An in vitro evaluation of the efects of diferent acidic beverages on the surface hardness of restorative materials.

Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the effects of different acidic beverages on the surface hardness of restorative materials which are frequently used in clinical practices.Materials and Methods: In this study, cola, sour cherry juice, apple juice, energy drink and orange juice were used as acidic beverages while two composite resins (Filtek Silorane, Filtek Z-550), one flowable composite (Filtek Ultimate Flowable), one compomer (Dyract Extra) and one resin modified glass ionomer (Fuji II LC) served as restorative materials to be tested. After measuring the initial surface hardness of the samples with Barcol surface hardness tester, each sample was put into acidic beverage for five seconds after which they were placed in artificial saliva for five seconds. This cycle was repeated ten times daily for one month. The control group was stored in the artificial saliva without any exposure to this cycle. At the end of the one-month-period, surface hardness of the restorative materials were measured again.Statistical analysis used: “Repeated Measures Analysis of Variance” and “Tukey’s Multiple Range Test” were used for statistical analysis.Results: The restorative materials were affected by the acidic beverages. The liquids used in the study, except the artificial saliva, had statistically similar effects on the surface hardness values of the materials used (p

Farklı asidik içeceklerin restoratif materyallerin yüzey sertliklerine olan etkilerinin in-vitro olarak değerlendirilmesi

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı; farklı asidik içeceklerin kliniklerimizde sıkça kullanılan restoratif materyallerin yüzey sertlikleri üzerine etkilerini incelemektir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada asidik içecekler olarak kola, vişne suyu, elma suyu, enerji içeceği ve portakal suyu; restoratif materyal olarak ise iki adet kompozit rezin (Filtek Silorane, Filtek Z-550), bir adet akışkan kompozit (Filtek Ultimate Flowable), bir adet kompomer (Dyract Extra) ve bir adet rezin modifiye cam iyonomer (Fuji II LC) kullanıldı. Başlangıç yüzey sertlik değerleri Barcol yüzey sertlik ölçüm metodu ile ölçüldükten sonra her bir örnek 1 ay boyunca toplam 10 döngü olmak üzere; 5 sn asidik içecek, 5 sn yapay tükürükte bekletildi. Kontrol grubu, örnekler döngüye tabi tutulmaksızın yapay tükürük içerisinde saklandı. 1 ayın sonunda restoratif materyallerin yüzey sertlikleri tekrar ölçüldü. İstatistiksel değerlendirme "Tekrarlanan Ölçümlü Varyans Analizi" ve "Tukey çoklu karşılaştırma testi" ile yapıldı.Bulgular: Restoratif materyaller asidik içecekten etkilenmiştir. Deneyde kullanılan sıvılardan yapay tükürük dışındaki sıvılar, kullanılan materyallerin yüzey sertlik değerleri üzerinde istatistiksel olarak benzer etki göstermiştir (p

PDF

___

1. Toz Akalin T. Kusdemir M. Gozukara Bag H. Clinical evaluation of 107 anterior teeth restored with direct nanofilled resin composite: up to 32 months. Yeditepe J Dent 2016; 12: 21-28.

2. Luiz BKM, . Effect of drinks on the surface properties of dental composites. Polym Test 2007; 26: 855-861.

3. Ferracane JL. Resin composite—State of the art. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 29–38.

4. Sakaguchi RL, Mitra SB. Restorative materials-Composites and polymers. In: Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM, editors. Craig’s restorative dental materials. 13th. United States, Mosby Inc. 2012; 9: 160-198.

5. Ertas E, Guler AU, Yucel AC, Koprulu H, Guler E. Color stability of resin composites after immersion in different drinks. Dent Mater J 2006; 25: 371-376.

6. Baltacioglu IH. A comparison of nanohybrid containing composites with regard to micro leakage with different curing lights. Ankara University, Institute of Health Sciences, Ankara, Doctorate thesis, 2011; 3-30.

7. Dayangac BG. Kompozit rezinler. In: Kompozit Restorasyonlar. 2. baskı, İstanbul, Quintessence 2011a; 1: 1-25.

8. Yikilgan I, Gurel MA, Bala O, Omurlu H. A comparison of the water absorption and solubility of different aesthetic restorative materials. J Dent Gazi Univ 2010; 27: 93-98.

9. Nicholson JW. Polyacid-modified composite resins “compomers” and their use in clinical dentistry. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 615–622.

10. Hse KMY, Leung SK, Wei SHY. Resin-ionomer restorative materials for children: A review. Aust Dent J 1999; 44:1-11.

11. Moore KB, Avery DR. Dental materials. In: McDonald RE, Avery DR, Dean JA, editors. Dentistry for the child and adolescent. 8th. USA, Mosby. 2004; 16: 333-352.

12. Berzins DW, Abey S, Costache MC, Wilkie CA, Roberts HW. Resin modified glass-ionomer setting reaction competition. J Dent Res 2010; 89:82-86.

13. Deliktas D, Ulusoy N. The effects of different curing lights on the surface hardness of hybrid and nanohybrid composit resins. AU Dishek Fak Derg 2006; 31: 1-10.

14. Cogulu D, Ersin N, Topaloglu-Ak A. An evaluation of the effect of acidic beverages on the surface hardness of three different restorative materials. Dicle Dishek Derg 2008; 9: 7-12.

15. Anusavice KJ. Mechanical properties of dental materials. In: Anusavice KJ, Shen C, Rawls RH, editors. Phillips' science of dental materials. l2th. China, Elsevier Saunders. 2012; 4: 48-68.

