___

• Ali, A. (2006). Modern technology and mass education: A case study of a global virtual learning system. In A. Edmundson (Ed.), Globalized learning cultural challenges.
• Hershey, PA, USA: Idea Group. pp 327-339. Anderson, B. (2006). Writing power into online discussion. Computers and Composition, 23, 108–124.
• Barrett, S. (2002). Overcoming transactional distance as a barrier to effective communication over the Internet. International Education Journal, 3(4), 34-42.
• Bash, L. (2009). Engaging with cross-cultural communication barriers in globalized higher education: The case of research-degree students. Intercultural Education, 20(5): 475-4 AN 46776969.
• Belchair, M.J., & Cucek, M. (2001). Student perceptions of their distance education courses. Research report 2001-04. ERIC #ED 480 923. Retrieved from http://www2.boisestate.edu/iassess/Reports/RR 2001-04.pdf http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=E D480923
• Berge, Z. L. (1998). Barriers to online teaching in post-secondary institutions: Can policy changes fix it? Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration. 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/Berge12.html
• Berge, Z. L. (2002). Active, interactive, and reflective elearning. The Quarterly Review of
• Distance Education. 3(2): 181-190. Betts, K. (2009, March). Online human touch (OHT) training & support: A conceptual framework to increase faculty engagement, connectivity, and retention in online education, Part 2. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(1).
• Borau, K., Ullrich, C., Feng, J., & Shen, R. (2009). Microblogging for language learning:
• Using twitter to train communicative and cultural competence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5686, 78-87, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-03426-8_10. Retrieved from http://www.carstenullrich.net/pubs/Borau09Microblogging.pdf
• Brown, J., & Metcalf, D. (2008, Summer). Mobile learning update. Elliott Masie’s Learning
• Consortium Perspective. Retrieved from http://www.numerons.in/files/documents/M- Learning-Forecast.pdf Carr, K., Gardner, F., Odell, M., Mumsch, T., & Wilson, B. (2003). The role of online, asynchronous interaction in development of light and color concepts. The Journal of
• Interactive Online Learning, 2(2): Retrieved from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/PDF/2.2.5.pdf Dabaj, F. (2011, January). Analysis of communication barriers to distance education: A review study. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 1(1). Retrieved from http://www.ojcmt.net/articles/111.pdfhttp://www.ojcmt.net/articles/111.pdf
• Dabaj, F., & Isman, A. (2004, February). Communication barriers in distance education:
• Demetriadis, S., Papadopoulos, M., & Tsoukalas, I. (2005). Bridging the contextual distance: The e-CASE learning environment for supporting students’ context awareness.
• Advances in informatics, Proceedings of the 10th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics. Volos, Greece, November 11-13. New York: Springer. pp: 523-533. Donaldson, R.L. (2011). Student acceptance of mobile learning. Doctoral dissertation,
• Florida State University. Retrieved from http://etd.lib.fsu.edu/theses/available/etd- 05312011-074842/unrestricted/Donaldson_R_dissertation_2011.pdf
• Feenberg, A. (1989). The written world: on the theory and practice of computer conferencing. In R. Mason & A.R. Kaye (Eds.) Mindweave: Communication, computers and distance education, Pergamon, 22-39. Retrieved from http://www.sfu.ca/~andrewf/Writworl.htm
• Fiedler, M., Haruvy, E., & Li, S.X. (2010). Social distance in a virtual world experiment.
• Games and Economic Behavior 72(2): 400-426. Freedman, S.C., Tello, S.F., & Lewis, D. (2003). Strategies for improving instructor- student communication in online education. In F. Albalooshi (ed.), Virtual Education:
• Cases in Learning & Teaching Technologies. IRM Press: Hershey, PA. 156-168. Retrieved from http://faculty.uml.edu/stello/IRMA0802.pdf
• Galusha, J.M. (1997). Barriers to learning in distance education. University of Southern
• Mississippi. Retrieved from http://www.infrastruction.com/barriers.htm Garrison, R. (2000). Theoretical challenges for distance education in the 21st century: A shift from structural to transactional issues. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 1(1): 1-17.
