Evaluation of Intravenous Immunoglobulin G treatment in Outpatients Rheumatology Practice

Objective: Intravenous immunoglobulin is an alternative therapeutic agent that can be used off-label in many autoimmune rheumatological diseases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the autoimmune rheumatological diseases characteristics in which intravenous immunoglobulin therapy is used and the efficacy and safety of this therapy. Methods and Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 133 patients with autoimmune rheumatological disease who received at least 1 course of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment at Hacettepe University Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic between January 2013 and December 2020. The autoimmune rheumatological disease demographic and clinical features, organ involvements, treatment phases (primary-secondary or infection), treatment responses and adverse effects were evaluated. Results: A total of 79% (n=105) patients were female and the mean±SD age was 45.5±16.9 years. The most common underlying rheumatic diseases were systemic lupus erythematosus (35%, n=47) and dermatomyositis/ polymyositis (35%, n=47). Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy was most commonly used for resistant/relapsed myositis and haematological involvement. The median (IQR) intravenous immunoglobulin treatment course was 6.5 (13) and the duration of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment was 10.8 (24) months. Although it is used as second-line therapy in 77% of patients, complete clinical response was observed in 32% and partial response in 47%. There was a significant reduction in the median (IQR) steroid doses (methylprednisolone or equivalent dose) patients received from baseline after intravenous immunoglobulin treatment [30 (33) vs 8 (12), p

___

1] Kaveri SV. Intravenous immunoglobulin: exploiting the potential of natural antibodies. Autoimmun Rev. 2012; 11(11): 792-4.

[2] Aggarwal R, Charles-Schoeman C, Schessl J, et al. Prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebocontrolled phase III study evaluating efficacy and safety of octagam 10% in patients with dermatomyositis (“ProDERM Study”). Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100(1): e23677.

[3] Sewell WA, Jolles S. Immunomodulatory action of intravenous immunoglobulin. Immunology. 2002;107(4): 387-93.

[4] Basta M, Dalakas MC. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin exerts its beneficial effect in patients with dermatomyositis by blocking endomysial deposition of activated complement fragments. J Clin Invest. 1994; 94(5): 1729-35.

[5] Jayne DR, Davies MJ, Fox CJ, et al. Treatment of systemic vasculitis with pooled intravenous immunoglobulin. Lancet. 1991; 337(8750): 1137-9.

[6] Toubi E, Kessel A, Shoenfeld Y. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulins: an option in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus. Hum Immunol. 2005; 66(4): 395-402.

[7] Cherin P, Marie I, Michallet M, et al. Management of adverse events in the treatment of patients with immunoglobulin therapy: A review of evidence. Autoimmun Rev. 2016;15(1):71-81.

[8] Guo Y, Tian X, Wang X, et al. Adverse Effects of Immunoglobulin Therapy. Front Immunol. 2018; 9: 1299.

[9] Pyne D, Ehrenstein M, Morris V. The therapeutic uses of intravenous immunoglobulins in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002; 41(4): 367-74.

[10] Mulhearn B, Bruce IN. Indications for IVIG in rheumatic diseases. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2015; 54(3): 383-91.

[11] Cherin P, Pelletier S, Teixeira A, et al. Results and long-term followup of intravenous immunoglobulin infusions in chronic, refractory polymyositis: an open study with thirtyfive adult patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2002; 46(2): 467-74.

[12] Dalakas MC, Illa I, Dambrosia JM, et al. A controlled trial of high-dose intravenous immune globulin infusions as treatment for dermatomyositis. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329(27): 1993-2000.

[13] Miyasaka N, Hara M, Koike T, et al. Effects of intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in Japanese patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis resistant to corticosteroids: a randomized double-blind placebocontrolled trial. Mod Rheumatol. 2012; 22(3): 382-93.

[14] Elovaara I, Apostolski S, van Doorn P, et al. EFNS guidelines for the use of intravenous immunoglobulin in treatment of neurological diseases: EFNS task force on the use of intravenous immunoglobulin in treatment of neurological diseases. Eur J Neurol. 2008; 15(9): 893-908.

[15] Enk A, European Dermatology Forum Guideline S. Guidelines on the use of high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin in dermatology. Eur J Dermatol. 2009; 19(1): 90-8.

[16] Anderson D, Ali K, Blanchette V, et al. Guidelines on the use of intravenous immune globulin for hematologic conditions. Transfus Med Rev. 2007; 21(2 Suppl 1): S9-56.

[17] Bianchi MT, Lavigne C, Sorond F, et al. Transient lifethreatening cerebral edema in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Clin Rheumatol. 2009; 15(4): 181-4.

[18] Friedman DM, Llanos C, Izmirly PM, et al. Evaluation of fetuses in a study of intravenous immunoglobulin as preventive therapy for congenital heart block: Results of a multicenter, prospective, open-label clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2010; 62(4): 1138-46.

