İzzet PARMAKSIZ

5312

Romantik İlişkilerde Modern Engel: Partner Sosyotelizmi (Phubbing) Üzerine Bir Derleme

Bu çalışmanın amacı sosyotelizm davranışının çift ilişkilerindeki yansımasını alan yazın derlemesiyle ortaya koymaktır. Sosyotelizmin çift ilişkilerine yansıması ise “partner sosyotelizm” olarak isimlendirilmektedir. Partner sosyotelizm kavramı romantik ilişkilerde çiftlerin birlikteyken karşılıklı ilgi göstermeleri gerektiğinde bunun yerine cep telefonlarıyla ilgilenmeleri ve muhatabını görmezden gelmeleridir. Bu davranışsal problem romantik ilişkilerde gittikçe büyük bir sorun haline dönüşerek çift anlaşmazlıklarının önemli bir nedeni olarak belirmektedir. Bu davranışı sergileyen birey partneriyle birlikteyken sık sık cep telefonunu kontrol eder. Telefonları her zaman görebilecekleri bir yerdedir ya da telefonunu ellerinde tutarlar. Ayrıca çiftler arasında kıskançlık kaynaklı problemlere de neden olur. Bu konuda problem yaşayan çiftlerin ilişkilerinden sağladıkları doyum da zamanla azalabilmektedir. Ayrıca yaşanan gerginlikler bireylerin iyilik halini de negatif etkilemektedir. Ortaya çıkardığı olumsuz sonuçlar partner sosyotelizmin ciddi bir problem olarak ele alınması ve her bir bireyin kişisel sorumluluk alması gerektiğini göstermektedir. Telefon ve internet kullanımını hayatımızdan çıkaramasak da bu teknolojileri nasıl doğru kullanacağımızın bilincinde olmak gerekiyor. Ayrıca olumsuz etkilerinden dolayı telefon kullanım alışkanlıkları ve ortaya çıkardığı sosyal sorunlarla ilgili farkındalık oluşturulmalıdır. Aile dinamiklerini de etkileyen bu problemin çiftler tarafından görmezden gelinmemesi gereken bir problem olarak da algılanması gerekmektedir. Oluşan bu farkındalık çift ilişkilerinde yaşanabilecek olumsuzlukların önüne geçebileceği gibi bu yanlış kullanımın ortaya çıkarabileceği diğer riskleri de azaltabilecektir. Böylelikle hayatımızın bir parçası haline gelen ve kullanmanın zorunlu hale geldiği telefonlarımız sorun oluşturmayan bir boyuta taşınabilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Phubbing (sosyotelizm), partner phubbing, partner, ilişki, iletişim

The Modern Barrier in Romantic Relationships: A Review on Partner Phubbing

The aim of this study is to reveal the reflection of phubbing behavior in couple relations with a literature review. The reflection of phubbing on couple relationships is called "partner phubbing". The concept of partner phubbing is defined as romantic couples ignoring each other by dealing with their cell phones instead of showing interest in each other while together. For this reason, this behavioral problem is becoming an increasingly big problem in romantic relationships and emerges as an important cause of couple disagreements. Individuals who exhibit this behavior frequently check their cell phones while they are with their partners. Their phones are always in a place where they can see them, or they hold the phone in their hand. It also causes jealousy problems between couples. In this respect, sometimes there may be a risk for the continuation of the relationship. Relationship satisfaction of couples who have problems in this regard also decreases over time. In addition, the tension experienced negatively affects the well-being of individuals. The negative results it reveals show that partner phubbing should be considered as a serious problem and that each individual should take personal responsibility. Despite all we cannot eliminate the use of telephone and internet from our lives, it is necessary to be conscious of how to use these technologies correctly. In addition, awareness should be created about phone usage habits and the social problems they cause due to their negative effects. This problem, which also affects family dynamics, should be perceived by couples as a problem that should not be ignored. This awareness will not only prevent the negativities that may be experienced in couple relations, but also reduce other risks that may arise from this misuse. Our phones, which have become a part of our lives and become necessary to use, can be moved to a dimension that does not cause problems.
Keywords:

Phubbing, partner phubbing, partner, relationship, communication,

PDF

___

  • Afifi, W.A., & Metts, S. (1998) Characteristics and consequences of expectation violations in close relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15, 365-392.
  • Ahlstrom, M., Lundberg, N.R., Zabriskie, R., Eggett, D., & Lindsay, G.B. (2012). Me, my spouse, and my avatar: The relationship between marital satisfaction and playing massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPGs). Journal of Leisure Research, 44(1), 1-22.
  • Aljasir, S. (2022). Present but absent in the digital age: testing a conceptual model of phubbing and relationship satisfaction among married couples. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, vol. 2022, Article ID 1402751.
  • Al-Saggaf, Y., & MacCulloch, R. (2019). Phubbing and social relationships: Results from an Australian sample. Journal of Relationships Research, 10, e10.
  • Al-Saggaf, Y., & O'Donnell, S.B. (2019). Phubbing: Perceptions, reasons behind, predictors, and impacts. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 132-140.
  • Bagwell, C.L., Newcomb, A.F. & Bukowski, W.M. (1998). Preadolescent Friendship and Peer Rejection As Predictors of Adult Adjustment. Child Development, 69(1), 140-153.
  • Baia, Q., Bai, S., Dan, Q., Lei, L., & Wang, P. (2020). Mother phubbing and adolescent academic burnout: The mediating role of mental health and the moderating role of agreeableness and neuroticism. Personality and Individual Differences, 155, 1-7.
  • Baron, R.S. (1986). Distraction-conflict theory: Progress and problems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 1-40.
  • Beukeboom, C.J., & Pollmann, M. (2021). Partner phubbing: Why using your phone during interactions with your partner can be detrimental for your relationship. Computers in Human Behavior, 124, 106932.
  • Blackhart, G.C., Nelson, B.C., Knowles, M.L., & Baumeister, R.F. (2009). Rejection elicits emotional reactions but neither causes immediate distress nor lowers self-esteem: A meta-analytic review of 192 studies on social exclusion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(4), 269-309.
  • Broadbent, S. (2016). Intimacy at Work: How digital media bring private life to the workplace. New York: Routledge.
  • Bröning, S., & Wartberg, L. (2022). Attached to your smartphone? A dyadic perspective on perceived partner phubbing and attachment in long-term couple relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 126, 106996.
  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S.C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4), Cambridge University Press.
  • Burgoon, J.K., & Hale, J.L. (1988). Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communications Monographs, 55(1), 58-79.
  • Burgoon, J.K., & Jones, S.B. (1976). Toward a theory of personal space expectations and their violations. Human Communication Research, 2(2), 131-146.
  • Burgoon, J.K. (1978). A communication model of personal space violation: Explication and an initial test. Human Communication Research, 4(2), 129-142.
  • Burgoon, J.K., Stern, L.A., ve Dillman, L. (1995). Kişilerarası uyum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Burgoon, J.K., Hale, J.L. (1988). Sözsüz Beklenti İhlalleri: Model Hazırlama ve Acil Davranışlara Uygulama. İletişim Monografileri , 55, 58-79.
  • Chasombat, P. (2015). Facebook effects on interpersonal communication: Study on Thai young adults. Journal of Public and Private Management, 22, 45-70.
  • Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K.M. (2016). How “phubbing” becomes the norm: The antecedents and consequences of snubbing via smartphone. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 9-18.
  • Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K. M. (2018a). The effects of phubbing on social interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 48(6), 304–316.
  • Chotpitayasunondh, V., & Douglas, K.M. (2018b). Measuring phone snubbing behavior: Development and validation of the Generic Scale of Phubbing (GSP) and the Generic Scale of Being Phubbed (GSBP). Computers in Human Behavior, 88, 5-17.
