Perceptions of Pre-service Teachers of English towards Grammar Teaching in the Turkish Context

Öz Problem Statement: ESL/EFL grammar teaching has been a controversial issue due to the contextual differences. Therefore, there is a growing need to explore how English teachers perceive and practise grammar teaching in a variety of contexts. Research studies into this issue can provide them with context-sensitive perspectives.Purpose of Study: This study aimed to investigate the perceptions and classroom practices of Turkish pre-service teachers of English employing a quantitative research design.Methods: In this study, which employs a quantitative research design, the questionnaire adapted from a recently conducted study was distributed to 39 female and 5 male senior students at the Department of English Language Teaching at an English-medium state university in Turkey. They were all enrolled in the course Practice Teaching. The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 18.Findings and Results: The student-teachers favored benefiting from not only form-focused instruction and but also holistic, meaning-based approaches. They assumed an active role in the teaching process as informed decision-makers sensitized to cultural and individual variables in their contexts within which their perceptions were shaped. Instructional challenges were the establishment of form-meaning mappings, informed use of authentic texts, contextualization, target language use, and skills integration.Conclusions and Recommendations: Classroom experience has helped student-teachers internalize the need for a balanced approach to grammar. Practice teaching course hours should be increased to proceduralize the skills of context-sensitive adjustments.

___

Alptekin, C., & Tatar, S. (2011). Research on foreign language teaching and learning in Turkey (2005–2009). Language Teaching 44(3), 328-353.

Andrews, S. (2003). Just like instant noodles: L2 teahcers and their beliefs about grammar pedagogy. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 9(4), 351-375.

Arıkan, A. (2006). Postmethod condition and its implications for English language teacher education. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies 2(1), 1-11.

Azar, B. (2007). Grammar-based teaching: A practicioner‟s perspective. TESL-E,J 11(2).

Bailey, K. M. (1996). The best-laid plans: Teachers‟ in class decisions to depart from their lesson plans. In K. M. Bailey and D. Nunan (Eds.). Voices from the class.

Baleghizadeh, S., & Farschi, S. (2009). An exploration of teachers‟ beliefs about the role of grammar in Iranian high schools and private language institutes. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 52(212), 17-38.

Batstone, R., & Ellis, R. (2009). Principled grammar teaching. System, 37, 194-204.

Bax, S. (2003). The end of CLT: a context approach to language teaching. ELT Journal, 57(3), 278-287.

Borg, S. (1999). The use of grammatical terminology in the second language classroom: a qualitative study of teachers‟ practices and cognitions. Applied Linguistics, 20, 95- 126.

Borg, S. (2001). Self-perception and practice in teaching grammar. ELT Journal, 53, 17- 167.

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in grammar teaching: A literature review. Language Awareness, 12(2), 96-108.

Borg, S., & Burns, A. (2008). Integrating grammar in adult TESOL classrooms. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 456-482.

Burns, A. (1996). Starting all over again: From teaching adults to teaching beginners. In D. Freeman and J. C. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 154-177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Burgess, J., & Etherington, S. (2002). Focus on grammatical form: explicit or implicit? System, 30(4), 433-458.

Cook, G., & Seidlhofer, B. (1995). An applied linguist in principle and practice. In G. Cook and B. Seidlhofer (Eds.). Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 1-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Copland, F., & Neokleous, G. (2011). L1 to teach L2: Complexities and contradictions. ELT Journal, 65(3), 270-280.

Corder, S. P. (1988). Pedagogic grammars. In W. Rutherford and M. S. Smith (Eds.). Grammar and second language teaching: A book of readings (pp. 123-145). Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.

Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (1998). Pedagogical choices in focus on form. In D. C., and J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Eisenstein-Ebsworth, M., & Schweers, C. W. (1997). What researchers say and practitioners do: Perspectives on conscious grammar instruction in the ESL classroom. Applied Language Learning, 8, 237-260.

Elder, C., & Manwaring, D. (2004). The relationship between metalinguistic knowledge and learning outcomes among undergraduate students of Chinese. Language Awareness, 13(3), 145-162.

Ellis, R. (1998). Teaching and research: Options in grammar teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 32(1), 39-60.

Ellis, R. (2002). Grammar teaching – practice or conciousness-raising? In J. C. Richards and W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice (pp. 167-174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 54(2), 141-172.

Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40(1), 83-108.

Ellis, R., Basturkmen, H., & Loewen, S. (2002). Doing focus on form. System, 30(4), 419- 432.

Garrett, N. (1986). The problem with grammar: What kind can the language learner use? The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 133-148.

Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hu, G. (2011). A place for metalanguage in L2 classroom. ELT Journal, 65(2), 180-182.

Kayaoğlu, M. N. (2012). The use of mother tongue in foreign language teaching from teachers‟ practice and perspective. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 25-35.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The postmethod condition: (E)merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 27–47.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35(4), 537-560.

Lightbrown, P. M. (2000). Classroom SLA research and second languge teaching. Applied

Linguistics, 21, 431-462.

Mojica-Diaz, C. C., & Sanchez-Lopez, L. (2010). Constructivist grammatical learning: a proposal for advanced grammatical analysis for college foreign language students. Foreign Language Annals, 45(3), 470-487.

Richards, J.C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge: CUP.

Scheffler, P., & Cinciata, M. (2010). Explicit grammar rules and L2 acquisition. ELT Journal, 65(1), 13-23.

Schulz, R. A. (1996). Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: students‟ and teachers‟ views no error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Language Annals, (29), 343-364.

Schulz, R. A. (2001). Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar teaching and corrective feedback: USA-Colombia. Modern Language Journal, (85), 244-258.

Scrivener, J. (2011). Teaching English grammar: What to teach and how to teach it. Oxford: Macmillan Publishers Limited.

Spada, N., and Lightbown, P. M. (2008). Form-focused instruction: isolated or integrated? TESOL Quarterly, 42, 181-207.

Swan, M. (2005). Legislation by hypothesis: the case of task-based instruction. Applied Linguistics, 26(3), 376-340.

Ur, P. (2012, October 19). How useful is the research? The Guardian Weekly (Learning English), p. 4.

VanPatten, B., Williams, J., and Rott, S. (2004). Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten, J. Williams, S. Rott, and M. Overstreet (Eds.), Form-meaning connections in second language acquisition (pp.1-26). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Walter, C. (2012, September 21). Time to stop avoiding grammar rules. Guardian Weekly (Learning English).p.4.