Distribution and ecology of Ostracoda (Crustacea) from troughs in Turkey

Troughs are artificially transformed natural springs, underground waters, or related habitats. Some effects of such transformation are mentioned in a few studies, but there has been no extensive study on species composition and diversity in troughs. To contribute to the knowledge on the ostracods in troughs, we examined ostracod composition and diversity in 105 troughs from 6 provinces (Bolu, Erzincan, Gaziantep, Kahramanmaraş, Ordu, Van) in Turkey. The troughs were randomly visited between the years 2006 and 2010. A total of 32 ostracod species and a mean number of 2.16 species per trough were found. The most common 4 species (Heterocypris incongruens, Ilyocypris bradyi, Psychrodromus olivaceus, Candona neglecta) occurred in 57, 48, 34, and 26 different troughs, respectively. A UPGMA dendrogram displayed these 4 species in the same clustering group. The first 2 axes of canonical correspondence analysis explained about 69.5% of the variations in the species data set between 15 species and 5 environmental variables. The 2 most important explanatory variables, altitude (P = 0.008, F = 2.389) and redox potential (P = 0.034, F = 2.230), were the 2 most effective factors on species occurrence in these troughs. Ecological tolerance and optimum estimates of cosmopolitan species were generally higher than the mean values. The Shannon-Wiener index showed high values for the 4 most common species, supporting the effect of their dominance. Our results suggest that troughs can have relatively high ostracod richness but evenness can be low due to the strong dominance of one or more species.

Distribution and ecology of Ostracoda (Crustacea) from troughs in Turkey

Troughs are artificially transformed natural springs, underground waters, or related habitats. Some effects of such transformation are mentioned in a few studies, but there has been no extensive study on species composition and diversity in troughs. To contribute to the knowledge on the ostracods in troughs, we examined ostracod composition and diversity in 105 troughs from 6 provinces (Bolu, Erzincan, Gaziantep, Kahramanmaraş, Ordu, Van) in Turkey. The troughs were randomly visited between the years 2006 and 2010. A total of 32 ostracod species and a mean number of 2.16 species per trough were found. The most common 4 species (Heterocypris incongruens, Ilyocypris bradyi, Psychrodromus olivaceus, Candona neglecta) occurred in 57, 48, 34, and 26 different troughs, respectively. A UPGMA dendrogram displayed these 4 species in the same clustering group. The first 2 axes of canonical correspondence analysis explained about 69.5% of the variations in the species data set between 15 species and 5 environmental variables. The 2 most important explanatory variables, altitude (P = 0.008, F = 2.389) and redox potential (P = 0.034, F = 2.230), were the 2 most effective factors on species occurrence in these troughs. Ecological tolerance and optimum estimates of cosmopolitan species were generally higher than the mean values. The Shannon-Wiener index showed high values for the 4 most common species, supporting the effect of their dominance. Our results suggest that troughs can have relatively high ostracod richness but evenness can be low due to the strong dominance of one or more species.

