Laboratuvaröz yeterlik ölçeği geliştirme çalışması

Laboratuvar ÖzYeterlik Ölçeği (LÖYÖ) taslakolaraklikerttipli15 maddeden oluşturulmuştur. Araştırmanın örneklemini sınıf öğretmenliği ve fen bilgisi öğretmenliği programında okuyan 248 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Açımlayıcı faktör analizi için orthogonaldöndürme (varimax) tekniği ve principal axis factoring yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Faktör eigen değerleri paralel analiz ile kontrol edilmiş ve faktör sayılarına karar verilmiştir. Ölçeğin amacına hizmet etmeyen maddeler ölçekten çıkarılmış ve faktör analizi tüm ölçek maddeleri amaca hizmet edene değin tekrar yapılmıştır. Üçü olumsuz olmak üzere 10 maddeden ve iki faktörlü bir yapıdan oluşanLÖYÖ’nün Cronbach’s alpha güvenirlik değeri .898’dir. İlk faktör “Laboratuvar olumlu beceri algısı” olarak isimlendirilmiş ve Cronbach’s alpha güvenirlik değeri .916’dır. İkinci faktör ise “Laboratuvarolumsuz beceri algısı” olarak adlandırılmış ve Cronbach’s alpha güvenirlik değeri .711’dir.

A Study of Developing Laboratory Self-Efficacy Scale

Draftlaboratory self-efficacy scale consisted of 15 Likert type items. Sample of the study consists of 248 students who study at science education and classroom education programs. Exploratory factor analyses with orthogonal (varimax) rotation technique are carried out. Factor eigen values are checked with parallel analyses and number of factors are retained with respect to analyses results. Items which did not serve the purpose of the scale are excluded from the scale and factor analyses are carried out until it has been decided that all items in the scale serve the purpose. Scale consists of 10 items where 3items are reverse coded items and has two factor structures. Scale internal consistency Cronbach’s alpha value is .898. First factor is named as “laboratory positive skills perception” with Cronbach’s alpha =.916 and second factor are named as “laboratory negative skill perception” with Cronbach’s alpha =.711.

