Diet composition and prey diversity of Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus (Linnaeus, 1758; Aves: Strigidae) in central Serbia during breeding

Diet composition and prey diversity of Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus (Linnaeus, 1758; Aves: Strigidae) in central Serbia during breeding

Annual variation in the diet, composition, and prey diversity of Tengmalm’s owl Aegolius funereus (Linnaeus, 1758) wasinvestigated in high-mountain coniferous forests of Mt. Kopaonik (central Serbia) during 3 consecutive years. Prey remains anddecomposed pellets (detritus) were collected at the bottom of nest-boxes during 2 separate periods: during mating and after nesting.Prey remains such as maxillae, mandibles, beaks, or feathers were used for prey identification. In total, 438 prey items were separatedand identified. Small mammals represented the most numerous class of prey (87.23%). The most frequent prey item was bank voleMyodes glareolus (23.29%). During the nesting season the proportion of voles eaten was significantly higher in comparison with themating period. The mean prey weight was 20.74 g. In the study area, according to diversity index calculations, prey diversity was highand it seems that the number of breeding attempts by Tengmalm’s owl showed dependence on the annual abundance of small rodents,but further research is needed to confirm this assertion.

___

  • Anděra M, Horáček I (1982). Poznáváme naše savce. Prague, Czechoslovakia: Mladá fronta (in Czech).
  • Birrer S (2009). Synthesis of 312 studies on the diet of the LongEared Owl Asio otus. Ardea 97: 615-624.
  • Fredga K (1964). En undersökning av Pärlugglans (Aegolius funereus) bytesval i Mellansverige. Vår Fågelvärld 23: 103-118 (in Swedish).
  • Hanski I, Hansson L, Henttonen H (1991). Specialist predators, generalist predators, and the microtine rodent cycle. J Anim Ecol 60: 353-367.
  • Henrioux P (2010). Etude d’une population de chouette de Tegmalm dans l’Ouest du Jura. Geneva, Switzerland: GERNOV (in French).
  • Hörnfeldt B (1994). Delayed density dependence as a determinant of vole cycles. Ecology 75: 791-806.
  • Hörnfeldt B, Carlsson BG, Löfgren O, Eklund U (1990). Effects of cyclic food supply on breeding performance in Tengmalm’s Owl (Aegolius funereus). Can J Zool 68: 522-530.
  • Jäderholm K (1987). Diets of the Tengmalm’s Owl Aegolius funereus and the Ural Owl Strix uralensis in central Finland. Ornis Fennica 64: 149-153.
  • Jost L (2006). Entropy and diversity. Oikos 113: 363-375. Kessler J (2015). Osteological guide of songbirds from Central Europe. Ornis Hung 23: 62-155.
  • Klaus S, Mikkola H, Wiesner J (1975). Aktivität und Ernährung des Rauhfusskauzes Aegolius funereus (L.) während der Fortflanzungsperiode. Zoo Jb Syst 102: 485-507 (in German).
  • Kloubec B, Vacík R (1990). Outline of food ecology of Tengmalm’s Owl (Aegolius funereus L.) in Czechoslovakia. Tichodroma 3: 103-125.
  • König C, Weick F (2008). Owls of the World. 2nd ed. London, UK: Christopher Helm.
  • Korpimäki E (1986a). Seasonal changes in the food of the Tengmalm’s Owl Aegolius funereus in western Finland. Annls Zool Fennici 23: 339-344.
  • Korpimäki E (1986b). Gradients in population fluctuations of Tengmalm’s Owl Aegolius funereus in Europe. Oecologia 69: 126-132.
  • Korpimäki E (1988). Diet of breeding Tengmalm’s Owls Aegolius funereus: long-term changes and year-to-year variation under cyclic food conditions. Ornis Fennica 65: 21-30.
  • Korpimäki E (1992a). Diet composition, prey choice and breeding success of long-eared owls: effects of multiannual fluctuations in food abundance. Can J Zool 70: 2373-2381.
  • Korpimäki E (1992b). Fluctuating food abundance determines the lifetime reproductive success of male Tengmalm’s owls. J Anim Ecol 61: 103-111.
  • Korpimäki E (1992c). Population dynamics of Fennoscandian owls in relation to wintering conditions and between-year fluctuations of food. In: Galbraith CA, Taylor IR, Percival S, editors. The Ecology and Conservation of European Owls. UK Nature Conservation, No 5. Peterborough, UK: Nature Conservation Committee, pp. 1-10.