___

  • Akdemir, D. 2009. Erzincan ve Diyarbakır (Türkiye) illeri Ostrakotlarının (Crustacea) biyocoğrafik dağılımı, ekolojik özellikleri ve tolerans seviyelerinin tespiti. PhD. Marmara University, İstanbul, Turkey.
  • Bacchiocchi, F. and Airoldi, L. 2003. Distribution and dynamics of epibiota on hard structures for coastal protection. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms 56: 1157–1166.
  • Benson, R.H. 1990. Ostracoda and the discovery of global Cainozoic Palaeoceanographical events. In: Ostracoda and Global Events (Eds. R. Whatley and C. Maybury). Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 41–59.
  • Bere, T. and Tundisi, J.G. 2009. Weighted average regression and calibration of conductivity and pH of benthic diatom assemblages in streams influenced by urban pollution – São Carlos/SP, Brazil. Acta Limnol. Bras. 21: 317–325.
  • Birks, H.J.B., Line, J.M., Juggins, S., Stevenson, A.C. and ter Braak, C.J.F. 1990. Diatoms and pH reconstruction. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 327: 263–278.
  • Bronshtein, Z.S. 1988. Freshwater Ostracoda. Fauna of the USSR, Crustaceans, Vol. 2 (1). Academy of Sciences of the USSR and Zoological Institute. Amerind, New Delhi, Calcutta, India (English translation).
  • Burt, J., Bartholomew, A., Usseglio, P., Bauman, A. and Sale, P.F. 2009. Are artificial reefs surrogates of natural habitats for corals and fish in Dubai, United Arab Emirates? Coral Reefs 28: 663–675. Carr, M.H. and Hixon, M.A. 1997. Artificial reefs: the importance of comparisons with natural reefs. Fisheries 22: 28–33.
  • Chaplin, J.A. and Ayre, D.J. 1997. Genetic evidence of widespread dispersal in a parthenogenetic freshwater ostracod. Heredity 78: 57–67.
  • Cianficconi, F., Corallini, C. and Moretti, G.P. 1998. Trichopteran fauna of the Italian springs. In: Studies in Crenobiology (Ed. L. Botosaneanu). Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, pp. 125–140.
  • Cohen, A.S. and Johnston, M.R. 1987. Speciation in brooding and poorly dispersing lacustrine organisms. Palaios 5: 426–435.
  • De Deckker, P. 1981. Ostracoda from Australian inland waters: notes on taxonomy and ecology. Proc. Roy. Soc. Vict. 93: 43–85.
  • Forester, R.M. and Brouwers, E.M. 1985. Hydrochemical parameters governing the occurrence of estuarine and marginal estuarine ostracodes: an example from south-central Alaska. J. Paleontol. 59: 344–369.
  • Fryer, G. 1997. The horse-trough ostracod Heterocypris incongruens. Naturalist 122: 121–135.
  • Glasby, T.M. and Connell, S.D. 1999. Urban structures as marine habitats. AMBIO 28: 595–598.
  • Godoy, E.A.S. and Coutinho, R. 2002. Can artificial beds of plastic mimics compensate for seasonal absence of natural beds of Sargassum furcatum? ICES J. Mar. Sci. 59: 111–115.
  • Horne, A.J. and Goldman, C.R. 1994. Limnology, 2nd ed. McGrawHill, New York.
  • Juggins, S. 2001. CALIBRATE Version 1.0. A C++ program for analyzing and visualizing species environment relationships and for predicting environment values from species assemblages. University of Newcastle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
  • Juggins, S. 2003. Software for Ecological and Palaeoecological Data Analysis and Visualization. C2 User Guide. University of Newcastle, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
  • Karanovic, I. 2006. Recent Candoninae (Crustacea, Ostracoda, Candonidae) of North America. Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement 71: 1–75.
  • Kesling, R.V. and Crafts, F.C. 1962. Ontogenetic increase in Archimedean weight of the ostracod Chlamydotheca unispinosa (Baird). Am. Midl. Nat. 68: 149–153.
  • King, J.L., Simovich, M.A. and Brusca, R.C. 1996. Species richness, endemism and ecology of crustacean assemblages in northern California vernal pools. Hydrobiologia 328: 85–116.
