Rezin Matriks CAD/CAM Materyaller

CAD/CAM, bilgisayar destekli tasarım ve bilgisayar destekli üretim anlamına gelmektedir. Diş hekimliğinde tasarım ve üretim sürecini hızlandırmak için CAD/CAM sistemleri kullanılmaktadır. Üç boyutlu tasarım ve frezeleme ile fiziksel bir modele ihtiyaç duymadan çeşitli restorasyonlar üretilebilmektedir. Ağız boşluğunu taramak ve dijital ölçü almak mümkündür. Restorasyon, yazılım vasıtasıyla tasarlanır ve laboratuvar aşaması olmadan daha kısa sürede üretilebilir. Ayrıca restorasyonların mekanik dayanımı ve kenar uyumluluğu iyileştirilir ve estetik restorasyonların üretilmesi amaçlanır. CAD/CAM teknolojisi zaman tasarrufu, olası hataların ortadan kaldırılması, kullanım kolaylığı ve tedavi kalitesi gibi avantajlar sunmaktadır. CAD/CAM restorasyonlarına yönelik artan talep ile birlikte çeşitli materyaller geliştirilmiştir. Günümüzde CAD/CAM malzemeleri piyasada yaygın olarak bulunmaktadır ve prefabrike bloklardan ve disklerden restorasyonlar üretilebilmektedir. Bu derlemede piyasada nispeten yeni olan ve dental restorasyonlar için bazı olumlu özelliklere sahip olduğu iddia edilen rezin matriks CAD/CAM materyaller anlatılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

CAD/CAM, rezin matriks, hibrit, nanoseramik

Resin Matrix CAD/CAM Materials

CAD/CAM stands for computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing. CAD/CAM systems are used to speed up the design and production process in dentistry. With three-dimensional design and milling, various restorations can be fabricated without the need for a physical model. It is possible to scan the oral cavity and take digital impressions. The restoration can be designed with the software's help and fabricated in a shorter time without laboratory stages. In addition, the mechanical strength and edge compatibility of the restorations are improved and the fabrication of aesthetic restorations is aimed. CAD/CAM technology offers advantages such as time savings, elimination of potential errors, ease of use, and treatment quality. With the increasing demand for CAD/CAM restorations, various materials have been developed. Nowadays, CAD/CAM materials are widely available on the market and restorations can be produced from prefabricated blocks and discs. In this review, resin matrix CAD/CAM materials, which are relatively new on the market and claimed to have some positive properties for dental restorations, are described.

Keywords:

CAD/CAM, nanoceramic, hybrid, resin matrix,

PDF

___

References 1. Mörmann WH, Brandestini M, Lutz F, Barbakow F. Chairside computer-aided direct ceramic inlays. Quintessence Int 1989;20(5):329-339.
2. Duret F, Preston JD. CAD/CAM imaging in dentistry. Curr Opin Dent 1991;1(2):150-154.
3. Gjelvold B, Chrcanovic BR, Korduner EK, Collin-Bagewitz I, Kisch J. Intraoral Digital Impression Technique Compared to Conventional Impression Technique. A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Prosthodont 2016;25(4):282-287.
4. Papadiochou S, Pissiotis AL. Marginal adaptation and CAD-CAM technology: A systematic review of restorative material and fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119(4):545-551.
5. Zimmermann M, Koller C, Reymus M, Mehl A, Hickel R. Clinical Evaluation of Indirect Particle-Filled Composite Resin CAD/CAM Partial Crowns after 24 Months. J Prosthodont 2018;27(8):694-699.
6. Santos GC, Santos MJ, Rizkalla AS, Madani DA, El-Mowafy O. Overview of CEREC CAD/CAM chairside system. Gen Dent 2013;61(1):36-41.
7. Liu PR. A panorama of dental CAD/CAM restorative systems. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2005;26(7):507-527.
8. Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2008;29(8):494-505.
9. Feuerstein P. Can technology help dentists deliver better patient care? J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135 Suppl:11S-16S.
10. Duret F, Blouin JL, Duret B. CAD-CAM in dentistry. The Journal of the American Dental Association 1988;117(6):715-720.
11. Mörmann WH. The origin of the Cerec method: a personal review of the first 5 years. Int J Comput Dent 2004;7(1):11-24.
12. Vichi A, Sedda M, Siena F, Louca C, Ferrari M. Flexural resistance of Cerec CAD/CAM system ceramic blocks. Part 1: Chairside materials. Am J Dent 2013;26(5):255-259.
13. Davidowitz G, Kotick PG. The Use of CAD/CAM in Dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2011;55(3):559-570.
14. Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007;28(8):422-431.
15. Saponaro PC, Yilmaz B, Heshmati RH, McGlumphy EA. Clinical performance of CAD-CAM-fabricated complete dentures: A cross-sectional study. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116(3):431-435.
16. Li RWK, Chow TW, Matinlinna JP. Ceramic dental biomaterials and CAD/CAM technology: State of the art. J Prosthodont Res 2014;58(4):208-216.
17. Romanyk DL, Martinez YT, Veldhuis S, et al. Strength-limiting damage in lithium silicate glass-ceramics associated with CAD-CAM. Dent Mater 2019;35(1):98-104.
18. Ruse ND, Sadoun MJ. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications. J Dent Res 2014;93(12):1232-1234.
19. Blatz MB, Conejo J. The Current State of Chairside Digital Dentistry and Materials. Dent Clin North Am 2019;63(2):175-197.
20. Kuijper M, Gresnigt M, Kerdijk W, Cune MS. Shear bond strength of two composite resin cements to multiphase composite resin after different surface treatments and two glass-ceramics. Int J Esthet Dent 2019;14(1):40-50.
21. Marchesi G, Camurri Piloni A, Nicolin V, Turco G, Di Lenarda R. Chairside CAD/CAM Materials: Current Trends of Clinical Uses. Biology (Basel) 2021;10(11):1170.
22. Alamoush RA, Kushnerev E, Yates JM, Satterthwaite JD, Silikas N. Response of two gingival cell lines to CAD/CAM composite blocks. Dent Mater 2020;36(9):1214-1225.
23. Lauvahutanon S, Takahashi H, Shiozawa M, et al. Mechanical properties of composite resin blocks for CAD/CAM. Dent Mater J 2014;33(5):705-710.
24. Mainjot AK, Dupont NM, Oudkerk JC, Dewael TY, Sadoun MJ. From Artisanal to CAD-CAM Blocks: State of the Art of Indirect Composites. J Dent Res 2016;95(5):487-495.
25. Nguyen JF, Migonney V, Ruse ND, Sadoun M. Resin composite blocks via high-pressure high-temperature polymerization. Dent Mater 2012;28(5):529-534.
26. Awada A, Nathanson D. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114(4):587-593.
27. Rusin RP. Properties and applications of a new composite block for CAD/CAM. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22(6 Suppl):35-41.
28. 3MTM ParadigmTM MZ100 Blocks for CEREC® | 3M United States. Accessed September 5, 2022. https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/p/d/b00008160/
29. BRILLIANT Crios. Accessed September 5, 2022. https://global.coltene.com/products/restoration/cadcam-solutions/brilliant-crios/
30. Grandio blocs - CAD / CAM Material | VOCO GmbH. Accessed August 8, 2022. https://www.voco.dental/en/products/indirect-restoration/cad-cam-material/grandio-blocs.aspx
31. LuxaCam Composite. DMG - High quality dental materials for dentists and dental technicians. Accessed August 6, 2022. https://www.dmg-dental.com/en/products/product/luxacam-composite/
32. Tetric CAD : Ivoclar. Accessed September 5, 2022. https://www.ivoclar.com/en_li/products/digital-processes/tetric-cad
33. Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater 2013;29(4):419-426.
34. Atabek D, Sillelioglu H, Olmez A. The efficiency of a new polishing material: nanotechnology liquid polish. Oper Dent 2010;35(3):362-369.
35. Schmalz G, Hickel R, Landuyt KL, Reichl FX. Nanoparticles in dentistry. Dent Mater 2017;33(11):1298-1314.
36. Fasbinder DJ. Chairside CAD/CAM: an overview of restorative material options. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2012;33(1):50-58.
37. Kurtulmus-Yilmaz S, Cengiz E, Ongun S, Karakaya I. The Effect of Surface Treatments on the Mechanical and Optical Behaviors of CAD/CAM Restorative Materials. J Prosthodont 2019;28(2):e496-e503.
38. Bapat RA, Joshi CP, Bapat P, et al. The use of nanoparticles as biomaterials in dentistry. Drug Discov Today 2019;24(1):85-98.
39. Eldwakhly E, Ahmed DRM, Soliman M, Abbas MM, Badrawy W. Color and translucency stability of novel restorative CAD/CAM materials. Dent Med Probl 2019;56(4):349-356.
40. Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28(3):227-235.
41. 3MTM LavaTM Ultimate CAD/CAM Restorative for CEREC® | 3M United States. Accessed August 3, 2022. https://www.3m.com/3M/en_US/p/d/b00008161/
42. Coşkun E, Aslan YU, Özkan YK. Evaluation of two different CAD-CAM inlay-onlays in a split-mouth study: 2-year clinical follow-up. J Esthet Restor Dent 2020;32(2):244-250.
43. Spitznagel FA, Vuck A, Gierthmühlen PC, Blatz MB, Horvath SD. Adhesive Bonding to Hybrid Materials: An Overview of Materials and Recommendations. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2016;37(9):630-637.
44. GC America | CERASMART® - Force Absorbing CAD/CAM Block. Accessed September 5, 2022. https://www.gcamerica.com/products/digital/CERASMART/
45. SHOFU Block & Disk HC – Shofu USA. Accessed September 5, 2022. https://www.shofu.com/en/product/shofu-block-disk-hc/
46. MAZIC® Duro (5pc x mandrel-type/Cerec-type blocks) – JSI Global. Accessed August 6, 2022. https://www.jsidental.com/products/mazic-duro
47. KATANA Avencia Block | a new type of hybrid ceramic. Accessed August 6, 2022. https://www.kuraraynoritake.eu/en/katana-avencia-block
48. Lambert H, Durand JC, Jacquot B, Fages M. Dental biomaterials for chairside CAD/CAM: State of the art. J Adv Prosthodont 2017;9(6):486-495.
49. Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P, et al. Mechanical properties and internal fit of 4 CAD-CAM block materials. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119(3):384-389.
50. VITA ENAMIC® - A new definition of stability. Accessed September 5, 2022. https://www.vita-zahnfabrik.com/en/VITA-ENAMIC-24970.html