___

• Abbo, Usman, and Kabiru Maitama Kura. 2018. “Comparative Administrative Reforms; Nigeria, Malaysia, Philippines and Brazil.” Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance: 1–10.
• Akkoyunlu, K. (2018). The Civil Service in Brazil and Turkey: A Comparative Study. Escola Nacional de Administração Pública (Enap), 9–31.
• Andrews, Christina W. 2008. “Legitimacy And Context: Implications For Public Sector Reform In Developing Countries.” Public Administration and Development 28: 171–80.
• Avritzer, L. (2012). Sociedade civil e Estado no Brasil : da autonomia à interdependência política. OPINIÃO PÚBLICA, 18(2), 383–398.
• Aydın, G., Nyadera, I.N. & Önder, M. (2020). Strategic Management in Turkey’s Public Sector: Reforms and Application Issues. Public Organization Review: Global journal, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-020-00463-8
• Bresser Pereira L. Ca. (1997). Managerial Public Administration: Strategy and Structure for a New State, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 20(1), 7-23, DOI: 10.1080/01603477.1997.11490136 https://doi.org/10.1080/01603477.1997.11490136
• Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2003). The 1995 Public Management Reform in Brazil Reflections Of A Reformer. 89–109.
• Bresser-pereira, L.C, Ben, I., Schneider, R., & Heredia, B. (2002). The 1995 Public Management Reform In Brazil : Reflections Of A Reformer.
• Bresser-pereira, L.C. (2001). “New Public Management Reform : Now in the Latin America Agenda , and Yet ...” Programa de Estudos Políticos (September): 117–40. Cavalcante, P. (2018). Innovations in the Federal Government During the Post-new Public Management Era. ANPAD, 885–902. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2018170391%0AInnovations
• Cavalcante, Pedro, and Paulo Carvalho. 2017. “The Professionalization of Brazilian Federal Bureaucracy ( 1995-2014 ): Advances and Dilemmas.” 51(1): 1–26.
• Costa, F. L. da. (2008). Brasil: 200 anos de Estado; 200 anos de administração pública; 200 anos de reformas. Revista De Administraçao Publica (RAP), 42(5), 830–874.
• Ensslin L., Ensslin S., Borgert A. D., & Lyrio, M. V. L. (2006). Gerenciamento do Desempenho da Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Regional da Grande Florianópolis: Uma Proposta Advinda da Combinação do Balanced Scorecard e da Metodologia Multicritério de Apoio à Decisão Construtivista. ENAPG, 22(24), 1–16.
• Estache, A., Goldstein, A., & Pittman, R. (2001). Privatization and Regulatory Reform in Brazil: The Case of Freight
• Filgueiras, F. (2018). Going beyond management : the agenda of democratic governance and the silenced change in Brazil. Brazilian of Public Administration, 52(1), 71–88.
• Gaetani, F., & Heredia, B. (2002). The Political Economy Of Civil Service Reform In Brazil : The Cardoso Years. Inter-American Devolopment Bank, October. https://publications.iadb.org/en/political-economy-civil-service-reform-brazil-cardoso-years: 1-37
• Gaetani, Francisco. 1998. “The Intriguing Brazilian Administrative Reform.” http://www.reformadagestaopublica.org.br/Terceiros/Autores/Gaetani,Francisco/gaetani2.pdf.
• Guimaraes, T. de A., Nader, R. M., & Ramagem, S. P. (1998). Avaliação de desempenho de pessoal: uma metodologia integrada ao planejamento e à avaliação organizacionais. RAP, 32(6), 44–61.
• Jha, Prakash Chandra. 2008. “Decentralization And Federalism In Brazil.” The Indian Journal of Political Science 68(1): 157–71.
• Laia, M., Cunha, M. C. da, Nogueira, A., & Mazzon, J. (2011). Electronic Government Policies In Brazil : Context , Ict Management And Outcomes. Rae, 52(1), 43–57.
• Lambert, Francis. 1969. “Trends in Administrative Reform in Brazil.” Journal of Latin American Studies 1(2): 167–88.