  • Kovach, W. 1998. Multivariate statistical package, version 3.0. Kovach Computer Services, Pentraeth, Anglesey, UK.
  • Külköylüoğlu, O. 1999. Seasonal distribution of freshwater Ostracoda (Crustacea) in springs of Nevada. Geosound-Sci. Tech. Bull. Earth Sci. 35: 85–91.
  • Külköylüoğlu, O. 2003. A new report and the loss of Scottia pseudobrowniana KEMPF, 1971 (Ostracoda) from a limnocrene spring in Bolu, Turkey. Crustaceana 76: 257–384.
  • Külköylüoğlu, O. 2004. On the usage of ostracods (Crustacea) as bioindicator species in different aquatic habitats in the Bolu region, Turkey. Ecol. Indic. 4: 139–147.
  • Külköylüoğlu, O. 2005. Factors affecting Ostracoda (Crustacea) occurrence in Yumrukaya Reedbeds (Bolu, Turkey). Wetlands 25: 224–227.
  • Külköylüoğlu, O., Akdemir, D. and Yüce, R. 2012a. Distribution, ecological tolerance and optimum levels of freshwater Ostracoda (Crustacea) from Diyarbakır, Turkey. Limnology 13: 73–80.
  • Külköylüoğlu, O., Dügel, M., Balcı, M., Deveci, A., Avuka, D. and Kılıç, M. 20 Limnoecological relationships between water level fluctuations and Ostracoda (Crustacea) species composition in Lake Sünnet (Bolu, Turkey). Turk. J. Zool. 34: 429–442. Külköylüoğlu, O. and Sarı, N. 2012. Ecological characteristics of the freshwater Ostracoda in Bolu Region (Turkey). Hydrobiologia 688: 37–46.
  • Külköylüoğlu, O., Sari, N. and Akdemir, D. 2012b. Distribution and ecological requirements of Ostracods (Crustacea) at high altitudinal ranges in Northeastern Van (Turkey). Ann. Limnol. – Int. J. Lim. 48: 39–51.
  • Külköylüoğlu, O. and Vinyard, G.L. 2000. Distribution and ecology of freshwater Ostracoda (Crustacea) collected from springs of Nevada, Idaho, and Oregon: a preliminary study. West. N. Am. Naturalist 60: 291–303.
  • Lim, T.M., McKaye, K.R. and Weiland, D.J. 1976. An investigation into the use of artificial habitats as a means of increasing the fishery productivity of the Great Lakes Complex of Nicaragua. In: Investigations of the Ichthyofauna of Nicaraguan Lakes (Ed. T.B. Thorson). University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, Nebraska, pp. 311–319.
  • Lopez, L.C.S., Gonçalves, D.A., Mantovani, A. and Rios, R.I. 2002. Bromeliad ostracods pass through amphibian (Scinaxax perpusillus) and mammalian guts alive. Hydrobiologia 485: 209–211.
  • Meisch, C. 2000. Freshwater Ostracoda of Western and Central Europe. Susswasserfauna von Mitteleuropa 8/3. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin.
  • Mezquita, F., Griffiths, H.I., Sanz, S., Soria, J.M. and Pinon, A. 1999. Ecology and distribution of ostracods associated with flowing waters in the eastern Iberian Peninsula. J. Crust. Biol. 19: 344– 3
  • Rossi, V., Benassi, G., Veneri, M., Bellavere, C., Menozzi, P., Moroni A. and McKenzie, K.G. 2003. Ostracoda of the Italian ricefields thirty years on: new synthesis and hypothesis. J. Limnology 62: 1–
  • Rouch, R. and Danielopol, D. L. 1997. Species richness of microcrustacea in subterranean freshwater habitats: comparative analysis and approximate evaluation. Int. Rev. Gesamten Hydrobiol. 82: 121–145.
  • Seaby, R.M. and Henderson, P.A. 2006. Species Diversity and Richness, Version 4. Pisces Conservation Ltd., Lymington, UK.
  • Simovich, M.A. 1998. Crustacean biodiversity and endemism in California’s ephemeral wetlands. In: Ecology, Conservation, and Management of Vernal Pool Ecosystems: Proceedings from a 1996 Conference (Eds. C.V. Witham, E.T. Bauder, D. Belk Jr, W.R. Ferren and R. Ornduff ). California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA, pp. 107–118.
  • Smith, S.D.A. and Rule, M.J. 2002. Artificial substrata in a shallow sublittoral habitat: do they adequately represent natural habitats or the local species pool? J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 277: 25–41.
