The Use of WebCt in Distance Learning Course in University of Manchester

The World Wide Web impacted the educational model and became part of distance education in this early century. There were many changes taking place in higher education for political, economic and educational reasons. New goals and educational objectives are being set within educational institutions. There were particular emphases to produce a more effective delivery of learning methods for distance learning students. The use of Internet was seen as an important issue in the development of an understanding of the complex process of instilling knowledge to post graduates students. Well-established universities are re-examining their missions and looking for different ways of providing lifelong education. The Building Division of the MACE was particularly keen to increase the use of web-based learning in its courses, which will increase the amount of students enrolled into these programmes, help them learn in a flexible and workable manner. This paper describes the outline for the design and development of a distance-learning module. Some benefits and setbacks will be discussed and recommendation for future improvement explained.

___

  • Aggarwal, A. (2000) Web Based Learning and Teaching Technologies: Opportunities and Challenges, Idea Group Publishing.
  • Bloom, B. S. (ed.) (1956) Taxonomy of Education Objectives, Vol. I, Cognitive Domain, New York: McKay.
  • Dearing R. (1997) National Committee of Inquiry into Higher education (Dearing Report). Higher education in the Learning Society, Report of the National Committee, Norwich: HMSO.
  • Dunlap, J. (1997) Preparing Students for lifelong Learning: A Review of Instructional Methodologies.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AECT, Albuquerque, NM.
  • Essaka (2001) Choosing an appropriate Virtual learning Environment (VLE) for University of Manchester, Information System Department, University of Manchester.
  • Essaka (2003) A practical Guide to using WebCT at University of Manchester, E-Learning Section Information Systems Department, University of Manchester, 21 May 2003.
  • Felder, R. (1993) Reaching the second Tier, Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education, Journal College Science Teaching, Vol. 23 (5) pp. 286-290.
  • Ford, N. (1985) “Learning Styles and Strategies of Postgraduate Students.” British Journal of Educational Technology 16(1): pp. 65-79. French, D., Hale, C. et. al (ed) (1999) Internet (based) Learning, An Introduction and Framework for Higher Education and Business, Kogan Page.
  • Inglis A., (2001) Selecting an integrated electronic learning environment in Innovation in Open and Distance Learning, Successful Development of online and Web-based Learning, Kogan Page.
  • Manwaring, G. (1988) Directing your Evaluation, Learning Technology Dissemination Initiative, Institute for Computer Based Learning, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh. U.K. Newby, H. (2000) The impact of globalisation and new technologies on higher education. Higher Education Futures, Design Council, pp. 41-43.
  • Oliver M., Conole G., (1988) Selecting a Methodology, Learning Technology Dissemination Initiative, Institute for Computer Based Learning, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh. U.K. Rogers, C. R. (1969) Freedom to Learn: A View of What Education might Become, Columbus OH: Merrill.