___

• Acharya, Amitav (2014). “Global International Relations (IR) and Regional Worlds”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 58, No. 4, p. 647-659.
• Acharya, Amitav, Pinar Bilgin and L.H.M. Ling (2016). “Global IR Special Issue”, International Studies Review, Vol. 18, No. 1, p. 4-146.
• Agathangelou, Anna M. and L.H.M. Ling (2004). “The House of IR: From Family Power Politics to the Poisies of Worldism”, International Studies Review, Vol. 6, No. 4, p. 21-49.
• Amin, Samir (1989). Eurocentrism. Translated by Russell Moore and James Membrez. 2009 ed., New York, Monthly Review Press.
• Barkawi, Tarak and Mark Laffey (2002). “Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations”, Millennium-Journal of International Studies, Vol. 31, No. 1, p. 109-127.
• Bhambra, Gurminder K. (2007). Rethinking Modernity: Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination. New York, Palgrave.
• Bilgin, Pinar (2016). “Do IR Scholars Engage with the Same World?”, Ken Booth and Toni Erskine (eds.), International Relations Theory Today. Oxford, Polity, p. 97-109.
• Bilgin, Pinar (2012). “Globalization and in/Security: Middle Eastern Encounters with International Society and the Case of Turkey”, Stephan Stetter (ed.), The Middle East and Globalization: Encounters and Horizons. New York, Palgrave Macmillian, p. 59-75.
• Bilgin, Pinar (2016). The International in Security, Security in the International. London, Routledge.
• Bilgin, Pinar (2021). “On the ‘Does Theory Travel?’Question: Traveling with Edward Said”, Zeynep Gülşah Çapan et al. (eds.), The Politics of Translation in International Relations. London, Palgrave, p. 245-255.
• Bilgin, Pinar (2020). “Opening up International Relations, Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love ‘Non-Western IR’”, Steven Roach (ed.), Handbook of Critical International Relations. , London, Edward Elgar, p. 12-28.
• Çapan, Zeynep Gülşah (2017). “Decolonising International Relations?”, Third World Quarterly, Vol. 38, No. 1, p. 1-15.
• Çapan, Zeynep Gülşah (2016). Re-Writing International Relations: History and Theory Beyond Eurocentrism in Turkey. London, Rowman & Littlefield.
• Çapan, Zeynep Gülşah, and Ayşe Zarakol (2017). “Postcolonial Colonialism? The Case of Turkey”, Charlotte Epstein (ed.), Against International Relations Norms. New York, Routledge, p. 193-210.
• Chan, Stephen (1994). “Beyond North-West: Africa and the East”, A. J. R. Groom and Margot Light (eds.), Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory. London, Pinter, p. 237-54.
• Chan, Stephen (2017). Plural International Relations in a Divided World. Cambridge, Polity.
• Chan, Stephen, Peter G Mandaville and Ronald Bleiker (eds.) (2001). The Zen of International Relations: IR Theory from East to West. London, Palgrave Macmillan.
• Crawford, Robert A. and Darryl S. Jarvis (eds.) (2001). International Relations - Still an American Social Science?: Toward Diversity in International Thought. Albany, State University of New York Press.
• Dhareshwar, Vivek (1990). “The Predicament of Theory”, Martin Kreiswirth and Mark Cheetham (eds.), Theory between the Disciplines: Authority/Vision/Politics. Ann Arbor, Michigan University Press.
• Fierke, Karin Marie and Vivenne Jabri (2019). “Global Conversations: Relationality, Embodiment and Power in the Move Towards a Global IR”, Global Constitutionalism, Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 506-535.
• Gopal, Priyamvada (2019). Insurgent Empire: Anticolonial Resistance and British Dissent. London, Verso.
• Grovogui, Siba N. (2006). Beyond Eurocentrism and Anarchy: Memories of International Order and Institutions. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.
• Grovogui, Siba N. (2002). “Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition”, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 315-38.
• Hagmann, Jonas and Thomas J. Biersteker (2014). “Beyond the Published Discipline: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of International Studies”, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 20, No. 2, p. 291-315.
• Hobson, John M. (2009). “Provincializing Westphalia: The Eastern Origins of Sovereignty”, International Politics, Vol. 46, No. 6, p. 671-690.
• Hobson, John M. (2004). The Eastern Origins of Western Civilization. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Hoffmann, Stanley (1977). “An American Social Science: International Relations”, Daedalus, Vol. 106, No. 3, p. 41-60.
• Holsti, Kalevi J. (1985). The Dividing Discipline: Hegemony and Diversity in International Theory. Boston, Allen & Unwin.
• Jabri, Vivienne and Stephen Chan (1966). “The Ontologist Always Rings Twice: Two More Stones About Structure and Agency in Reply to Hollis and Smith”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 22, No 1, p. 107-110.
• Jones, Branwen Gruffydd (2006). “Introduction: International Relations, Eurocentrism, and Imperialism”, Branwen Gruffydd Jones (ed.), Decolonizing International Relations. London, Rowman & Littlefield, p. 1-22.
• Landry, Donna and Gerald M. MacLean (1996). The Spivak Reader: Selected Works of Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak. New York and London, Routledge.
• Levine, Daniel J. and David M. McCourt (2018). “Why Does Pluralism Matter When We Study Politics? A View from Contemporary International Relations”, Perspectives on Politics, Vol. 16, No. 1, p. 92-109.
• Muppidi, Himadeep (2004). The Politics of the Global, Borderlines. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
• Narayan, Uma (2000). “Essence of Culture and a Sense of History: A Feminist Critique of Cultural Essentialism”, Uma
• Narayan and Sandra Harding (eds.), Decentering the Center: Philosophy for a Multicultural, Postcolonial, and Feminist World. , Bloomington, Indiana University Press, p. 80-100.
• Quijano, Anibal (2000). “Coloniality of Power, Eurocentrism, and Latin America”, Neplanta, Vol. 1, No. 3, p. 533-580.
• Rosenberg, Emily S. (2004). “Considering Borders”, Michael J. Hogan and Thomas G. Paterson (eds.), Explaining the History of American Foreign Relations. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 176-193.
• Sabaratnam, Meera (2011). “IR in Dialogue… but Can We Change the Subjects? A Typology of Decolonising Strategies for the Study of World Politics”, Millennium, Vol. 39, No. 3, p. 781-803.
• Shilliam, Robbie (2021). Decolonizing Politics: An Introduction. Cambridge, Polity.
• Shohat, Ella and Robert Stam (2014). Unthinking Eurocentrism: Multiculturalism and the Media. London, Routledge.
• “Special Issue: Locating the ‘I’ in ‘IR’: Dislocating Euro-American Theories” (2003). Global Society, Vol. 17, No. 2, p. 107-221.
• Subrahmanyam, Sanjay (1997). “Connected Histories: Notes toward a Reconfiguration of Early Modern Eurasia”, Modern Asian Studies, Vol. 31, No. 3, p. 735-762.
• Suzuki, Shogo, Yongjin Zhang and Joel Quirk (eds.) (2014). International Orders in the Early Modern World: Before the Rise of the West. London, Routledge.
• Tickner, Arlene B. and David Blaney (eds.) (2012). Thinking International Relations Differently. London, Routledge.
• Vaughan-Williams, Nick (2005). “International Relations and the Problem of History”, Millennium, Vol. 34, No. 1, p. 115-136.
• Waever, Ole (1998). “The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations”, International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4, p. 687-727.
• Wemheuer-Vogelaar et al. (2016). “The IR of the Beholder: Examining Global IR Using the 2014 TRIP Survey”, International Studies Review, Vol. 18, No. 1, p. 16-32.