[19] Lim KS, Cheong KL, Tan CT. Periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges in neuropsychiatric lupus: association with cerebritis in magnetic resonance imaging and resolution after intravenous immunoglobulin. Lupus. 2010; 19(6): 748-52.

[20] Boletis JN, Ioannidis JP, Boki KA, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin compared with cyclophosphamide for proliferative lupus nephritis. Lancet. 1999 ;354(9178): 569- 70.

[21] Perricone R, De Carolis C, Kroegler B, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in pregnant patients affected with systemic lupus erythematosus and recurrent spontaneous abortion. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2008; 47(5): 646-51.

[22] Jolles S, Sewell WA, Misbah SA. Clinical uses of intravenous immunoglobulin. Clin Exp Immunol. 2005; 142(1): 1-11.

[23] Jayne DR, Chapel H, Adu D, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin for ANCA-associated systemic vasculitis with persistent disease activity. QJM. 2000; 93(7): 433-9.

[24] Jayne DR, Lockwood CM. Intravenous immunoglobulin as sole therapy for systemic vasculitis. Br J Rheumatol. 1996; 35(11): 1150-3.

[25] Ballow M. The IgG molecule as a biological immune response modifier: mechanisms of action of intravenous immune serum globulin in autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011; 127(2): 315-23; quiz 24-5.

[26] Lapraik C, Watts R, Bacon P, et al. BSR and BHPR guidelines for the management of adults with ANCA associated vasculitis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007; 46(10): 1615-6.

[27] Al-Mayouf SM, Laxer RM, Schneider R, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for juvenile dermatomyositis: efficacy and safety. J Rheumatol. 2000; 27(10): 2498-503.

[28] Silverman ED, Laxer RM, Greenwald M, et al. Intravenous gamma globulin therapy in systemic juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1990; 33(7): 1015-22.

29] Guillevin L, Pagnoux C, Karras A, et al. Rituximab versus azathioprine for maintenance in ANCA-associated vasculitis. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(19): 1771-80.

[30] Bayry J, Negi VS, Kaveri SV. Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2011; 7(6): 349-59.

[31] Crickx E, Machelart I, Lazaro E, et al. Intravenous Immunoglobulin as an Immunomodulating Agent in Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated Vasculitides: A French Nationwide Study of Ninety-Two Patients. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016; 68(3): 702-12.

[32] Martinez V, Cohen P, Pagnoux C, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulins for relapses of systemic vasculitides associated with antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies: results of a multicenter, prospective, open-label study of twenty-two patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 58(1): 308-17.

[33] Hamrock DJ. Adverse events associated with intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. Int Immunopharmacol. 2006; 6(4): 535-42.

[34] Katz U, Achiron A, Sherer Y, et al. Safety of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy. Autoimmun Rev. 2007; 6(4): 257-9.
Acta Medica-Cover
  • ISSN: 2147-9488
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2012
  • Yayıncı: HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Enthesitis Related Arthritis: A Single Center Experience

Selcan DEMİR, Mu s erref Kasap CU CEOG LU, Yelda BİLGİNER

Laparoscopic Treatment of Hydatid Liver and Pancreas Disease: Some Technical Aspects and Importance

Payam Hacisalihoglu, Murat Sevmis, Elbrus Zarbaliyev, Dauren Sarsenov, Mehmet Caglikulekci

Liposomal Amphotericin B Induced Acute Reactions

Melda Bahap, Kutay Demirkan, Pinar Bakir Ekinci, Sehnaz Alp, Serife Gul Oz

Could We Use Vital Signs and Lactate Levels Together to Predict the Prognosis in Abdominal Pain?

Meltem Akkaş, Nalan Metin Aksu, Filiz Froohari Damarsoy, Elif Öztürk

Conventional Synthetic Dmards in Psoriatic Arthritis: Changing Practice in Biologic Era; Real-Life Results from HURBIO-PsA Registry

EMRE BİLGİN, Umut KALYONCU

Evaluation of Intravenous Immunoglobulin G treatment in Outpatients Rheumatology Practice

Berkan ARMAĞAN, Bayram FARİSOĞULLARI, Levent KILIÇ, Şule Apraş BİLGEN, Sedat KIRAZ, Umut KALYONCU

Incomplete Partition type I: Radiological Evaluation of the Temporal Bone

Şafak PARLAK, Ayça AKGÖZ, Sevtap ARSLAN, Levent SENNAROGLU

NK/T cell Lymphoma as a Rare Cause of an Oronasal Fistula

Irfan Mohamad, Ahmad Izani Mohd Safian, Ahmad Fakrurrozi Mohamad, Ramiza Ramza Ramli

Factors influencing surgical success in concomitant horizontal strabismus

Aslıhan UZUN, Asena KELEŞ ŞAHİN

Mechanical Versus Manual Chest Compression: A Retrospective- Cohort in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Fatih Tanrıverdi, Gül Pamukçu Günaydın, Alp Şener