Pınar DOĞAN, Bahar Nur KANBUR, Selmin KÖSE, Sonay BALTACI GÖKTAŞ

İlk ve acil yardım öğrencilerinin neonatal resusitasyona yönelik bilişsel becerilerinin geliştirilmesinde simülasyonun etkisi

Amaç: Bu araştırma ilk ve acil yardım öğrencilerinin neonatal resüsitasyon konusundaki bilişsel becerilerinin arttırılmasında simülasyonun etkisinin incelenmesi amacı ile yapıldı.Gereç ve Yöntem: Randomize kontrollü deneysel olarak planlanan araştırma İlk ve Acil Yardım bölümünün ikinci sınıfında öğrenim gören 60 öğrenci ile yapıldı. Öğrenciler deney ve kontrol grubu olarak ikiye ayrıldı. Çalışmanın öncesinde her iki gruba öğrencilerin bireysel özelliklerini belirlemeye yönelik bilgi formu, Problem Çözme becerileri ölçeği (PÇÖ) ve Neonatal Ressüsitasyona İlişkin Bilgi Sınavı yapıldı. Deney grubundaki öğrencilere “Senaryo Temelli Simülasyon Uygulaması” ile eğitim verildi, kontrol grubuna ise araştırmacı tarafından "Neonatal Ressüsitasyon" konulu teorik ders verildi. İki hafta sonra her iki gruba son testler uygulandı. Bulgular: Öğrencilerin eğitim sonrası Neonatal Resuscitation sınavından aldıkları puan ortalamaları incelendiğinde gruplar arasında fark olduğu ve simülasyon grubunda fazla olduğu, PÇÖ’den aldıkları puan ortalamaları incelendiğinde ise, yaklaşma, kişisel kontrol ve PÇÖ toplam puan ortalamalarının istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde farklılık gösterdiği saptandı.Sonuç: Simülasyon kullanımının İlk ve Acil Yardım öğrencilerinin neonatal resüsitasyon eğitiminde etkin olduğu, öğrencilerin bilgi puan ortalamasını ve problem çözme becerilerini arttırdığı belirlendi.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Student, neonatal resuscitation, simulation

Effect of simulation on the development of cognitive skills of the first aid and emergency aid students in neonatal resuscitation

Purpose: This study was conducted to search the effect of simulation on the development of cognitive skills of the first aid and emergency students in neonatal resuscitation. Materials and Methods: The study, which was planned as a randomized controlled, experimental study, was performed between with 60 students studying in the second year of First Aid and Emergency Programme. The students were divided into two groups as experimental and control groups. Prior to the study, the students were provided with an information form and the Scale of Problem Solving Inventory (PSI) and the Neonatal Resuscitation Knowledge Exam were conducted on both of the groups to determine the individual characteristics of the students. The students in the experimental group were trained with the “Scenario-Based Simulation Application” while the control group was given a theoretical lecture on “Neonatal Resuscitation” by the researcher. After two weeks, the final tests were applied to both groups. Result: The averages of the student grades from the Neonatal Resuscitation examination after the training revealed a difference between the groups and that simulation group got higher grades, and the averages of the student groups from the PSI determined that the total grade averages of trust, personal control and total score were significantly different.Conclusion: The use of simulation in the neonatal resuscitation training of the First Aid and Emergency students is effective and it increases the knowledge score averages and problem-solving skills of the student.

Keywords:

