Envanter Yönetimi Açısından Ürün Seçiminde AHP-TOPSIS ve AHP-VIKOR Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Firmalar, olağanüstü rekabetin yaşandığı günümüz pazar koşullarında maliyetleri en aza indirgeyen ve kârları en üst düzeye çıkaran etkili envanter politikaları geliştirmeli ve uygulamalıdır. Envanterler, imalat işletmelerinin toplam varlıklarında önemli bir yere sahiptir. Bu önemli kalem için etkin envanter yönetimi politikalarının uygulanması, firmanın geleceği için çok önemlidir. Firmalar, önem seviyelerine göre sınıflandırdıkları envanteri kontrol ederek müşteri ihtiyaçlarını daha etkin bir şekilde karşılayabilirler. Bu bakış açısından yararlanılarak hazırlanan bu çalışmada, envanter yönetimi açısından en önemli ürünü belirlemek için çok kriterli karar verme yöntemlerini uygulayan bir uygulama sunulmuştur. Belirlenmiş kriterlere göre en önemli ürünü belirleme sürecinde kriterlerin ağırlıklarının hesaplanması için literatürde sıkça kullanılan AHP yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Bu ağırlıklar TOPSIS ve VIKOR yöntemlerinde girdi olarak kullanılmış ve alternatifler sıralanmıştır.

Comparison of AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-VIKOR Methods in Product Selection in terms of Inventory Management

Firms must develop and implement effective inventory policies that minimize costs and maximize profits in today's market conditions where extraordinary competition is experienced. Inventory has an important place in the total assets of manufacturing enterprises. Implementation of effective inventory management policies for this important item is crucial for the future of firms. Firms can meet customer needs more effectively by controlling fewer inventories that they classify according to their importance level. In this study, which is prepared by taking advantage of this point of view, application is presented that applies multi-criteria decision-making methods to determine the most important product in terms of inventory management. In the process of determining the product in the most important according to criteria determined, AHP method which is frequently used in the literature is applied for calculation weights of criteria. These weights are used in TOPSIS and VIKOR methods and results of these two methods are compared.

___

  • Hwang, C. L., and Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Multiple attribute decision making (pp. 58-191). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • Kılıç, A., Aygün, S., Aydın Keskin, G., and Baynal, K. A. (2014). Variant Perspective to Multi Criteria ABC Analysis Problem: Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process-Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 20(5), 179-188.
  • Kumar, G. A., Anzil, A., Ashik, K., James, A. T., and Ashok, J. K. (2017). Effective Inventory Management system through selective inventory control. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 3(6).
  • May, B. I., Atkinson, M. P., and Ferrer, G. (2017). Applying inventory classification to a large inventory management system. Journal of Operations and Supply Chain Management, 10(1), 68-86.
  • Opricovic, S. (1998). Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems. Faculty of Civil Engineering, Belgrade, 2(1), 5-21.
  • Opricovic, S., and Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European journal of operational research, 156(2), 445-455.
  • Özdemir, A., Özveri, O. (2013). Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process Analysis in Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification”. Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal, 19(2).
  • Partovi, F. Y., and Burton, J. (1993). Using the analytic hierarchy process for ABC analysis. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 13(9), 29-44.
  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resources allocation. New York: McGraw, 281.
  • Zhou, P. and Fan, L. (2007). A note on multi-criteria ABC inventory classification using weighted linear optimization. European journal of operational research, 182(3), 1488-1491.
  • Aydin Keskin, G., and Ozkan, C. (2013). Multiple criteria ABC analysis with FCM clustering. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2013.
  • Aydın, Ö. (2009). Hospital Location for Ankara with Fuzzy AHP. Dokuz Eylul University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences Journal, 24(2), 2009.
  • Bhattacharya, A., Sarkar, B., & Mukherjee, S. K. (2007). Distance-based consensus method for ABC analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 45(15), 3405-3420.
  • Boulos, M. N. K. (2003). Location-based health information services: a new paradigm in personalised information delivery. International journal of health geographics, 2(1), 2.
  • Cakir, O., and Canbolat, M. S. (2008). A web-based decision support system for multi-criteria inventory classification using fuzzy AHP methodology. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 1367-1378.
  • Chen, Y., Li, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., and Hipel, K. W. (2008). A case-based distance model for multiple criteria ABC analysis. Computers & Operations Research, 35(3), 776-796.
  • Ertugrul, I., and Tanriverdi, Y. (2013). ABC Method for Stock Controls and the Application of the AHP Analysis to Yarn Company. International Journal of Alanya Faculty of Business, 5(1), 2013.
  • Görgülü, I., Korkmaz, M., and Eren, T. (2013). Analytic network process and TOPSIS methods with selection of optimal investment strategy. Sigma, 31, 203-213.
  • Hatefi, S. M., and Torabi, S. A. (2015). A common weight linear optimization approach for multicriteria ABC inventory classification. Advances in Decision Sciences, 2015.