  • Çizmeci, E. (2017). Both sides of the coin: Smartphones in romantic relationships of youth. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 16(63), 1400–1415.
  • Collins, N.L., & Feeney, B.C. (2000). A safe haven: An attachment theory perspective on support seeking and caregiving in intimate relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(6), 1053-1073.
  • Coyne, S.M., Stockdale, L., Busby, D., Iverson, B., & Grant, D.M. (2011). “I luv u:)!”: A descriptive study of the media use of individuals in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 60(2), 150-162.
  • Davey, S., Davey, A., Raghav, S.K., Singh, J.V., Singh, N., Blachnio, A., & Przepiórkaa, A. (2018). Predictors and consequences of phubbing among adolescents and youth in India: An impact evaluation study. Journal of Family and Community Medicine, 25, 35-42.
  • David, M.E., & Roberts, J.A. (2021). Investigating the impact of partner phubbing on romantic jealousy and relationship satisfaction: The moderating role of attachment anxiety. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(12), 3590-3609.
  • David, M.E., Roberts, J.A., & Christenson, B. (2018). Too much of a good thing: Investigating the association between actual smartphone use and individual wellbeing. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 34(3), 265-275.
  • David, M., & Roberts, J. (2017). Phubbed and alone: Phone snubbing, social exclusion, and attachment to social media. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 155-163.
  • Elhai, J.D., Rozgonjuk, D., Yildirim, C., Alghraibeh, A.M., & Alafnan, A.A. (2019). Worry and anger are associated with latent classes of problematic smartphone use severity among college students. Journal of Affective Disorders, 246, 209-216.
  • Elphinston, R.A., Feeney, J.A., & Noller, P. (2011). Measuring romantic jealousy: Validation of the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale in Australian samples. Australian Journal of Psychology, 63(4), 243-251.
  • Floyd, K., Voloudakis, M. (1999). Yetişkin platonik arkadaşlıklarda sevecen davranış: Beklenti ihlallerini yorumlama ve değerlendirme. İnsan İletişimi Araştırması, 25(3), 341-369.
  • Garrido, E.C., Issa, T., Esteban, P.G., & Delgado, S.C. (2021). A descriptive literature review of phubbing behaviors. Heliyon, 7(5), e07037.
  • Gonza´lez-Rivera, J.A., Segura-Abreu, L.M., & Urbistondo-Rodrı´guez, V. (2018). Phubbing in romantic relationships: Cell phone use, couple satisfaction, psychological well-being and mental health. Interacciones. Revista de Avances En Psicologı´a, 4, 81-91.
  • Gonzales, A.L., & Wu, Y. (2016). Public cellphone use does not activate negative responses in Others…Unless they hate cellphones. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(5), 384-398.
  • Guazzini, A., Duradoni, M., Capelli, A., & Meringolo, P. (2019). An explorative model to assess individuals’ phubbing risk. Future Internet, 11, 1-13.
  • Hales, A.H., Dvir, M., Wesselmann, E.D., Kruger, D.J., & Finkenauer, C. (2018). Cell phone-induced ostracism threatens fundamental needs. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(4), 460–473.
  • Halpern, D., & Katz, J.E. (2017). Texting's consequences for romantic relationships: A cross-lagged analysis highlights its risks. Computers in Human Behavior, 71, 386–394.
  • Han, S., Min, J. & Lee, H. (2015). Antecedents of social presence and gratification of social connection needs in SNS: A study of Twitter users and their mobile and non-mobile usage. International Journal of Information Management, 35(4), 459-471.
  • Kadylak, T. (2020). An investigation of perceived family phubbing expectancy violations and well-being among U.S. older adults. Mobile Media and Communication, 8(2), 247–267.
  • Karadağ, E., Tosuntaş, Ş.B., Erzen, E., Duru, P., Bostan, N., Şahin, B.M., & Babadağ, B. (2015). Determinants of phubbing, which is the sum of many virtual addictions: A structural equation model. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 4(2), 60-74.
  • Kelly, L., Miller-Ott, A.E., & Duran, R.L. (2017). Sports scores and intimate moments: An expectancy violations theory approach to partner cell phone behaviors in adult romantic relationships. Western Journal of Communication, 81(5), 619–640.