16. Grippo JO, Simring M. Dental erosion revisited. JADA 1995; 126: 619-630.

17. Lussi A, Jaeggi T, Zero D. The role of diet in aetiology of dental erosion. Caries Res 2004; 38: 34-44.

18. Edeer D, Martin CW. Occupational dental erosion. 1st Ed., Richmond BC: WorksafeBc Evidence Based Practice Group, 2010. p. 1-30.

19. Zero DT. Etiology of dental erosion extrinsic factors. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104: 162-177.

20. Zero DT, Lussi A. Behavioral Factors. Monogr Oral Sci 2006; 20: 100-105.

21. Wongkhantee S, Patanapiradej V, Maneenut C, Tantbirojn D. Effect of acidic food and drinks on surface hardness of enamel, dentine, and tooth coloured filling materials. J Dent 2006; 34: 214–220.

22. Yu H, Wegehaupt FJ, Wiegand A, Roos M, Atin T. Erosion and abrasion of tooth-colored restorative materials and human enamel. J Dent 2009; 37: 913–922.

23. Mathias P, Lessa AG, Cavalcanti AN. Effect of erosive and abrasive challenges on the bond strength and marginal degradation of composite restorations. Rev odonto ciênc. 2009; 24: 290-294.

24. Braga RR, Pfeifer CS, Sakagucci RL. Testing of dental materials and biomechanics. In: Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM, editors. Craig’s restorative dental materials. 13th., United States, Mosby Inc. 2012; 5: 83-107.

25. Deliktas D. The effects of several liquids on the surface hardness of two composite resins polymerized with different curing lights. Ankara University, Institute of Health Sciences, Ankara, Doctorate thesis, 2006; 18, 84.

26. Sari ME, Koyuturk AE, Cankaya S. Effects of surface hardness and surface roughness of restorative materials and enamel of daily consumed food and beverages. J Dent Ataturk Univ 2010; 20: 153-161.

27. Han L, Okamoto A, Fukushima M, Okiji T. Evalution of flowable resin composite surfaces eroded by acidic and alcoholic drinks. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 455-465.

28. Young A, Tenuta LMA. Initial erosion models. Caries Res 2011; 45: 33–42.

29. Mckenzie MA, Linden RWA, Nicholson JW. The Physical properties of conventional and resin modified glass ionomer dental dements stored in saliva, proprietary acidic beverages, saline and water. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 4063-4069.

30. Francisconi LF, . Effect of erosive pH cycling on different restorative materials and on enamel restored with these materials. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 203-208.

31. Honorio HM, Rios D, Francisconi LF, Magalhaes AC, Machado MAAM, Buzalaf MAR. Effect of prolonged erosive pH cycling on different restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35: 947–953.

32. De Oliveira, Garcia PPNS, Dos Santos PA, Campos JADB. Surface roughness and hardness of a composite resin: Influence of finishing and polishing and immersion methods. J Mater Res 2010; 13: 409-415.

33. Shahdad AS, McCabe JF, Bull S, Rusby S, Wassell WR. Hardness measured with traditional vickers and martens methods. Dent Mater 2007; 23: 1079-1085.

34. Abate PF, Zahra VN, Macchi RL. Effect of photopolymerization variables on composite hardness. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 632-635.

35. Mills RW, Uhl A, Blackwell GB, Jandt KD. High power light emitting diode (LED) arrays versus halogen light polymerization of oral biomaterials: Barcol hardness, compressive strength and radiometric properties. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 2955-2963.

36. Kauppi MR, Combe EC. Polymerization of orthodontic adhesives using modern high-intensity visible curing lights. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003; 124: 316- 322.

37. Bagis YH, Ertas E. Effects of storage conditions on surface hardness of composite resin: in vitro T Klin J Dental Sci 2000; 6: 41-47.

38. Arisu HD, Bala O, Uctasli MB. Barcoll hardness of different restorative materials cured by halogen or led. J Dent Gazi Univ 2008; 25: 19-24.

39. Agbaje LO, Shaba OP, Adegbulugbe IC. Evaluation of the mechanical and physical properties of a posterior resin composite in posterior adult teeth. Niger J Clin Pract 2010; 13: 431-435.

40. D’Alpino PHP, . Methacrylate-and silorane-based composite restorations: Hardness, depth of cure and interfacial gap formation as a function of the energy dose. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 1162-1169.

41. Bechtold J, Dos-Santos PJ, Anido-Anido A, Di Hipolito V, Alonso RCB, D’Alpino PHP. Hardness, polymerization depth, and internal adaptation of Class II silorane composite restorations as a function of polymerization protocol. Eur J Dent 2012; 6: 133-140.

42. Gonulol N, Ozer S, Tunc ES. Effect of a third-generation LED LCU on microhardness of tooth-colored restorative materials. Int J Paediatr Dent 2016; 26: 376-382.

43. Wassell RW, McCabe JF, Walls AW. Subsurface deformation associated with hardness measurements of composites. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 218-223.

44. Ilie N, Rencz A, Hickel R. Investigations towards nano-hybrid resin-based composites. Clin Oral Invest 2013; 17: 185- 193.

45. Rios D, Honorio HM, Francisconi LF, Magalhaes AC, De Andrade Moreira Machado MA, Buzalaf MAR. In situ effect of an erosive challenge on different restorative materials and on enamel adjacent to these materials. J Dent 2008; 36: 152- 157.

46. Bors A, Molnar-Varlam C, Székely M. The behaviour of composites, glass ionomers and compomers in erosive conditions – in vitro study. Acta Medica Marisiensis 2014; 60: 200 203.

47. Badra VV, Faraoni JJ, Ramos RP, Palma-Dibb RG. Influence of different beverages on the microhardness and surface roughness of resin composites. Oper Dent 2005; 30: 213-219.