___

• Akça, M. (2020). Social sciences teachers’ views about distance education during the covid-19 pandemic process. Social Scientific Centered Issues, 2(2), 81-88.
• Annunziata, D., Hogue, A., Faw, L., & Liddle, H. A. (2006). Family functioning and school success in at risk, inner-city adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(1), 105-113.
• Ansong, D., Okumu, M., Bowen, G. L., Walker, A. M., & Eisensmith, S. R. (2017). The role of parent, classmate, and teacher support in student engagement: Evidence from Ghana. International Journal of Educational Development, 54, 51-58.
• Aslanargun, E. (2007). Okul-aile işbirliği ve öğrenci başarısı üzerine bir tarama çalışma. Manas Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(18), 119-135.
• Badge, J., Saunders, N., & Cann, A.(2012). Beyond marks: New tools to visualise student engagement via social networks. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 1-14.
• Bağrıaçık Yılmaz, A. & Banyard, P. (2020). Engagement in distance education settings: A trend analysis. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(1), 101-120.
• Bakioğlu, B. ve Çevik, M. (2020). Covid-19 pandemisi sürecinde fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin uzaktan eğitime ilişkin görüşleri. Turkish Studies, 15(4), 109-129.
• Balaman, F. ve Hanbay Tiryaki, S. (2021). Corona virüs (Covid-19) nedeniyle mecburi yürütülen uzaktan eğitim hakkında öğretmen görüşleri. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(1), 52-84.
• Barlow, A. & Brown, S. (2020). Correlations between modes of student cognitive engagement and instructional practices in undergraduate STEM courses. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(18), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00214-7
• Bolliger, D. U. & Halupa, C. (2018). Online student perceptions of engagement, transactional distance, and outcomes. Distance Education, 1(18), 299-316.
• Borup, J., Stevens, M. A., & Waters, L. H. (2015). Parent and student perceptions of parent engagement at a cyber charter high school. Online Learning, 19(5), 69-91.
• Canpolat, U. ve Yıldırım, Y. (2021). Ortaokul öğretmenlerinin COVID-19 salgın sürecinde uzaktan eğitim deneyimlerinin incelenmesi. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(1), 74-109.
• Conner, J. O. & Pope, D. C. (2013). Not just robo-students: Why full engagement matters and how schools can promote it. Journal of Youth Adolescence 42, 1426-1442.
• Corso, M. J., Bundick, M. J., Quaglia, R. J., & Haywood, D. E. (2013). Where student, teacher, and content meet: Student engagement in the secondary school classroom. American Secondary Education, 41(3), 50-61.
• Çakın, M. & Külekçi Akyavuz, E. (2020). The Covid-19 process and its reflection on education: An analysis on teachers’ opinions. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, 6(2), 165-186.
• Davey, L. (1991). The application of case study evaluations. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 2(9), 1-2.
• Delen, E., Liew, J., & Willson, V. (2014). Effects of interactivity and instructional scaffolding on learning: Self-regulation in online video-based environments. Computers & Education, 78, 312-320.
• Demir, F. ve Özdaş, F. (2020). COVID-19 sürecindeki uzaktan eğitime ilişkin öğretmen görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Milli Eğitim, 49(1), 273-292.
• Elitaş, T. (2017). Uzaktan eğitim lisans sürecinde yeni iletişim teknolojileri: Atatürk Üniversitesi uzaktan eğitim merkezi (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Ergün, E. ve Koçak Usluel, Y. (2015). Çevrimiçi öğrenme ortamlarında öğrenci bağlılık ölçeği’nin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 5(1), 20-33.
• Felfe, J., Schyns, B., & Tymon, A. (2014). The impact of university students’ commitment on in-and extra-role performance. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 6(1), 149-167.
• Forker, S. L. (2020). Online teachers and their perceptions of the teacher/student relationship and student engagement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Hofstra University, New York.
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
• Glanville, J. L. & Wildhagen, T. (2007). The measurement of school engagement: Assessing dimensionality and measurement invariance across race and ethnicity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67(6), 1019-1041.
• Gökoğlu, S. (2021). Öğrenci bağlılığı kavramı üzerine bir literatür incelemesi: Kuramlar, bileşenler, etkileyen faktörler ve göstergeler. ERPA International Congresses on Education 2021’de sunulan bildiri, Sakarya, Türkiye.
• Hewitt, J. (2005). Toward an understanding of how threads die in asynchronous computer conferences. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(4), 567-589.
• Hu, M. & Li, H. (2017). Student engagement in online learning: A review. Paper presented at the 2017 International Symposium on Educational Technology, Hong Kong, China.