  • Khodabakhsh, S., & Le Ong, Y. (2021). The Impact of Partner Phubbing on Marital Quality among Married Couples in Malaysia: Moderating Effect of Gender and Age. Aloma: Revista De Psicologia, Ciències De L'educació İ De L'esport Blanquerna, 39(1), 9-16.
  • Knoll, K.R.H., Corso, K.B., & Junior, P.V.C. (2017). Eu, voce e o smartphone, ate que o phubbing nos separe”: Um estuda sobre as implicaocoes du uso (excessivo) do smartphone entre casais. Paper presented at XX SEMEAD Semina´rios em Administrac¸a˜o Novembro, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
  • Krasnova, H., Abramova, O., Notter, I. & Baumann, A. (2016). Why phubbing is toxic for your relationship: Understanding the role of smartphone jealousy among “Generation Y” users. In Twenty-fourth European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Lee, J., & Shrum, L. J. (2012). Conspicuous consumption versus charitable behavior in response to social exclusion: A differential needs explanation. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(3), 530-544.
  • Lin-Qian, F. U., Xiao-Chun, X.I.E., & Li, L.E.I. (2020). The influence of partner's phubbing and its psychological mechanisms. Journal of Psychological Science, 3, 726-732.
  • Macquarie Dictionary (2013). Erişim adresi: macmillandictionary.com/buzzword/ entries/phubbing.html. 20.05.2021 tarihinde erişildi.
  • McDaniel, B.T., & Coyne, S.M. (2016). “Technoference”: The interference of technology in couple relationships and implications for women's personal and relational wellbeing. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 5(1), 85–98.
  • McDaniel, B.T., & Drouin, M. (2019). Daily technology interruptions and emotional and relational well-being. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 1–8.
  • Miller-Ott, A.E., & Kelly, L. (2017). A politeness theory analysis of cell-phone usage in the presence of friends. Communication Studies, 68(2), 190–207.
  • Misra, S., Cheng, L., Genevie, J., & Yuan, M. (2016). The iPhone effect: The quality of in-person social interactions in the presence of mobile devices. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 275-298.
  • Molden, D.C., Lucas, G.M., Gardner, W.L., Dean, K. ve Knowles, M.L. (2009). Motications for prevention or promotion following social exclusion: Being rejects vs. being ignored. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(96), 415-431.
  • Nazir, T., & Pişkin, M. (2016). Phubbing: A technological invasion which connected the world but disconnected humans. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 3(4), 175-182.
  • Nuñez, T.R., Radtke, T., & Eimler, S.C. (2020). A third-person perspective on phubbing: Observing smartphone-induced social exclusion generates negative affect, stress, and derogatory attitudes. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 14(3), 1-22.
  • Parmaksız İ. (2018). Phubbing (Sosyotelizm). A. İşcan (Ed.) Eğitim bilimlerinde örnek araştırmalar içinde. (s.601-617) Ankara: Nobel Yayınları. Parmaksız, İ. (2020). İletişimde ve ilişkilerde phubbing. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 24(2), 359-372.
  • Przybylski, A.K., & Weinstein, N. (2013). Can you connect with me now? How the presence of mobile communication technology influences face-to-face conversation quality. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30(3), 237-246.
  • Rencken, N. (2020). Modern Love: A quantitative study to determine the correlation between partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction in South African marriages. The IIE.
  • Roberts, J.A., & David, M.E. (2016). My life has become a major distraction from my cell phone: Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction among romantic partners. Computers in human behavior, 54, 134-141.
  • Roberts, J.A., & David, M.E. (2017). Put down your phone and listen to me: How boss phubbing undermines the psychological conditions necessary for employee engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 206-217.
  • Roberts, J.A., Petnjiyaya, L.H., & Manolis, C. (2014). The invisible addiction: Cellphone activities and addiction among male and female college students. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 3(4), 254-265.
