Splintlemede Kullanılan Materyaller Ve Splint Tipleri

Periodontal tedavi açısından splintlerin önemi son yıllarda tartışma konusu olmuştur.Ve splintler her zaman endike olmayabilirler. Splint tedavisinin periodontal problemi tam anlamıyla gidermediği kısmen bir iyileşme sağladığı bilinmelidir. Splintleme kararı, yapılması gereken periodontal tedaviler sonrasında hasta takip altında tutularak düşünülüp verilmelidir. Splintleme endikasyonları genellikle travma sonrası oluşan mobiliteyi kontrol etmek, hastada çiğneme, ısırma gibi fonksiyonların daha konforlu hale gelmesini sağlamakla sınırlıdır. Ancak doğru endikasyon sonrası ve özellikle son dönemlerde geliştirilen splint çeşitleriyle tatmin edici tedavi sonuçları alınmaktadır. Splintleme tedavisi, mobilitenin azalmasını sağlayıp hem periodontal yumuşak dokuların sağlığının korunmasını hem de kemikteki mobiliteyle oluşan rezorbsiyonların önüne geçilmesini sağlandığından kıymetli bir tedavi yöntemidir

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Mobilite, periodontal splint, splint materyalleri

Materials Used in Splinting and Splint Types

The importance of splints in terms of periodontal treatment has been the subject of discussion in recent years. And splints may not always be indicated. It should be known that splint treatment does not completely eliminate the periodontal problem, but provides a partial recovery. The decision of splinting should be considered and made by keeping the patient under follow-up after periodontal treatments. Indications for splinting are generally limited to controlling post-traumatic mobility and making functions such as chewing and biting more comfortable for the patient. However, satisfactory treatment results are obtained after the correct indication and especially with splint types developed recently. Splinting treatment is a valuable treatment method, as it reduces the mobility and ensures both the protection of the health of periodontal soft tissues and the prevention of resorptions caused by mobility in the bone.

Keywords:

Mobility, periodontal splint, splint materials,

PDF

___

1. Kwon S-O. Philosophical background of evidence-based medicine. Uisahak. 2004;13(2):335-46.
2. Rosenberg W, Donald A. Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem-solving. BMJ. 1995;310(6987):1122-6.
3. Vig KWL. Evidence-Based Orthodontics – Its Evolution and Clinical Application. Evidence-Based Orthodontics. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2018: 1-9.
4. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-based medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. Jama. 1992;268(17):2420-5.
5. McNamara JA, Ribbens KA. Early orthodontic treatment: is the benefit worth the burden? Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry. Ann Arbor, Mich: 2007.
6. O’Brien K, Macfarlane T, Wright J, Conboy F, Appelbe P, Birnie D et al. Early treatment for Class II malocclusion and perceived improvements in facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(5):580-5.
7. Papageorgiou SN, Eliades T. Evidence-based orthodontics: Too many systematic reviews, too few trials. J Orthod. 2019;46(1):9-12.
8. Rinchuse DJ, Sweitzer EM, Rinchuse DJ, Rinchuse DL. Understanding science and evidence-based decision making in orthodontics. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2005;127(5):618-24.
9. Genç S, Soysal MI? Parametrik ve Parametrik Olmayan Çoklu Karşılaştırma Testleri. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science. 2018;1(1):18-27.
10. Akram NC, Harrison JE. Evidence-based orthodontics Structured Abstracts. Journal of Orthodontics. 2008;35(4):276-82.
11. Glenny A-M, Harrison JE. How to...interpret the orthodontic literature. J Orthod. 2003;30(2):159-64.
12. JONES C. Evidence-based medicine: Research methods. Pharmaceutical journal. 2002;268(7202):839-41.
13. Levin KA. Study design III: Cross-sectional studies. Evid Based Dent. 2006;7(1):24-5.
14. Green BN, Johnson CD. How to write a case report for publication. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine. 2006;5(2):72-82.
15. Yılmaz E. Yarbay M. Kanıta Dayalı Tıp. J Clin Anal Med. 2014;5(6):537-542.
16. Akin B, Koçoğlu D. Randomize Kontrollü Deneyler. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Dergisi. 2017;4(1):73-92.
17. Krishnan V, Davidovitch Z. On a path to unfolding the biological mechanisms of orthodontic tooth movement. J Dent Res. 2009;88(7):597-608.
18. Bartel DP. Metazoan MicroRNAs. Cell. 2018;173(1):20-51.
19. Yang L, Cheng P, Chen C, He H-B, Xie G-Q, Zhou H-D, vd. Function loop mediates osteoblast mineralization. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27(7):1598-606.
20. Glass GV. Primary, Secondary, and Meta-Analysis of Research. Educational Researcher. 1976;5(10):3-8.
21. Topçu P. Cinsiyetin bilgisayar tutumu üzerindeki etkisi: bir meta analiz çalışması. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi, 2009.
22. Comparative Education: Vol 57, No 3 [İnternet]. [2021]. Erişim adresi: https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cced20/current?gclid=CjwKCAjwuvmHBhAxEiwAWAYj-IwhE45aX5Pwuuj4UeX953TYdW6qz9gbtKU7UW_L1kfBWwXaLIAjkBoCYGEQAvD_BwE
23. Tavşancil E, Kinay E. Üniversite giriş sınavı yordama geçerliği çalışmalarının meta analizi. Tez, Ankara: Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Ve Değerlendirme Anabilim Dalı; 2012.
24. Kunin CM. Antibiotic Resistance—A World Health Problem We Cannot Ignore. Ann Intern Med. 1979;99(6):859-60.