  • Solow, A.R. 1993. A simple test for change in community structure. J. Anim. Ecol. 62: 191–193. ter Braak, C.J.F. 1987. The analysis of vegetation–environment relationships by canonical correspondence analysis. Vegetatio 69: 69–77. ter Braak, C.J.F. and Barendregt, L.G. 1986. Weighted averaging of species indicator values: its efficiency in environmental prediction. Mathem. Biosci. 78: 57–72. ter Braak, C.J.F. and Van Dam, H. 1989. Inferring pH from diatoms: a comparison of old and new methods. Hydrobiologia. 178: 209–223.
  • TODAİE. 2011. Köyler. Institute of Public Administration for Turkey and Middle East, Ankara. Available from www.yerelnet.org.tr. pe an d g eog ra phic al d at a m ea sur ed . bb re vi at io ns: C ode , s ta tio n co de; S HE, sta nd ar d h ydr og en ele ct ro de (mV TDS, t ava ila ble due t o t ec hnic al p ro blem s; S t. de v., s ta nd ar d de vi at io n. S pe cies co CV , C yp rido ps is v id ua *; C pu , C ypr is pu be ra ; DS, D ar w in ul a ste ve ns on i; D si, D ol er oc yp ris s in ens is* ; FF , F ab ae for m isc an don a fa ba efor m is; FL, H . re vic auda ta ; HI, H et er oc yp ris i nc on gr uens ; H ro , H. r ot un da ta ; H sa, H . alin a; Ib r, Ily oc yp ris b ra dy i; IG, I. g ib ba ; II, I. i ner m is; P F, Po ta m oc ypr is fa lla x; P fu , P. fu lva ; P P, P. pa llida ; Psi , P . im ili s; PU , P . nic auda ta ; PV , P . ar iege ta* ; P vi , P . ill os a; Po t, Po ta m oc ypr is sp .; Pze , P rio no cy pr is zen ker i; PAI, Ps eudoc Pfo , Ps yc hro dro m us fo nt in al is; PO ne ar t he t ro ug h w her e wa ter flo Tr oug h N am e G ün ey ce t ro ug h A hm et K oç h ay ra tı Yeşi lce t ro ug h Yeşi lce t ep esi M es-K ava klıder Ka va klıder G üzle k H ar çb eli çeşm H acı D . ltun h Fa tma taş ha yr at ı Or30 3 na 25 6 1179 PO , P fu , P ot, TL1 12/6/2010 40°134 ′ 37°122 ′ Ya pı lış 1995 t ro ug h Or34 6 28 na 8 2 5 0.1 1236 HI 12/6/2010 40°860 ′ 37°467 ′ Ya pı lış 25.06.1995 Or43 8 na 9 1275 PF, CA s p 12/6/2010 40°228 ′ 37°110 ′ Ay ba stı y ol-2 t ro ug h Or45 3 8 na 355 231 971 CN, P fu 12/6/2010 40°573 ′ 37°021 ′ To kg özler h ay ra tı Or48 81 –32 na 189 792 HI, Ib r 12/6/2010 40°494 ′ 37°682 ′ G öl kö y G ür gen tep e y ol Or49 na na 305 199 9 CN, HI 13/6/2010 40°903 ′ 37°229 ′ G ür gen tep e y ol-1 Or50 na 213 na 49 307 5 0.2 1085 HI 13/6/2010 40°442 ′ 37°416 ′ G ür gen tep e Ç am aş y ol u Or55 4 –115 na 3 17 1127 HI 13/6/2010 40°952 ′ 37°427 ′ Ça m aş h acım ahm ut m a. Or59 –315 na 15 2 746 CN, PO , I l1 13/6/2010 40°299 ′ 37°651 ′ Ça m aş k öy t ro ug h Or60 8 –17 11 120 CN 40°946 ′ 37°402 ′ Buzdo la bı t ug h Or64 na 137 1008 CN, HI 40°795 ′ 37°120 ′ A la ba lık h avuzu Or71 na na na 9 2 7 na 1077 CN 13/6/2010 40°531 ′ 37°218 ′ Ka bad üz E sen yur t Or82 na na na 248 244 CN, PO , Ib r 14/6/2010 40°764 ′ 37°951 ′ Or çim t ro ug h Or84 na na na 31 207 324 HI 14/6/2010 40°295 ′ 37°852 ′ Per şem be y ol u-3 Or92 na na na 315 29 PU 14/6/2010 41°0313 ′ 37°667 ′ A rt ıla r acı su t ro ug h Or106 na na na 408 140 HI, PO 15/6/2010 40°465 ′ 37°380 ′ Ko rga n y ol u-2 t ro ug h Or107 na na na 8 146 HI, PO 15/6/2010 40°363 ′ 37°253 ′ Sa hi bü l H ay ra t Or111 na na na 9 216 PO 15/6/2010 40°134 ′ 37°180 ′ Ko rga n y ol u-5 t ro ug h Or112 na na na 31 8 216 HI, PO , Po t4 15/6/2010 40°134 ′ 37°180 ′ Ka sım oğ lu m er m er Or113 na na na 7 230 CN, PO 15/6/2010 40°118 ′ 37°944 ′ A la ğa n m ah. T ro ug h Or114 na na na 9 PO , PU , P P, Ps e2 40°357 ′ 37°842 ′
Turkish Journal of Zoology-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-0179
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: TÜBİTAK
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Histopathological observations in Neogobius bathybius (Actinopterygii: Gobiidae) infected by Dichelyne minutus (Nematoda: Cucullanidae) in the Caspian Sea, Iran

