TÜRKİYE’DEKİ İMALAT İŞLETMELERİNİN SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR İNOVASYON FAALİYETLERİ

Amaç: İmalat işletmelerinin, sürdürülebilir kalkınma hedefi doğrultusunda rekabet avantajını sürdürebilmek ve daha verimli çalışabilmek için sürdürülebilir inovasyon faaliyetlerine kaynak ayırmaları gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye’deki imalat işletmelerinin sürdürülebilir inovasyon faaliyetlerinin genel durumunu ortaya koymaktır.

SUSTAINABLE INNOVATION ACTIVITIES of MANUFACTURING FIRMS in TURKEY

Purpose: Manufacturing enterprises should allocate resources for sustainable innovation activities in order to maintain their competitive advantage in sustainable development target. This study aims to reveal an overall state of sustainable innovation activities of manufacturing firms in Turkey.

___

  • AÇIKALIN, N. ve KAYABAŞI, A. (2019), İşletmelerin Sürdürülebilir İnovasyon Faaliyetleri: Pazarlama Bakış Açısıyla Nitel Bir İnceleme, Pazarlama Teorisi ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 5 (2), 191-220.
  • ARUNDEL, A. ve KEMP R. (2009), Measuring Eco-innovation, UNI-MERIT Research Memorandum, Maastricht, The Netherlands, https://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/consumption-innovation/43960846.pdf, (Erişim tarihi:10.02.2019).
  • BASSO, L. F. C., SANTOS D. F. L., KIMURA H. ve BRAGA A. C. S. (2013), Eco-Innovation in Brazil: The Creation of an Index, The Business & Management Review, 4 (1), 2-17.
  • CALIK, E. ve BADURDEEN F. (2016), A Measurement Scale to Evaluate Sustainable Innovation Performance in Manufacturing Organizations, Procedia CIRP, 40, 449-454.
  • CHEN, Y.S. (2008), The Driver of Green Innovation and Green Image: Green Core Competence, Journal of Business Ethics, 81 (3), 531-543.
  • CHEN, Y. S., CHANG C. H. ve WU F. S. (2012), Origins of Green Innovations: The Differences between Proactive and Reactive Green Innovations, Management Decision, 50 (3), 368-398.
  • CHEN, Y.S., LAI, S. B. ve WEN C. T. (2006), The Influence of Green Innovation Performance on Corporate Advantage in Taiwan, Journal of Business Ethics, 67 (4), 331-339.
  • CHENG, C. C. ve SHIU E. (2012), Validation of A Proposed Instrument for Measuring Eco-Innovation: An Implementation Perspective, Technovation, 32 (6), 329-344.
  • CHIOU, T. Y., CHAN, H. K., LETTICE, F. ve CHUNG, S. H. (2011), The Influence of Greening The Suppliers and Green Innovation on Environmental Performance and Competitive Advantage in Taiwan, Transportation Research Part E, 47, 822-836.
  • CILLO, V., PETRUZZELLI, A. M., ARDITO, L. ve DEL GIUDICE, M. (2019), Understanding Sustainable Innovation: A Systematic Literature Review, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26 (5), 1012-1025.
  • ÇALIK, E. (2021), İmalat İşletmelerinin Sürdürülebilir Süreç İnovasyonu (SSİ) Faaliyet ve Sonuçlarının PLS-SEM ile Değerlendirilmesi, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, Journal of Busıness Research-Turk, 13 (1), 67-82.
  • DELMAS, M. A. ve PEKOVIC, S. (2018), Corporate Sustainable Innovation and Employee Behavior, Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 1071-1088.
  • DONG, Y., WANG, X., JIN, J., QIAO Y. ve SHI, L. (2014), Research on Effects of Eco-innovation Types and Regulations on Firms’ Ecological Performance: Empirical Evidence from China, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 34, 78-98.
  • EDEŞ, U. ve ÇALIK, E. (2020), İmalat İşletmelerinin Sürdürülebilir Süreç İnovasyon Performansının Ölçümü için Ölçek Geliştirme, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 9 (2), 1-24.
  • GARCÍA-GRANERO, E. M., PIEDRA-MUÑOZ L. ve GALDEANO-GÓMEZ E. (2018), Eco-Innovation Measurement: A Review of Firm Performance Indicators, Journal of Cleaner Production, 191, 304-317.
  • GUNARATHNE, N. (2019), Sustainable Innovation Measurement; Approach and Challenges, Innovation for Sustainability. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 233-251.
  • GÜRLEK, M. ve TUNA M. (2018), Reinforcing Competitive Advantage through Green Organizational Culture and Green Innovation, The Service Industries Journal, 38 (7-8), 467-491.
  • IRANMANESH, M., ZAILANI, S., MOEINZADEH, S. ve NIKBIN, D. (2017), Effect of Green Innovation on Job Satisfaction of Electronic and Electrical Manufacturers’ Employees Through Job Intensity: Personal Innovativeness as Moderator, Review of Managerial Science, 11 (2), 299-313.
  • KETATA, I., SOFKA, W., ve GRIMPE C. (2015), The Role of Internal Capabilities and Firms’environment for Sustainable Innovation: Evidence for Germany, R&D Management, 45 (1), 60–75.
  • KÜÇÜKOĞLU, M. T. (2018), The Mediating Role of Green Organizational Culture between Sustainability and Green Innovation: A Research in Turkish Companies, Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 6 (1), 64-85.
  • LI, Y. ve HUANG J.W. (2017), The Moderating Role of Relational Bonding in Green Supply Chain Practices and Performance, Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 23 (4), 290-299.
  • LOPEZ-VALEIRAS, E., GOMEZ-CONDE, J. ve NARANJO-GIL D. (2015), Sustainable Innovation, Management Accounting and Control Systems, and International Performance, Sustainability, 7 (3), 3479-3492.
  • MALETIČ, M., MALETIČ, D., DAHLGAARD, J. J., DAHLGAARD-PARK, S. M., ve GOMIŠČEK, B. (2016), Effect of Sustainability-Oriented Innovation Practices on The Overall Organisational Performance: An Empirical Examination, Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27 (9-10), 1171-1190.
  • OECD ve EUROSTAT (2005), Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition, The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities, Paris.
  • PEKER, İ., AR, İ. ve BAKİ, B. (2019), Lojistik Firmalarının Çevresel Yenilik Performanslarının Bulanık ÇKKV Yaklaşımı ile Değerlendirilmesi, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 8 (2), 1-20.
  • SAEIDI, S. P., OTHMAN, M. S. H., SAEIDI, P. ve SAEIDI, S. P. (2018), The Moderating Role of Environmental Management Accounting Between Environmental Innovation and Firm Financial Performance, International Journal of Business Performance Management, 19 (3), 326-348.
  • SHUAIB, M., SEEVERS, D., ZHANG, X., BADURDEEN, F., ROUCH, K. E. ve JAWAHIR, I. S. (2014), Product Sustainability Index (ProdSI)-A Metricsbased Framework to Evaluate the Total Life-cycle Sustainability of Manufactured Products, Journal of Industrial Ecology, 18 (4), 491-507.
  • TUMELERO, C., SBRAGIA, R. ve EVANS S. (2019), Cooperation in R&D and Eco-innovations: The Role in Companies’ Socioeconomic Performance, Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 1138–1149.
  • UNITED NATIONS, (2015), Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld/publication, (Erişim tarihi: 15.10.2020).
  • VARADARAJAN, R. (2017), Innovating for Sustainability: A Framework for Sustainable Innovations and a Model of Sustainable Innovations Orientation, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45 (1), 14-36.
  • WEIDNER, K., NAKATA, C. ve ZHU, Z. (2020), Sustainable Innovation and the Triple Bottom-Line: A Market-Based Capabilities and Stakeholder Perspective, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 29 (2), 141-161.
  • WONG, S. K. S. (2013), Environmental Requirements, Knowledge Sharing and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from The Electronics Industry in China, Business Strategy and the Environment, 22, 321-338.
  • WORLD COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENT AND DEVELOPMENT (WCED), (1987), Our Common Future, Oxford University, Oxford.
  • WU, G. C. (2017), Effects of Socially Responsible Supplier Development and Sustainability-Oriented Innovation on Sustainable Development: Empirical Evidence from SMEs, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24 (6), 661–675.
  • YİĞİT, S. (2014), İnovasyonun Çevreci Yüzü ve Türkiye, Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 21 (1) 251-265.
Verimlilik Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1013-1388
  • Başlangıç: 2004
  • Yayıncı: T.C. SANAYİ VE TEKNOLOJİ BAKANLIĞI STRATEJİK ARAŞTIRMALAR VE VERİMLİLİK GENEL MÜDÜRLÜĞÜ
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

