Abdulkareem ALMARRAWI

7518

Yatay Alveolar Distraksiyon Osteogenezinde Dental İmplantların Sağkalım Oranı

DO, ayrılmış kemik segmentlerinin aşamalı gerilmesiyle arada yeni kemiğin olustuğu cerrahi tekniktir. Alveolar DO, vertikal ve horizontal yönlerde aveolar kemik ogmentasyonu için etkili bir teknik olarak tanıtılmıştır. Bu çalışmanın amaçı, horizontal alveolar DO nun teknik sonuçların, ve distrakte kemiklere yerleştirilmiş dental implantların sağ kalım oranını değerlendirmektir. Mandibular posterior alveolar kemik genişliğinde azalma olan 12 sağlıklı bireyde horizontal alveolar DO ile kemik rekonstrüksiyonu yapıldı. 4 ay sonra, dental implantlar yerleştirildi. Dental implantların sağ kalım oranı iki periotta değerlendirildi. Fonksiyonel yüklemeden önce (4 ay), ve ikincisi: fonksiyonel yüklemeden sonrası (6 ay sürdü). Dental implantların sağkalım oranları birinci dönemde % 100, ikincisinde % 94.1 bulundu. DO dişsiz alveolar sırtların eksikliklerinin düzeltilmesinde etkili ve güvenilir bir cerrahi yöntem olabilir.
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Alveolar Kemik, Distraksiyon Osteogenezi (DO), Dental İmplant, Sağkalım Oranı

Survival Rate of Dental Implants in Horizontal Alveolar Distraction Osteogenesis

Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is the surgical technique of generating new bone by progressive stretching of divided bone segments. Alveolar DO was introduced as an effective new technique for ridge augmentation in vertical and horizontal directions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of horizontal alveolar DO, by assessment the survival rate of dental implants placed in the distracted bones. 12 systematically healthy individuals, with reduction in the width of alveolar bone in posterior mandible, bone reconstruction was done by horizontal alveolar DO. After 4 months dental implants were placed. The survival rate of dental implants was assessed in two periods: the first before functional loading (4 months), and the second after functional loading (lasted to 6 months). Survival rates of dental implants were 100% in the first period and 94.1% in the second. Distraction osteogenesis can be an effective and reliable surgical method to correct deficits of edentulous ridges.
Keywords:

Alveolar Bone, Distraction Osteogenesis (DO), Dental Implant, Survival Rate,

PDF

___

  • 1- Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Impl Res, 2006; 17 (2): 136–159.
  • 2- Clementini M, et al. Success rate of dental implants inserted in autologous bone graft regenerated areas: A systematic review. ORAL & Implantology – 2011; Anno IV (N. 3-4) :3-10.
  • 3- F. Pourdanesh, M. Esmaeelinejad , F. Aghdashi. Clinical outcomes of dental implants after use of tenting for bony augmentation: a systematic review. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2017; 55: 999–1007.
  • 4- Jimi E, Hirata S, Osawa K, et al. The current and future therapies of bone regeneration to repair bone defects. Int J Dent, 2012; Vol 2012: ID 148261.
  • 5- S Bozkaya, et al. Use of alveolar distraction osteogenesis for implant placement: a case report with eight-year follow-up. Australian Dental Journal, 2016; 61: 252–256.
  • 6- Turker N, Basa S, Vural G. Evaluation of osseous regeneration in alveolar distraction osteogenesis with histological and radiological aspects. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2007;65(4):608-14.
  • 7- Yalcin S, Ordulu M, Emes Y, Gur H, Aktas I, Caniklioglu C. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis before placement of dental implants. Implant Dent, 2006;15(1):48-52.
  • 8- Dinse WE, Burnett RR. Anterior maxillary restoration using distraction osteogenesis and implants: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent, 2008;100(4):250-3.
  • 9- Garcia Garcia A, Somoza Martin M, Gandara Vila P, Saulacic N, Gandara- Rey JM. Alveolar distraction before insertion of dental implants in the posterior mandible. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2003: 41: 376–379.
  • 10- Iizuka T, Hallermann W, Seto I, Smolka W, Smolka K, Bosshardt DD. Bi-directional distraction osteogenesis of the alveolar bone using an extraosseous device. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2005: 16: 700–707.
  • 11- Laster, Z., Rachmiel, A. & Jensen, O. Alveolar width distraction osteogenesis for early implant placement. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 2005; 63: 1724–1730.
  • 12- Laster, Z., Reem, Y. & Nagler, R. Horizontal alveolar ridge distraction in edentulous patient. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 2011; 69: 502–506.
  • 13- Chiapasco, M., Ferrini, F., Casentini, P., Accardi, S. & Zaniboni, M. Dental implants placed in expanded narrow edentulous ridges with the extension crest device. A 1-3-year multicenter follow-up study. Clinical Oral Implant Research, 2006b; 17: 265–272.
  • 14- Watzak, G., Zechner, W., Tepper, G., Vasak, C., Busenlechner, D. & Bernhart, T. Clinical study of horizontal alveolar distraction with modified micro bone screws and subsequent implant placement. Clinical Oral Implant Research, 2006; 17: 723–729.
  • 15- Takahashi, T., Funaki, K., Shintani, H. & Haruoka, T. Use of horizontal alveolar distraction osteogenesis for implant placement in a narrow alveolar ridge: a case report. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 2004; 19: 291–294.
  • 16- Garcia-Garcia, et al. Horizontal alveolar distraction: a surgical technique with the transport segment pedicled to the mucoperiosteum. Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 2004; 62: 1408–1412.
  • 17- Swennen G, Schliephake H, Dempf R, Schierle H, Malevez C. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature: Part 1: clinical studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2001; 30(2): 89-103.
  • 18- Chiapasco, M., Lang, N.P. & Bosshardt, D. Quality and quantity of bone following alveolar distraction osteogenesis in the human mandible. Clin Oral Impl Res, 2006; 17(4) :394-402.
  • 19- McAllister, B.S. Histologic and radiographic evidence of vertical ridge augmentation utilizing distraction osteogenesis: 10 consecutively placed distractors. Journal of Periodontology, 2001; 72: 1767– 1779.
  • 20- Raghoebar, G.M., Liem, R.S.B. & Vissink, A. Vertical distraction of the severely resorbed edentulous mandible: a clinical, histological and electron microscopic study of 10 treated cases. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2002; 13: 558–565.
  • 21- Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissue: Part 1. The influence of stability of fixation and soft tissue preservation. Clin Orthop, 1989; 238: 249–281.
  • 22- Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissue: Part 2. The influence of the rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop, 1989; 239: 263–285.
  • 23- McCarthy JG, Schreiber, J, Karp N, Thorne CH, Grayson BH. Lengthening the human mandible by gradual distraction. Plast Reconstr Surg, 1992; 89: 1–8.
  • 24- Chin M, Toth B. Distraction osteogenesis in maxillofacial surgery using internal devices: Review of five cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1996; 54:45–53.
  • 25- Jensen OT, Cockrell R, Kuhlke L, Reed C. Anterior maxillary alveolar distraction osteogenesis: A prospective 5-year clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2002;17:52–68.
  • 26- Gaggl A, Schultes G, Kärcher H. Vertical alveolar ridge distraction with prosthetic treatable distractors: A clinical investigation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 2000; 15: 701–710.
  • 27- Saulacic N, Iizuka T, Martin MS, Garcia AG. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2008; 37(1):1–7.
  • 28- Samchukov ML, Cherkashin AM, Cope JB: Distraction osteogenesis: history and biologic basis of new bone formation, in Lynch SE, Genco RJ, Marx RE (eds): Tissue Engineering: Applications in Maxillofacial Surgery and Periodontics. Carol Stream, Quintessence, 1999, pp 131-146.
  • 29- Chiapasco M, Brusai R, Galioto S: Distraction osteogenesis of a fibular revascularized flap for improvement of oral implant positioning in a tumor patient: A case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2000; 58: 1434.
