Impact of dike age on biodiversity and functional composition of soilmacrofaunal communities in poplar forests in a reclaimed coastal area

Impact of dike age on biodiversity and functional composition of soilmacrofaunal communities in poplar forests in a reclaimed coastal area

Four patches of poplar forest with different dike histories (about 30 to 200 years) were selected from the coastal area of Yancheng, China, for detecting the effect of dike age on soil macrofauna. A total of 825 individuals belonging to 21 taxonomic groups were collected. Omnivorous, phytophagous, predaceous, and saprophagous groups were classified on the basis of diet. Higher biodiversity values were observed in the forests with longer dike histories (100 and 200 years) than in those with shorter dike histories (30 and 50 years). By principal coordinate analysis, the soil macrofaunal communities from the forests were distinguished as three groups with shorter or longer dike histories (30 years, 50 years, and above 100 years). One-way ANOSIM analysis revealed significant differences among soil macrofaunal communities (P < 0.050), except for those with longer dike histories (100 and 200 years, P = 0.217). The groups of omnivorous and predaceous macrofauna showed no significant differences in taxonomic richness and abundance among habitats, while significant differences were observed between the other functional groups. A significant difference in functional composition between the soil macrofaunal communities in the forests with dike ages of 30 and 100 years was found with the chi-square test (P = 0.027). The biodiversity and functional composition of soil macrofauna was significantly affected by dike age in the reclaimed coast.

___

  • An S, Li H, Guan B, Zhou C, Wang Z, Deng Z, Zhi Y, Liu Y, Xu C, Fang S et al. (2007). China’s natural wetlands: past problems, current status, and future challenges. Ambio 36: 335–342.
  • Azul AM, Mendes SM, Sousa JP, Freitas H (2011). Fungal fruitbodies and soil macrofauna as indicators of land use practices on soil biodiversity in Montado. Agroforest Syst 82: 121–138.
  • Barrios E, Cobo JG, Rao IM, Thomas RJ, Amezquita E, Jimenez JJ, Rondon MA (2005). Fallow management for soil fertility recovery in tropical Andean agroecosystems in Colombia. Agric Ecosyst Environ 110: 29–42.
  • Brown C, Corcoran E, Herkenrath P, Thonell J (2006). Marine and Coastal Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Synthesis Report Based on the Findings of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environment Programme.
  • Brussaard L (1998). Soil fauna, guilds, functional groups and ecosystem processes. Appl Soil Ecol 9: 123–135.
  • Cui J, Liu C, Li Z, Wang L, Chen X, Ye Z, Fang C (2012a). Long-term changes in topsoil chemical properties under centuries of cultivation after reclamation of coastal wetlands in the Yangtze Estuary, China. Soil Till Res 123: 50–60.
  • Cui J, Meng H, Nie M, Chen X, Li Z, Bu N, Chen J, Quan Z, Fang C (2012b). Bacterial succession during 500 years of soil development under agricultural use. Ecol Res 27: 793–807.
  • De Bruyn LAL (1997). The status of soil macrofauna as indicators of soil health to monitor the sustainability of Australian agricultural soils. Ecol Econ 23: 167–178.
  • Dewan AM, Yamaguchi Y, Rahman MZ (2012). Dynamics of land use/cover changes and the analysis of landscape fragmentation in Dhaka Metropolitan, Bangladesh. GeoJournal 77: 315–330.
  • Duke NC, Meynecke JO, Dittmann S, Ellison AM, Anger K, Berger U, Cannicci S, Diele K, Ewel KC, Field CD et al. (2007). A world without mangroves? Science 317: 41–42.
  • Ellis S, Atherton JK (2003). Properties and development of soils on reclaimed alluvial sediments of the Humber estuary, eastern England. Catena 52: 129–147.
  • Etter A, McAlpine C, Pullar D, Possingham H (2006). Modelling the conversion of Colombian lowland ecosystems since 1940: drivers, patterns and rates. J Environ Manage 79: 74–87.
  • Frouz J, Elhottová D, Kuráž V, Šourková M (2006). Effects of soil macrofauna on other soil biota and soil formation in reclaimed and unreclaimed post mining sites: results of a field microcosm experiment. Appl Soil Ecol 33: 308–320.
  • Gaston KJ, Smith RM, Thompson K, Warren PH (2004). Gardens and wildlife: the BUGS project. Br Wildl 16: 1–9.
  • Ge BM, Li ZX, Zhang DZ, Zhang HB, Liu ZT, Zhou CL, Tang BP (2012). Communities of soil macrofauna in green spaces of an urbanizing city at east China. Rev Chil Hist Nat 85: 219–226.
  • Ge BM, Zhang DZ, Cui J, Zhang HB, Zhou CL, Tang BP (2014a). Biodiversity variations of soil macrofauna communities in forests in a reclaimed coast with different diked history. Pakistan J Zool 46: 1053–1059.
  • Ge BM, Zhang DZ, Tang BP, Zhou CL (2014b). Effect of land cover on biodiversity and composition of a soil macrofauna community in a reclaimed coastal area at Yancheng, China. Turk J Zool 38: 229–233.
  • Hammer Ø, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistical software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron 4: 1–9.Huston MA (2005). The three phases of land-use change: implications for biodiversity. Ecol Appl 15: 1864–1878.
  • Lavelle P, Decaëns T, Aubert M, Barot S, Blouin M, Bureau F, Margerie P, Mora P, Rossi JP (2006). Soil invertebrates and ecosystem services. Eur J Soil Biol 42: S3–S15.
  • Lefebvre F, Gaudry E (2009). Forensic entomology: a new hypothesis for the chronological succession pattern of necrophagous insect on human corpses. Ann Soc Entomol Fr (n.s.) 45: 377–392.
  • Li J, Pu L, Zhu M, Zhang J, Li P, Dai X, Xu Y, Liu L (2014). Evolution of soil properties following reclamation in coastal areas: a review. Geoderma 226/227: 130–139.
  • Liiri M, Häsä M, Haimi J, Setälä H (2012). History of land-use intensity can modify the relationship between functional complexity of the soil fauna and soil ecosystem services - a microcosm study. Appl Soil Ecol 55: 53–61.
  • Margalef DR (1957). Information theory in ecology. Gen System 3: 36–71.
  • Martínez ML, Pérez-Maqueo O, Vázquez G, Castillo-Campos G, García-Franco J, Mehltreter K, Landgrave R (2009). Effects of land use change on biodiversity and ecosystem services in tropical montane cloud forests of Mexico. Forest Ecol Manag 258: 1856–1863.
  • Mora C, Sale PF (2011). Ongoing global biodiversity loss and the need to move beyond protected areas: a review of the technical and practical shortcomings of protected areas on land and sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 434: 251–266.
  • Paterson DM, Hanley M, Black K, Defew EC, Solan M (2011). Science and policy mismatch in coastal zone ecosystem management. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 434: 201–202.
  • Pauli N, Barrios E, Conacher AJ, Oberthür T (2011). Soil macrofauna in agricultural landscapes dominated by the Quesungual lash-and-mulch agroforestry system, western Honduras. Appl Soil Ecol 47: 119–132.
  • Rainio J, Niemelä J (2003). Ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) as bioindicators. Biodivers Conserv 12: 487–506.
  • Salamon JA, Zaitsev A, Gärtner S, Wolters V (2008). Soil macrofaunal response to forest conversion from pure coniferous stands into semi-natural montane forests. Appl Soil Ecol 40: 491–498.
  • Sauberer N, Zulka KP, Abensperg-Traun M, Berg HM, Bieringer G, Milasowszky N, Moser D, Plutzar C, Pollheimer M, Storch C et al. (2004). Surrogate taxa for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes of eastern Austria. Biol Conserv 117: 181–190.
  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL, USA: University of Illinois Press.
  • Thomas F, Folgarait P, Lavelle P, Rossi JP (2004). Soil macrofaunal communities along an abandoned rice field chronosequence in Northern Argentina. Appl Soil Ecol 27: 23–29.
  • Wang J, Chen Y, Shao X, Zhang Y, Cao Y (2012). Land-use changes and policy dimension driving forces in China: present, trend and future. Land Use Policy 29: 737–749.
  • Wolanski E (2007). Estuarine Ecohydrology. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
  • Wu J, Fu C, Chen S, Chen J (2002). Soil faunal response to land use: effect of estuarine tideland reclamation on nematode communities. Appl Soil Ecol 21: 131–147.
  • Yin WY (2000). The Soil Fauna of China. Beijing, China: Science Press (in Chinese).
  • Zou P, Fu J, Cao Z (2011). Chronosequence of paddy soils and phosphorus sorption–desorption properties. J Soil Sedim 11: 249–259.
Turkish Journal of Zoology-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0179
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Faunistic and zoogeographical composition and preliminary evaluations of some ecological features of the subfamily Staphylininae (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae) ofthe Central Anatolian Region of Turkey

