___

• Adas, M. (2011). Imperialist rhetoric and modern historiography: The case of lower Burma before and after conquest. Journal of Souteast Asian Studies, 3(2), 175-192.
• Apaydın, S. & Müftüler -Baş, M. (2021). The Syrian refugee crisis through the lenses of Turkish political discourse: An analysis of delibrations in the Turkish Parliement. International Migration, 1(20), 1-20.
• Arawolo, A.A. (2002). Return migration and the problem of re-integration. International Migration, 38(5), 59-82.
• Beasley, V.B. (2001). The rhetoric of ideological consensus in the United States: American princibles and American pose in presidential inaugurals. Communication Monographs, 68(2), 169-183.
• Beasley, V.B. (2006). Who belongs in America? Presidents, rhetoric and immigration. USA: Texas A&M University Press.
• Bilgili, C. & Goroskho, O.L. (2022). Comperative study on transmedia awareness of traditional media audiences and social media users in Turkey and Ukraine. Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism, 26(4), 697-704.
• Calderon, C.A., Vega, G. & Blanco, D.H. (2020). Topic modeling and characterization of hate speech against immigrants on Twitter around the emergence of a far-right party in Spain. Social Sciences, 9(11), 188.
• Cap, P. (2017). From cultural belonging to terrorist risk: Communicating threat in Polish anti-immigration discourse. Critical Discourse Studies, 15(3), 285-302.
• Chen, Z., Su, C.C. & Chen, A. (2019). Top down or bottom up ? A network agenda-setting study of Chinese nationalism on social media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(3), 513-533.
• Coombs, T.W. & Holladay, S. J. (2012). The para-crisis: The challenge created by publicly managing crisis prevention. Public Relations Review, 38(3), 408-415.
• Demirtaş, B. (2021). Türkiye’de artan mülteci karşıtlığı: Sorular, sorunlar ve umutlar. FikirTuru (18 Ağustos, 2021), 23 Haziran 2022 tarihinde https://fikirturu.com/toplum/turkiyede-artan-multeci-karsitligi-sorular-sorunlar-ve-umutlar/ adresinden edinilmiştir.
• Erdoğan, M. M. (2020d). Suriyeliler Barometresi 2019. Suriyelilerle Uyum İçinde Yaşamın Çerçevesi. Retrieved from https://www.unhcr.org/tr/wp-content/uploads/sites/14/2020/09/SB2019-TR-04092020.pdf
• Ekman, M. (2019). Anti-immigrant sentiments and mobilization on the Internet. Kevin Smets, Koren Leurs, Myria Georgiuo, Sasskia Witteborn, Radhika Gajalla (eds) in Handbook of Media and Migration, (s- 551-562). Sage Publishing.
• Faustini, P. (2017). Migration, hate speech and media ethics, Unicef Connect Evidence for Action, 18 Haziran 2022 tarihinde https://blogs.unicef.org/evidence-for-action/migration-hate-speech-and-media-ethics/ adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Farkas, J., Schou, J. & Neumayer, C. (2018). Platformed antagonism: Racist discourse on fake Muslim Facebook pages. Critical Discourse Studies, 15(5), 463-480.
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archeology of knowledge and the discourse on language. Londra: Routledge.
• Gombas, J. (2017). Determinants of anti-immigrant sentiments. Senior Scholars Day 21. Susquehanna Üniversitesi, 18 Haziran 2022 tarihinde scholarlycommons.susqu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1043& adresinden erişilmiştir.
• Guo, L. (2012). The application of social network analysis in agenda setting research: a methodological exploration. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 616-631. Guo, L., & McCombs, M. (Eds). (2015). The power of information networks: New directions for agenda setting. New York, NY: Routledge. Habermas, J. (1997). Kamusalın yapısal dönüşümü. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
• İçduygu, A. (2017). Türkiye’deki Suriyeli sığınmacılar: Siyasallaşan bir sürecin analizi. Toplum ve Bilim, 2017(140), 27-42.
• Analysis of interaction between leave and remain and conservative labour supporters. (22 Mayıs, 2017). Ipsos Mori. 21 Haziran 2022 tarihinde https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/analysis-interaction-between-leaveremain-and-conservativelabour-supporters adresinden alınmıştır.
• Joke, J. (2013). Readers debate a local murder trial: Race in the online public sphere. Communication, Culture & Critique, 6(1), 179-200.
• Protes, D. & McCombs, M.E. (1991) Watergate: An exploration of the agenda building process. David Protes & Maxwell E. McCombs (ed.) içinde Agenda setting, readings on media, public opinion and policy making (s.447-468). London: Routledge
• Matamoroz- Fernandez, A. (2016). Platformed racism: The mediation and circulation of an Australian race based controversy on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube. International Communication and Society, 20(6), 930-946.
• McCombs, M.E. & Shaw, D.L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(36), 176-187.
• McCombs M. & Ghanem, S. (2001). The convergence of agenda setting and framing. Londra: Routledge.
• McCombs, M. (2004). Setting the agenda: mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Öztürk, İ. D. & Zeybek, B. (2020). Siyasal iletişim kampanya aracı olarak video içerik paylaşım ağı YouTube: 23 Haziran 2019 İstanbul Yerel Seçimi üzerine bir değerlendirme. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2020(35), 92-114.
• Savaş ya da zulüm durumunda sığınmacılara kapılar açılmalı. (20 Haziran 2022). Ipsos Türkiye, 22 Haziran 2022 tarihinde https://www.ipsos.com/tr-tr/savas-ya-da-zulum-durumunda-siginmacilara-kapilar-acilmali adresinden edinilmiştir.
• Sundin, O. (2015). Information litearcy in the Sweedish curriculum for compulsory schools, Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 10(4), 193-209.
• Uygun, G.A. (2021). Uluslararası göçün seçim bildirgelerindeki yeri: 24 Haziran 2018 seçimine ilişkin bir değerlendirme. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2021 (23), 207-230.
• Weaver, D. H. (2007). “Thoughts on Agenda Setting, Framing, and Priming”. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 142-147.
• Weber, A. (2009). Manual on Hate Speech. France: Council of Europe Publishing.
• Vadaketh, S.T. & Low, D. (2014). Hard choices: Challenging the Singapor’s Consensus. NUS Press.
• Van Dijk, T. (2018). Söylem ve Göç. Richard, Zabatta-Barrero ve Evren, Yalaz (ed.) içinde Avrupa göç çalışmalarında nitel araştırmalar. (s-266-287). İstanbul: Gar Kitaplık.
• Van Dijk, T. (2009). Society and discourse. How social context influence text and talk. Londra: Cambridge University Press.
• Yolcu, T. (2018). Türkiye’deki muhalefet partilerinin göç sorununa yaklaşımlarına yönelik içerik analizi. Gazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(14), 678-694.