Objective: It is intended to research the value of umbilical artery (UA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) Doppler indices in predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Material and Methods: The study was planned at Zeynep Kamil Women and Chil- dren’s Diseases Training and Research Hospital. Pregnant women were divided into two groups: group 1 consisted of 123 fetuses with normal pregnancy outcomes and group 2 had 74 fetuses with adverse pregnancy outcomes. The value of the UA sys- tole/diastole (S/D) ratio was questioned to predict possible adverse pregnancy out- comes. Differences in Doppler measurements between the groups with p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: UA S/D ratios were established as ultrasonographical parameters in pre- dicting normal pregnancy outcomes at 28th , 32 nd , and 36th weeks of gestation, with cutoff values of 2.58, 2.56, and 2.62, respectively. Negative predictive values of these three cutoffs for adverse pregnancy outcomes were 70.21%, 72.53%, and 69.03%, respectively. Conclusion: UA S/D ratios may be helpful to the clinic as ultrasonographical mea- surements to predict the normal pregnancy outcomes at 28 th , 32 nd , and 36 th weeks of gestation. "> [PDF] Relationship between umbilical artery Doppler indices and adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus | [PDF] Relationship between umbilical artery Doppler indices and adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus Objective: It is intended to research the value of umbilical artery (UA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) Doppler indices in predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Material and Methods: The study was planned at Zeynep Kamil Women and Chil- dren’s Diseases Training and Research Hospital. Pregnant women were divided into two groups: group 1 consisted of 123 fetuses with normal pregnancy outcomes and group 2 had 74 fetuses with adverse pregnancy outcomes. The value of the UA sys- tole/diastole (S/D) ratio was questioned to predict possible adverse pregnancy out- comes. Differences in Doppler measurements between the groups with p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: UA S/D ratios were established as ultrasonographical parameters in pre- dicting normal pregnancy outcomes at 28th , 32 nd , and 36th weeks of gestation, with cutoff values of 2.58, 2.56, and 2.62, respectively. Negative predictive values of these three cutoffs for adverse pregnancy outcomes were 70.21%, 72.53%, and 69.03%, respectively. Conclusion: UA S/D ratios may be helpful to the clinic as ultrasonographical mea- surements to predict the normal pregnancy outcomes at 28 th , 32 nd , and 36 th weeks of gestation. ">

Relationship between umbilical artery Doppler indices and adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Relationship between umbilical artery Doppler indices and adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Objective: It is intended to research the value of umbilical artery (UA) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) Doppler indices in predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Material and Methods: The study was planned at Zeynep Kamil Women and Chil- dren’s Diseases Training and Research Hospital. Pregnant women were divided into two groups: group 1 consisted of 123 fetuses with normal pregnancy outcomes and group 2 had 74 fetuses with adverse pregnancy outcomes. The value of the UA sys- tole/diastole (S/D) ratio was questioned to predict possible adverse pregnancy out- comes. Differences in Doppler measurements between the groups with p