BORSA İSTANBUL BANKA ENDEKSİ’NİN VERİ TABANLI MODELLER İLE ANALİZ EDİLMESİ

Salim Sercan SARI, Eyyup Ensar BAŞAKIN

BİR DEVLET HASTANESİNDE KALİTE MALİYETLERİNİN PAF MODELİ İLE İNCELENMESİ

Buket OĞUZ, Sıdıka KAYA, Kenan GÖZLÜ

SAĞLIK KURUMLARINDA DENGELİ PUAN CETVELİ KONULU ÇALIŞMALARIN BİLİM HARİTALAMA TEKNİĞİNE GÖRE ANALİZİ

Zekai ÖZTÜRK, İlknur ARSLAN ÇİLHOROZ

BİR EĞİTİM ARAŞTIRMA HASTANESİ ACİL SERVİS BİRİMİNE BAŞVURAN HASTA SAYISI TAHMİNİ

Hatice ESEN, Ümran KAYA

SEÇİLMİŞ OECD ÜLKELERİNDE YENİLENEBİLİR ENERJİ TÜKETİMİ, EKONOMİK BÜYÜME, PETROL FİYATLARI VE CO2 EMİSYONU ARASINDAKİ NEDENSELLİK İLİŞKİSİ

Orhan CENGİZ, Müge MANGA

EKONOMİK FAKTÖRLER VE ULUSAL SAĞLIK SİSTEMLERİNDE TEKNİK ETKİNLİK: PANEL VERİYE DAYALI BİR UYGULAMA

Murat KONCA, Mehmet TOP

ENERJİ VERİMLİLİĞİ ÜZERİNE ARZ VE TALEP YÖNLÜ GENEL BİR BAKIŞ

Mustafa NAIMOGLU, Mustafa AKAL

YÜKSEK TEKNOLOJİLİ ÜRÜN İHRACATININ EKONOMİK BÜYÜME ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ: ÜST ORTA GELİRLİ ÜLKELER İÇİN PANEL VERİ ANALİZİ

Gizem AKBULUT YILDIZ, Gülçin ADIYAMAN

KENT İÇİ RAYLI ULAŞIM PERFORMANSINI DEĞERLENDİRMEDE SWARA VE ARAS YÖNTEMLERİ İLE BİR MODEL ÖNERİSİ-A MODEL PROPOSAL WITH SWARA AND ARAS METHODS IN EVALUATION OF URBAN RAIL TRANSPORT PERFORMANCE

Ramazan ERTURGUT, Nesrin KOÇ USTALI

ALTERNATİF TURİZM KAPSAMINDA EĞİTİM TURİZMİ VE AKDENİZ ÜNİVERSİTESİNDE BİR UYGULAMA

Mir Salim HEYDAROV, Mustafa GÜLMEZ