Dik Yamaçlardaki Kaya Düşme Tehlikesinin Değerlendirilmesi: Ermenek (Karaman, Turkiye)
Ermenek, topoğrafik özellikleri nedeniyle Karaman (Turkiye) ili sınırları içerisindeki en ilginç yerleşim alanıdır. Yerleşim yeri, 1250 m’den 1850 m’ye yükselen eklemli kireçtaşlarından oluşan oldukça dik, sarp kayalıkların kuzey tarafında yer almaktadır. Bunun yanı sıra, yaklaşık 90° eğime sahip olan bu şevler, kaya birimlerin litolojik ve mühendislik özellikleri ile iklim etkisi nedeniyle kaya düşmesi kaynak alanlarıdır. Şimdiye kadar, Ermenek’te kaya düşmesi nedeni ile yaklaşık 500 konut ağır hasar görmüş ve can kaybı ile sonuçlanan kaya düşmeleri meydana gelmiştir. Çalışma alanındaki kaya düşmelerine neden olan etmenler; süreksizlikler, litolojik değişiklikler, iklim ve donma-çözülme süreci olarak tanımlanabilir. Bu çalışmada; yürütülen yoğun ve detaylı süreksizlik analizleri ile asılı, ayrılmış ve düşmüş blokların yerleri ve boyutları saptanmış, ayrıca jeolojik, morfolojik ve topoğrafik özellikleri belirlenmiştir. Buna ek olarak, kaya düşmesi tehlikesi, 10 profilde iki boyutlu kaya düşmesi analizleri ile değerlendirilmiştir. Kaya düşmesi analizi sırasında, her bir profil için çeşitli boyutlarda blokların kaçma mesafesi, sıçrama yüksekliği, kinetik enerji ve hızları RocFall v4.0 paket programı kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Kaya düşmesi analizinden elde edilen sonuçlar, muhtemel kaya düşme tehlike bölgelesi alanlarını belirlemek için kullanılmış ve kaya düşmesi kaynak alanları yorumlanmıştır. Yapılan kaya düşmesi analizleri, saha çalışmaları ve laboratuar deney sonuçlarına göre, kaya düşmesi tehdidi altında olan alanlar için koruyucu ve önleyici yöntemler önerilebilir. Ancak, literatürdeki en yaygın yöntemler olan; hendekler, istinat duvarları, tel örgüler, gerdirme ağlar, kaya saplamaları vb., çalışma alanının topoğrafik, atmosferik ve litolojik özellikleri nedeniyle yetersiz kalmaktadır. Bu nedenle, bölgede yaşayan sakinlerin daha güvenli olabilmeleri amacıyla, öncelikle tehlike bölgeleri tahliye edilmeli ve sonrasında, güvenlik önlemleri alınarak, erişilebilen yerlerde asılı bloklar temizlenmelidir.
Assessment of Rockfall Hazard on Steep Slopes: Ermenek (Karaman, Turkey)
Ermenek is a extraordinary settlement area due to its topographical features in Karaman (Turkey). The city is located in the northernside of the steep cliffs, which are formed of jointed limestone that abruptly increases from 1250 m to 1850 m. Moreover,these cliffs, having a slope dip of nearly 90°, are the main rockfall source areas due to their lithological characteristics, climaticeffects and the engineering properties of rock units. Up to now, depending on the rockfall event, nearly 500 residences havebeen severely damaged, and the loss of life has occurred in Ermenek. The rockfall phenomenon is initiated by discontinuities,lithological changes, weathering and the freeze-thaw process in the study area. In this study, extensive fieldwork including thedetermination of locations and dimensions of hanging, detached and fallen blocks; a detailed discontinuity survey; and the descriptionof geological, morphological and topographical characteristics was performed. Additionally, rockfall hazard has beenevaluated by two-dimensional rockfall analysis involving 10 profiles. While these profiles were determined, the locations wherethe most of the fallen blocks are observed are selected in the field study. During the rockfall analysis, run-out distance, bounceheight, kinetic energy and the velocities of various sizes of blocks for each profile were determined through the use of RocFallv4.0 software. The results obtained from the rockfall analysis were used to map the areas of possible rockfall hazard zones, androckfall source areas were interpreted.According to the rockfall analysis, field study and laboratory testing, protective and preventive recommendations can be suggestedfor the areas threatened by rockfall. However, the most widely known remedial measures in literature, such as trenches,retaining walls (barriers), wire mesh, cable/stretching nets and rock bolting, etc., are not sufficient in the study area due to itstopographical, atmospheric and lithological features. For these reasons, hanging blocks in the reachable locations can be removed,the total evacuation of the danger zone may applied, and then taking safety measures in this area to make it safer forthe residents.