___

  • 1. HAPO Study Cooperative Research Group, Metzger BE, Lowe LP, Dyer AR, Trimble ER, Chaovarindr U, et al. Hyperglycemia and adverse preg- nancy outcomes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1991–2002.
  • 2. Bracero LA, Figueroa R, Byrne DW, Han HJ. Comparison of umbilical Doppler velocimetry, nonstress testing, and biophysical profile in preg- nancies complicated by diabetes. J Ultrasound Med 1996;15:301–8.
  • 3. Salvesen DR, Higueras MT, Mansur CA, Freeman J, Brudenell JM, Nicolaides KH. Placental and fetal Doppler velocimetry in pregnan- cies complicated by maternal diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:645–52.
  • 4. Salvesen DR, Brudenell MJ, Nicolaides KH. Fetal polycythemia and thrombocytopenia in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;166:1287–93.
  • 5. Leung WC, Lam H, Lee CP, Lao TT. Doppler study of the umbilical and fetal middle cerebral arteries in women with gestational diabetes melli- tus. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004;24:534–7.
  • 6. Kasiulevicius V, Sapoka V, Filipaviciute R. Sample size calculation in epidemiological studies. Gerontologija 2006;7:225–31.
  • 7. WHO Expert Committee on Diabetes Mellitus: Second report. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 1980;646:1–80.
  • 8. Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, Bilardo C, Hernandez-Andrade E, Johnsen SL, et al. Practice guidelines for performance of the rou- tine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:116–26.
  • 9. Bhide A, Acharya G, Baschat A, Bilardo CM, Brezinka C, Cafici D, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines (updated): Use of Doppler velocimetry in obstetrics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021;58:331–9.
  • 10. American Diabetes Association. 14. Management of diabetes in preg- nancy: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care 2019;42:S165–S72.
  • 11. Bilardo CM, Nicolaides KH, Campbell S. Doppler measurements of fetal and uteroplacental circulations: Relationship with umbilical venous blood gases measured at cordocentesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1990;162:115– 20.
  • 12. Vyas S, Nicolaides KH, Bower S, Campbell S. Middle cerebral artery flow velocity waveforms in fetal hypoxaemia. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1990;97:797–803.
  • 13. Bracero L, Schulman H, Fleischer A, Farmakides G, Rochelson B. Um- bilical artery velocimetry in diabetes and pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 1986;68:654–8.
  • 14. Bracero LA, Jovanovic L, Rochelson B, Bauman W, Farmakides G. Significance of umbilical and uterine artery velocimetry in the well-con- trolled pregnant diabetic. J Reprod Med 1989;34:273–6.
  • 15. Landon MB, Gabbe SG, Bruner JP, Ludmir J. Doppler umbilical artery velocimetry in pregnancy complicated by insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Obstet Gynecol 1989;73:961–5.
  • 16. Dicker D, Goldman JA, Yeshaya A, Peleg D. Umbilical artery velocimetry in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) pregnancies. J Perinat Med 1990;18:391–5.
  • 17. Bracero LA, Schulman H. Doppler studies of the uteroplacental circula- tion in pregnancies complicated by diabetes. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1991;1:391–4.
  • 18. Johnstone FD, Steel JM, Haddad NG, Hoskins PR, Greer IA, Chambers S. Doppler umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms in diabetic preg- nancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:135–40.
  • 19. Fadda GM, D’Antona D, Ambrosini G, Cherchi PL, Nardelli GB, Capo- bianco G, et al. Placental and fetal pulsatility indices in gestational dia- betes mellitus. J Reprod Med 2001;46:365–70.
  • 20. Vambergue A, Fajardy I. Consequences of gestational and pregesta- tional diabetes on placental function and birth weight. World J Diabetes 2011;2:196–203.
  • 21. Dantas AMA, Palmieri ABS, Vieira MR, Souza MLR, Silva JC. Dop- pler ultrasonographic assessment of fetal middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity in gestational diabetes mellitus. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2019;144:174–9.
  • 22. Maruotti GM, Rizzo G, Sirico A, Sarno L, Cirigliano L, Arduini D, et al. Are there any relationships between umbilical artery Pulsatility Index and macrosomia in fetuses of type I diabetic mothers? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2014;27:1776–81.
  • 23. Quintero-Prado R, Bugatto F, Sánchez-Martín P, Fajardo-Expósito MA, Torrejón R, Bartha JL. The influence of placental perfusion on birth- weight in women with gestational diabetes. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016;29:32–5.
  • 24. Reece EA, Homko CJ, Wiznitzer A. Doppler velocimetry and the assess- ment of fetal well-being in normal and diabetic pregnancies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1994;4:508–14.
Zeynep Kamil medical journal (Online)-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-7971
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Ali Cangül
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Iliopsoas muscle abscess after total hip arthroplasty mimicking adnexal mass: A case report

Hakan KOCAOĞLU, Bulut VARLI, Ruşen AYTAÇ, Koray Görkem SAÇINTI, Bircan YILDIRIM BAYDEMİR

Relationship between umbilical artery Doppler indices and adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Mucize ERİÇ ÖZDEMİR

Round block (Benelli mastopexy) technique in the surgical treatment of gynecomastia

Sami AÇAR, Erman ÇİFTÇİ

Parental chromosomal abnormalities in individuals with recurrent pregnancy loss

Orhan ŞAHİN, Biray ERTÜRK, Ömer Faruk KARAÇORLU

Effect of perinatal period and obstetric characteristics on neonatal mortality and morbidity in preterm SGA and AGA babies with a birth weight of 1000–2000 g

Ateş KARATEKE, Habibe AYVACI TAŞAN, Nazan USAL TARHAN, Engin DENİZ, Pakize KARTAL, Nihan UYGUR KÜLCÜ

Retrospective analysis of surgical site infections after cesarean section: Rates, microbiological profile, and clinical features

Pınar KUMRU, Sami AÇAR, Erman ÇİFTÇİ, Betül YILMAZER

Is preoperative colonoscopy in all gynecologic cancer patients necessary?

İlhan TAŞDÖVEN, Hakan BALBALOĞLU

AMH and FSFI scores improved after recovery from COVID-19 pneumonia

Murat YASSA, Pınar EKER, Niyazi TUĞ, Emre YAVUZ, Pınar BİROL, Edip EMİR, Ceyhun KILINÇ, Gaye KARAGÜN ARSLAN

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on anxiety and depression in pregnant women

Yeşim BAYOĞLU TEKİN, Recep ERİN, Deniz KULAKSIZ, Kübra BAKİ ERİN

Ultrasound-guided liver mass biopsy

Mehmet ONAY, Ali Burak BİNBOĞA