  • Sanders, G.S., Baron, R.S., & Moore, D.L. (1978). Distraction and social comparison as mediators of social facilitation effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(3), 291-303.
  • Shellenbarger, S. (2013). Secrets of effective office humour. Wall street journal, August 13. Erişim adresi: wsj.com/articles/secrets-of-effective-office-humor-1376436011 16.04.2019 tarihinde erişildi.
  • Tandon, A., Dhir, A., Talwar, S., Kaur, P., & Mäntymäki, M. (2022). Social media induced fear of missing out (FoMO) and phubbing: Behavioural, relational and psychological outcomes. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174, 121149.
  • Tedeschi, J.T., & Harris Bond, M. (2001). Aversive behavior and aggressionin cultural perspective. In R.M. Kowalski (Ed.),Behaving badly: Aversivebehaviors in interpersonal relationships(pp. 257–293). Washington, DC: American Psychology Association.
  • Topal, K., Güngör, R., Çoban, H., Şahintürk, S., Kırmızıkaya, E., Şendil, T.G. (2021). Üniversite öğrencilerinde partner sosyotelizmi, bağlanma ve algılanan romantik ilişki kalitesi arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. Ulakbilge, 58, 462-475.
  • Trafton, J.G., Altmann, E.M., Brock, D.P., & Mintz, F.E. (2003). Preparing to resume an interrupted task: Effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 58(5), 583-603.
  • Umari, T., Rusandi, M.A., & Yakub, E. (2019). Phubbing as a result of the 4th Industrial Revolution: Is it dangerous? In N. Islami & R. Iinda (Eds.), Proceedings of the SS9 and 3rd URICES (pp.230-236).
  • Vanden Abeele, M.M.P. (2020). The social consequences of phubbing: A framework and research agenda. In R. Ling, G. Goggin, L. Fortunati, S.S. Lim, & Y. Li (Eds.), Handbook of mobile communication, culture, and information, section 4.3, Oxford Press.
  • Vanden Abeele, M.M.P., Antheunis, M.L., & Schouten, A.P. (2016). The effect of mobile messaging during a conversation on impression formation and interaction quality. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 562-569.
  • Vanden Abeele, M.M.P., Hendrickson, A.T., Pollmann, M.M., & Ling, R. (2019). Phubbing behavior in conversations and its relation to perceived conversation intimacy and distraction: An exploratory observation study. Computers in Human Behavior, 100, 35-47.
  • Vaterlaus, J.M., & Tulane, S. (2019). The perceived influence of interactive technology on marital relationships. Contemporary Family Therapy, 41(3), 247-257.
  • Wang, X., & Zhao, K. (2022). Partner phubbing and marital satisfaction: The mediating roles of marital ınteraction and marital conflict. Social Science Computer Review, 08944393211072231.
  • Wang, X., Xie, X., Wang, Y., Wang, P., & Lei, L. (2017). Partner phubbing and depression among married Chinese adults: The roles of relationship satisfaction and relationship length. Personality and Individual Differences, 110, 12-17.
  • Wang, X., Zhao, F., & Lei, L. (2021). Partner phubbing and relationship satisfaction: Self-esteem and marital status as moderators. Current Psychology, 40(7), 3365-3375.
  • Yam, F.C, ve İlhan, T. (2020). Modern çağın bütünsel teknolojik bağımlılığı: Phubbing ve dinamikleri. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 12(1), 1-15.
  • Zamani, F., Talepasand, S., & Taghinezhad, A. (2020). Psychometric properties of the phubbing scale among iIranian students. Health Education and Health Promotion, 8(1), 25-30.
Yaşam Becerileri Psikoloji Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2587-1536
  • Başlangıç: 2017
  • Yayıncı: Muhammed YILDIZ
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Sürekli ve Düzenli Sınıf Öğretmeni Değişikliğinin Kaynaştırma Öğrencisi Üzerindeki Etkisinin Öğretmen Görüşlerine Göre Belirlenmesi

Halil ÖZGÜR, Cahit NURİ

Bilişsel Esneklik, Depresif Belirtilerle Nasıl İlişkilendirilir? Duygu Düzenleme Güçlüğü ve Problem Çözmeyi İçeren Çoklu Bir Aracılık Modeli

Servet KAÇAR BAŞARAN, Ceren GÖKDAĞ, Zeynep ERDOĞAN YILDIRIM

Romantik İlişkilerde Modern Engel: Partner Sosyotelizmi (Phubbing) Üzerine Bir Derleme

İzzet PARMAKSIZ

Öğrenme Güçlüğü Tanısı Almış Çocuğa Sahip Ailelerde Tükenmişlik ile Umutsuzluk Düzeyleri Arasındaki İlişki

Ebru ÖZÜLKÜ, Başak BAĞLAMA

Öğretmene Yönelik Şiddet

Sefa BULUT, Emre GÜRKAN