PDF

___

Açışlı, S. ve Turgut, Ü. (2011). Fizik laboratuvar uygulamalarında 5E öğrenme modelineuygun olarak geliştirilen materyallerin öğrenci kazanımlarına etkisinin incelenmesi.International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3 (2), 562-593.
Ajzen, I. (2005a). Behavioral interventions based on the theory of planned behavior: Briefdescription of the theory of planned behavior. http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.intervention.pdf Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2016
Ajzen, I. (2005b). Constructing a theory of planned behavior questionnaire: Brief descriptionof the theory of planned behavior. http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2016
Ajzen, I. (2005c). Sample TpB questionnare. http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.questionnaire.pdf Erişim Tarihi: Kasım 2016
Alkan, F., ve Erdem, E . (2013). Kendi kendine öğrenmenin laboratuvarda başarı, hazırbulunuşluk, laboratuvar becerileri tutumu ve endişeye etkisi. Hacettepe ÜniversitesiEğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 44 (44) , 15-26
Anthoine, E., Moret, L., Regnault, A., Sébille, V., ve Hardouin, J.-B. (2014). Sample sizeusedto validate a scale: a review of publications on newly-developed patient reportedoutcomes measures. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12, 2.
Artino, A.R. (2012). Academic self-efficacy: from educational theory to instructional practice. Perspectives on Medical Education, 1, 76–85.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Self-efficacy beliefs ofadolescents, 5, 307-337. Urdan, T., ve Pajares, F. (Eds.). Greenwich, CT: IAP.
Bandura, A. (2010). Self-Efficacy. The corsini encyclopedia of psychology.
Berg, D.A.G ve Smith, L.F. (2016). Preservice teacher self-efficacy beliefs: An opportunity togenerate “good research” in the asia-pacific region. In S.G Editor ve D. P. Editor(Eds.), Asia-Pacific Perspectives on Teacher Self-Efficacy (1-17). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers
Berkes, E. (2007). Practicing biology: Undergraduate laboratory research, persistence inscience, and the impact of self-efficacy beliefs. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis.Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Washington University, Missouri, USA.
Bernardez, R.Q. (1982). Factors affecting attitudes to laboratory work [Abstract].Unpublished Thesis. Baguio City, Philippines.
Boddey, K. (2012). Chemistry experiences of first-year nursing students: the interplay of selfefficacy, anxiety, prior chemistry experience and academic performance – a mixedmethod approach. Unpublished Master Thesis. Avondale College of HigherEducation, Auckland, New Zealand.
Brinkman, W-P. (2009). Design of a questionnaire instrument, handbook of mobiletechnology research methods. ISBN 978-1-60692-767-0, pp. 31-57 Netherlands: Nova Publisher
Cabrera-Nguyen, P. (2010). Author guidelines for reporting scale development and validationresults in the Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research. Journal of theSociety for Social Work and Research, 1 (2), 99-103.
Chan, M.T. (2002). The teaching of science process skills: Primary teachers' self-perception[Abstract]. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education & Development, 5 [special 1],91-111.
Coll, R.K., Dalgety, J., ve Salter, D. (2002). The development of the chemistry attitudes andexperiences questionnaire (CAEQ). Chemistry Education Research and Practice inEurope, 3 (1), 19-32.
Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G. ve Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenliistatistik spss ve lirsel uygulamaları. APegem Akademi. Ankara
Deshpande, L. (2004). Challenges in measurement of scientific attitude. Paper presented atepi STEME-1: An International Conference to Review Research on ScienceTechnology and Mathematics Education (137-138), Goa, India.
Devadoss, S., ve Foltz, J. (1996). Evaluation of factors influencing student class attendanceand performance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78 (3), 499–507.
Ekici, G. (2009a). Biyoloji öz-yeterlik ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. Kastamonu EğitimDergisi, 17 (1), 111-124.
Ekici, G. (2009b). Biyoloji öğretmenlerinin laboratuar kullanımı öz-yeterlik algılarınınincelenmesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10 (3), 25-35.
Erdem, E. (2015). The relationship between self-efficacy and attitudes of chemistry teachercandidates. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 63, 62-70.
Eryılmaz, A., Yıldız, İ., veAkın, S. (2011). Investigating of relationship between attitudestowards physics laboratories, motivation and amotivation for the class engagement.Eurasian Journal of Physics and Chemistry Education, Special Issue, 59-64.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using ibm spss statistics (4th Edition).London: SAGE
Francis, J., Eccles, M. P., Johnston, M., Walker, A. E., Grimshaw, J. M., Foy, R., Kaner, E. F.S., Smith, L. and Bonetti, D. (2004). Constructing questionnaires based on the theoryof planned behaviour: A manual for health services researchers. Newcastle uponTyne, UK: Centre for Health Services Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
Fraser, B. J., ve Lee, S. S. U. (2008). Science laboratory classroom environments in Koreanhigh schools. Learning Environments Research, 12 (1), 67–84.
Friedman, P., Rodriguez, F., ve McComb, J. (2001). Why students do and do not attend classes.College Teaching, 49 (4), 124–133.
Güneş, M.H., Şener, N., Topal Germi, N., ve Can, N. (2013). Fen ve teknoloji dersindelaboratuvar kullanımına yönelik öğretmen ve öğrenci değerlendirmeleri. DicleÜniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 20, 1-11.
Güngör, C., ve Aşkar, P. (2004). E-öğrenmenin ve bilişsel stilinbaşarı ve internet öz yeterlikalgısı üzerindeki etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 27, 116-125.
Hinkin, T. R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in surveyquestionnaires. Organizational Research Methods, 2 (1), 104-121
Hinkin, T. R., Tracey, J. B., ve Enz, C. A. (1997). Scale construction: Developing reliable andvalid measurement instruments. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 21 (1),100-120.
Hof, M.W. (2012). Questionnaire evaluation with factor analysis and cronbach ’ s alpha :an example. http://www.let.rug.nl/nerbonne/teach/rema-stats-methseminar/student-papers/MHof-QuestionnaireEvaluation-2012-CronbachFactAnalysis.pdfErişim Tarihi: Nisan 2018
Jaussi, K. S., ve Randel, A. E. (2014). Where to Look? Creative Self-Efficacy, KnowledgeRetrieval, and Incremental and Radical Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(4),400–410.
