KÜBRA VURAL ÖZBEY, John Lylynin ENDYMİON

A RECONCILIATION of CONFLICTS: JOHN LYLY'S ENDYMION, THE MAN IN THE MOON

The use of opposing elements constitutes the main grid of dramatic works, and the consolidation of antithetical forces in an array of conflicts creates unison of multiple perspectives in such works. Renaissance drama, succeeding the medieval period, predominantly hinges on the clash of antagonistic components in that dichotomies are dissolved in the end. John Lyly's Endymion, The Man in the Moon is one of the Renaissance plays in which the playwright establishes his whole work on different binary elements. This paper sets out to pinpoint three conflicting elements in terms of the use of mythology and history, the presentation of female stance and different types of love in Lyly's play.

John Lyly'nin Endymion, Ay'daki Adam Adlı Oyununda Çatışmaların Uzlaştırılması

Zıt unsurların kullanımı tiyatro eserlerinin esas yapısını oluşturur ve karşıt güçlerin çeşitli çatışmalar içerisinde bir araya getirilmesi bu tür çalışmalarda farklı bakış açılarının birlikteliğini sağlar. Ortaçağ dönemini takiben, Rönesans tiyatrosu, çoğunlukla, ikiliklerin sonunda çözüldüğü zıt öğelerin çarpışması üzerine kuruludur. John Lyly'in Endymion, The Man in the Moon [Endymion, Ay'daki Adam] adlı eseri, yazarın tüm oyununu farklı zıt unsurlar üzerine kurduğu Rönesans oyunlarından biridir. Bu çalışma, mitoloji ve tarih kullanımı, kadın duruşunun sergilenişi ve farklı aşk türleri bağlamında Lyly'nin oyunundaki üç çatışmalı unsuru irdelemeyi amaçlar.

___

Primary Source

Lyly, J. (1996). Endymion. David Bevington (ed.). Manchester: Manchester UP.

Secondary Sources

Bevington, D. (1996). Introduction, Endymion (pp.1-72). By John Lyly. Manchester: Manchester UP.

Bond, R. W. (1967). Introduction, The Complete Works of John Lyly (pp.1-15). By John Lyly. Vol. III. Oxford: Clarendon P.

Bozio, A. (2016). The Contemplative Cosmos: John Lyly's Endymion and the Shape of Early Modern Space. Studies in Philology, 113(1), 55- 81.

Bradbrook, M. C. (1973). The Growth and Structure of Elizabethan Comedy. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Burkert, W. (1979). Structure and History in Greek Mythology and Ritual. Berkeley: U of California P.

Deats, S. (1975). The Disarming of the Knight: Comic Parody in Lyly's Endymion. South Atlantic Bulletin, 40(4), 67-75.

Doran, S. (1996). Monarchy and Matrimony: The Courtships of Elizabeth I. London: Routledge.

Fussell, B. H. (1975). Tragicomedy in Lyly, Shakespeare, and Jonson. Unpublished Dissertation. State University of New Jersey.

Gannon, C. C. (1973). John Lyly's Endymion: From Myth to Allegory. Unpublished Dissertation. University of California.

Knoll, G. (2014). How to Make Love to the Moon: Intimacy and Erotic Distance in John Lyly's Endymion. Shakespeare Quarterly, 65(2), 164- 79.

Knox, J. B. L. (2009). Molière: An Existential Vision of Authenticity in Man Across Time. J. Stewart (ed.), Kierkegaard and the Renaissance and Modern Traditions (pp.125-36). Cornwall: Ashagate.

Kuritz, P. (1988). The Making of Theatre History. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Mackenzie, A. M. (1971). The Playgoer's Handbook to English Renaissance Drama. New York: Cooper Square P.

McCarthy, J. H. (2003). Ben Jonson and the Boy Company Tradition. Journal for Early Modern Cultural Studies, 3(1), 1-49.

Schuddebroom, F. (2005). Gods, Goddesses, and Mythology. Vol. 4. New York: Cavendish.

Scragg, L. (2003). Introduction, John Lyly: Selected Prose and Dramatic Work (pp. vii-xxiii). By John Lyly. New York: Routledge.

Seters, J. V. (1983). In Search of History: Historiography in the Ancient World and the Origins of Biblical History. New Haven: Yale UP.

Symonds, J. A. (1967) Shakespeare's Predecessors in the English Drama. New York: Cooper Square P.

Thomas, S. D. (1978). Endimion and Its Sources. Comparative Literature, 30(1), 35-52.

Weltner, P. N. (1971). Translated Mortality: John Lyly's Visionary Theater. Unpublished Dissertation. Indiana University.

Wilson, J. D. (1970). John Lyly. New York: Haskell P.