Seda CENGİZ, Şafak KÜLÜNK, Neslin VELİOĞLU, M Selçuk ORUÇ

İndirekt Kompozit ve Titanyum Arasındaki Bağlantı Dayanımı Üzerine Adeziv ve Mekanik Etkilerin Karşılaştırılması

Bu çalışmanın amacı titanyum restorasyonların hızlıca veneerlenmesi için kompozitlerin kullanılabilmesi açısından yeni dental adeziv sistemlerin titanyum yüzeyine bağlanma özelliklerinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Elli dört titanyum örnek 10 x 10 x 2 mm yüzey hazırlama metodlarına göre altı gruba ayrıldı. Bir grup kontrol grubu olarak kullanılırken, deney grupları aluminyum oksit ile kumlama ardından, adeziv ve metal primerinin uygulanmasıyla hazırlanmıştır. Yüzey uygulamaları titanyum ve indirekt kompozit yüzeyleri arasındaki makaslama dayanımını artırmıştır p

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Titanyum, İndirekt kompozit, Yüzey uygulaması, Makaslama kuvveti

Comparison of Adhesive and Mechanical Effects on the Bond Strength of Indirect Composite to Titanium

The objective of this study was to compare the bonding properties of new dental adhesive systems to the surface of titanium for the express purpose of evaluating these systems for composite veneering of titanium restorations.Fifty-four titanium specimens 10 x 10 x 2 mm were divided into six groups accourding to the surface conditioning method to be applied. One of the groups served as control and experimental groups consisted of air abrasion with aluminum oxide particles; application of dental adhesive andmetal primer. Surface treatments increased the shear bond strength of indirect composite resin to titanium alloy surface P

Keywords:

Titanium, Indirect composite, Surface treatment, Shear bond strength,

PDF

___

1. Veiga C. Davim J, Loureiro A. Properties and applications of titanium alloys: A brief review. Rev Adv Mater Sci 2012; 32:133-148.
2. Leyens C, Peters M. Titatium and Titanium Alloys: Fundamentals & Applications; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2006; pp. 441-485.
3. Fujishima A, Fujishima Y, Ferracane JL. Shear bond strength of four commercial bonding systems to cp Ti. Dent Mater 1995;11:82-86.
4. Yanagida H, Matsumura H, Taira Y, Atsuta M, Shimoe S. Adhesive bonding of composite material to cast titanium with varying surface preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:121-126.
5. Yanagida H, Taira Y, Shimoe S, Atsuta M, Yoneyama T, Matsumura H. Adhesive bonding of titanium-aluminiumniobium alloy with nine surface preparations and three self-curing resins. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111:170-174.
6. Adachi M, Mackert Jr JR, Parry EE, Fairhurst CW. Oxide adherence and porcelain bonding to titanium and Ti-6Al4V alloy. J Dent Res 1990;69:1230-1235.
7. Pang IC, Gilbert JL, Chai J, Lautenschlager EP. Bonding characteristics of low-fusing porcelain bonded to pure titanium and palladium-copper alloy. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:17-25.
7. Kononen M, Kivilahti J. Fusing of dental ceramics to titanium. J Dent Res 2001;80:848-854.
8. Togaya T, Suzuki M, Tsutsumi A, Ida K. An application of pure titanium to the metal porcelain system. Dent Mater J 1983;2:210-219.
9. Vojvodic D, Jerolimov V, Celebic A, Catovic A. Bond strength of silicoated and acrylic resin bonding system to metal. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:1-6.
10. Yoshida K, Kamada K, Taira Y, Atsuta M. Effect of three adhesive primers on the bond strengths of four lightactivated opaque resins to noble alloy. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:168-173.
11. Douglas R. Color stability of new-generation indirect resins for prosthodontic application. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:166-170.
12. Touati B, Aidan N. Second generation laboratory composite resins for indirect restorations. J Esthet Dent 1997;9:108- 118.
13. Kakaboura A, Rahiotis C, Zinelis S, Al-Dhamadi YA, Silikas N, Watts DC. In vitro characterization of two laboratoryprocessed resin composites. Dent Mater 2003;19:393-398.
14. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Post-cure heat treatments for composite properties and fractography. Dent Mater 1992;8:290-295.
15. Almilhatti HJ, Giampaolo ET, Vergani CE, Machado AL, Pavarina AC. Shear bond strength of aesthetic materials bonded to Ni-Cr alloy. J Dent 2003;31:205-211.
16. Lee S, Vang M, Yang H, Park S, Park H, Lim H. Shear bond strength of composite resin to titanium according to various surface treatments. J Adv Prosthodont 2009;1:68- 74.
17. Lim BS, Heo SM, Lee YK, Kim CW. Shear Bond Strength between Titanium Alloys and Composite Resin: Sandblasting versus Fluoride-Gel Treatment. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2003;64B:38-43.
18. Kawaguchi T, Shimizu H, Lassila LV, Vallittu PK, Takahashi Y.Effect of surface preparation on the bond strength of heat-polymerized denture base resin to commercially pure titanium and cobalt-chromium alloy.Dent Mater J 2011;30:143-150.
19. Mukai M, Fukui H, Hasegawa J. Relationship between sandblasting and composite resin-alloy bond strength by a silica coating. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:151-155.
20. Tanaka T, Fujiyama E, Shimizu H, Tanaki A, Atsuta M. Surface treatment of nonprecious alloys for adhensionfixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:456-462.
21. El-Sherif MH, El-Messery A, Halhoul MN. The effecs of alloy surface treatments and resins on the retention of resin bonded retainers. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:782-786.
22. Barzilay I, Myers ML, Cooper LB, Graser GN. Mechanical and chemical retention of laboratory cured composite to metal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:131-137.
23. Koizuka M, Komine F, Blatz MB, Fushiki R, Taguchi K, Matsumura H. The effect of different surface treatments on the bond strength of a gingiva-colored indirect composite veneering material to three implant framework materials. Clin Oral Impl Res 2013; 24: 977-984.
24. Ozcan M, Nijhuis H, Valandro LF. Effect of various surface conditioning methods on the adhesion of dual-cure resin cement with MDP functional monomer to zirconia after thermal aging.Dent Mater J 2008;27:99-104.
25. Suguwara H, Yanagida H, Tanoue N, Koishi Y, Nagano K, Atsuta M, Matsumura H. Effect of alumina abrasion for bonding between Ti-6Al-7Nb alloy and an indirect composite. Int Chin J Dent 2004;4:8-14.
26. Seimenis I, Sarafianou A, Papadopoulou H, Papadopoulos TR. Shear bond strength of three veneering resins to a NiCr alloy using two bonding procedures. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:600-608.
27. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, et al. The microtensile bond test: a review. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:299-309.
28. Lim HP, Kim SS, Yang HS, Vang MS. Shear bond strength and failure types of polymethyl methacrylate denture base resin and titanium treated with surface conditioner. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:246-248.
29. Katyayan M, Katyayayn P, Ravishanker K. Shear bond strength of composite veneers and acrylic veneer bonded to Ni-Cr Alloy: A laboratory study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2011;11:89-97.
30. Radhi A, Juszczyk AS, Curtis RV, Sherriff M, Radford DR, Clark RK. Effect of GC Metalprimer II on bond strength of heat-cured acrylic resin to titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4V) with two different surface treatments. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2008;16:132-137.
31. Ohkubo C, Watanabe I, Hosoi T, Okabe T. Shear bond strengths of polymethyl methacrylate to cast titanium and cobalt-chromium frameworks using five metal primers. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:50-57.
32. Rothfuss, LG, Hokett SD, Hondrum SO, Elrod CW. Resin to metal bond strengths using two commercial systems. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:270-272.
33. Ekstrand K, Ruyter IE, Oysad H. Adhesion to titanium of methacrylate-based polymer materials. Dent Mater 1988;4:111-115.
34. Matsumura H, Yoshida K, Tanaka T, Atsuta M. Adhesive bonding of titanium with a titanate coupler and 4-META/ MMATBB opaque resin. J Dent Res 1990;69:1614-1621.