  • 30- Rubio-Bueno P, Padrón A, Villa E, et al: Distraction osteogenesis of the ascending ramus for mandibular hypoplasia using extraoral or intraoral devices: A report of 8 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2000; 58: 593.
  • 31- Block MS, Brister GD: Use of distraction osteogenesis for maxillary advancement: Preliminary results. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1994; 52: 282.
  • 32- Nosaka, Y., Kitano, S., Wada, K. & Komori, T. Endosseous implants in horizontal alveolar ridge distraction osteogenesis. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 2002; 17: 846– 853.
  • 33- Nosaka, Y., Kobayashi, M., Kitano, S. & Komori, T. Horizontal alveolar ridge distraction osteogenesis in dogs: radiographic and histologic studies. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, 2005; 20: 837–842.
  • 34- Aparicio, C. & Jensen, O.T. Alveolar ridge widening by distraction osteogenesis: a case report. Practical Procedures and Aesthetic Dentistry, 2001; 13: 663–668.
  • 35- Isoda K, et al. Relationship between the bone density estimated by cone-beam computed tomography and the primary stability of dental implants. Clin. Oral Impl. Res, 2012 Jul;23(7):832-6.
  • 36- Garcia AG, Martin MS, Vila PG, Maceiras JL. Minor complications arising in alveolar distraction osteogenesis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2002; 60: 496–501.
  • 37- Shukla A, et al. Alveolar ridge augmentation using distraction osteogenesis: a clinical trial. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research, 2012; 2 (1); 25–29.
  • 38- Enislidis G, et al. Analysis of complications following alveolar distraction osteogenesis and implant placement in the partially edentulous mandible. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 2005; 100: 25-30.
  • 39- Misch C. An implant is not a tooth: A comparison of periodontal indices. In: Misch C. Contemporary implants dentistry. Third Edition, Canada , Mosby, Inc. 2008; (Ch 41): pp 1055- 1072.
  • 40- Misch C, et al. Implant Success, Survival, and Failure: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dentistry, 2008; 17: 5-15.
  • 41- Mistry G, Shetty O, Shetty S, Singh R. Measuring implant stability: A review of different methods. Journal of Dental Implants, 2014; 4(2): 165- 169.
  • 42- Javed, F. & Romanos, G.E. The role of primary stability for successful immediate loading of dental implants. A literature review. Journal of Dentistry, 2010 38: 612–620.
  • 43- Bilhan H, et al. The Evaluation of the Reliability of Periotest for Implant Stability Measurements: An In Vitro Study. Journal of Oral Implantology, 2015; vol XLI(4): e90- e95.
  • 44- López A, et al. Resonance frequency analysis of dental implant stability during the healing period. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2008;13(4): E244-7.
  • 45- Barewal RM, Oates TW, Meredith N, Cochran DL. Resonance frequency measurement of implant stability in vivo on implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl, 2003; 18(5): 641-51.
  • 46- Uribe R, Peñarrocha M, Balaguer J, Fulgueiras N. Immediate loading in oral implants. Present situation. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal, 2005;10 Suppl 2: E143-53.
  • 47- Aparicio C, Lang N.R, Rangert B. Validity and clinical significance of biomechanical testing of implant/bone interface. Clin Oral Impl Res, 2006; 17: 2–7.
  • 48- Huwiler MA, Pjetursson BE, Bosshardt DD, Salvi GE, Lang NP. Resonance frequency analysis in relation to jawbone characteristics and during early healing of implant installation. Clin Oral Implants Res, 2007; 18(3): 275-280.
  • 49- Park J, et al. resonance frequency analysis from two directions: a prospective clinical study during the initial healing period. Clin Oral Impl Res, 2010; 21: 591–597.
  • 50- Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: Biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000, 2008; 47:51–66.
  • 51- Isaacson B, et al. Effectiveness of resonance frequency in predicting orthopedic implant strength and stability in an in vitro osseointegration model. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2009; 46(9): 1109-20.
  • 52- Kessler-Liechti G, Zix J, Mericske-Stern R. Stability measurements of 1-stage implants in the edentulous mandible by means of resonance frequency analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl, 2008; 23(2):353–58.
  • 53- Raikar S, et al. Factors Affecting the Survival Rate of Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community Dentistry, 2017; 7(6): 351–355.
  • 54- Chiapasco M, Casentini,P, Zaniboni M. Bone Augmentation Procedures in Implant Dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl, 2009; 24(SUPPL):237–259.
  • 55- Chiapasco M, Consolo U, Bianchi A, Ronchi P. Alveolar distraction osteogenesis for the correction of vertically deficient edentulous ridges: a multicenter prospective study on humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl, 2004;19: 399-407.
Uluslararası Diş Hekimliği Bilimleri Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2149-8628
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Dişeti Çekilmesinde Epitez Kullanımı: Olgu Raporu

Gözde MEMİŞOĞLU, Ece AÇIKGÖZ

Yatay Alveolar Distraksiyon Osteogenezinde Dental İmplantların Sağkalım Oranı

Abdulkareem ALMARRAWI

Eksternal Kök Rezorpsiyonlu Ve Geniş Periapikal Lezyonlu Bir Dişin Endodontik Tedavisi

Damla KIRICI, Meltem ÇOLAK, Ayşe Nur KUŞUÇAR

Coğrafik Dil ve Psoriasis Hastalığı Arasındaki İlişki: Olgu Sunumu ve Literatür Derlemesi

Birsen KORKMAZ, Murat İnanç CENGİZ, Rafet KOCA

Alt Çenenin Ön Bölgesinde Yer Alan Çevresinde Büyük Bir Kist Olan Gömülü Dişlerin Beklenmedik Patolojik Bulgusu

Bilgün ÇETİN, Fatma Büşra DOĞAN, Faruk AKGÜNLÜ