___

• 1. Langdon WINNER, Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1977), p. 47
• 2. Robert HEILBRONER, The Limits of American Capitalism (New York: Harper & Row, 1966), p. 115
• 3. Wilbert E. MOORE, Social Change (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1963), p. 89
• 4. Walter E. ROSTOW, Politics and the Stages of Growth (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1971), p. 56
• 5. Daniel BELL, The Coming of Post-Industrial Society (New York: Basic Books, 1973), p. 349
• 6. Jacques ELLUL, The Technological Society (New York: Knopf, 1964), p. xxv
• 7. Şuradan alıntılanmıştır: Herbert MARCUSE, “Industrialization and Capitalism in the Work of Max Weber” in Negations (Boston: Beacon, 1968), p. 204
• 8. Elliot FREIDSON, Professional Power (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986), p. 3
• 9. Ibid
• 10. Max WEBER, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (New York: Scribner, 1958)
• 11. Hans GERTH and C. Wright MILLS, From Max Weber (New York: Oxford University Press, 1958), p. 221
• 12. Ibid
• 13. Johanno STRASSER, “1984: Decade of the Experts?” in 1984 Revisited ed
• Irving Howe (New York: Harper & Row, 1984), pp. 162-63
• 14. Peter BERGER, Brigitte BERGER and Hansfried KELLNER, The Homeless Mind: Modernization and Consciousness (New York: Vintage, 1973), pp
• 97-115
• 15. Ibid
• 16. WEBER, The Protestant Ethic, p. 182
• 17. Paul GOODMAN, New Reformation: Notes of a Neolithic Conservative (New York: Random House, 1970), pp. 192-93
• 18. William H. SMYTH, “Technocracy: Definitions and Origin”, Nation 125 (December 28, 1932), p. 646
• 19. Francis BACON, The Great Instauration and the New Atlantis, ed. J
• Weinberger (Arlington Heights, IL: AHM, 1980)
• 20. Bkz. William LEISS, The Domination of Nature (Boston: Beacon, 1972)
• 21. Peter GAY, The Enlightenment: An Interpretation, 2 vols. (New York: Knopf, 1966-69)
• 22. Marquis de CONDORCET, Sketch for a Historical Picture of the Progress of the Human Mind (New York: Noonday, 1955)
• 23. E. H. CARR, Studies in Revolution (New York: Grossett and Dunlap, 1964), p. 2
• 24. Howard P. SEGAL, Technological Utopianism in American Cultural (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985), pp. 62-63- 25. Ibid., p. 47
• 26. BELL, The Coming of Post-Industrial Society
• 27. Henri de Saint-SIMON, Social Organization, the Science of Man and Other Writings (New York: Harper Torch, 1964), pp. 1-27
• 28. Bu benzetme, Saint-Simon’un eseri L’Organisateur’da vardır (1819). Bu, Felix M. H. Markham’ın, Henri Comte de Saint-Simon: Seçilmiş Yazılar adlı çalışmasında da görülür (Oxford: Blackwell, 1952), pp. 72-75
• 29. Auguste COMTE, Cours de philosophie positive, vol. 6 (Paris: Bachelier, 1830)
• 30. KOLAKOWSKI’ye göre pozitivizm, “insan bilgisiyle ilgili olarak bir değerlendirme kriteri ve kurallar derlemesine” ve ‘bilgi’, ‘bilim’, ‘biliş’ ve ‘enformasyon’ gibi terimleri nasıl kullanacağımızı düzenleyen normatif bir tutuma gönderme yapar. O, pozitif bilgiyi oluşturan dört temel kural belirler. Bunlar: (1) veri toplama, somut deneyimde ortaya çıkan gerçeklerle sınırlı olmalıdır; (2) genel anlamda formüle edilen kavrama belirli gerçekler dışında hiçbir göndergeye sahip olmamalıdır; (3) değer tahminleri, deneysel bilginin oluşturulmasıyla aynı şekilde keşfedilebilir değildir ve bilimsel yöntemin temel bir bütünlüğü vardır. Bkz. Leszek KOLAKOWSKI, Positivist Philosophy (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972)
• 31. Auguste COMTE, System of Positive Polity: Treatise on Sociology Instituting the Religion of Humanity, 4 vols. (London: Longman’s Green, 1851)
• 32. G. M. YOUNG, Victorian England: Portrait of an Age (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1964), pp. 32-33
• 33. Laurence TRIBE, “Policy Science: Analysis or Ideology” Philosophy and Public Affairs 2 (1972): 66-110; and Alasdair MACLNTYRE, “Utilitarianism and Cost/Benefit Analysis: An Essay on the Relevance of Moral Philosophy to Bureaucratic Theory” in Ethical Theory and Business, ed
• Tom Beauchamp and Norman Bowie (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1979)
• 34. Bu noktada, kusursuz bir tartışma için bkz. Peter STEINBERGER, Ideology and the Urban Crisis (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1985), pp
• 40-62
• 35. Gerçek - değer ikiliği ve kavranamazlık değer için bkz. M. E. Hawkesworth, Theoretical Issues in Policy Analysis (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1988), pp. 36-72
• 36. John BYRNE, “Policy Science and the Administrative State: The Political Economy of Cost-Benefit Analysis” in Confronting Values in Policy Analysis, ed. Frank FISCHER and John FORESTER (Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1987), pp. 70-93