Johanson, G.A., ve Brooks, G.P. (2010). Initial scale development: Sample size for pilotstudies. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70 (3), 394-400.
Johnson, R.L. ve Morgan, G.B. (2016). Survey scales: Investigating scale quality. New York,NY: The Guilford Press.
Kalaycı, Ş. (2010). Spss uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. (5. Baskı). Asil Yayın Dağıtım Ltd. Şti. Ankara.
Karwowski, M. ve Kaufman, J.C. (Eds.). (2017). The creative self. San Diego, CA: AcademicPress.
Kılıç, D., Keleş, Ö., ve Uzun, N. (2015). Fen bilimleriöğretmenlerinin Laboratuvarkullanımına yönelik öz yeterlikinançları: Laboratuvar uygulamaları programınınetkisi. Erzincan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 17 (1), 218-236.
Kıryak, Z. ve Özdilek, Z. (2019). Tahmin-açıklama-gözlem-açıklama yönteminin sekizincisınıf öğrencilerinin asit yağmurları konusundaki kavramsal anlama düzeylerine etkisi.Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 51, 216-240.
Kurbanoğlu, N.İ. (2014). Lise öğrencilerinin kimya laboratuarı kaygı ve kimya dersitutumlarının cinsiyet ve okul türü değişkenlerine göre incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(171), 199-210.
Kurbanoglu, N.I., ve Akim, A. (2010). The relationships between university students’chemistry laboratory anxiety, attitudes and self-efficacy beliefs. Australian Journal ofTeacher Education, 35 (8), 48-59.
Laipply, R.S. (2004). A case study of self-efficacy and attitudes toward science in an inquirybased biology laboratory. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis. The Graduate Faculty ofThe University of Akron, USA.
Lang, Q.C., Wong, A.F.L. ve Fraser, B.J. (2005). Student perceptions of chemistry laboratorylearning environments, student–teacher interactions and attitudes in secondary schoolgifted education classes in Singapore. Research in Science Education, 35, 299–321.
Lovelace, M. and Brickman, P. (2013). Best practices for measuring students’ attitudestoward learning science. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 12 (4), 606-617.
Madans, J. H. (2001). Health Surveys. International Encyclopedia of the Social & BehavioralSciences, 6619–6627.
Madden, T. J., Ellen, P. S., ve Ajzen, I. (1992). A comparison of the theory of plannedbehavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and Social PsychologyBulletin, 18 (1), 3–9.
Miller, M.D. (2006). Science self-efficacy in tenth grade Hispanic female high schoolstudents. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis. College of Education, University of CentralFlorida, USA
Monsen, J.J., Ewing, D.L., ve Kwoka, M. (2014). Teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion,perceived adequacy of support and classroom learning environment. LearningEnvironments Research, 17, 113–126
Moore, R.W. & Foy, R.L.H. (1997). The scientific attitude inventory: A revision (SAI II).Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34 (4), 327-336.
Musisi, M. (2018). Gender, science self-efficacy and science related career aspirationsamong ordinary level students in Wakiso District. Unpublished Masters Dissertation.Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
Nuhoğlu, H., veYalçın, N. (2004). Fizik laboratuvarına yönelik bir tutum ölçeğiningeliştirilmesi ve öğretmen adaylarının fizik laboratuvarına yönelik tutumlarınındeğerlendirilmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi, 5 (2), 317-327.
Rodgers, W. M., Hall, C. R., Blanchard, C. M., McAuley, E., ve Munroe, K. J. (2002). Taskand scheduling self-efficacy as predictors of exercise behavior. Psychology & Health,17 (4), 405–416.
Rummey, C., Clemons, T. D., ve Spagnoli, D. (2019). The impact of several demographicfactors on chemistry laboratory anxiety and self-efficacy in students' first year ofuniversity. Student Success, 10 (1), 87-98.
Savran Gencer, A., Sevim, S., ve Kaska, A. (2015). Genel biyoloji laboratuvarında VEE diyagramı uygulaması: Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının akademik başarılarının, özyeterlik inançlarının ve tutumlarının boylamsal olarak değerlendirilmesi. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14 (52), 183-202.
Shi, W-Z., He, X., Wang, Y. ve Huan, W. (2015). Effects of lab group sex composition onphysics learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education,11 (1), 87-92.
Smist, J.M. (1993). General chemistry and self-efficacy. Paper presented at the NationalMeeting of the American Chemical Society (206th, Chicago, IL, August 1993).
Tekin, S., Sağır, Ş.U., veKaramustafaoğlu, S. (2012). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının fen bilgisilaboatuvar uygulamaları-1 dersi kazanımlarının kimya deneyleri açısındanincelenmesi. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 31, 163-174.
Teo, T. ve Lee, C. B. (2010). Examining the efficacy of the theory of planned behavior(TPB) to understand pre-service teachers’ intention to use technology.In C.H. Steel, M.J. Keppell, P. Gerbic ve S. Housego (Eds.), Curriculum, technology &transformation for an unknown future. Proceedings ascilite Sydney 2010 (pp.968-972)http://ascilite.org.au/conferences/sydney10/procs/Teo-concise.pdf Erişim Tarihi: Şubat 2018
Tighezza, M. (2014). Modeling relationships among learning, attitude, self-perception, andscience achievement for grade 8 Saudi students. International Journal of Science andMathematics Education, 12 (4), 721-740.
Trafimow, D. (2009). The theory of reasoned action. Theory & Psychology, 19 (4), 501 518.
Ural, E. (2016). The effect of guided-inquiry laboratory experiments on science educationstudents' chemistry laboratory attitudes, anxiety and achievement. Journal ofEducation and Training Studies, 4 (4), 217-227
Uzuntiryaki, E., veÇapa Aydın, Y. (2009). Development and validation of chemistry selfefficacy scale for college students. Research in Science Education, 39 (4), 539-551.
Watkins, M. W. (2000). Monte carlo PCA for parallel analysis [computer software]. StateCollege, PA: Ed & Psych Associates.
Wititsiri, S. (2007). Students’ learning outcomes and perceptions of the learningenvironments in physical chemistry laboratory classes in Thailand [Abstract].Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, Science and Mathematics Education Center, CurtinUniversity of Technology, Thailand.
Wong., M. ve Lian, S. (2003). Development of a self-efficacy scale for assessing secondaryschool students’ science self-efficacy beliefs.http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.472.8479Erişim Tarihi:Ekim 2014
Zimmerman, B.J., Bonner, S. ve Kovach, R. (1996). Developing self-regulated learners:Beyond achievement to self-efficacy. Washington, DC: American psychologicalassociation.