Samaneh REZAEI, Jamileh PAZOOKI, İssa SHARIFPOUR, Mahmood MASOUMIAN

Two new records for the Polychaeta fauna of the Sea of Marmara: Laubieriellus salzi and Spiophanes afer (Polychaeta: Spionidae)

Ertan DAĞLI

Feeding ecology of vimba (Vimba vimba L., 1758) in terms of size groups and seasons in Lake Sapanca, northwestern Anatolia

Hacer Canan OKGERMAN, Cumhur Haldun YARDIMCI

The fauna and ecology of mosquito larvae (Diptera: Culicidae) in western Iran

Omid BANAFSHI, Mohammad-reza ABAI, Hossein LADONNI, Hassan BAKHSHI

Biochemical composition of the hemolymph, hepatopancreas, ovary, and muscle during ovarian maturation in the penaeid shrimps Fenneropenaeus merguiensis and F. penicillatus (Crustacea: Decapoda)

Habib FATIMA, Zarrien AYUB, Syed Abid ALI, Ghazala SIDDIQUI

Pycnogonida (Arthropoda) from Mersin Bay (Turkey, eastern Mediterranean)

Cengiz KOÇAK, Naciye ALAN

First record of the schizomid Stenochrus portoricensis (Schizomida: Hubbardiidae) in Poland, with DNA barcode data

Krzysztof ZAWIERUCHA, Pawel SZYMKOWIAK, Miroslawa DABERT, Mark Stephen HARVEY

Preliminary study on Acropora (Scleractinia: Astrocoeniina: Acroporidae) of the Persian Gulf, with emphasis on the north and northeastern areas

Mohammadreza RAHMANI, Hassan RAHIMIAN

Comparative study on muscle nutritional composition of juvenile bighead carp (Aristichthys nobilis) and paddlefish (Polyodon spathula) fed live feed

Pei-song SHI, Qin WANG, Yu-ting ZHU, Qian-hong GU, Bang-xi XIONG

Distribution and ecology of Ostracoda (Crustacea) from troughs in Turkey

Okan KÜLKÖYLÜOĞLU, Derya AKDEMİR, Necmettin SARI, Mehmet YAVUZATMACA, Ceren ORAL, Elif BAŞAK