Student, neonatal resuscitation,

PDF

___

1. WHO. Health-related Millennium Development Goals. World Health Statistics. Geneva, WHO, 2014.
2. UNICEF. Levels&Trends in Child Mortality. Report 2013. New York, UNICEF, 2013.
3. Lee AC, Kozuki N, Blencowe H, Vos T, Bahalim A, Darmstadt GL et al. Intrapartum-related neonatal encephalopathy incidence and impairment at regional and global levels for 2010 with trends from 1990. Pediatr Res. 2013;74:S50-72.
4. Martinello K, Hart AR, Yap S, Mitra S, Robertson NJ. Management and investigation of neonatal encephalopathy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2017;102:S346-58.
5. Perlman JM, Wyllie J, Kattwinkel J, Wyckoff MH, Aziz K, Guinsburg R. et al. Neonatal Resuscitation: 2015 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Circulation. 2015;132:S204–41.
6. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations Sentinel event alert. http://www.jointcommission.org/SentinelEvents/Se ntinelEventAlert/sea_30.htm. (accessed August 2019).
7. World Health Organization (WHO). Guidelines on Basic Resuscitation. Geneva, WHO, 2012.
8. Weiner GM. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation 7th edition. Elk Grove Village, IL, American Academy of Pediatrics, 2016.
9. Gülpınar MA, Gürpınar E., Songur A., Vitrinel A. Mezuniyet Öncesi Tip Eğitimi Ulusal Çekirdek Eğitim Programi‐2014 ULUSAL ÇEP‐2014. Ankara, Yükseköğretim Kurulu, 2014.
10. Erdil F, Başer M, Kaya H, Özer N, Duygulu S, Orgun F. Hemşirelik Ulusal Çekirdek Eğitim Programı (HUÇEP). Ankara, Yükseköğretim Kurulu, 2014.
11. Kattwinkel J. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation. 4th edition. Elk Grove Village, IL, American Academy of Pediatrics, 2000
12. Eichenwald EC, Strand ML. Summary of the revised neonatal resuscitation guideline. NRP Instructor Update. 2015;24:1-12.
13. Tezel B, İlhan M., Günay İ, Özbaş S. Neonatal Resuscitation program provider courses in Turkey. İzmir Dr. Behçet Uz Çocuk Hastanesi Dergisi. 2015;5:101-8.
14. Campbell DM, Barozzino T, Farrugia M, Sgro M. High-fidelty simulation in neonatal resuscitation. Paediatr Child Health. 2009;14:19-23.
15. Halamek LP, Kaegi DM, Gaba DM, Sowb YA, Smith BC, Smith BE. et al. Time for a new paradigm in pediatric medical education: Teaching neonatal resuscitation in a simulated delivery room environment. Pediatrics. 2000;106:45–53.
16. Murphy AA, Halamek LP. Simulation-based training in neonatal resuscitation. Neoreviews. 2005;6:489–92.
17. Şendir M., Doğan P. Hemşirelik eğitiminde simülasyonun kullanımı: Sistematik inceleme. Florence Nightingale Hemşirelik Dergisi. 2015;23:49- 56.
18. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Lee GD, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27:10-28.
19. Kourmousi N, Xythali V, Theologitou M, Koutras V. Validity and reliability of the Problem Solving Inventory (PSI) in a nationwide sample of Greek educators. Soc Sci (Basel). 2016;5:S25.
20. Terzioğlu F, Kapucu S, Özdemir L, Boztepe H, Duygulu S, Tuna Z. et al. Simülasyon yöntemine ilişkin hemşirelik öğrencilerinin görüşleri Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi Hemşirelik Dergisi. 2012;19:16-23.
21. Lendahls L, Oscarsson MG. Midwifery students' experiences of simulation- and skills training. Nurse Educ Today. 2017;50:12-16.
22. Smith R, Gray J, Raymond J, Catling-Paull C, Homer CSE. Simulated learning activities: Improving midwifery students’ understanding of reflective practice. Clin Simul Nurs. 2012;8:451-7.
23. Sarmasoğlu Ş, Yücel Ç, Tunçbilek, Z. Hemşirelik eğitiminde simülasyon uygulamaları. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Educ-Special Topics. 2017;2:70-80.
24. Alinier G, Hunt B, Gordon R, Harwood C. Effectiveness of intermediate-fidelity simulation training technology in under graduate nursing education. J Adv Nurs. 2006;54:359-69.
25. Burns HK. O’Donnell J. Artman J. High-fidelity simulation in teaching problem solving to 1st-year nursing students a novel use of the nursing process. Clin Simul Nurs. 2010;6:87-95.
26. Andrıghettı TP, Knestrıck, JM, Marowıtz A, Martın C, Engstrom JL. Shoulder dystocia and postpartum hemorrhage simulati- ons: student confidence in managing these complications. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012;57:55-60
27. Brady S, Bogossıan F, Gıbbons K. The effectiveness of varied levels of simulation fidelity on integrated performance of technical skills in midwifery studentsa randomized intervention trial. Nurse Educ Today. 2015;35:524-9.
28. Bull A, Sweet L. Midwifery students receiving the newborn at birth: a pilot study of the impact of structured training in neonatal resuscitation. Nurse Educ Pract. 2015;15:387-392.
29. Mckenna L, Bogossıan F, Hall H, Brady S, Fox-Young S, Cooper S. Is simulation a substitute for real life clinical experience in midwifery? a qualitative examination of perceptions of educational leaders. Nurse Educ Today. 2011;31:682-6.