PARTY COMPETITION AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION: A COMPARISON OF WESTEAST AND CANDIDATE COUNTRIES

How does the domestic structure of party competition affect parties’ political support for European integration? Is it possible to estimate a party’s position about European integration by looking at its political stance in domestic politics? Previous research has proved that the answer to the above questions is “yes”. This article aims to explore whether these findings travel to the candidate countries that are going to join the European family in a near future. Our findings show that this model is applicable to candidate countries. The results, on the other hand, suggest that the four candidate countries Serbia, Bosnia Herzegovina, and Macedonia introduce similar patterns with East European countries whereas Turkey is more similar to West Europe in terms of the structure of party competition.

___

Arnold, H. (2007). Political Arguments Against Turkey’s Accession to the European Union, Internazionale Politik und Gesellschaf 3, 101-113.

Budge, I. (2000). Expert Judgments of Party Policy Positions: Uses and Limitations in Political Research, European Journal of Political Research, 37(1), 103–113.

Erdogdu, E. (2002). Turkey and Europe: Undivided but not United, Middle East Review of International Affairs, 6(2), 40-51

Franklin, M. (1992). The Decline of Cleavage Politics. In Mark Franklin, T. Mackie and Henry Valen (Eds.), Electoral Change: Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.

Grigoriadis, I.N. (2006). Turkey’s Accession to the European Union: Debating the Most Difficult Enlargement Ever, SAIS Review, 26(1), 147-160.

Hix, S. and Lord, C. (1997). Political Parties in the European Union, New York, St. Martin’s.

Hix, S.(1999a). Dimensions and alignments in European Union Politics: Cognitive Constraints and Partisan Responses”, European Journal of Political Research, 35: 69-125.

Hix, S. (1999b). The political system of the European Union, London, Macmillan.

Hooghe, L., and Marks, G. (1999). Making of a Polity: The Struggle Over European Integration. In Herbert Kitschelt, Peter Lange, Gary Marks and John Stephens (Eds.), Continuity and Change in Contemporary Capitalism (pp. 70-97). Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press.

Hooghe, L., Marks, G. and Wilson, C. (2002). Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European integration?, Comparative Political Studies, 35, 965-989.

Inglehart, R. (1990). Cultural Shift in Advanced Industrial Society, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.

Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization, New Jersey, Princeton University Press.

Ladrech, R. (1994). Europeanization of Domestic Politics and Institutions: The Case of France, Volume 32, 1, 69–88.

Lane, D. (2002). The Legacy of State Socialism and the Future of Transformation, New York, Rowman and Littlefield.

Lipset, S. and Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An introduction”. In Seymour M. Lipset and Stein Rokkan (Eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Crossnational Perspectives, 1-64, New York, Free Press.

Marks, G. and Wilson, C. (2000). The Past in the Present: A Cleavage Theory of Party Response to European Integration, British Journal of Political Science, 30, 433–459.

Marks, G., Hooghe, L., Nelson, M. and Edwards, E. (2006) Party Competition and European Integration in the East and West : Different Structure, Same Causality, Comparative Political Studies, 39, 155.

Marks, G., Hooghe, L., Steenbergen, M. and Bakker, R. (2007). Cross-Validating Data on Party Positioning on European Integration, Electoral Studies, 26(1), 23-38.

Marks, G., Wilson, C. and Ray, L. (2002). National Political Parties and European Integration, American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 585-594.

Öniş, Z. (1999). Turkey, Europe and Paradoxes of Identity: Perspectives on the International Context of Democratization, Mediterranean Quarterly, 10(3), 107-136

Steenbergen, M. and Marks, G. (2007). Evaluating Expert Judgments, European Journal of Political Research, 46, 347–366.

Tavits, M. and Letki, N. (2009). When Left is Right: Party Ideology and Policy in Post-Communist Europe, American Political Science Review, 103, 555-69.

Tsebelis, G and Garrett, G. (2000). Legislative Politics in the European Union, European Union Politics, 1(9), 9-36.

Williams, S. (1990). Sovereignty and Accountability in the European Community, The Political Quarterly, 61(3), 299-317.
Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1307-9832
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2008
  • Yayıncı: Kenan ÇELİK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

TÜRKİYE’DE BÖLGELERARASI GELİR DAĞILIMI YAKINSAMASI: MEKANSAL EKONOMETRİK ANALİZ

Uğur ÇAPAR, Nihal YAYLA

TÜRKİYE’DE E-FATURA BAŞVURU SÜRECİ VE KULLANIMI

İlker KEFE, Zozan KANARIĞ

TÜRKİYE’DE BÜYÜKŞEHİR BELEDİYELERİNİN MALİ YAPILARI VE BÜTÇE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİKLERİNİN ORAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİYLE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Emine UZUNALİ, Abdurrahman halit GÖRMEZ

PARTY COMPETITION AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION: A COMPARISON OF WESTEAST AND CANDIDATE COUNTRIES

Alper Tolga BULUT

TÜRKİYE’DE YENİLENEBİLİR ELEKTRİK ENERJİSİ ÜRETİMİNİN BELİRLEYENLERİ

Özgür UYSAL, Emriye GÜMÜŞ

TÜRKİYE EKONOMİSİNDE İŞSİZLİĞİN BELİRLEYİCİSİ OLAN TEMEL MAKROEKONOMİK DEĞİŞKENLERİN TESPİTİNE İLİŞKİN BİR UYGULAMA

Fatih KAYHAN

İNSTAGRAM FENOMENLERİNİN GÖRSEL VE SÖZEL PAYLAŞIMLARININ MARKA TUTUMU, MARKA DEĞİŞTİRME VE ELEKTRONİK KULAKTAN KULAĞA PAZALA-MA ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Emel YILDIZ, İbrahim AVCI

KATILIM BANKALARI İLE GELENEKSEL BANKALARIN ÇKKV YÖNTEMLERİ İLE PERFORMANSININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: TOPSIS VE GRİ İLİŞKİSEL ANALİZ YÖNTEMLERİ İLE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI ANALİZ

Füsun KÜÇÜKBAY, Ümit Hasan GÖZKONAN

PARTY COMPETITION AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION: A COMPARISON OF WEST-EAST AND CANDIDATE COUNTRIES

Alper BULUT

İNSTAGRAM FENOMENLERİNİN GÖRSEL VE SÖZEL PAYLAŞIMLARININ MARKA TUTUMU, MARKA DEĞİŞTİRME VE ELEKTRONİK KULAKTAN KULAĞA PAZARLAMA ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Emel YILDIZ, İbrahim AVCI