• Gunawardena, C. N., & Zittle, F. J. (1997). Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. The American Journal of
• Distance Education, 11(3), 8–26. Hallberg, D., & Wafula, L. (2010). Empowering rural women in Kenya with literacy skills using web 2.0: experiences of language & communication barriers in learning,
• Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on ICT for Africa, March 25-27, Yaounde, Cameroon. Baton Rouge, LA: International Center for IT and Development. pp: 100- Hansen, B., Shinkle, A., & Dupin, P. (1999, December). Feedback in distance education:
• Broadening electronic communication pathways. Journal of Extension, 37(6). Retrieved from http://www.joe.org/joe/1999december/iw3.php
• Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2000). Students’ distress with a Web-based distance education course: An ethnographic study of participants’ experiences. Information, Communication and Society, 3(4), 557-579.
• Isman, A., & Altinay, F. (2005, October). Communication barriers: A study of Eastern
• Mediterranean University students’ and teachers’ of online program and courses. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 6(4) Article 13. Retrieved from http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde20/pdf/article_13.pdf Isman, A., Canan, O., Isbulan, O., & Demir, Z. (2008). Communication barriers: A study of candidates of using technology. 8th International Educational Technology Conference.
• Anadolu University, Eskisehir. Isman, A., Dabaj, F., Altinay, F., & Altinay, Z. (2003, October). Communication barriers in distance education. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(4), article 2.
• Jones, M. (2010). A CSCL approach to blended learning in the integration of technology in teaching. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning & Learning Objects, 6, 103-113.
• Keegan, D. (1986). The foundations of distance education. London: Croom Helm.
• Kim, J. K., & Bonk, C. J. (2002). Cross-cultural comparisons of online collaboration.
• Journal of Computer Mediated Communication, 8(1). Kim, K.-J., Liu, S., & Bonk, C. J. (2005). Online MBA students’ perceptions of online learning: Benefits, challenges and suggestions. Internet and Higher Education, 8(4), 335- 3
• King, S., Taylor, E., Satzinger, F., Carbonaro, M., & Greidanus, E. (2008). Developing interdisciplinary team competencies in a blended learning course: Impact on student learning. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Proactice, 6(1).
• Kirschner, P. A., & Van Bruggen, J. (2004). Learning and understanding in virtual teams.
• CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7(2), 135-139. Koh, M. H., & Hill, J. R. (2009). Student perceptions of group work in an online course:
• Benefits and challenges. Journal of Distance Education, 23(2): 69-91. Koh, M.H., Barbour, M., & Hill, J.R. (2010). Strategies for instructors on how to improve online groupwork. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(2): 183-205.
• Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2005). Current uses of wireless and mobile learning. Retrieved http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Current%20Uses%20FINAL%202005.doc
• Kurubacak, G. (2007). Identifying research priorities and needs in mobile learning technologies for distance education: A Delphi study. Journal of Teaching and Learning in
• Higher Education, 19(3): 216-227. Liu, X., Liu, S., Lee, S.-h., & Magjuka, R. J. (2010). cultural differences in online learning: international student perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 13 (3), 177–188.
• McKee, T. (2010, May). 69. Thirty years of distance education: personal reflections.
• International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(2). McMahon, J., Gardner, J.A., Gray, C. & Mulhern, G. (1999). Barriers to student computer usage: staff and student perceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15(4), 302- 3
• Moore, M. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education (pp. 22-38). London: Routledge.
• Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning, (3rd ed.). New York: Wadsworth/Cengage.
• O’Hanlon, N. (2001, Summer). Development, delivery, and outcomes of a distance course for new college students. Library Trends, 50(1): 8-27.
• Ozelkan, E.C. & Galambosi, A. (2012). Overcoming communication barriers in online teaching: Understanding faculty preferences. In the Proceedings of the International
• Conference on Communication, Media, Technology and Design (ICCMTD). Istanbul, Turkey. 09-11 May. pp. 292-298. Retrieved from http://www.cmdconf.net/2012/makale/55.pdf
• Pereira, A. Lisbon, A., & Lõhmus, K. (2005). Chapter 4: Pedagogical issues in ODL. In K.
