AVUKATLIK MASRAFLARI CISG’NİN 74. MADDESİ KAPSAMINDA TAZMİN EDİLEBİLİR Mİ?
Milletlerarası Mal Satımına İlişkin Sözleşmeler Hakkında Birleşmiş Milletler Antlaşması (CISG) satım sözleşmelerine ilişkin uluslararası ticari işlemleri düzenleyen kurallardan oluşur. CISG’nin 74. maddesi zararların tazmin edilmesi için gerçekleşmesi gereken şartları düzenler ve bu maddeye göre: “Taraflardan birinin sözleşmeyi ihlâli halinde ödenecek tazminat, mahrum kalınan kâr dâhil olmak üzere, ihlâlden dolayı diğer tarafın uğradığı zararın toplamına eşittir”. Bu maddede avukatlık masraflarının ‘zarar’ kapsamına girip girmediği açıkça düzenlenmemiştir ve bu konu özellikle Amerikan 7. Temyiz Mahkemesinin ‘Zapata’ kararında bu zararların CISG m. 74’e göre tazmin edilemeyeceğine ilişkin kararından bu yana yoğun bir şekilde tartışılmaktadır. Bu makalede söz konusu ‘Zapata’ kararı detaylı bir şekilde analiz edilecek ve CISG m. 74’ün avukatlık masraflarını içerecek şekilde yorumlanmasının gerektiği tartışılacaktır.
ARE ATTORNEY FEES RECOVERABLE UNDER ARTICLE 74 OF CISG?
United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale ofGoods (CISG) consists of a set of rules which govern internationalcommercial transactions related to contracts of sale of goods1. Article 74 of theCISG regulates requirements that need to be fulfilled for recovery of damagesand stipulates that “damages for breach of contract by one party consist of asum equal to the loss, including loss of profit, suffered by one party…”. It isnot explicitly stated in this article whether attorney fees fall under the categoryof loss and this issue has been highly debated especially since US 7th CircuitCourt of Appeals ruled in ‘Zapata case’ that attorney fees cannot becompensated under article 74 of CISG2.In this article, firstly, so-called Zapata case will be analyzed andcriticized in detail. Secondly, it will be argued that the CISG article 74 shouldbe interpreted in a way that includes attorney fees.
___
- Butler, Allison E. (2007) ‘A Practical Guide to the CISG: Negotiations
through Litigation’ Chapter 6, Aspen Publisher, Pp. 1-18, available at:
- CISG Advisory Council Opinion No. 6, ‘Calculation of Damages
under CISG Article 74’, Rapporteur: Professor John Yukio Gotanda, Villanova
University School of Law, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA, available at:
- Dixon, David B. (2007) ‘Que Lastima Zapata! Bad CISG Ruling on
Attorneys' Fees Still Haunts U.S. Courts’, University of Miami Inter-American
Law Review, Pp. 405-429, available at:
- Erdoğan, Ersin (2016) Medeni Usul Hukuku Kurallarının Yer Bakımından Uygulanması, Ankara, Yetkin Yayınları.
- Felemegas, John (2002) ‘An Interpretation of Article 74 CISG by the
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals’, Pace International Law Review, Pp.91-147,
available at:
- Felemegas, John (2001) ‘The United Nations Convention on Contracts for
the International Sale of Goods: Article 7 and Uniform Interpretation,
Pace Review of the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods
(CISG)’, Kluwer Law International, Pp. 115-265, available at:
- Fletcher, Harry M. (2002) ‘Recovering Attorneys' Fees as Damages under the U.N. Sales Convention (CISG): The Role of Case Law in the New International Commercial Practice, with Comments on Zapata Hermanos v. Hearthside Baking’, V: 22 I: 2, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, Pp. 121-160.
- Fletcher, Harry M./ Lookofsky, Joseph (2008) ‘Viva Zapata! American
Procedure and CISG Substance in a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal’, The
Vindobona Journal of International Commercial Law & Arbitration, V: 7,
University of Pittsburgh Legal Studies Research, Pp. 93-103, available at
SSRN:
- Gotanda, John Yukio (1999) ‘Awarding Costs and Attorneys' Fees in
International Commercial Arbitrations’, Michigan Journal of International
Law, V: 21 I: 1, Pp.1-50, available at:
- Honnold, John O. (1999) ‘Uniform Law for International Sales under
the 1980 United Nations Convention’, 3rd edition, Kluwer Law International,
available at:
- Huber, Peter/Mullis, Alastair (2007) The CISG A New Textbook for Students and Practitioners, Sellier European Law Publishers.
- Jochem, Helena (2015) ‘Damages under the CISG – old and new
challenges’ (LLM Research Paper) available at:
- Lookofsky, Joseph (2000) ‘The 1980 United Nations Convention on
Contracts for the International Sale of Goods’, Published in, J. Herbots (editor) /
R. Blanpain (general editor), International Encyclopedia of Laws - Contracts,
Suppl. 29, Pp. 1-192. available at:
- McMahon Anthony J. (2006) ‘Differentiating between Internal and
External Gaps in the U.N. Convention on Contracts for the International Sale
of Goods: A Proposed Method for Determining "Governed by" in the Context
of Article 7(2)’, V: 44 of Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, availableat:
- Schlechtriem, Peter/Butler, Petra (2009) UN Law on International Sales the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
- Schlechtriem, Peter (2007) ‘Legal Costs as Damages in the Application of UN Sales Law, Journal of Law and Commerce’, V: 26 Pp. 71-80.
- Schlechtriem, Peter (2002) ‘Attorneys' Fees as Part of Recoverable
Damages’ Pace International Law Review, available at:
- Schwenzer, Ingeborg/Fountoulakis, Christina (Editors) (2007) International Sales Law, Taylor & Francis e-Library.
- Schwenzer, Ingeborg/Schlechtriem, Peter (2010) Commentary on the UN Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG), 3rd edition, Oxford University Press.
- Şanlı Cemal/Esen Emre/Figanmeşe-Ataman İnci (2016) Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, 5. Bası, İstanbul, Vedat Yayıncılık.
- Zeller, Bruno (2013) ‘Attorneys’ Fees—Last Ditch Stand?’, Villanova
Law Review:761 V:58 I: 4, Pp. 761-772.
- Zeller, Bruno (2003) ‘Four-Corners- The Methodology for Interpretation
and Application of the UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale
of Goods’, available at:
- ISSN: 2149-5831
- Başlangıç: 2016
- Yayıncı: Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi