___

• Ağayev, S. (2010). “Doğrudan Yabancı Sermaye Yatırımları ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: Geçiş Ekonomileri Örneğinde Panel Eştümleşme ve Panel Nedensellik Analizleri”, Gazi Üniversitesi, İİBF Dergisi, 12/1, 159-184.
• Ağayev, S. (2011). “İhracat ve Ekonomik Büyüme İlişkisi: 12 Geçiş Ekonomisi Örneğinde Panel Eştümleşme ve Panel Nedensellik Analizleri”, Ege Akademik Bakış, Cilt 11, Sayı: 2, 241 – 254.
• Ahn, J. -H., Han, S.-P. ve Lee, Y.-S. (2006). "Customer Churn Analysis: Churn Determinants and Mediation Effects of Partial Defection In The Korean Mobile Telecommunications Service Industry". Telecommunications Policy, 30(10-11), 552–568.
• Ariöz, A. (2005). Telekomüni̇kasyon Sektöründe Serbestleşme Süreci̇. Rekabet Kurumu, Ankara.
• Atiyas, İ. ve Doğan, P. (2007). "When good intentions are not enough : Sequential entry and competition in the Turkish mobile industry", Telecommunications Policy, 31, 502–523.
• http://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2007.05.012, (Erişim Tarihi: 14.10.2015).
• Badulescu, A. (2011). Competition and Oligopoly In Telecommunications Industry In The EU. http://tr.scribd.com/doc/48599342/Competition-and-oligopoly-in-telecommunications-industry-in-the-EU, (Erişim Tarihi:14.10.2015).
• Bagdadioglu, N. ve Cetinkaya, M. (2010). "Sequencing in telecommunications reform: A review of the Turkish case", Telecommunications Policy, 34(11), 726–735.
• Baltagi, Badi H. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, Third Edition, John Wiley&Sons Ltd., England.
• Borenstein, S. ve Rose, L. N. (1994). "Competition and Price Dispersion in the U.S. Airline Industry", Journal of Political Economy, (102), 653–683.
• Borissova, L. (2001). "Promoting Competition, Liberalization and Regulation of The Telecommunications Sector in the Central and Eastern European Countries", European Common Market Law Review, 22(2), 59–73.
• BTK (2016a). Pazar Verileri, Bilgi Teknololojileri ve İletişim Kurumu, http://www.btk.gov.tr/tr-TR/Sayfalar/Pazar-Verileri, (Erişim Tarihi: 20.04.2016).
• BTK (2016b). Numara Taşınabilirliği, http://www.nts.gov.tr/, (Erişim Tarihi: 20.04.2016).
• Buehler, S., Dewenter, R. ve Haucap, J. (2006). "Mobile number portability in Europe", Telecommunications Policy, 30(7), 385–399.
• http://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2006.04.001, (Erişim Tarihi: 10.10.2015).
• Chen, P. Y. ve Forman, C. (2006). "Can Vendors Influence Switching Costs and Compatibility in an Environment with Open Standards?", MIS Quarterly, 30, 1–22.
• Chen, P. Y. ve Hitt, L. M. (2002). "Measuring Switching Costs and Their Determinants in Internet Enabled Businesses: A Study of the On-line Brokerage Industry", Information Systems Research, 13(3), 255–276.
• Cho, D., Ferreira, P. ve Telang, R. (2013). The Impact of Mobile Number Portability on Price , Competition and Consumer Welfare Introduction, School of Information Systems and Management, Heinz College, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213.
• Demirel, M. (2012). Reklamda Slogan Etkeni Üzerine Bir Alan Araştırması: GSM Operatörlerinde Numara Taşıma Örneği, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fırat Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İletişim Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı, Elazığ.
• Doganoglu, T. ve Grzybowski, L. (2013). Dynamic duopoly competition with switching costs and network externalities. Review of Network Economics, 12(January), 1–25.
• Engle, Robert F. ve Granger, C. W. J. (1987), “Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing”, Econometrica, 55, s.251–276.
• European Parliament (2002). Directive 2002/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 March 2002 on universal service, file:///C:/Users/win7/Downloads/1495_file_MOD6_SEC4_EUNRF.AuthorizationDirective.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 20.10.2015).
• Fuentelsaz, L., Maicas, J. P. ve Polo, Y. (2012). "Switching Costs, Network Effects, and Competition in the European Mobile Telecommunications Industry", Information Systems Research, 23, 93–108.
• Gans, J. S. ve King, S. P. (2000). "Mobile network competition, customer ignorance and fixed-to-mobile call prices", Information Economics and Policy, 12(4), 301–327.
• Geradin, D. (2000). The Opening of State Monopolies to Competition: Main Issues of the Liberalization Process, Boston: Kluwer Law International.
• Grajek, M. (2010). Estimating network effects and compatibility: Evidence from the Polish mobile market. Information Economics and Policy, May, 130–143.
• Grzybowski, L. (2005). "Regulation of mobile telephony across the European Union: An empirical analysis", Journal of Regulatory Economics, 28(1), 47–67.
• Güngör, M. ve Evren, G. (2010). Mobil Numara Taşınabilirliği, Rekabete ve Tüketicilere Etkileri: Ardıl Düzenleyici Etki Analizi Çalışması, Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İletişim Kurumu Sektörel Araştırma ve Stratejiler Dairesi Başkanlığı, Ankara.