___
- Zorlu K, Tunusluoglu MC, Gorum T, Nefeslioglu HA,
Yalcin A, Turer D, Gokceoglu C., 2011.
Landform effect on rockfall and hazard
mapping in Cappadocia (Turkey). Environmental
Earth Science, 62(8), 1685–1693.
- Zorlu, K., Taga, H., 2009. Effects of geologic factors
on rockfall events: Ermenek (Karaman), Turkey.
EGU General Assembly 2008, Wien,
Austria, Abstract No. EGU2009- A-2882.
- Yurtsever, T.Ş., Ilgar, A. ve Gürçay, B., 2005. Ermenek
(Karaman)-Mut-Gülnar (İçel) Arasında Kalan
Tersiyer Havzasının Jeolojik Ve Sedimantolojik
İncelenmesi. MTA Rapor No:10776
(Unpublised).
- Yılmaz I, Yildirim M, Keskin I., 2008. A method for
mapping the spatial distribution of RockFall
computer program analyses results using
ArcGIS software. Bulletin of Engineering
Geology and Environment, 67, 547–554.
- Whalley WB., 1984. Rockfalls. In: Brunsden D, Prior
DB (eds) Slope stability. Wiley, New York,
pp 217–256.
- Varnes DJ., 1978. Slopemovement types and processes.
In: Schuster RL, Krizek RJ (ed)
Landslides, analysis and control. Transportation
and Road Research Board, National
Academy of Science, Washington, DC, pp
11–33.
- Ulusay R, Gokceoglu C, Topal T, Sonmez H, Tuncay
E, Erguler ZA, Kasmer O., 2006. Assessment
of environmentel and engineering geological
problems for the possible re-use
of an abandoned rock-hewn settlement in
Ürgüp (Cappadocia) Turkey. Environmental
Geololgy, 50, 473–494.
- Tunusluog˘lu MC, Zorlu K., 2009. Rockfall hazard assessment
in a cultural and natural heritage
(Ortahisar Castle, Cappadocia, Turkey). Environmental
Geology, 56(5), 963–972.
- Topal T, Akin M. K., Akin M., 2012. Rockfall hazard
analysis for an historical Castle in Kastamonu
(Turkey), Natural Hazards 62, 255-274.
- Topal T, Akin M, Ozden AU., 2007. Assessment of
rock fall hazard around Afyon Castle, Turkey.
Environmental Geololgy, 53, 177–189.
- Taga, H., Zorlu, K., 2007. Ermenek İlçesindeki (Karaman)
Kaya Düşmelerinin Kinetik Enerji Dağılımı
Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. 60. Türkiye
Jeoloji Kurultayı Bildiri Özleri Kitabı, s.317.
- Şafak, Ü., 1997. Karaman yöresi Üst Miyosen-Pliyosen
istifinin ostrakoda faunası ve ortamsal
yorumu. MTA Dergisi, 119, 89-102.
- Schweigl J, Ferretti C, Nossing L., 2003. Geotechnical
characterization and rockfall simulation
of slope: a practical case study from South
Tyrol (Italy). Engineering Geology, 67, 281–
296.
- Rocscience 2002. RocFall software—for risk analysis
of falling rocks on steep slopes. Rocscience
user’s guide, p 59.
- Robotham ME, Wang H, Walton G., 1995. Assessment
of risk from rockfall from active and
abandoned quarry slopes. Transactions
of the Institution of Mining and Metallurgy,
104(1–4), A25–A33.
- Pfeiffer TJ, Bowen TD., 1989. Computer simulation of
rockfalls.Bulletin of the International Association
of Engineering Geology, 1, 135– 146.
- Perret S, Dolf F, Kienholz H., 2004. Rockfalls into forest:
analysis and simulation of rockfall trajectories-consideration
with respect to mountainous
forest in switzerland. Landslides,
1,123–130.
- Özgül, N., 1976.Torosların bazı temel jeoloji özellikleri.
Türkiye Jeoloji Kururultayı Bülteni, Ankara,
19, 65-78.
- Okura Y, Kitahara H, Sammori T, Kawanami A., 2000.
The effects of rockfall volume on runout distance.
Engineering Geology, 58,109–124.