• Ilgaz, H. ve Aşkar, P. (2009). Çevrimiçi uzaktan eğitim ortamında topluluk hissi ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Türk Bilgisayar ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 1(1), 27-35.
• Kahu, E. R. & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(1), 58-71.
• Krause, K. & Coates, H. (2008). Students’ engagement in first-year university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(5), 493-505.
• Kumar, S. S. & Shastry, P. M. (2019). Analysis of student engagement and course completion in massive open online courses. In A. N. Krishna, K. C. Srikantaiah, & C. Naveena (Eds.), Integrated Intelligent Computing, Communication and Security (pp. 447-458). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8797-4_46
• Kurt, G., Atay, D., & Öztürk, H. A. (2021). Student engagement in K12 online education during the pandemic: The case of Turkey. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. https://10.1080/15391523.2021.1920518
• Ladd, G. W. & Dinella, L. M. (2009). Continuity and change in early school engagement: Predictive of children’s achievement trajectories from first to eighth grade? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 190-206.
• Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159-174.
• Lazareva A. (2018). Factors affecting student engagement in online collaborative learning courses. In M. E. Auer, D. Guralnick, & I. Simonics (Eds.), Teaching and Learning in a Digital World (pp. 349-359). Springer.
• Lee, J.-S. (2012). The effects of the teacher–student relationship and academic press on student engagement and academic performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 330-340.
• Lisha, L. & Zhang, Q. (2003). The types and characteristics of online learning. Education Science, 1, 49-52.
• Ma, J., Han, X., Yang, J., & Cheng, J. (2015). Examining the necessary condition for engagement in an online learning environment based on learning analytics approach: The role of the instructor. The Internet and Higher Education, 24, 26-34.
• Maki, R. H. & Maki, W. S. (2007). Online courses. In F. T. Durso (Ed.), Handbook of applied cognition (2nd ed., pp. 527-552). New York: Wiley & Sons.
• Martin, A. J. & Collie, R. J. (2019). Teacher-student relationships and students’ engagement in high school: Does the number of negative and positive relationships with teachers matter? Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(5), 861-876.
• McNally, J. J. & Irving, P. G. (2010). The relationship between university student commitment profiles and behavior: Exploring the nature of context effects. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17(2), 201-215.
• MEB. (2020). Bakan Selçuk, koronavirüs’e karşı eğitim alanında alınan tedbirleri açıkladı, https://www.meb.gov.tr/bakan-selcuk-koronaviruse-karsi-egitim-alaninda-alinan-tedbirleri-acikladi/haber/20497/tr adresinden 05.04.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Milligan, C., Littlejohn, A., & Margaryan, A. (2013). Patterns of engagement in connectivist MOOCs. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 149-159.
• Moçoşoğlu, B., ve Kaya, A. (2020). Koronavirüs hastalığı (COVID-19) sebebiyle uygulanan uzaktan eğitime yönelik öğretmen tutumlarının incelenmesi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi, 2(1), 15-43.
• Offir, B., Barth, I., Lev, Y., & Shteinbok, A. (2003). Teacher-student interactions and learning outcomes in a distance learning environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00162-8
• Orhan, G. & Beyhan, Ö. (2020). Teachers’ perceptions and teaching experiences on distance education through synchronous video conferencing during Covid-19 pandemic. Social Sciences and Education Research Review, 7(1), 8-44.
• Ozan Leymun, Ş., Odabaşı, H. F. ve Kabakçı Yurdakul, I. (2017). Eğitim ortamlarında durum çalışmasının önemi. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(3), 369-385.
• Quin, D. (2016). Longitudinal and contextual associations between teacher-student relationships and student engagement. Review of Educational Research, 87(2), 345-387.
• Rovai, A. P. (2002). Development of an instrument to measure classroom community. The Internet and Higher Education, 5(3), 197-211.
• Skinner, E. A. & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581.
• UNESCO. (2020). Education: From disruption to recovery, https://en.unesco.org/covid19/educationresponse adresinden 02.04.2021 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Ünal, M. ve Bulunuz, N. (2020). COVID-19 salgını dönemi uzaktan eğitim çalışmaları ve sonraki süreçle ilgili fen bilimleri öğretmenlerinin görüş ve önerileri. Milli Eğitim, 49(1), 343-369.
• von Konsky, B. R., Martin, R., Bolt, S., & Broadley, T. (2014). Transforming higher education and student engagement through collaborative review to inform educational design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6), 619-633.
• Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi. Yurdakul, B. (2015). Uzaktan eğitim. Demirel, Ö. (Ed.), Eğitimde yeni yönelimler içinde (s. 271-288). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.