Effects of Rootstocks on Sugar and Organic Acid Contents of 'Deveci' Pear

Effects of Rootstocks on Sugar and Organic Acid Contents of 'Deveci' Pear

The aim of present study was to determine the effects of three rootstocks [quince BA 29 and EMC (Cydonia oblonga), and seedling of P. communis] on sugars and organic acid contents in 'Deveci' pear (Pyrus communis L.) cultivar during 20112015 years. In the study, oxalic, tartaric, malic, ascorbic, acetic, citric, fumaric and propionic acid as organic acids and fructose, sucrose, glucose and total sugar as sugars in the fruit samples were investigated in terms of rootstocks. Major organic acids for 'Deveci' pear were malic, ascorbic and propionic acids. Malic and ascorbic acid in BA 29 rootstock were higher than EMC and seedling rootstocks. Contrarily, propionic acid was higher in seedling rootstock. In terms of malic acid, BA 29 had the highest malic acid content (3425.3 mg 100g-1) while seedling rootstock had the lowest amount (2976.5 mg 100g-1). Significant differences were observed between rootstocks for tartaric, ascorbic, acetic, citric and fumaric acids. Tartaric, ascorbic, citric and fumaric acids in BA 29 and EMC rootstock were higher than the content of seedling rootstock. The most abundant sugars in 'Deveci' pear were fructose (32.4, 39.27 and 42.4 g kg-1 fw, respectively) and glucose (18.7, 22.3 and 26.7 g kg-1 fw) for BA 29, EMC and seedling rootstocks. The total sugar content of the seedling rootstock (74.0 g kg1 fw) was higher than BA 29 (53.0 g kg-1 fw) and EMC (65.8 g kg-1 fw)

___

  • Chen J., Wang Z., Wu J., Wang Q and Hu X., 2007. Chemical compositional characterization of eight pear cultivars grown in China. Food Chemistry, 104(1): 268-275.
  • Colaric M., Sturm K and Stampar F., 1999. Seasonal variation of sugars and organic acids in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) in different growing systems. Plant Physiology, 39: 91-96.
  • Colaric M., Stampar F., Solar A and Hudina M., 2006. Influence of branch bending on sugar, organic acid and phenolic content in fruits of 'Williams' pears (Pyrus communis L.). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 86: 2463-2467.
  • Dolenc K and Stampar F., 1997. An investigation of the application and conditions of analyses of HPLC methods for determining sugars and organic acids in fruits. Research reports of Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana; Ljubljana, Slovenia, 69: 99-106.
  • Dziezak JD., 2003. Acids. Encyclopaedia of Food Sciences and Nutrition (2nd edn) (Eds. B. Caballero, LC. Trugo and PM Finglas). Academic Press, London, pp. 7-17.
  • Ercisli S., 2004. A short review of the fruit germplasm resources of Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 51: 419-435.
  • FAO 2017. The FAOSTAT website. http://www.faostat.org. [Access: May 10, 2017].
  • Gundogdu M., Ozrenk K., Ercisli S., Kan T., Kodad O and Hegedus A., 2014. Organic acids, sugars, vitamin C content and some pomological characteristics of eleven hawthorn species (Crataegus spp.) from Turkey. Biological Research, 47: 21-26.
  • Hancock JF and Lobos GA., 2008. Pears. In: Temperate Fruit Crop Breeding: Germplasm to Genomics. Berlin, Germany, Springer, pp. 299-336.
  • Hudina M and Stampar F., 2000. Sugars and organic acids contents of European (Pyrus communis L.) and Asian (Pyrus serotine Rehd.) pear cultivars. Acta Aliment, 29: 217-230.
  • Jackson JE., 2003. Biology of apples and pears. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Muir JG., Rose R., Rosella O., Liels K., Barrett JS., Shepherd SJ and Gibson PR., 2009. Measurement of Short-Chain Carbohydrates in Common Australian Vegetables and Fruits by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 57: 554-565.
  • Nour V., Trandafr I and Ionica ME., 2010. Compositional Characteristics of Fruits of several Apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) Cultivars. Natulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 39(3): 228-233.
  • Ozcagiran R., Unal A., Ozeker E and Isfendiyaroglu M., 2004. Pear. Temperate Fruit Trees (Pome Fruits) Volume-II. Ege University Agriculture Faculty Publications Number: 556, Bornova-Izmir, Turkey, pp. 73-126 (in Turkish).
  • Peck GM., Andrews PK., Reganold JP and Fellman K., 2006. Apple orchard productivity and fruit quality under organic, conventional, and integrated management, HortScience, 41: 99-107.
  • Roth E., Berna A., Beullens K., Lammertyn J., Schenk A and Nicolai B., 2007. Postharvest quality of integrated and organically produced apple fruit. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 45: 11-19.
  • Sen F., Ünal A and Arda E., 2009. Bursa yöresinde yetiştirilen 'Deveci' armut çeşidinin yöresel olgunluk standartlarının ve depolama durumlarının saptanması üzerinde bir araştırma, Anadolu, 9(2): 33-48.
  • Sha S., Li J., Wu J and Zhang S., 2011. Characteristics of organic acids in the fruit of different pear species. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6(10): 2403-2410.
  • Silva MB., Andrade PB., Mendes GC., Seabra FM and Ferreira MA., 2002. Study of the Organic Acids Composition of Quince (Cydonia oblonga Miller) Fruit and Jam. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50: 2313-2317.
  • TSMS 2017. Turkish State Meteorological Service. https://mgm.gov.tr/eng/forecast-cities.aspx?m= SAMSUN. [Access: May 15, 2017].
Uluslararası Tarım ve Yaban Hayatı Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2149-8245
  • Başlangıç: 2015
  • Yayıncı: BOLU ABANT İZZET BAYSAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ > ZİRAAT VE DOĞA BİLİMLERİ FAKÜLTESİ