Bacillus thuringiensis ile Neem ekstraktlarının ve karışımlarının etkinlikleri üzerinde incelemeler

Biopestisitler konusunda yaşanan dezavantajların başında gelen etkinin gecikmeli olarak ve konvansiyonel pestisitlere göre daha düşük oranda ortaya çıkması bu çalışmanın çıkış noktasını oluşturmuştur. Çalışmada, Bacillus thuringiensis esaslı biopestisitler ile Azadirahtin esaslı biopestisitlerin tek başlarına ve karışım halinde kullanımlarının etkililiği karşılaştırılmıştır. Çalışmada test böceği olarak Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)’in yeni 5. döneme geçmiş larvaları, biopestisit olarak da Bacillus thuringiensis var.kurstaki (Delfin® WG, Certis) ve Bacillus thuringiensis var. aizawai (XenTari® WG, Valent BioScience), yağ bazlı neem (Neem Azal® T/S, Trifolio-M) ve neem (Neemix® 4.5, Certis) esaslı biopestisitler kullanılmıştır. Biopestisitler, 50 ppm ve 100 ppm dozlarında tek başlarına ve yarım dozda karışımlar halinde besin yoluyla uygulanmıştır. Biopestisitlerin karışım halinde uygulandığı bireylerde tek başlarına uygulandıklarına göre beslenmenin dolayısıyla da gelişmenin ilk günden itibaren yavaşladığı ve erken ölümlerin gerçekleştiği ortaya konulmuştur. Özellikle XenTari biopestisitinin olduğu karışım uygulamalarından en yüksek ve hızlı etki alınmıştır. XenTari+Neem Azal karışımlarında ortalama larva ağırlıkları 48-51 mg arasında değişirken, XenTari+Neemix karışımlarında 42-63 mg arasında gerçekleşmiştir. Bu karışımları sırasıyla Delfin+Neem Azal ve Delfin+Neemix karışımlarının etkileri izlemiştir. En düşük etki Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki etkili maddeli Delfin biopestisitinin tek başına uygulandığı bireylerde gözlenirken, kontrol grubunu oluşturan bireyler ortalama 410 mg’a kadar ulaşmıştır. En yüksek öldürücü etki ise uygulamadan sonraki yedi ve dokuz gün sonra yine biopestisit karışım halinde denendikleri gruplardan elde edilmiştir.

Studies on the efficacies of combinations of Bacillus thuringiensis with neem extracts

This study was carried out to overcome delayed and less effectiveness that are the main disadvantages of biopesticides compared to conventional pesticides. The use of combination of Bacillus thuringiensis and azadirachtin based biopesticides was evaluated for efficacies. The penultimate instar larvae of Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) as test insect, Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki (Delfin® WG, Certis), Bacillus thuringiensis var. aizawai (XenTari® WG, Valent BioSciece), oil based neem (Neem Azal T/S®, Trifolio-M), and neem (Neemix® 4.5, Certis) as biopesticides were used in this study. The biopesticides were applied to the test insect larvae at the doses of 50 ppm, 100 ppm individually and in combinations, and also half doses in combinations through feed. It was concluded that rapid slowdown of feeding behavior, accordingly reduction in larval growth, and premature deaths from the first day were determined when the biopesticides were treated in combination compare to that of individual applications. Combinations of XenTari+Neem Azal and XenTari+Neemix had the highest efficacies in terms of the larvae weight. In those groups, larvae weight chanced between 48-51 mg and 42-63 mg respectively. Following treatments in combination of Delfin+Neem Azal, and Delfin+Neemix were also found effective compare to that of their individual applications and untreated ones (up to 410 mg). Highest lethal effects had also observed mostly in seven and nine days after application in combination of biopesticides.