- Keskin I., 2013. Evaluation of rock falls in an urban
area: the case of Boğazici (Erzincan/Turkey).
Environmental Earth Science, 70, 1619–
1628.
- Katz O, Reichenbach P, Guzzetti F., 2011. Rock fall
hazard along the railway corridor to Jerusalem,
Israel in the Soreq and Refaim valleys.
Natural Hazards, 56, 649–665.
- Jones CL, Higgins JD, Andrew RD., 2000. Colorado
rockfall simulation program version 4.0. Colorado
Department of Transportation, Colorado
Geological Survey.
- Ilgar, A. and Nemec, W., 2005. Early Miocene lacustrine
deposits and sequence stratigraphy of
the Ermenek Basin, Central Taurides, Turkey.
Sedimentary Geology, 173, 233–275.
- Hoek E., 2007. Practical rock engineering. Course
note.
- Hoek E.,1987. Rockfall—a program in BASIC for the
analysis of rockfall from slopes. Unpublished
note, Golder Associates/ University of
Toronto, Canada.
- Gul M and Eren M., 2003. The sedimentary characteristics
of Dagpazarı patch reef (Middle
Miocene, Mut-Icel/Turkey). Carbonates and
Evaporites, 18 (1), 51-62.
- Guzzetti F, Reichenbach P, Wieczorek GF., 2003.
Rockfall hazard and risk assessment in
the Yosemite Valley, California, USA. Natural
Hazards and Earth System Science, 3,
491–503.
- Guzzetti F, Crosta G, Detti R, Agliardi F., 2002. STONE:
a computer program for the three-dimensional
simulation of rockfalls. Computer
Geoscience, 28, 1079–1093.
- Falcetta JL.,1985. Un nouveau mod’’ele de calcul de
trajectoires de blocs rocheux. Revue Francaise
de Geotechnique, 30, 1–17.
- Evans SG, Hungr O.,1993. The assessment of rockfall
hazard at the base of talus slopes. Canadian
Geotechnical Journal, 30, 620–636.
- Duncan C. Wyllie, 2014. Calibration of rock fall modeling
parameters, International Journal of
Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 67,
170-180.
- Dorren LKA, Maier B, Putters US, Seijmonsbergen
AC., 2004. Combining field and modelling
techniques to assess rockfall dynamics on
a protection forest hillslope in the European
Alps Geomorphology, 57, 151–167.
- Dorren LKA., 2003. A review of rockfall mechanics
and modeling approaches. Progress in
Physical Geography, 27(1), 69–87.
- Chen H, Chen RH, Huang T.,1994. An application of
an analytical model to a slope subject to
rockfalls Bulletin of Engineering Geology
and Environment, 31, 447–458.
- Chau KT, Wond RHC, Lee CF.,1996. Rockfall problems
in Hong Kong and some new experimental
results for coefficient of restitution.
International Journal of Rock Mechanics
and Mining Science, 35, 662–663.
- Buzzi O, Giacomini A, Spadari M., 2012. Laboratory
investigation on high values of restitution
coefficient Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
45, 35-43.
- Bourrier, F., Berger, F., Tardif, P., Dorren, L. and
Hungr, O., 2012. Rockfall rebound: comparison
of detailed field experiments and alternative
modelling approaches. Earth Surface
Process. Landforms.
- Bozzolo D, Pamini R., 1986. Modello matematico per
lostudio della caduta dei massi. Laboratorio
di FisicaTerrestre ICTS. Dipartimento Pubblica
Educazione, Lugano-Trevano.
- Binal A, Ercanog˘lu M., 2010. Assessment of rockfall
potential in the Kula (Manisa, Turkey) Geopark
Region. Environmental Earth Science,
61, 1361–1373.
- Bassato G, Cocco S, Silvano S., 1985. Programma
di simulazione per lo scoscendimento di
blocchi rocciosi. Dendronatura, 6(2), 34–36.
- Bassant, P., van Buchem, F.S.P., Strasser, A. and Görür
N., 2005. The stratigraphic architecture and
evolution of the Burdigalian carbonate–siliciclastic
sedimentary systems of the Mut basin,
Turkey. Sedimentary Geology, 173, 187-232.
- Azzoni A, de Freitas MH.,1995. Experimentally gained
parameters, decisive for rockfall analysis.
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
28(2), 111–124.
- Agliardi F, Crosta GB., 2003. High resolution three-dimensional
numerical modelling of rockfalls.
International Journal of Rock Mechanics
and Mining Science, 40, 455–471.