Features of Relations between the State and Religion: Principles and Development Trends

In this article analyzes aspects of religion and state relations in Iran and Turkey. In order to open relations between the state and religion, analyzed the features of the manifestation of religious elements in the power system of these countries, including the country's Constitution and legislation regulating the sphere of religion, the activities of religious parties and religious communities. In addition, special attention was paid to the geographical location of the two countries, ethnic and religious composition, and cultural history. Among Islamic countries, Iran and Turkey have a number of differences in religious and state relations compared to other Muslim countries. Therefore, it is important to focus on the models of these two countries when studying the world experience of relations between religion and the state in a comprehensive way. This is especially important for Kazakhstan, which is moving in a secular direction. In the structure of the state administration of Iran, the influence of the religious corps «Valiyat Faqih» is predominant. In Turkey, on the other hand, the religious administration of Dianet is subordinate to the presidential administration. In Iran, religious parties are politically active, while in Turkey, political parties are not allowed to use any religious elements. However, despite these features, both countries are recognized in the world as States that give priority to the Muslim religion. Since the article is aimed at uncovering the specifics of state-confessional relations in Iran and Turkey, structural and functional and comparative analysis methods have been used in the study.

Features of Relations between the State and Religion: Principles and Development Trends

In this article analyzes aspects of religion and state relations in Iran and Turkey. In order to open relations between the state and religion, analyzed the features of the manifestation of religious elements in the power system of these countries, including the country's Constitution and legislation regulating the sphere of religion, the activities of religious parties and religious communities. In addition, special attention was paid to the geographical location of the two countries, ethnic and religious composition, and cultural history. Among Islamic countries, Iran and Turkey have a number of differences in religious and state relations compared to other Muslim countries. Therefore, it is important to focus on the models of these two countries when studying the world experience of relations between religion and the state in a comprehensive way. This is especially important for Kazakhstan, which is moving in a secular direction. In the structure of the state administration of Iran, the influence of the religious corps «Valiyat Faqih» is predominant. In Turkey, on the other hand, the religious administration of Dianet is subordinate to the presidential administration. In Iran, religious parties are politically active, while in Turkey, political parties are not allowed to use any religious elements. However, despite these features, both countries are recognized in the world as States that give priority to the Muslim religion. Since the article is aimed at uncovering the specifics of state-confessional relations in Iran and Turkey, structural and functional and comparative analysis methods have been used in the study.

___

  • 1. Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. [Elektrondy resýrs]. URL: http://en.parliran.ir/eng/en/Constitution#preamble
  • 2. Martynenko N. Protsess polıtıcheskoı modernızatsıı Irana // Svobodnaıa mysl. – 2014. – №5 (1647). – S. 73–86. [in Russian]
  • 3. Dýnaeva E.V. Shııtskoe dýhovenstvo v polıtıcheskoı jıznı sovremennogo Irana // Kontýry globalnyh transformatsıı: polıtıka, ekonomıka, pravo. – 2018. – T. 11. – №4. – S. 169–189. [in Russian]
  • 4. Iran Population [Elektrondy resýrs]. URL: // https://countrymeters.info/en/Iran#religion
  • 5. Ravandı-Fadaı S. Osnovnye cherty etnokonfessıonalnoı sıtýatsıı v sovremennom Irane // Rossııa ı mýsýlmanskıı mır. – 2015. – №2 (272). [Elektrondy resýrs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/osnovnye-cherty-etnokonfessionalnoy-situatsii-v-sovremennom-irane (data obraenııa: 19.01.2020).
  • 6. Iran 2018 international religious freedom report. [Elektrondy resýrs]. URL: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/IRAN-2018-INTERNATIONAL-RELIGIOUS-FREEDOM-REPORT.pdf
  • 7. Political Parties Law. [Elektrondy resýrs]. URL: https://irandataportal.syr.edu/political-parties-law 29.12.2019
  • 8. Hossein Asayesh and others. Political Party in Islamic Republic of Iran: A Review // Journal of Politics and Law. – March, 2011. – Vol. 4, No. 1. – P. 221. [in English]
  • 9. Ýsmanov R.H. Realızatsııa prıntsıpov ıslamskogo gosýdarstva v sovremennoı ıslamskoı respýblıke Iran // Sotsıalno-gýmanıtarnye znanııa. – 2011. – №8. [Elektrondy resýrs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/realizatsiya-printsipov-islamskogo-gosudarstva-v-sovremennoy-islamskoy-respublike-iran (data obraenııa: 10.01.2020).
  • 10. Polıtıcheskoe prostranstvo ı sotsıalnoe vremıa: ıdentıchnost ı povsednevnost v strýktýre jıznennogo mıra: tezısy XХХ Harakskogo forýma 26–30 maıa 2016 g., g. Ialta / Pod red. T.A. Senıýshkınoı, A.V. Baranova. – Sımferopol: IT «ARIAL», 2016. – 260 s. [in Russian]
  • 11. Turkey Population. [Elektrondy resýrs]. URL: https://countrymeters.info/en/Turkey#religion
  • 12. Turkey's Constitution of 1982 with Amendments through 2017. [Elektrondy resýrs]. URL: https://www.constituteproject.org/constitution/Turkey_2017.pdf?lang=en
  • 13. Vysshıı Sovet po Relıgıoznym delam. [Elektrondy resýrs]. URL: https://www.diyanet.gov.tr/ru
  • 14. Turkey 2018 international religious freedom report. [Elektrondy resýrs]. URL: https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/TURKEY-2018-INTERNATIONAL-RELIGIOUS-FREEDOM-REPORT.pdf
  • 15. Law on political parties. [Elektrondy resýrs]. URL: https://www.legislationline.org/download/id/7853/file/Turkey_law_political_parties_1983_am2014_en.pdf
  • 16. Matıýhın V.V. Domınırovanıe partıı spravedlıvostı ı razvıtııa v týretskom polıtıcheskom protsesse: ıdeologıcheskıı aspekt // Vestnık RÝDN. Serııa: Polıtologııa. 2016. №2. [Elektrondy resýrs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/dominirovanie-partii-spravedlivosti-i-razvitiya-v-turetskom-politicheskom-protsesse-ideologicheskiy-aspekt (data obraenııa: 09.01.2020).
  • 17. Razlıvaev A. Týrtsııa: vozrojdenıe relıgıoznyh obın // Rossııa ı mýsýlmanskıı mır. – 2010. – №3. [Elektrondy resýrs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/turtsiya-vozrozhdenie-religioznyh-obschin (data obraenııa: 07.01.2020).
  • 18. Commission of the European Communities: Turkey 2019 Report. – Brussels, 2019. – P. 31–32.
  • 19. Kýdrıashova Iý. Kýltýrno-relıgıoznaıa samobytnost Týrtsıı kak faktor, stavıaıı pod somnenıe ee ıdentıchnost so stranamı ES // Rossııa ı mýsýlmanskıı mır. – 2010. – №8. [Elektrondy resýrs]. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kulturno-religioznaya-samobytnost-turtsii-kak-faktor-stavyaschiy-pod-somnenie-ee-identichnost-so-stranami-es (data obraenııa: 13.01.2020).