• Leeds, E. (2013). Civil Society and Citizen Security in Brazil : A Fragile but Evolving Relationship. WOLA, June.
• Leme, Alessandro Andre. 2011. “Estado e Privatização.” Civitas Porto Alegre 11(2): 339–60.
• Lora, Eduardo. 2007. Stanford University Press The State of State Reform in Latin America. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/The-State-of-State-Reform-in-Latin-America.pdf.
• Martins, Luciano. (1997). “Reforma Da Administração Pública e Cultura Política No Brasil: Uma Visão Geral.” ENAP: 6–49.
• Meacham, C. E. (1999). Administrative Reform And National Economic Development In Latin America And The Caribbean ( Post- Dictatorships ). Policy Studies Review, 16(2), 42–62.
• Murat Onder & Israel Nyaburi Nyadera (2020) The Role of Non -Economic Drivers in Development Planning: The Case of South Korea and Turkey, International Journal of Public Administration, 43:4, 283-293, DOI: 10.1080/01900692.2019.1628057
• OECD. (2010). OECD Reviews of Human Resource Management in Government: Brazil Federal Government.(OECD Publishing) s.11-279
• OECD. (2018). Digital Government Review of Brazil: Towards the Digital Transformation of the Public Sector (OECD Digital Studies). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264307636-en
• Olavarría-Gambi, M. (2019). Recent and Past Governance Reforms in Latin America: What Can We Learn? Public Organization Review, 19(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-018-0412-z
• Oliveira, J. A. P. (2017). Brazilian Public Administration : Shaping and Being Shaped by Governance and Development. Chinese Political Science Review, 2(1), 7–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-017-0052-4
• Önder, M. & Köylü, M. (2018). “ABD Yerel Yönetimlerinde Profesyonel Kent Yöneticiliği Modeli Yayılıyor mu?” Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler Dergisi, 27:1, (77-112).
• Önder, M. (1998). "Örgütsel ve Yönetsel Eklektizm: Toplam Kalite Yönetimi” Amme İdaresi Dergisi, 31:3, (37-74).
• Önder, M. (2012). “Reinventing Government: Historical Foundations, Philosophy, Critique, and Future Implications.” Akademik Bakış Dergisi, Ocak 2012. S. 28
• Pereira, Adelyne Maria Mendes, Luciana Dias de Lima, and Cristiani Vieira Machado. (2018). “Decentralization and Regionalization of Health Policy: A Historical-Comparative Approach between Brazil and Spain.” Ciencia e Saude Coletiva 23(7): 2239–2251.
• Reining, Henry. 2020. VI . The Brazilian Program of Administrative Reform Author The American Political Science Review , Vol . 39 , No . 3 ( Jun ., 1945 ), Pp . 536-547 Published by : American Political Science Association ,39(3): 536–47. Russo, Mario, '' Privatizações ganharam força a partir dos anos 90'', O Globo Economia, https://oglobo.globo.com/economia/privatizacoes-ganharam-forca-partir-dos-anos-90-10448501 Accesed Time:18.06.2020
• Siegel, G. B. (1966). The Strategy of Public Administration Reform : The Case of Brazil Linked. Public Administration Review, 26(1), 45–55.
• Ter-minassian, T. (2012). Structural Reforms in Brazil: Progress and Unfinished Agenda. Inter-American Development Bank Department, May, 1–39.
• Tripodi, Z. F., & Sousa, S. (2018). From Government to Governance: Permeability Of The State To Privatizing Logics In Education. Cadernos De Pesquisa, 48(167), 228–251.
• Vezbergaite, I. (2016). Decentralisation Policies, Subnational Autonomy and Federal Executive Power: A Comparison of Brazil and Mexico. Crotaian and Comparative Public Administration, 16(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.31297/hkju.16.1.2
• Woortmann, Mario F. 2012. “Performance Management in the Central Governments of New Zealand and Brazil: A Comparative Study.” AUT University.1-154
• Yıldırım, K. & Önder, M. (2019). “Collaborative Role of Metropolitan Municipalities in Local Climate Protection Governance Strategies: The Case of Turkish Metropolitan Cities.” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 21:2. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1464333219500066