Hekimhan (KB Malatya) Geç Kampaniyen'inde yeni bir pseudedomia (Foraminifer) türü: Pseudedomia hekimhanensis n.sp.

Bu çalışmada Hekimhan (KB Malatya) Geç Kampaniyen'inde yeni bir Pseudedomia türü (Foraminifer) tanımlanmıştır. Yeni tür, Pseudedomia hekimhanensis n. sp., diğer Pseudedomia türlerinden kavkısının boyutu ve şekliyle; loca, locacık ve bölme düzenleri bakımından ayrılır.

A new species of Pseudedomia: Pseudedomia hekimhanensis n.sp. from the Late Campanian of Hekimhan NW Malatya,Turkey

Pseudedomia hekimhanensis, a new species of Pseudedomia Henson 1948 from the Lale Campanian of Hekimhan, NW Malatya, Turkey, is described. It differs from the other Pseudedomia species by its lest size, chamber and chamberlet arrangments.

___

  • Colalongo, M.L., 1963, Sellialveolina vialli n. gean, n. sp. diAlveolinidae Cenomaniana deli' Appennina meridio-nale: Giomale di Geologia, ser. 2, 30,1-10.
  • Eames, F.E. ve Smout, A.H., 1955, Complanate Alveolinidsand associated foraminifera from the Upper Cretace-ous of the Middle East: Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. Lon-don, ser. 12, 8, 505 - 512.
  • Goharian, F., 1971, Etude micropaleontologique du Campani-an type des charentes consequences stratigraphiques:Rev. Micropaleont., 14 (1), 20 - 34.
  • Görmüş, M*., 1990, Stratigraphy and foraminiferal micropale-ontology of Upper Cretaceous in Hekimhan, NWMalatya, Turkey: Univ. Hull. PhD thesis, 429 p.
  • Görmüş, M., 1992a, Geological Setting, Facies and Evolutionof the Tohma Reef Formation, An Upper Cretaceoussequence in the Hekimhan Area, Turkey: 9. PetrolKong., Jeoloji, 173 -184.
  • Görmüş, M., 1992b, Hekimhan (KB Malatya) Yöresindeki Istiflerin Biyostratigrafik İncelemesi: Türkiye Jeol.Kurultayı Bült., 7,179 -191.
  • Görmüş, M., 1994a, Hekimhan (KB Malatya) YöresindekiÜst Kretase Çökellerinde Fasiyes - Organizma Dağı-lımı: DoğaDerg., 3 (1), 1 -15.
  • Görmüş, M., 1994b, Campanian - Maastrichtian Foraminife-rid Fauna in the Hekimhan Area: Türkiye 10. PetrolKong., Jeoloji, 165 -198.
  • Hamaouii, M., 1984, Sur la dynamique arhitecturale des Alve-olinidae: Benthos'83, 2nd Int. Symp. Benthic Foram.(Pau),271-279.
  • Henson, F.R.S., 1948, Larger imperforate foraminifera of So-uth - Western Asia: Bull. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.),London, 1 -127.
  • Horstmann, G., 1967, Geologie de la partie meridionale deHie de - Zanthe (Grece): These, Univ. Paris, p. 1 -127 (ine*dit), Lab. Micropaleont. Dept. Geol. Sed.,Univ. Pierre - et Marie Curie (Paris - VI).
  • Loeblich, A.R. Jr. and Tappan, H., 1988, Foraminiferal generaand their classification: Van Nostrand ReinholdCompany, New York, 2 volumes, 970 p. plus 222 p.847 pi.
  • Marie, P.E., 1958, Goupillaudina nouveau genre de Foramini-fere du Cretace superieur: Bull. Soc. geol. Frence,Paris, 7 (6), 861 - 876, Paris.
  • Marie, P., 1959, Sur le Cretace superieur marin des Martiques(Bouches du Rhone): Compte rendu de F Akad. sci-en., Dijon. Colegue Cretace sup. Francais, Paris, 449-496.
  • Perconig, E. et Martin, L., 1971, Estratigraphia del Cretacecode la zone de Ontur y Yecla (Zona Prebetica): Cong.Hispano - Luso Americano geol. econ., Madrid -Lisboa,331-341.
  • Smout, A.H., 1963, The genus Pseudedomia and its phyleticrelationships, with remarks on Orbitolites and othercomplex foraminifera: In: Evolutionary trends in fo-raminifera, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 224 - 281.
  • Rahaghi, A., 1976, Contribution â 1 etude de quelques grandsforaminiferes de l'lran: Soc. Nat. Iran Des Petrol.Lab. de Micropal. 6, 1 - 23.
  • Mavrikas G., Fleury, JJ. and Fourcade, E., 1994, Implicationspaleobiogeographiques de la presence de Pseudedo-mia (foraminifere) dans le Maastrichtienmediterraneen: C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris, (Paleontologie/ Paleontology (Paleoenvironnement / Paleoenviron-ment) 318 (II), 849-855.