9.
  • [10] Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010; 340: c332. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c332.
  • [11] Fricka KB, McAsey CJ, Sritulanondha S. To Cement or Not? Five-Year Results of a Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented vs Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2019; 34: S183-7. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.arth.2019.02.024.
  • [12] Fricka KB, Sritulanondha S, McAsey CJ. To Cement or Not? Two-Year Results of a Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Cemented Vs. Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA). J Arthroplasty 2015; 30: 55-8. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.04.049.
  • [13] Hasan S, van Hamersveld KT, Marang-van de Mheen PJ, et al. Migration of a novel 3D-printed cementless versus a cemented total knee arthroplasty: two-year results of a randomized controlled trial using radiostereometric analysis. Bone Joint J 2020; 102-B: 1016-24. https://doi. org/10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2020-0054.R1.
  • [14] Kim Y-H, Park J-W, Lim H-M, et al. Cementless and cemented total knee arthroplasty in patients younger than fifty five years. Which is better? Int Orthop 2014; 38: 297-303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-2243-4.
  • [15] Nam D, Lawrie CM, Salih R, et al. Cemented Versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty of the Same Modern Design: A Prospective, Randomized Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101: 1185-92. https://doi.org/10.2106/ JBJS.18.01162.
  • [16] Park J-W, Kim Y-H. Simultaneous cemented and cementless total knee replacement in the same patients: a prospective comparison of long-term outcomes using an identical design of NexGen prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93: 1479-86. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B11.27507
  • [17] Rand JA. Cement or cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991: 52-62.
  • [18] McCaskie AW, Deehan DJ, Green TP, et al. Randomised, prospective study comparing cemented and cementless total knee replacement: results of press-fit condylar total knee replacement at five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80: 971-5. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.80b6.8558.
  • [19] Matassi F, Carulli C, Civinini R, et al. Cemented versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Joints 2014; 1: 121-5.
  • [20] Haeberle HS, Salem HS, Ehiorobo JO, et al. Newer Generation of Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. Surg Technol Int 2020; 36: 351-9 . [21] Newman JM, Sodhi N, Dekis JC, et al. Survivorship and Functional Outcomes of Cementless versus Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis. J Knee Surg 2020; 33: 270-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1678525.
  • [22] Jones AC, Arns CH, Sheppard AP, et al. Assessment of bone ingrowth into porous biomaterials using MICRO-CT. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 2491-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. biomaterials.2007.01.046.
  • [23] Ejaz A, Laursen AC, Kappel A, et al. Tourniquet induced ischemia and changes in metabolism during TKA: a randomized study using microdialysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015; 16: 326. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-015- 0784-y.
  • [24] Lawrie CM, Schwabe M, Pierce A, et al. The cost of implanting a cemented versus cementless total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2019; 101-B: 61-3. https://doi. org/10.1302/0301-620X.101B7.BJJ-2018-1470.R1.
  • [25] Gao F, Henricson A, Nilsson KG. Cemented versus uncemented fixation of the femoral component of the NexGen CR total knee replacement in patients younger than 60 years: a prospective randomised controlled RSA study. Knee 2009; 16: 200-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. knee.2008.11.009.
  • [26] Yang J-H, Yoon J-R, Oh C-H, et al. Hybrid component fixation in total knee arthroplasty: minimum of 10-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27: 1111-8. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2011.09.019.
Acta Medica-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-9488
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Enthesitis Related Arthritis: A Single Center Experience

Selcan DEMİR, Mu s erref Kasap CU CEOG LU, Yelda BİLGİNER

The Prevalence of Hilar Lymphadenopathy and Related Factors in Pneumoconiosis Patients of a University Hospital Occupational Diseases Polyclinic

Yusuf Samir HASANLI, Meral TÜRK

Evaluation of Intravenous Immunoglobulin G treatment in Outpatients Rheumatology Practice

Berkan ARMAĞAN, Bayram FARİSOĞULLARI, Levent KILIÇ, Şule Apraş BİLGEN, Sedat KIRAZ, Umut KALYONCU

Factors influencing surgical success in concomitant horizontal strabismus

Aslıhan UZUN, Asena KELEŞ ŞAHİN

Could We Use Vital Signs and Lactate Levels Together to Predict the Prognosis in Abdominal Pain?

Meltem Akkaş, Nalan Metin Aksu, Filiz Froohari Damarsoy, Elif Öztürk

Conventional Synthetic Dmards in Psoriatic Arthritis: Changing Practice in Biologic Era; Real-Life Results from HURBIO-PsA Registry

EMRE BİLGİN, Umut KALYONCU

Liposomal Amphotericin B Induced Acute Reactions

Melda Bahap, Kutay Demirkan, Pinar Bakir Ekinci, Sehnaz Alp, Serife Gul Oz

Non-inferiority of The Cementless Total TKA Compared to The Cemented TKA, A m-Metanalysis

Tommaso Bonanzinga, Riccardo Garibaldi, Federico Adravanti, Gerardo Fusco, Maurilio Marcacci, Francesco Manlio Gambaro

Mechanical Versus Manual Chest Compression: A Retrospective- Cohort in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Fatih Tanrıverdi, Gül Pamukçu Günaydın, Alp Şener

An Evaluation of Information Sources Regarding Drug Use and/or Poisoning Cases of Community Pharmacists in Ankara, Turkey

Ayçe ÇELİKER, EMRE KARA, Sevilay KARAHAN