Distribution patterns and habitat suitability for three species ofthe genus Hyla Laurenti, 1768 in the Western Palearctic

Distribution patterns and habitat suitability for three species ofthe genus Hyla Laurenti, 1768 in the Western Palearctic

Hyla is one of the genera in the family Hylidae that is distributed in the Old World. Three tree frog species of this genus are distributed in Eurasia and especially inhabit semiaquatic regions. Several studies were conducted on the genus with different methodologies to delimit the species level. In the present study, we modeled the potential distribution areas for three frogs (Hyla orientalis, Hyla savignyi,and Hyla felixarabica) to determine the suitable habitat of each species separately. Models of all three species had a good fit as indicated by the high area under the curve (AUC) values (H. orientalis = 0.987, SD = ±0.004; H. savignyi = 0.988, SD = ±0.002; H. felixarabica = 0.994, SD = ±0.002). Three important climate variables had high contributions to species presence as isothermal temperature and precipitation variables. Because of the sensitivity of these frogs to moisture and temperature levels, they have declined in unsuitable regions, and we can assume that these variables form a natural barrier for species dispersion. It is clear that separation of H. felixarabica from the complex of H. savignyi is completely related to these natural barriers in central Arabia. However, the population in Jordan will be synonymized with H. savignyi because of the continuous distribution range in the Middle East.

___

  • Alford RA, Richards SJ (1999). Global amphibian declines: a problem in applied ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 30: 133–165.
  • Blaustein AR, Kiesecker JM (2002). Complexity in conservation: lessons from the global decline of amphibian populations. Ecol Lett 5: 597–608.
  • Blaustein AR, Wake DB (1995). The puzzle of declining amphibian populations. Sci Amer272: 52–57.
  • Blaustein AR, Wake DB, Sousa WP (1994). Amphibian declines: judging stability, persistence, and susceptibility of populations to local and global extinctions. Conserv Biol 8: 60–71.
  • D’Amen M, Bombi P (2009). Global warming and biodiversity: evidence of climate-linked amphibian declines in Italy. Biol Conserv 142: 3060–3067.
  • Elith J, Graham CH, Anderson RP, Dudík M, Ferrier S, Guisan A, Hijmans RJ, Huettmann F, Leathwick JR, Lehmann A et al. (2006). Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29: 129–151.
  • Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudík M, Chee YE, Yates CJ (2011). A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers Distribut17: 43–57.
  • Fouquet A, Ficetola GF, Haigh A, Gemmell N (2010). Using ecological niche modelling to infer past, present and future environmental suitability for Leiopelma hochstetteri, an endangered New Zealand native frog. Biol Conserv 143: 1375–1384.
  • Gallien L, Douzet R, Pratte S, Zimmermann NE, Thuiller W (2012). Invasive species distribution models–how violating the equilibrium assumption can create new insights. Global Ecol Biogeogr 21: 1126–1136.
  • Guisan A, Thuiller W (2005). Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol Lett 8: 993–1009.
  • Gül S (2013). Ecological divergence between two evolutionary lineages of Hyla savignyi (Audouin, 1827) in Turkey: effects of the Anatolian Diagonal. Animal Biol 63: 285–295.
  • Gül S, Kutrup B, Özdemir N (2012). Patterns of distribution of tree frogs in Turkey based on molecular data. Amphibia-Reptilia 33: 95–10.
  • Gvoždík V, Moravec J, Klütsch C, Kotlík P (2010). Phylogeography of the Middle Eastern tree frogs (Hyla, Hylidae, Amphibia) as inferred from nuclear and mitochondrial DNA variation, with a description of a new species. Mol Phylogenet Evol 55: 1146–1166.
  • Gvoždík V, Moravec J, Kratochvíl L (2008). Geographic morphological variation in parapatric Western Palearctic tree frogs, Hyla arborea and Hyla savignyi: are related species similarly affected by climatic conditions? Biol J Linn Soc95: 539–556.
  • Hernandez PA, Graham CH, Master LL, Albert DL (2006). The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography 29: 773–785.
  • Muñoz MES, Giovanni R, Siqueira MF, Sutton T, Brewer P, Pereira RS, Canhos DAL, Canhos VP (2011). openModeller: a generic approach to species’ potential distribution modeling. GeoInformatica 15: 111–135.
  • Navarro‐Cerrillo RM, Hernández‐Bermejo JE, Hernández‐Clemente R (2011). Evaluating models to assess the distribution of Buxus balearica in southern Spain. Applied Veg Sci 14: 256–267.
  • Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006). Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190: 231–259.
  • Phillips SJ, Dudik M (2008). Modeling of species distributions with Maxent: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation. Ecography 31: 161–175.
  • Raes N, ter Steege H (2007). A null‐model for significance testing of presence‐only species distribution models. Ecography 30: 727–736.
  • Rissler LJ, Apodaca JJ (2007). Adding more ecology into species delimitation: ecological niche models and phylogeography help define cryptic species in the black salamander (Aneidesflavipunctatus). Syst Biol 56: 924–942.
  • Şekercioğlu ÇH, Anderson S, Akçay E, Bilgin R, Can ÖE, Semiz G, Tavşanoğlu Ç, Yokeş MB, Soyumert A, İpekdal K et al. (2011). Turkey’s globally important biodiversity in crisis. Biol Conserv 144: 2752–2769.
  • Sillero N (2011). What does ecological modelling model? A proposed classification of ecological niche models based on their underlying methods. Ecol Model 222: 1343–1346.
  • Stöck M, Dubey S, Klutsch C, Litvinchuk S, Scheidt U, Perin N (2008). Mitochondrial and nuclear phylogeny of circum-Mediterranean tree frogs from the Hyla arborea group. Mol Phylogenet Evol 49: 1019–1024.
  • Stöck M, Dufresnes C, Litvinchuk SN, Lymberakis P, Biollay S, Berroneau M, Borzée A, Ghali K, Ogielska M, Perrin N (2012). Cryptic diversity among Western Palearctic tree frogs: postglacial range expansion, range limits, and secondary contacts of three European tree frog lineages (Hyla arborea group). Mol Phylogenet Evol 65: 1–9.
  • Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues AS, Fischman DL, Waller RW (2004). Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306: 1783–1786.
  • Wake DB, Vredenburg VT (2008). Are we in the midst of the sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians. P Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 11466–11473.