___

  • Abdelgaleil, S. A. M. & A. F. El-Aswad, 2005. Antifeedant and Growth Inhibitory Effects of Tetranortriterpenoids Isolated from Three Meliaceous Species on the Cotton Leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.). Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 1(2): 234-241.
  • Aggarwal, N., M. Holaschke & T. Basedow, 2006. Evaluation of bio-rational insecticides to control Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and Spodoptera exigua (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) fed on Vicia faba L. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemeine und Angewandte Entomologie,15: 365-368.
  • Babu G. R., P. V. Krishnayya, P. A. Rao & V. S. Rao, 2008. Field efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki in combination with plant oils on pest complex of cauliflower. Annals of Plant Protection Sciences, 16 (1): 53 57.
  • Basedow, T. & A. Peters, 1997. “Control of Colorado Potato Beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineata Say) by an Azadirachtin-Formulation (Neem-Azal T/S'), by Bacillus thuringiensis tenebrionis (`Novodor'), and by Combinations of both: Short-term and Long-term Effects, 59-66”. In: Practice Orientated Results on Use and Production of Neem-Ingredients and Pheromones (Eds: H. Kleeberg & C.P.W. Zebitz). Proc. 5th Workshop, Wetzlar.
  • Demirbağ, Z., R. Nalçacıoğlu, H. Katı, İ. Demir, K. Sezen & Ö. Ertürk, 2008. Entomopatojenler ve Biyolojik Mücadele. Esen Ofset Matbaacılık, Trabzon, 325 s.
  • Fora, C. G., K. F. Lauer & C. A. Fora, 2007. NeemAzal-T/S in combination with Bacillus thuringiensis var. aizawai in gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) control. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca, 63: 318-322.
  • Hellpap, C. & C. P. W. Zebitz, 1986. Combined application of neem-seed-kernel-extract with Bacillus thuringiensisproducts for the control of Spodoptera frugiperda and Aedes togoi. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie,101(5): 515-524.
  • Koul, O. & S. Wahab, 2004. Neem: Today and In The New Millenium.Kluwer AcademicPublishers New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow, p.291.
  • Kumpmann, S., J. Kienzle, C. Schulz, C. P. W. Zebitz, A. Trapp & M. Kelderer, 2002. “Control of Adoxophyes orana F.v.R. with entomopathogens and NeemAzal-T/S: first approach for optimal combination strategies, 35-42”. 10 th International Conference on Cultivation Technique and Phytopathological Problems in Organic Fruit Growing and Viticulture Proceedings of a Conference, Weinsberg.
  • O’Brien, K. P., S. Franjevic & J. Jones, 2009. Green Chemistry and Sustainable Agriculture The Role of Biopesticides.Barbara Smith Fund, Kendeda Sustainability Fund and the Johnson Family Foundation, pp.55.
  • Rajamohan, H., 2002. Joint Action of Neem Seed Extracts (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) and Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. kurstaki Against Plutella xylostella (L.). Ph.D. Thesis, Post-Graduate School, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, 62pp.
  • Rosell,G., C. Quero, J. Coll & A. Guerrero, 2008. Biorational insecticides in pest management. The Journal of Pesticide Science, 33(2): 103–121
  • Salama, H. S., M. S. Foda, F. N Zaki & S. Moawad, 1984. Potency of combinations of Bacillus thuringiensis and chemical insecticides on Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 77(4): 885-890.
  • Schulz, C., J. Kienzle, P. Haug, S. Kumpmann & C. P. W. Zebitz, 2004. “Combinations of Bacillus thuringiensisproducts and NeemAzal-T/S for the control of the winter moth Operophthera brumata, 119-125”. Practice Oriented Results on Use and Production of Neem-Ingredients and Pheromones,Proc. of the 9th workshop, Hohensolms, Germany.
  • Schumetterer,H., 1990. Properties and potential of natural pesticides from the neem tree, Azadirachta indica. Annual Review of Entomology, 35: 271-297.
  • Senthil Nathan, S. S., K. Kalaivani & K. Murugan, 2006. Behavioural responses and changes in biology of rice leaffolder following treatment with a combination of bacterial toxins and botanical insecticides. Chemosphere, 64(10): 1650–1658.
  • Singh, G., P. J. Rup & O. Koul, 2007. Acute, sublethal and combination effects of Azadirachtin and Bacillus thuringiensis toxins on Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 97: 351-357.
  • Trisyono, A. & M. E. Whalon, 1999. Toxicity of neem applied alone and in combinations with Bacillus thuringiensis to Colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera : Chrysomelidae). Journal of Economic Entomology, 92(6): 1281-1288.
  • Turcani, M., 2001. “The preliminary results of trials conducted with neem and combinations of neem and Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki in gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) control in Slovakia, 120-123”. Practice Oriented Results on the Use of Plant Extracts and Pheromones in Pest Control: Proceedings of the International Workshop, Tartu, Estonia.
  • Whalon, M. E. & B. A. Wingerd, 2003. Bt: mode of action and use. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology, 54: 200-211.
Türkiye Entomoloji Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1010-6960
  • Başlangıç: 1977
  • Yayıncı: Galip KAŞKAVALCI
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Toxic and behavioural effects of Tanacetum abrotanifolium L. DRUCE (Asteraceae) stem and flower extracts on Sitophilus granarius and Sitophilus oryzae (Col., Curculionidae)

Mustafa ALKAN, Ayhan GÖKÇE

Bitki ekstraktlarının Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)’e olan kontak toksisiteleri

Ömer Cem KARAKOÇ, Ayhan GÖKÇE

Heterodera cruciferae Franklin, 1945 (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae) ile bulaşık Brassica oleracea var. capitata subvar. alba`nın histopatojisi

Sevilhan MENNAN, Zafar A. HANDOO

İzmir ilinde taze soğan tarlalarında bulunan akar (Acari) türleri

Tülin KILIÇ, Sultan ÇOBANOĞLU, Zeynep YOLDAŞ, Nilgün MADANLAR

Contact toxicities of plant extracts to Spodoptera littoralis (Lep., Noctuidae)

Ömer Cem KARAKOÇ, Ayhan GÖKÇE

Farklı hasat zamanlarının Bactrocera oleae (Gmelin, 1790) (Diptera: Tephritidae) zararıyla, zeytinyağı verim ve kalitesine etkileri

Halil TOPUZ, Enver DURMUŞOĞLU

Organik domates tarımında Kök-ur nematodları (Meloidogyne spp.)’na karşı savaşta bazı yöntemlerin birlikte kullanım etkinlikleri

Hatice AKKURT DURAN, Galip KAŞKAVALCI

Malaria vektörü Anopheles stephensi yaşının potansiyel kutikular hidrokarbon biyolojik işaretleyiciler ile tespiti

Mahmood Reza NIKBAKHTZADEH, Ala'a Saeidi & Mansoureh SHAEGHI

Some biological characteristics of Gryon monspeliensis (Picard) (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) on eggs of Eurygaster integriceps Put. (Heteroptera: Scutelleridae)

Mahmut İSLAMOĞLU

Tanacetum abrotanifolium (L.) DRUCE (Asteraceae)’ un gövde ve çiçek ekstraktlarının Sitophilus granarius ve Sitophilus oryzae (Col., Curculionidae)’ye olan kontakt ve davranışsal etkileri

Mustafa ALKAN, Ayhan GÖKÇE