Rusmanizah USTATI Language Department IPGM Kampus Pendidikan Teknik, Bandar Enstek, MALAYSIA
Distance Learning Students’ Need: Evaluating Interactions From Moore’s Theory Of Transactional Distance
This study draws on the experience from a focus group interviews under the distance learning programme known as Program Pensiswazahan Guru (PPG) organized by the Malaysian Ministry of Education in collaboration with local universities and institutes of education. Its purpose is to uncover students’ perception about the platform used by International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) which is the Learning Management System (LMS). LMS is a vital instructional medium especially for the varsity distant learners. Michael Moore’s Theory of Transactional Distance is used as the guiding framework to gain insights on learning and interactions in this e-learning setting. Teacher-student interactions are analyzed for better understanding of the phenomena under study. The findings indicate that in terms of usability LMS is perceived as a good platform to acquire information on content and to receive feedback from instructors. However, IIUM learners hope for more interactivity where learners can communicate amongst themselves beside engaging with the instructor-learner- content interactions that they currently experience via the system. This study aspires to provide insights on the significance of interactions from distance learners’ perception.
Keywords:
Distance Learning, Theory of Transactional Distance Student-Teacher Interaction, E-Learning,
___
- Giossos,Y. Mauroidis, H. and Koutsouba, M. (2008). Research in distance education: review and perspectives. Open Education – The Journal for Open ad Distance Education and Educational Technology. 4 (1). Retrieved December 8, 2012, from http://www.opennet.gr/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=Itemid=28
- Fox, M. (2003). Learning design and e-learning. Brighton: Epic Group plc.
- Retrieved December 8, 2012, from www.dokeos.com/doc/thirdparty/Epic_Whtp_learningdesign.pdf
- McIsaac, M.S. and Gunawardena, C.N. (1996). Distance Education. in D.H. Jonassen, ed. Handbook of research for educational communications and technology: a project of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. (pp. 403-407). New
- York: Simon &Schuster Macmillan. Moore, M. G. (1972). Learner autonomy: The second dimension of independent learning. Convergence, 5(2), 76-88.
- Moore, M. G. (1973). Towards a theory of independent learning and teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 44(9), 661-679.
- Moore, M. G. (1980). Independent study. In R. D. Boyd, Apps, J. W., & Associates (Eds).
- Redefining the discipline of adult education. (Vol. 5, pp.16-31). San Francisco: Jossey- Bass. Moore, M. G. (1984). On a theory of independent study. In D. Stewart, D. Keegan & B.
- Holemberg (Eds.) Distance education: International perspectives (pp. 68-94). London: Routledge. Moore, M. G. (1993).Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.) Theoretical principles of distance education (Vol. 1, pp. 22-38). London: Routledge.
- Moore, J. L. (2011). “E-learning, online learning, and distance learning.” Retrieved
- December 8, 2012, from https://scholar.vt.edu/access/.../eLearning%Scott%Midkiff.pdf
- Ravenscroft, A. (2001). Designing E-learning Interactions in the 21st Century: revisiting and rethinking the role of theory. European Journal of Education, 36 (2). 133-156.
- Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning : Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital
- Age. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional. Starr-Glass, D. (2012). Learners’ Perception of Distance in an online course: Revisiting
- Moore’s Theory of Transactional Distance. Retrieved December 8, 2012, from www.umuc.edu/ctl/upload/Starr-Glass_paper.pdf
- Schunk, D. H. (2009). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. (5th ed.). New
- Jersey: Pearson Education International.
- ISSN: 1302-6488
- Başlangıç: 2000
- Yayıncı: Anadolu Üniversitesi