Şafak PARLAK, Ayça AKGÖZ, Sevtap ARSLAN, Levent SENNAROGLU

Incomplete Partition type I: Radiological Evaluation of the Temporal Bone

Objective: Incomplete partition type I is an uncommon congenital anomaly of the inner ear, characterized by typical cystic cochleovestibular appearance. Incomplete partition type I was firstly defined as cystic cochlea and vestibule without large vestibular aqueduct; however, large vestibular aqueduct and/or enlarged endolymphatic duct could rarely be seen in incomplete partition type I anomaly. Correct diagnosis of the type of cochlear malformation and differentiation of incomplete partition type I is necessary for patient management and surgical approach. Our aim was to document the temporal bone imaging findings in a series of patients with incomplete partition type I. Materials and Methods: CT (n=85) and/or MRI (n=80) examinations of 99 ears in 59 incomplete partition type I patients were retrospectively evaluated. All structures of the otic capsule were retrospectively assessed. The appearances of cochlea and vestibule, vestibular aqueduct/endolymphatic duct, semicircular canals were qualitatively evaluated by an experienced neuroradiologist. The vertical dimension of vestibular aqueduct and/or endolymphatic duct (from the point where the duct arises from the vestibule) was measured on CT/MRI. Anteriorposterior diameter of the internal acoustic canal and the diameter of cochlear aperture were measured on CT. The cochleovestibular nerves were evaluated on sagittal-oblique high T2-weighted imaging. Results: All 99 ears had defective partition with unpartitioned cochlear basal turn and absent interscalar septae, separated but cystic cochlea. The vestibule was enlarged in all ears except one. Semicircular canals were usually dysplastic (92.9%). A total of 35 incomplete partition type I ears (35.3%) had large vestibular aqueduct and/or enlarged endolymphatic duct. Internal acoustic canal was wide in 21% of ears. Cochlear aperture was wide in 5.9% of ears. Cochlear nerve was either hypoplastic or aplastic in about a quarter of incomplete partition type I ears. Conclusion: In up to one-third of incomplete partition type I patients, an associated large vestibular aqueduct /endolymphatic duct could be seen accompanying typical inner ear findings. Although the cochlear nerves are normal in the majority of cases, auditory brainstem implantation may be necessary in certain cases of incomplete partition type I anomaly.

PDF

___

[1] Sennaroglu L, Saatci I. A new classification for cochleovestibular malformations. Laryngoscope. 2002; 112: 2230-2241.

[2] Sennaroglu L. Histopathology of inner ear malformations: Do we have enough evidence to explain pathophysiology? Cochlear Implants Int. 2016; 17: 3-20.

[3] Sennaroglu L, Saatci I. Unpartitioned versus incompletely partitioned cochleae: radiologic differentiation. Otol Neurotol. 2004; 25: 520-529..

[4] Kontorinis G, Goetz F, Giourgas A, et al. Radiological diagnosis of incomplete partition type I versus type II: significance for cochlear implantation. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22: 525-532.

[5] Berrettini S, Forli F, De Vito A, et al. Cochlear implant in incomplete partition type I. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2013; 33: 56-62.

[6] Adibelli ZH, Isayeva L, Koc AM, et al. The new classification system for inner ear malformations: the INCAV system. Acta Otolaryngol. 2017; 137: 246-252.

[7] Baheti AD. A case of bilateral incomplete partition type I with enlarged vestibular aqueducts: an unreported entity. Clin Radiol. 2013; 68: 98-99.

[8] Casselman JW, Offeciers FE, Govaerts PJ, et al. Aplasia and hypoplasia of the vestibulocochlear nerve: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology. 1997; 202: 773-781.

[9] Ozbal Batuk M, Cinar BC, Ozgen B, et al. Audiological and Radiological Characteristics in Incomplete Partition Malformations. J Int Adv Otol. 2017; 13: 233-238.

[10] Sennaroglu L, Sarac S, Ergin T. Surgical results of cochlear implantation in malformed cochlea. Otol Neurotol. 2006; 27: 615-623.

[11] Sennaroglu L, Bajin MD. Classification and Current Management of Inner Ear Malformations. Balkan Med J. 2017; 34: 397-411.

[12] Vijayasekaran S, Halsted MJ, Boston M, et al. When is the vestibular aqueduct enlarged? A statistical analysis of the normative distribution of vestibular aqueduct size. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 28: 1133-1138.

[13] Harnsberger HR, Dahlen RT, Shelton C, et al. Advanced techniques in magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of the large endolymphatic duct and sac syndrome. Laryngoscope. 1995; 105: 1037-1042.

[14] Lim CH, Lim JH, Kim D, et al. Bony cochlear nerve canal stenosis in pediatric unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2018; 106: 72-74.

[15] Marques SR, Ajzen S, D’Ippolito G, et al. Morphometric analysis of the internal auditory canal by computed tomography imaging. Iran J Radiol. 2012; 9: 71-78.

[16] Jackler RK, Luxford WM, House WF. Congenital malformations of the inner ear: a classification based on embryogenesis. Laryngoscope. 1987; 97(3 Pt 2 Suppl 40): 2-14.

[17] Levent Sennaroğlu, Gamze Atay, Münir Demir Bajin. A new cochlear implant electrode with a ‘‘cork’’-type stopper for inner ear malformations. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2014; 41: 331–336

[18] Pamuk G, Pamuk AE, Akgöz A, et al. Radiological measurement of cochlear dimensions in cochlear hypoplasia and its effect on cochlear implant selection. J Laryngol Otol. 2021; 135: 501-507.

[19] Ceylan N, Bayraktaroglu S, Alper H, et al. CT imaging of superior semicircular canal dehiscence: added value of reformatted images. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010; 130: 996- 1001.

[20] Ho ML, Moonis G, Halpin CF, et al. Spectrum of Third Window Abnormalities: Semicircular Canal Dehiscence and Beyond. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2017; 38: 2-9.

[21] Sennaroglu L. Cochlear implantation in inner ear malformations--a review article. Cochlear Implants Int. 2010; 11: 4-41.

[22] Eftekharian A, Eftekharian K, Mokari N, et al. Cochlear implantation in incomplete partition type I. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019; 276: 2763-2768.