Selçuk ŞAHİN, Mithat EKŞİ, İsmail EVREN, Emre ŞAM, Ramazan UĞUR, Fatih AKKAŞ, Serdar KARADAĞ, Muhammed Cihan TEMEL

Sağ Pelvik Böbrekte Laparoskopik Donör Nefrektomi: Zorlu İkilem Olgusu

Transplantasyon ve diyaliz son dönem böbrek yetmezliğinin temel tedavi seçenekleridir. Kalıcı çözüm sağlayan nakil işlemi kadavradan ve canlıdan olmak üzere iki farklı şekilde yapılabilir. Kadavradan nakil arzu edilen seçenek olsa da ülkemizde yapılan böbrek nakillerinin yaklaşık yüzde 70’i canlıdan yapılmaktadır. Canlıdan yapılan donör nefrektomilerde sağladığı avantajlar nedeniyle genellikle sol böbrek tercih edilir ve minimal invaziv yöntem olan laparoskopi kılavuzlarca önerilmekte ve cerrahlarca tercih edilmektedir. Bu çalışmamızda sağ pelvik yerleşimli ve kompleks renal vasküler yapısı olan ve 99mTc-Dimerkaptosüksinik asit sintigrafide fonksiyonu % 45 olması nedeniyle tercih edilen ve laparoskopik sağ pelvik donör nefrektomi yapılan olgu sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Donör Nefrektomi, Pelvik Böbrek, Laparoskopi

Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy for a Right Pelvic Kidney: A Case Report of Challenging Dilemma

Transplantation and dialysis are the main treatment options for end-stage renal failure. Transplant, which provides a permanent solution, can be done in two different ways: cadaver and living. Although transplantation from cadaver is the desired option, approximately 70 percent of kidney transplants in our country are made from live donors. In living donor nephrectomies, the left kidney is generally preferred due to its advantages, and laparoscopy, a minimally invasive method, is recommended by guides and is preferred by surgeons. In this study, we present a case with right pelvic location and complex renal vascular structure and preferred for laparoscopic right pelvic donor nephrectomy due to its function on 99mTc-Dimercaptosuccinic acid scintigraphy.

Keywords:

Donor Nephrectomy, Laparoscopi, Pelvic Kidney,

PDF

___

1) C. L. Davis, F. L. Delmonico, “Living-donor kidney transplantation: A review of the current practices for the live donor,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 16, no. 7, pp.2098–2110, 2005.
2) Nicol DL, Preston JM, Wall DR, et al: Kidneys from patients with small renal tumours: a novel source of kidneys for transplantation. BJU Int 120:188, 2008
3. He B, Mitchell A, Lim W, et al: Western Australia program using kidney from urologist referrals for renal transplant. XXIII International Congress of the Transplantation Society (AbstractNo 048.02). August 15–19, 2010. Vancouver, Canada
4) Kim CH, Fjeldgorg O: Transplantation of pelvic kidney. Scan J Urol Nephrol 7:236, 1973
5) Spanos PK, Weil R 3rd, Simmons RL, et al: Successful transplantation of ectopic kidneys from living related donors. Am J Surg 131:360, 1976
6) Bacharach MD, Tilney NL: Use of an ectopic pelvic donor kidney for transplantation. Transplant Proc 16:1663, 1984
7) Grogan EL, Nylander WA, Shaffer D: Living-related transplantation of an ectopic pelvic kidney. Transplantation 77:953, 2004
8)Papanikolaou V, Giakoustidis D, Antoniadis N, et al: Livingrelated transplantation of an ectopic pelvic kidney. Int J Urol 14:357, 2007
9) He and A. Mitchell, “Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for ectopic kidney,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 3051–3054, 2012.
10) Briganti EM, Russ GR, McNeil JJ, Atkins RC, Chadban SJ. Risk of renal allograft loss from recurrent glomerulonephritis. N Engl J Med 2002;347:103-109. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa013036
11) Dretler SP, Olsson C, Pfister RC. The anatomic, radiologic and clinical characteristics of the pelvic kidney: an analysis of 86 cases. J. Urol 1971;105:623–7.
12) Bauer SB. Anomalies of the kidney and ureteropelvic junction. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughn ED, Wein AJ (eds). Cambell’s Urology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1998; 1708–55.
13) J. E. Johnson, E. J. Loveday, L. J. Archer, P. Lear, and M. J. Thornton, “Preoperative evaluation of live renal donors using multislice CT angiography,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 771–777, 2005.
14) T. A. Siemens et al., “Pelvic kidney for living transplantation: case report and review of the literature,” Jornal Brasileiro de Nefrologia, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 418–421, 2015.
15) J. C. Boughey, O. E. Emovon, F. Afzal et al., “Living donor transplantation of a pelvic kidney,” Clinical Transplantation, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 336–338, 2004.
16) J. Li, S. Nadalin, A. Paul et al., “The symptomatic pelvic kidney: A new source of organs for living donor kidney transplantation?” Transplantation, vol. 82, no. 9, pp. 1241-1242, 2006.
17) P. P. W. Luke, V. C. McAlister, A. M. Jevnikar et al., “Use of a pelvic kidney for living transplantation: Case report and review of the literature,”AmericanJournal of Transplantation, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 235–238, 2003.
18) Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Merety KS, Darcy MD, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy. N Engl J Med 1991;324:1370-1.
19) Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the four year Johns Hopkins University experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1999;14:2090-3.
20) Odland MD, Ney AL, Jacobs DM, Larkin JA, Steffens EK, Kraatz JJ, et al. Initial experience with laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Surgery 1999;126:603-7.
21) Tuğcu V, Şahin S, Yiğitbaşı İ, Şener NC, Akbay FG, Taşçı Aİ. “Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy, complications and management: Single center experience.” Turk J Urol. 2017 Mar;43(1):93-97.