• DePryck (Ed.), Getting started with open and distance learning. (pp: 43-55). Antwerp, Belgium: Garant Publishers. Retrieved from http://www.odlexpert.net/getstart/chapter4.pdf Perreault, H., Waldman, L., Alexander, M., & Zhao, J. (2002, July/August). Overcoming barriers to successful delivery of distance-learning courses. Journal of Education for Business, 77(6), 313-318.
• Ramsden, A., & Jordan, L. (2009). Are students ready for QR codes? Findings from a student survey at the University of Bath. Working Paper. University of Bath.
• Retrievedhttp://opus.bath.ac.uk/12782/1/qrcodes_student_survey_uniofbath_feb09.pdf
• Rittschof, K. A., Griffin, B. W. (2003a). Confronting limitations of cyberspace college courses: Part I—Identifying and describing issues. International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(2), 127-142.
• Rittschof, K. A., Griffin, B. W. (2003b). Confronting limitations of cyberspace college courses: Part 2—Developing solutions. International Journal of Instructional Media, 30(3), 285-294.
• Rohleder, P., Bozalek, V., Carolissen, R., Leibowitz, B., & Swartz, L. (2008). Students’ evaluation of the use of e-learning in a collaborative project between two South African universities. Higher Education, 56(1), 95-107.
• Russell, C.K., Gregory, D.M., Care, W.D., & Hultin, D. (2007 November-December).
• Recognizing and avoiding intercultural miscommunication in distance education: A study of the experiences of Canadian faculty and aboriginal nursing students. Journal of Professional Nursing, 23(6): 351-361. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18053961
• Rye, S.A., & Stİkken, A.M. (2012, January). The implications of the local context in global online education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1).
• Sarrafzadeh, M., & Williamson, K. (2012, January/June). Multicultural, virtual work places: Opportunities and challenges for LIS educators. International Journal of
• Information Science and Management, 2(1): 89-102. Retrieved from http://www.ricest.ac.ir/ijist/Vol10N1/ijism-V10N1_files/ijism101-89-102.pdf Sharma, P., & Maleyeff, J. (2003). Internet education: Potential problems and solutions.
• The International Journal of Educational Management, 17(1), 19-25. Shen, C-Y. (2004). The impact of cultural factors in distance learning: A reviewing research. In L. Cantoni & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on
• Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2004 (pp. 3743-3748). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
• Slagter van Tryon, P.J., & Bishop, M.J. (2009). Theoretical foundations for enhancing social connectedness in online learning environments. Distance Education, 30(3): 291- 3
• So, H.-J., & Brush, T.A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers and Education, 51: 318–336.
• Thorpe, M. (2002). Rethinking learner support: The challenge of collaborative online learning. Open Learning, 17(2): 106-119.
• Tinguely, S. (2010, July 27). Issues in distance education: Communication. Retrieved from http://learning-with-sara.blogspot.com/2010_07_27_archive.html
• Valaitis, R., Sword, W.A., Jones, B., & Hodges, A. (2005). Problem-based learning online: perceptions of health science students. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 10:231– 2 DOI 10.1007/s10459-005-6705-3
• Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Wang, M., & Kang, M. (2006). Cybergogy for engaged learning: A framework for creating learner engagement through information and communication technology. In D. Hung and M.S. Khine (Eds.), Engaged Learning with Emerging Technologies, pp: 225-253. DOI: 1007/1-4020-3669-8_11
• Willis, W. (1996, February 1). Telephony products enhance convenience, communication
• & distance learning. T.H.E. Journal, Retrieved from http://thejournal.com/articles/1996/02/01/telephony-products-enhance-convenience- communication--distance-learning.aspx
• Winthrop, R. (1991). Dictionary of Concepts in Cultural Anthropology (Vol. 11). New
• York, NY.: Greenwood Press. Zaltsman, R. (2009). Chapter XIX: Communication barriers and conflicts in cross-cultural e-learning. In M. Chang & C. Kuo (Ed.) Learning Culture and Language through
• ICTs: Methods for Enhanced Instruction. Pp: 318-330. Hershey, PA USA: IGI. l.