• Güngör, M. ve Tözer, A. (2009). "Telekomünikasyon Sektöründe Şebeke Etkileri, Piyasaya İlk Giren Avantajları ve Bir Rekabet Politikası Aracı Numara Taşınabilirliği Uygulaması", Rekabet Kurumu 2. Rekabet Ekonomisi ve Politikası Sempozyumu, 9-10 Ekim 2009, 143-179, Denizli.
• Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H. ve Shin, Y. (2003) “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels” Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), s. 53–74.
• İleri, N. (2009). Telekomüni̇kasyon Hi̇zmetleri̇nde Fi̇yatlandirma Strateji̇leri̇, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İşletme Anabilim Dalı.
• ITU (2015a). ICT Statistics Newslog Mobile Number Portability, http://www.itu.int/ITU-D/ict/newslog/CategoryView,category,Mobile% 2Bnumber%2Bportability.aspx, (Erişim Tarihi: 08.06.2015).
• ITU (2015b). Mobile Cellular Subscriptions, http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/statistics/2015/Mobile_cellular_2000-2014.xls, (Erişim Tarihi: 19.11.2015).
• Kandemir, A. (2002). Ulusal Numaralandırma Planları ve Numara Taşınabilirliği: Standartlar, Yöntemler ve Sonuçlar, Telekomünikasyon Kurumu Uzmanlık Tezi, Ankara.
• Kutlu, B. (2013). "Effects of Mobile Number Portability : Case of Turkey", International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(14), 120–124.
• Lee, J., Kim, Y., Lee, J.-D. ve Park, Y. (2006). "Estimating The Extent of Potential Competition In The Korean Mobile Telecommunications Market: Switching Costs and Number Portability", International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(1), 107–124.
• Levin, A., C. Lin ve J.C. Chia-Shang (2002) “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finite-Sample Properties”, Journal of Econometrics, 108, 1–24.
• Lyons, S. (2006). Measuring the Benefits of Mobile Number Portability, Trinity College Dublin, https://www.tcd.ie/Economics/TEP/2006_papers/TEP9.pdf, (Erişim Tarihi: 15.10.2015).
• Maddala, G.S. (1992). Introduction to Econometric, Second Edition, Macmillan Publishing Company, New York.
• McCloughan, P. ve Lyons, S. (2006). "Accounting for ARPU: New evidence from international panel data", Telecommunications Policy, 30(10-11), 521–532.
• Meral, A. ve Baş, M. (2013). "Türkiye’de Faaliyet Gösteren GSM Operatörlerinin Hizmet Kalitesi Bakımından Karşılaştırılması ve Uygulanan Rekabet Stratejileri", Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 15 /2 (2013), 41-70.
• Park, M. (2011). "The economic impact of wireless number portability", Journal of Industrial Economics, 59(4), 714–745.
• Pedroni, P. (1999) “Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 653–670.
• Pedroni, P. (2004) “Panel Cointegration; Asymptotic and Finite Sample Properties of Pooled Time Series Tests with an Application to the PPP Hypothesis”, Econometric Theory, 20, 597–625.
• Sánchez, B. U. ve Asimakopoulos, G. (2012). "Regulation and competition in the European mobile communications industry: An examination of the implementation of mobile number portability", Telecommunications Policy, 36(3), 187–196.
• Shi, W., Zhou, W. ve Liu, J. (2010). "Analysis of The Influencing Factors of Users’ Switching Intention in The Context of One-way Mobile Number Portability", The Journal of China Universities of Posts and Telecommunications, 17(July), 112–117.
• Shum, M. (2004). "Does Advertising Overcome Brand Loyalty? Evidence From The Breakfast-Cereals Market", Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 13, 241–272.
• Shy, O. (2002). "A quick-and-easy method for estimating switching costs", International Journal of Industrial Organization, January, 71–87.
• Šopovová, A. (2010). Oligopoly Theory: Mobile Phone Providers in the Czech Republic, Yayımlanmamış Lisans Tezi, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Social Sciences Institute of Economic Studies, file:///C:/Users/win7/Downloads/bcsopovova.pdf, (Erişim tarihi: 15.10.2015).
• Srinuan, P. ve Bohlin, E. (2009). Mobile Number Portability: Evaluating the Swedish mobile market, The Conference on Economics of ICT 2009, http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/publication/97762-mobile-number-portability-evaluating-the-swedish-mobile-market, (Erişim Tarihi: 15.10.2015).
• Ürper, C. (2009). GSM Sektöründe Numara Taşınabilirliği ve Operatör Değiştirme Davranışları: Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Numara Taşıma Niyeti Üzerine Bir Araştırma, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
• Vodafone. (2015). Tarihçe, http://www.vodafone.com.tr/VodafoneHakkinda/ tarihce_home.php, (19.11.2015).
• Wei, X. ve Zhu, K. (2012). Reducing Consumer Switching Costs with Technology Portability: Evidence of Market Competition in the Global Wireless Industry, San Diego, http://fudan-uc.ucsd.edu/_files/02052013_CRW_XiahuaWei.pdf, (20.11.2015).
• Yıldız, H. (2013). Mobil Numara Taşınabilirliği Uygulamasını Tüketici Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türkiye İncelemesi, Bilgi Teknolojileri ve İletişim Kurumu İdari Uzmanlık Tezi, Mayıs 2013, BTK Yayın No: 0159.