İnşaat Yıkıntı Atıklarının Zemin İyileştirmesinde Kullanılabilirliği

Zeminlerin mühendislik özelliklerinin yetersiz olduğu durumlarda zemin iyileştirerek mühendislik özellikleri arttırılabilmektedir. Zemin iyileştirme çalışmalarında kireç, çimento, uçucu kül vb. birçok yöntem kullanılmaktadır. Zemin iyileştirmelerinde zeminin mevcut mühendislik özellikleri ve iyileştirme maliyetleri önemli parametrelerdir. Bu çalışmada, deprem bölgelerinde ciddi çevre sorunu haline gelen, şehirlerde görüntü kirliliği yaratan ve yaşam konforunu bozan deprem yıkıntı atıklarının zemin iyileştirmesinde kullanılması amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla, Sakarya da 1999 yılı depremlerinde yıkılan binalara ait yıkıntı atıkları ile laboratuar ortamında zemin iyileştirmesi yapılarak bu zeminlerin CBR değerleri belirlenmiştir. Çalışmada, inşaat yıkıntı atığı, kireç ve kaolin karıştırılarak bu karışımların 1, 7 ve 28 günlük CBR değerleri ölçülmüştür. İyileştirilecek zemin örneği olarak şişme potansiyeli en yüksek olan kaolen kili kullanılmıştır. Karışımlarda kireç oranı %0 referans, %5 ve %8 seçilirken, inşaat atığı oranı %0 referans ile %23 arasında, kaolin ise %0 referans ve %72 ile %100 arasında seçilmiştir. Karışımlarda birinci, yedinci ve yirmi sekizinci gün için en düşük CBR değerleri sırasıyla 26.3, 28.65 ve 33.13 olarak %3 Yıkıntı atığı, %5 Kireç ve %92 Kaolin kullanıldığında, en yüksek CBR değeri ise 33.52, 34.70 ve 34.95 ile %23 yıkıntı atığı, %5 kireç ve %72 kaolin kullanıldığında elde edilmiştir.

Utilization of Construction Demolition Waste in Soil Improvement

In the cases when the engineering properties of the soils are insufficient, engineering properties can be increased by improving the soil. In the soil improvement studies, various methods such as lime, cement, fly-ash etc., are employed. The available engineering properties and the cost of improvement are important parameters in the soil improvement. In this study, it was aimed to utilise earthquake construction waste, which has become a serious environmental problem in the earthquake zones, causes visual pollution in the cities and ruins the living comfort, in soil improvement. For this purpose, the CBR values of these soils were determined by carrying out soil improvements with the construction waste of the buildings collapsed in the 1999 earthquake in Sakarya in the laboratory environment. In the study, the CBR values of 1, 7, and 28 days of these mixtures were measured by mixing the construction waste, lime and kaolin. As the sample of the soil to be improved, kaolin clay which has the highest potential to swell was used. While the lime ratio in the mixtures was selected as 0% reference, 5% and 8%, the construction waste ratio was selected between 0% reference and 23%, and kaolin was selected as 0% reference and between 72% and 100%. When 3% Construction waste, 5% Lime and 92% Kaolin were used in the mixtures, the lowest CBR values were obtained as 26.3, 28.65 and 33.13 for the first, seventh and twenty-eighth days, respectively, and when 23% construction waste, 5% lime and 72% kaolin were used, the highest CBR values were obtained as 33.52, 34.70 and 34.95, respectively.

