OTOMOTİV SEKTÖRÜNDE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ YÖNETİMİ: KURUMSAL SÜRÜDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK RAPORLARI ÇERÇEVESİNDE BİR İÇERİK ANALİZİ

Bu çalışma otomotiv sektöründe sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri yönetimi uygulamalarını içerik analizi yöntemiyle incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu kapsamda otomotiv işletmelerinin yayınladıkları kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik raporlarının tedarik zinciri yönetimi bölümleri içerik analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Çalışmada Otomotiv Sanayi Derneği’ne üye otomotiv işletmelerinden 2020 yılı kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik raporunu yayınlayan 7 işletmenin raporları çalışmanın örneklemini oluşturmaktadır. Raporlarda yer alan tedarik zinciri yönetimine ilişkin veriler Maxqda Analytics Pro 2022 programında analiz edilmiştir. Sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri uygulamaları sürdürülebilir süreç tasarımı, tedarik yönlü ve talep yönlü sürdürülebilirlik tasarımı ve sürdürülebilir ürün tasarımı olarak 4 ana kod ve metinlerden elde edilen 27 alt kod ile kodlanmıştır. Veriler program aracılığı ile görselleştirilmiş ve raporlara ait kelime haritası çalışmaya eklenmiştir. Araştırmanın sürdürülebilirlik literatürüne ve uygulayıcı sektör temsilcilerine katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