Osman SERT, Senem FIRAT

Heavy metal (cadmium, lead, and chromium) contamination infarmed fish: a potential risk for consumers' health

N. Muhammad KHAN, S. Zahid MIRZA, Asif ALI, M. Anser CHATTA

Halil İbrahim YOLCU, Aziz ASLAN, Ayhan SERTTAŞ, Halil SARIBAŞAK, Hasan UYSAL, Abdurrahman ÇOBANOĞLU

André LIRA, Victor ARAÚJO, Cleide ALBUQUERQUE

Karyology of Mullus barbatus (Pisces, Perciformes) from the Mediterranean basin

V. Denis PRAZDNIKOV

Distribution patterns and habitat suitability for three species ofthe genus Hyla Laurenti, 1768 in the Western Palearctic

Serkan GÜL, Seyyed Saeed YOUSEFKHANI HOSSEINIAN, Sahar JAVAHERI TEHRANI, Behnoush MOODI

Contribution to the knowledge of the Chrysididae (Hymenoptera, Aculeata) in the south of Iran, with nine new records

Ali Asghar TALEBI, Yaghoub FATHIPOUR, Afrouz FARHAD, Paolo ROSA, Hamidreza HAJIQANBAR

Ensemble distribution modeling of the Mesopotamian spiny-tailed lizard, Saara loricata(Blanford, 1874), in Iran: an insight into the impact of climate change

Gunther KOEHLER, Masoud YOUSEFI, Atefe ASADI, Mohammad KABOLI, Anooshe KAFASH

Monitoring the survival rate of released chukars: a case study in Elmalı Cedar Forest, Antalya, Turkey

Halil İbrahim YOLCU, Aziz ASLAN, Halil SARIBAŞAK, Hasan UYSAL, Abdurrahman ÇOBANOĞLU, Ayhan SERTTAŞ

First record of the invasive vinegar fly Drosophila suzukii (Matsumura)(Diptera: Drosophilidae) from eastern Turkey

Rafet ASLANTAŞ, Göksel TOZLU, Alper ORHAN, Banu Şebnem ÖNDER