" Eurosclerosis'ten 'Eurosteoporoz'a: Avrupa Birliği'nin uygar güç nosyonunun sonu

Avrupa Birliği kimi düşünürler tarafından bir uygar güç olarak tanımlan- maktadır. Bu kavram sorun çözme becerisi anlamında askeri seçenekler- den ziyade ekonomik enstrümanların ve diplomasinin ön plana çıkmasını ifade eder. Bu süreç, 1973 petrol krizi sonrası sekteye uğramış ve Euroscle- rosis olarak tanımlanan bir durgunluk dönemi yaşanmıştır. Uygar güç so- syolojik bir temele dayanır ve bu politikaların uygulanabilmesi için gerekli motivasyonun Avrupa Birliği’nin halklarının sahip olduğu sosyal ve si- yasal kültürde mevcut olduğu kabul edilir. Ancak uygar güç yaklaşımı özellikle 11 Eylül’den sonra sıkça eleştirilmeye başlanmıştır. Bu çalışmada Avrupa Birliği’nin 2004 ve 2007 genişlemelerinden sonra kimliğini oluş- turan normları ve Avrupa Birliği’nin uygar güç olma nosyonunu kaybet- meye başladığı iddia edilmektedir. Bu durum Avrupa Birliği’nin yapısında bir Eurosteoporoz meydana getirmiştir.

From ‘Eurosclerosis’ to ‘Eurosteoporoz’: End of the civil power notion of European Union

European Union is defined as a civil power by several authors. That term refers to the usage of economic instruments and diplomacy rather than mili- tary options in terms of problem-solving skills. This process suffered a standstill after the 1973 oil crisis and a recession period has experienced which is called as Eurosclerosis. Civil power is based on sociological basis, moreover it is accepted that the motivation which is necessary for the implementation of these policies is available in the social and political culture of the peoples of the European Union. However the approach of civil power is being criticized especially after September 11. In this study, it is claimed that the EU has began to lose both the norms that construct its identity and notion of being a civil power after the 2004 and 2007 enlargements. This situation has created a Eurosteoporoz in the structure of the European Union.