___

  • Adam, M., Ibrahim, M., Ikramuddin, I., & Syahputra, H. (2020). The role of digital marketing platforms on supply chain management for customer satisfaction and loyalty in small and medium enterprises (SMEs) at Indonesia. International Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(3), 1210-1220.
  • Al-Mudimigh, A. S., Zairi, M., & Ahmed, A. M. M. (2004). Extending the concept of supply chain:: The effective management of value chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 87(3), 309-320.
  • Bekçi, İ., Doğru, E. (2011). Değer Yaratan Faaliyetler Açısından İşletme Başarısı: Çimento Sanayii İşletmelerinde Bir Araştırma. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 13, 169-192.
  • Bhanot, N., Rao, P. V., & Deshmukh, S. G. (2017). An integrated approach for analysing the enablers and barriers of sustainable manufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 4412-4439.
  • Blome, C., Hollos, D., & Paulraj, A. (2014). Green procurement and green supplier development: antecedents and effects on supplier performance. International Journal of Production Research, 52(1), 32-49.
  • Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2011). A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Computers in Industry, 62(2), 164-174.
  • Büyüközkan, G., & Çifçi, G. (2012). A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 3000-3011.
  • Chi, C. G., & Gursoy, D. (2009). Employee satisfaction, customer satisfaction, and financial performance: An empirical examination. International journal of hospitality management, 28(2), 245-253.
  • Curkovic, S., & Sroufe, R. (2011). Using ISO 14001 to promote a sustainable supply chain strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(2), 71-93.
  • D’heur, M. (2015). Sustainable Value Chain Management. Delivering sustainability. Springer Cham.
  • Das, D. (2017). Development and validation of a scale for measuring Sustainable Supply Chain Management practices and performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 164, 1344-1362.
  • Dienes, D., Sassen, R., & Fischer, J. (2016). What are the drivers of sustainability reporting? A systematic review. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 7(2), 154-189.
  • Elkington, J. (1998), Cannibals With Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, New Society Publishers, Vancouver.
  • Eraslan, İ. H., Kuyucu, A. D. H., Bakan, İ. (2008). “Değer Zinciri (Value Chain) Yöntemi İle Türk Tekstil Ve Hazırgiyim Sektörünün Değerlendirilmesi”, Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 307-332.
  • Erol, I., Cakar, N., Erel, D., & Sari, R. (2009). Sustainability in the Turkish retailing industry. Sustainable Development, 17(1), 49-67.
  • Esfahbodi, A., Zhang, Y., & Watson, G. (2016). Sustainable supply chain management in emerging economies: Trade-offs between environmental and cost performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 350-366.
  • Fallahpour, A., Olugu, E. U., Musa, S. N., Wong, K. Y., & Noori, S. (2017). A decision support model for sustainable supplier selection in sustainable supply chain management. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105, 391-410.
  • Fearne, A., Martinez, M. G., & Dent, B. (2012). Dimensions of sustainable value chains: implications for value chain analysis. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17(6), 575-581.
  • Fisher, O., Watson, N., Porcu, L., Bacon, D., Rigley, M., & Gomes, R. L. (2018). Cloud manufacturing as a sustainable process manufacturing route. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 47, 53-68.
  • Frohlich, M. T., & Westbrook, R. (2001). Arcs of integration: an international study of supply chain strategies. Journal of operations management, 19(2), 185-200.
  • Gagnon, B., Leduc, R., & Savard, L. (2012). From a conventional to a sustainable engineering design process: different shades of sustainability. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(1), 49-74.
  • Gedik, Y. (2021). Sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri yönetimi ve sürdürülebilirliğin tedarik zincirleri üzerindeki etkileri: kavramsal bir değerlendirme. International Journal of Management Economics & Business/Uluslararasi Yönetim Iktisat ve Isletme Dergisi, 17(3).
  • Global Reporting Iniatative, 2022. https://www.globalreporting.org/about-gri/mission-history/ Erişim tarihi: 24.07.2022.
  • Gómez-Luciano, C. A., Domínguez, F. R. R., González-Andrés, F., & De Meneses, B. U. L. (2018). Sustainable supply chain management: Contributions of supplies markets. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 311-320.
  • GRI Standarts, GRI 101: Foundation,2016. https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/media/1036/gri-101-foundation-2016.pdf, Erişim tarihi: 25.07.2022
  • GRI Universal Standarts 2021, Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs). https://www.globalreporting.org/media/zauil2g3/public-faqs-universal-standards.pdf . Erişim tarihi: 25.07.2022
  • Hong, Z., & Guo, X. (2019). Green product supply chain contracts considering environmental responsibilities. Omega, 83, 155-166.
  • Hutchins, M. J., Robinson, S. L., & Dornfeld, D. (2013). Understanding life cycle social impacts in manufacturing: A processed-based approach. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 32(4), 536-542.
  • İre, U. Ç. A. L., Ervural, B. Ç., & Bozat, S. (2017). Sürdürülebilir tedarik zinciri yönetiminde DEMATEL yöntemiyle tedarikçi değerlendirme kriterlerinin incelenmesi ve sağlık sektöründe bir uygulama. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(4), 477-485.,
  • Kumar, R. and Kumar, V. (2012), “Lean manufacturing: elements and its benefits for manufacturing industry”, Group, Vol. 16, p. 27.
  • Lambert, D. M., García‐Dastugue, S. J., & Croxton, K. L. (2005). An evaluation of process‐oriented supply chain management frameworks. Journal of Business Logistics, 26(1), 25-51.
  • Lambert, D.M. (2014). Supply Chain Management: Processes, Partnerships, Performance, Chapter 1, 4th edition. Supply Chain Management Institution.
  • Lee, A. H., Kang, H. Y., Hsu, C. F., & Hung, H. C. (2009). A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert systems with applications, 36(4), 7917-7927.
  • Li, E. L., Zhou, L., & Wu, A. (2017). The supply-side of environmental sustainability and export performance: The role of knowledge integration and international buyer involvement. International Business Review, 26(4), 724-735.
  • Liu, Y., Zhu, Q., & Seuring, S. (2017). Linking capabilities to green operations strategies: The moderating role of corporate environmental proactivity. International Journal of Production Economics, 187, 182-195.
  • Lueg, K., Krastev, B., & Lueg, R. (2019). Bidirectional effects between organizational sustainability disclosure and risk. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 268-277.
  • Masoumi, S. M., Kazemi, N., & Abdul-Rashid, S. H. (2019). Sustainable supply chain management in the automotive industry: A process-oriented review. Sustainability, 11(14), 1-30.
  • McGuffog, T., & Wadsley, N. (1999). The general principles of value chain management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 4(5), 218-225.
  • Mukherjee, A., & Nuñez, R. (2019). Doing well by doing good: can voluntary CSR reporting enhance financial performance?. Journal of Indian Business Research, 11(2), 100-119.
  • Pakdeechoho, N., & Sukhotu, V. (2018). Sustainable supply chain collaboration: incentives in emerging economies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(2), 273-294.
  • Paulraj, A., Chen, I. & Blome, C. (2017). Motives and performance outcomes of sustainable supply chain management practices: A multi-theoretical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 145, 239-258.
  • Peng, Q., Hosseinpour, A., Gu, P., & Fan, Z. (2013, August). Tools for Sustainable Product Design: Review and Expectation. In International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 55911, p. V004T05A044). American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
  • Porter, M. E. “Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance”, New York: The Free Press, 1985.
  • Rainbird, M. (2004). A framework for operations management: the value chain. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 34(3/4), 337-345.
  • Reefke, H., & Sundaram, D. (2017). Key themes and research opportunities in sustainable supply chain management–identification and evaluation. Omega, 66, 195-211.
  • Roehrich, J. K., Grosvold, J., & Hoejmose, S. U. (2014). Reputational risks and sustainable supply chain management: Decision making under bounded rationality. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 34(5), 695-719.