  • Korpimäki E,‎ Hakkarainen H (2012). The Boreal Owl: Ecology, Behaviour and Conservation of a Forest-Dwelling Predator. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Korpimäki E, Sulkava S (1987). Diet and breeding performance of Ural Owls Strix uralensis under fluctuating food conditions. Ornis Fennica 64: 57-66.
  • Krebs CJ (1999). Ecological Methodology. 2nd edition. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers, Inc.
  • Kryštufek B (1991). Sesalci Slovenije. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Prirodoslovni muzej (in Slovenian).
  • Love RA, Webbon C, Glue DE, Harris S (2000). Changes in the food of British Barn Owls (Tyto alba) between 1974 and 1997. Mammal Rev 30: 107-129.
  • Macholán M (1996). Key to European House Mice (Mus). Folia Zool 45: 209-217.
  • Magurran AE (2004). Measuring Biological Diversity. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Mezzavilla F, Lombardo S, Sperti MT (1994). First data on biology and breeding success of Tengmalm’s Owl Aegolius funereus in Cansiglio. Mus Reg Sci Nat Torino 1994: 325-334.
  • Mikkola H (1983). Owls of Europe. Carlton, UK: T & AD Poyser. Petrov MB (1992). Mammals of Yugoslavia: Insectivores and Rodents. Belgrade, Serbia: Natural History Museum.
  • Pokorný J, Kloubec B, Obuch J (2003). Comparison of Tengmalm’s Owl Aegolius funereus diet in several Czech mountain areas. Vogelwelt 124: 313-323.
  • Pykal J, Kloubec B (1994). Feeding ecology of Tengmalm’s Owl Aegolius funereus in the Šumava National Park, Czechoslovakia. In: Meyburg BU, Chancellor RD, editors. Raptor Conservation Today. Berlin, Germany: WWGBP/The Pica Press, pp. 537-541.
  • Rajković D, Grujić D, Novčić R, Mirić R (2013). Population of Tengmalm’s Owl Aegolius funereus in Kopaonik National Park (central Serbia). Acrocephalus 34: 27-32.
  • Rajković D, Puzović S, Raković M, Grubač B, Simović A, Vučanović M, Đorđević I (2010). Records of boreal owl Aegolius funereus in Serbia. Ciconia 19: 131-140 (in Serbian).
  • Scheuren F (1970). Übersicht über die Brutem des Rauhfusskauzes (Aegolius funereus) in den belgischen Ostkantonen EupenMalmedy-St. Vith. Charadrius 6: 1-6 (in German).
  • Schoener TW (1971). Theory of feeding strategies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 2: 369-404.
  • Simeonov DS (1980). A new nesting site of the Tengmalm’s Owl (Aegolius funereus (L.)) in Bulgaria. Ecology (BAS) 6: 70-73 (in Bulgarian with English summary).
  • Simeonov S, Michev T, Nankinov D (1990). The fauna of Bulgaria. Vol. 20. Aves. Part I. Sofia, Bulgaria: BAS (in Bulgarian with English summary).
  • Sorbi S (1995). La chouette de Tegmalm (Aegolius funereus) en Belgique: synthèse et mise à jour du stat. Aves 32: 101-132 (in French).
  • Sulkava P, Sulkava S (1971). Die nistzeitliche Nahrung des Rauhfusskauzes Aegolius funereus in Finland 1958–67. Ornis Fennica 48: 117-124 (in German).
  • Schwerdtfeger O (1988). Analyse der Depotbeute in den Bruthöhlen des Rauhfußkauzes (Aegolius funereus). Vogelwelt 109: 176- 181 (in German).
  • Tvrtković N (1979). Razlikovanje i određivanje morfološki sličnih vrsta podroda Sylvaemus Ognev & Vorobiev 1923 (Rodentia, Mammalia). JAZU 383: 155-186 (in Serbian).
  • Ujhelyi P (1989). A Magyaroszági Vadonéló Emlósállatok Határozója. Budapest, Hungary: Magyar Madártani Egyesület (in Hungarian).
  • Ujhelyi P (2016). Cranial morphology of European passerine bird families (Aves, Passeriformes). Ornis Hung 24: 54-77.
  • Uttendörfer O (1952). Neue Ergenbisse über die Ernährung der Greifvögel und Eulen. Verlag Eugen Ulmerm, Stuttgart, Germany: Broschiert (in German).
  • Zang H, Kunze P (1978). Zur Ernährung des Rauhfusskauzes (Aegolius funereus) im Harz mit einer Benerkung zur Gefährdung durch Eichhörnchen (Sciurus vulgaris). Vogelkd Ber Niedersachsen 2: 41-44 (in German).
  • Zárybnická M, Riegert J, Šťastný K (2011). Tengmalm’s Owl diet composition: a comparison of camera surveillance and pellet analysis. Ornis Fennica 88: 147-153.
  • Zárybnická M, Riegert J, Šťastný K (2013). The role of Apodemus mice and Microtus voles in the diet of the Tengmalm’s Owl in Central Europe. Popul Ecol 55: 353-361.