PDF

___

Aggestam, Lisbeth, ‘Introduction: Ethical Power Europe?’, International Affairs, Vol. 84, No.1, 2008, s. 1-11.
Ashley, Richard K., ‘The Poverty of Neorealism,’ International Organization, Vol. 38, No. 2, 1984, s. 225-286.
Bellamy, Alex J., ‘Humanitarian Intervention’, içinde Alan Collins, Contemporary Security Studies, (Oxford: Oxford Press, 2007), s. 359-377.
Bentolila, Samuel ve Guiseppe Bertola, ‘Firing Costs and Labour Demand: How Bad is Eurosclerosis?’, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 57, 1990, s. 381-402.
Breuss, Fritz, ‘An Evaluation of the EU’s Fifth Enlargement with Special Focus on Bulgaria and Romania’, içinde F. Keereman ve I. Szekely (der.), Five Years of an Enlarged EU, (Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag 2010), s. 221-248.
Bull, Hedley, ‘Civilian Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 21, No. 2, Aralık 1982, s. 149–170.
Carr, Edward, The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939, (New York: Perennial, 2001).
Center for Strategic and International Studies Commission on Smart Power, A Smarter, More Secure America, (Washington, D.C.: CSIS, 2007).
Deutsch, Karl W., Sidney A. Burrell ve Robert A. Kann , Political Community and the North Atlantic Areas: International Organization in the Light of Historical Experience, (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957).
Deutsch Karl W., ‘Security Community’, içinde James N. Rosenau (der.), International Politic and Foreign Polity, (New York: Free Press, 1961).
Dahl, Robert A., ‘The Concept of Power’, Behavioral Science, Vol. 2, No. 3, Temmuz 1957, s. 201-215.
Duchêne, François, ‘Europe’s Role in World Peace’, içinde Richard Mayne (der.) Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead, (London: Fontana, 1972).
Duchêne François, ‘The European Community and the Uncertainties of Interdependence’, içinde M. Kohnstamm, W. Hager (der.) A Nation Writ Large? Foreign Policy Problems before the European Community, (Macmillan: Basingstoke, 1973).
Falkner, Gerda ve Oliver Treib, ‘Three Worlds of Compliance or Four? The EU-15 Compared to New Member States’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 2008, Vol. 46. No. 2, 2008, s. 293–313.
Fox, William, The Super-Powers: The United States, Britain, and the Soviet Union, Their Responsibility for Peace, (Harcourt: Brace a. Co, 1944).
Freres, Christian, ‘The European Union as Global Civil Power: Development Cooperation in EU–Latin American Relations’, Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, Vol. 42, No. 2, 2000, s. 63–86.
Frey, Frederick W., 1993. ‘The Perception of Power: Regarding What Is Perceived.’, International Review of Sociology, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1993, s. 156-182.
Giersch, Herbert, ‘Eurosclerosis’, IfW Discussion Paper Kiel Institute for World Economics, No. 112, 1985.
Galtung, Johan, The European Community: A Superpower in the Making, (Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1973).
Harnisch, Sebastian ve Hanns Maull, Germany as a Civilian Power? The Foreign Policy of the Berlin Republic, (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2001).
Kerr, Pauline, ‘Human Security’, içinde Alan Collins, Contemporary Security Studies, (Oxford: Oxford Press, 2007), ss. 121-135.
King, Gary ve Christopher J. L. Murray, ‘Rethinking Human Security’, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 116, No. 4, Kış 2001-2002, s. 585-610.
Korpi, Walter, ‘Eurosclerosis and the Sclerosis of Objectivity: On the Role of Values Among Economic Policy Experts’, The Economic Journal, Vol. 106, No. 439, Kasım 1996, s. 1727-1746.
Kříž, Zdeněk, ‘German Involvement in the War against International Terrorism. End of Civilian Power?’, Central European Political Studies Review, Bölüm. 2-3, Vol. 8, İlkbahar/Yaz 2006, http://www.cepsr.com/clanek.php?ID=265 (Erişim Tarihi: 01.12. 2010).
Lewis, Jeffrey, ‘EU Policy on Iraq: The Collapse and Reconstruction of Consensus-based Foreign Policy’, International Politics, Vol. 46, 2009, s. 432–450.
Manners, Ian, ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2002, s. 235-258.
Manners, Ian, ‘Global Europa: Mythology of the European Union in World Politics’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 2010, Vol. 48. No. 1, 2010, s. 67–87.
Maull, Hanns W., ‘Germany and Japan: The New Civilian Powers’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 69, No. 1, 1990, s. 91-106.
Maull, Hanns W., ‘Germany and the Use of Force: Still a Civilian Power?’, Survival, No. 2, Yaz 2000, s. 56 – 80.
Mearsheimer, John, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, (New York: W.W. Norton, 2001).
Morgenthau, Hans J., Politics Among Nations. The Struggle for Power and Peace, Kenneth Thompson tarafından gözden geçirilmiş Altıncı Baskı (New York: McGraw Hill, 1985).
Nye Jr. Joseph S., ‘Soft Power’, Foreign Policy, No. 80, Twentieth Anniversary, Sonbahar 1990, s. 153-171.
Padoa-Schioppa, Tomasso, Europe, a Civil Power, (Londra: The Federal Trust for Education and Research, 2004).
Ripsman, Norrin M., ‘Globalization and the National Security State: A Framework for Analysis’, International Studies Review, Vol. 7, 2005, s. 199-227.
Quille, Quille, Giovanni Gasparini, Roberto Menotti ve Nicoletta Pirozzi, ‘Developing EU Civil Military Co-ordination: The Role of the new Civilian Military Cell’, (der.)
Stephen Pullinger, Joint Report by ISIS Europe and CeMiSS, Brüksel, Haziran 2006.
Raveaud, Gilles, ‘The European Employment Strategy: Towards More and Better Jobs?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 45. No. 2. 2007, s. 411–434.
Riboud, Michelle, Carolina Sánchez-Páramo ve Carlos Silva-Jáuregui, Does Eurosclerosis Matter?: Institutional Reform and Labor Market Performance in Central and Eastern Europe, (Washington DC: World Bank Publications, 2002).
Sadurski, Wojciech, ‘Accession’s Democracy Dividend: The Impact of the EU Enlargement upon Democracy in the New Member States of Central and Eastern Europe’, European Law Journal, Vol. 10, No. 4, Temmuz 2004, s. 371–401.
Senghaas, Dieter, The Civilisation of Conflict: Constructive Pacifism as a Guiding Notion for Conflict Transformation, Berghof Research Center for Constructive Conflict Management, 2004.
Waltz, Kenneth N., Theory of International Politics, (New York: McGraw Hill, 1979).
Waltz, Kenneth N., ‘Evaluating Theories’, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 91, No. 4, Aralık 1997, s. 913-917.
Weber, Max, Sosyoloji Yazıları, (der.) H.H. Gerth-C.W. Mills, (çev.) Taha Parla, (İstanbul: İletişim, 2003).