PDF

___

[1] A. Önalp, İnşaat Mühendislerine Geoteknik Bilgisi, Cilt 2, K.T.Ü, Trabzon,1983.
[2] B. R. P. Kumar and R. S. Sharma, “Effect of Fly Ash on Engineering Properties of Expansive Soils,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, vol. 130, no. 7, pp. 764–767, 2004
[3] A. A. Al-Rawas, A. Hago, and H. Al-Sarmi, “Effect of lime, cement and Sarooj (artificial pozzolan) on the swelling potential of an expansive soil from Oman,” Building and Environment, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 681– 687, 2005.
[4] Neeraja D, Rao Narsimha AV, “Use of certain admixtures in the construction of pavement on expansive clayey subgrade”, Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol., 2(11):6108– 6114, 2010.
[5] L. Yadu and R. Tripathi, “Effects of Granulated Blast Furnace Slag in the Engineering Behaviour of Stabilized Soft Soil,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 51, pp. 125–131, 2013
[6] M. Khemissa and A. Mahamedi, “Cement and lime mixture stabilization of an expansive overconsolidated clay,” Applied Clay Science, vol. 95, pp. 104–110, 2014.
[7] V. Ortega-López, J. M. Manso, I. I. Cuesta, and J. J. González, “The long-term accelerated expansion of various ladle-furnace basic slags and their soil-stabilization applications,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 68, pp. 455–464, 2014.
[8] T. Thyagaraj, S. M. Rao, P. S. Suresh, and U. Salini, “Laboratory Studies on Stabilization of an Expansive Soil by Lime Precipitation Technique,” Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1067–1075, 2012.
[9] U. Hasan, A. Chegenizadeh, M. A. Budihardjo, and H. Nikraz, “Experimental Evaluation of Construction Waste and Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag as Alternative Soil Stabilisers,” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1707–1722, 2016.
[10] M. H. Al-Malack, G. M. Abdullah, O. S. B. AlAmoudi, and A. A. Bukhari, “Stabilization of indigenous Saudi Arabian soils using fuel oil flyash,” Journal of King Saud University - Engineering Sciences, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 165–173, 2016.
[11] O. Amu, A. Fajobi, and S. Afekhuai, “Stabilizing Potential Of Cement-Fly Ash Mixture On Expansive Clay Soil,” Journal of Technology and Education in Nigeria, vol. 12, no. 2, 2008.
[12] M. J. Mccarthy, L. J. Csetenyi, A. Sachdeva, and R. K. Dhir, “Engineering and durability properties of fly ash treated lime-stabilised sulphate-bearing soils,” Engineering Geology, vol. 174, pp. 139–148, 2014.
[13] M. Limbachiya, M. S. Meddah, and Y. Ouchagour, “Use of recycled concrete aggregate in fly-ash concrete,” Construction and Building Materials, 2011.
[14] Y. Kasai, “The Second International RILEM Symposium on demolition and reuse of concrete and masonry,” Materials and Structures, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 312– 319, 1989.
[15] T. C. Hansen, “Recycled aggregates and recycled aggregate concrete second state-of-the-art report developments 1945–1985,” Materials and Structures, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 201–246, 1986.
[16] Khalaf F, DeVenny A, “Recycling of demolished masonry rubble as coarse aggregate in concrete: review”, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 16(4):331–340, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0899- 1561,16:4(331), 2004.
[17] C.-S. Poon and D. Chan, “The use of recycled aggregate in concrete in Hong Kong,” Resources, Conservation and Recycling, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 293–305, 2007.
[18] M. C. Rao, S. K. Bhattacharyya, and S. V. Barai, “Influence of field recycled coarse aggregate on properties of concrete,” Materials and Structures, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 205–220, Jun. 2010.
[19] http://www.environment.gov.au/about-us
[20] Tüdeş E., “Zeminlerin Kireç ve Çimento Katkısı ile Çözümü”, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 161s, 1996.
[21] TS 1900-1, “Methods of testing soils for civil engineering purposes in the laboratory part 1:determination of physica properties”, TSI, Ankara, [in Turkish], 2006.
[22] TS 1900-2, “Methods of testing soils for civil engineering purposes in the laboratory - Part 2: Determination of mechanical properties”, TSI, Ankara, [in Turkish], 2006.
[23] TS 1500, “Classification of Soil For Civil Engineering Purposes”, TSI, Ankara, pp. 25-57, [in Turkish], 2000.
[24] ASTM D4318, “Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils”, 2008.